Theorem sate0 35459

Description: The simplified satisfaction predicate for any wff code over an empty model. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.) (Revised by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sate0	⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))

Proof of Theorem sate0

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 5243	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2		satefv 35458	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ V ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
3	1, 2	mpan 690	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
4		xp0 5714	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∅ × ∅) = ∅
5	4	ineq2i 4164	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)) = ( E ∩ ∅)
6		in0 4342	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( E ∩ ∅) = ∅
7	5, 6	eqtri 2754	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)) = ∅
8	7	oveq2i 7357	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅))) = (∅ Sat ∅)
9	8	fveq1i 6823	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω) = ((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)
10	9	fveq1i 6823	. 2 ⊢ (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈)
11	3, 10	eqtrdi 2782	1 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111  Vcvv 3436   ∩ cin 3896  ∅c0 4280   E cep 5513   × cxp 5612  ‘cfv 6481  (class class class)co 7346  ωcom 7796   Sat csat 35380   Sat_∈ csate 35382

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2180  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pr 5368

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2929  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-sbc 3737  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4281  df-if 4473  df-sn 4574  df-pr 4576  df-op 4580  df-uni 4857  df-br 5090  df-opab 5152  df-id 5509  df-xp 5620  df-rel 5621  df-cnv 5622  df-co 5623  df-dm 5624  df-iota 6437  df-fun 6483  df-fv 6489  df-ov 7349  df-oprab 7350  df-mpo 7351  df-sate 35388

This theorem is referenced by:  prv0  35474