Theorem sate0 33676

Description: The simplified satisfaction predicate for any wff code over an empty model. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.) (Revised by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sate0	⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))

Proof of Theorem sate0

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 5251	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2		satefv 33675	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ V ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
3	1, 2	mpan 687	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
4		xp0 6096	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∅ × ∅) = ∅
5	4	ineq2i 4156	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)) = ( E ∩ ∅)
6		in0 4338	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( E ∩ ∅) = ∅
7	5, 6	eqtri 2764	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)) = ∅
8	7	oveq2i 7348	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅))) = (∅ Sat ∅)
9	8	fveq1i 6826	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω) = ((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)
10	9	fveq1i 6826	. 2 ⊢ (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈)
11	3, 10	eqtrdi 2792	1 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2105  Vcvv 3441   ∩ cin 3897  ∅c0 4269   E cep 5523   × cxp 5618  ‘cfv 6479  (class class class)co 7337  ωcom 7780   Sat csat 33597   Sat_∈ csate 33599

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5243  ax-nul 5250  ax-pr 5372

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3404  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3728  df-dif 3901  df-un 3903  df-in 3905  df-ss 3915  df-nul 4270  df-if 4474  df-sn 4574  df-pr 4576  df-op 4580  df-uni 4853  df-br 5093  df-opab 5155  df-id 5518  df-xp 5626  df-rel 5627  df-cnv 5628  df-co 5629  df-dm 5630  df-iota 6431  df-fun 6481  df-fv 6487  df-ov 7340  df-oprab 7341  df-mpo 7342  df-sate 33605

This theorem is referenced by:  prv0  33691