Theorem sate0 33090

Description: The simplified satisfaction predicate for any wff code over an empty model. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.) (Revised by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sate0	⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))

Proof of Theorem sate0

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 5200	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2		satefv 33089	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ V ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
3	1, 2	mpan 690	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
4		xp0 6021	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∅ × ∅) = ∅
5	4	ineq2i 4124	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)) = ( E ∩ ∅)
6		in0 4306	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( E ∩ ∅) = ∅
7	5, 6	eqtri 2765	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)) = ∅
8	7	oveq2i 7224	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅))) = (∅ Sat ∅)
9	8	fveq1i 6718	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω) = ((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)
10	9	fveq1i 6718	. 2 ⊢ (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈)
11	3, 10	eqtrdi 2794	1 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1543   ∈ wcel 2110  Vcvv 3408   ∩ cin 3865  ∅c0 4237   E cep 5459   × cxp 5549  ‘cfv 6380  (class class class)co 7213  ωcom 7644   Sat csat 33011   Sat_∈ csate 33013

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1976  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5192  ax-nul 5199  ax-pr 5322

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 848  df-3an 1091  df-tru 1546  df-fal 1556  df-ex 1788  df-nf 1792  df-sb 2071  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2886  df-ral 3066  df-rex 3067  df-rab 3070  df-v 3410  df-sbc 3695  df-dif 3869  df-un 3871  df-in 3873  df-ss 3883  df-nul 4238  df-if 4440  df-sn 4542  df-pr 4544  df-op 4548  df-uni 4820  df-br 5054  df-opab 5116  df-id 5455  df-xp 5557  df-rel 5558  df-cnv 5559  df-co 5560  df-dm 5561  df-iota 6338  df-fun 6382  df-fv 6388  df-ov 7216  df-oprab 7217  df-mpo 7218  df-sate 33019

This theorem is referenced by:  prv0  33105