Theorem sate0 35650

Description: The simplified satisfaction predicate for any wff code over an empty model. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.) (Revised by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sate0	⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))

Proof of Theorem sate0

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 5236	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2		satefv 35649	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ V ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
3	1, 2	mpan 696	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
4		xp0 5725	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∅ × ∅) = ∅
5	4	ineq2i 4153	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)) = ( E ∩ ∅)
6		in0 4330	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( E ∩ ∅) = ∅
7	5, 6	eqtri 2763	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)) = ∅
8	7	oveq2i 7374	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅))) = (∅ Sat ∅)
9	8	fveq1i 6835	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω) = ((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)
10	9	fveq1i 6835	. 2 ⊢ (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈)
11	3, 10	eqtrdi 2791	1 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1547   ∈ wcel 2119  Vcvv 3432   ∩ cin 3889  ∅c0 4268   E cep 5524   × cxp 5623  ‘cfv 6492  (class class class)co 7363  ωcom 7813   Sat csat 35571   Sat_∈ csate 35573

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-10 2152  ax-11 2168  ax-12 2189  ax-ext 2712  ax-sep 5225  ax-nul 5235  ax-pr 5369

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-fal 1560  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2573  df-clab 2719  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2815  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2936  df-ral 3055  df-rex 3065  df-rab 3393  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3731  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-in 3897  df-ss 3907  df-nul 4269  df-if 4462  df-sn 4563  df-pr 4565  df-op 4569  df-uni 4846  df-br 5080  df-opab 5142  df-id 5520  df-xp 5631  df-rel 5632  df-cnv 5633  df-co 5634  df-dm 5635  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fv 6500  df-ov 7366  df-oprab 7367  df-mpo 7368  df-sate 35579

This theorem is referenced by:  prv0  35665