Theorem sate0 35399

Description: The simplified satisfaction predicate for any wff code over an empty model. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.) (Revised by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sate0	⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))

Proof of Theorem sate0

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 5312	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2		satefv 35398	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ V ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
3	1, 2	mpan 690	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
4		xp0 6179	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∅ × ∅) = ∅
5	4	ineq2i 4224	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)) = ( E ∩ ∅)
6		in0 4400	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( E ∩ ∅) = ∅
7	5, 6	eqtri 2762	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)) = ∅
8	7	oveq2i 7441	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅))) = (∅ Sat ∅)
9	8	fveq1i 6907	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω) = ((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)
10	9	fveq1i 6907	. 2 ⊢ (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈)
11	3, 10	eqtrdi 2790	1 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1536   ∈ wcel 2105  Vcvv 3477   ∩ cin 3961  ∅c0 4338   E cep 5587   × cxp 5686  ‘cfv 6562  (class class class)co 7430  ωcom 7886   Sat csat 35320   Sat_∈ csate 35322

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1791  ax-4 1805  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2174  ax-ext 2705  ax-sep 5301  ax-nul 5311  ax-pr 5437

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1539  df-fal 1549  df-ex 1776  df-nf 1780  df-sb 2062  df-mo 2537  df-eu 2566  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2813  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2938  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-rab 3433  df-v 3479  df-sbc 3791  df-dif 3965  df-un 3967  df-in 3969  df-ss 3979  df-nul 4339  df-if 4531  df-sn 4631  df-pr 4633  df-op 4637  df-uni 4912  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-id 5582  df-xp 5694  df-rel 5695  df-cnv 5696  df-co 5697  df-dm 5698  df-iota 6515  df-fun 6564  df-fv 6570  df-ov 7433  df-oprab 7434  df-mpo 7435  df-sate 35328

This theorem is referenced by:  prv0  35414