Theorem sate0 35390

Description: The simplified satisfaction predicate for any wff code over an empty model. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.) (Revised by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sate0	⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))

Proof of Theorem sate0

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 5249	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2		satefv 35389	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ V ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
3	1, 2	mpan 690	. 2 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
4		xp0 6111	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∅ × ∅) = ∅
5	4	ineq2i 4170	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)) = ( E ∩ ∅)
6		in0 4348	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( E ∩ ∅) = ∅
7	5, 6	eqtri 2752	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)) = ∅
8	7	oveq2i 7364	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅))) = (∅ Sat ∅)
9	8	fveq1i 6827	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω) = ((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)
10	9	fveq1i 6827	. 2 ⊢ (((∅ Sat ( E ∩ (∅ × ∅)))‘ω)‘𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈)
11	3, 10	eqtrdi 2780	1 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((∅ Sat ∅)‘ω)‘𝑈))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  Vcvv 3438   ∩ cin 3904  ∅c0 4286   E cep 5522   × cxp 5621  ‘cfv 6486  (class class class)co 7353  ωcom 7806   Sat csat 35311   Sat_∈ csate 35313

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5238  ax-nul 5248  ax-pr 5374

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3397  df-v 3440  df-sbc 3745  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4479  df-sn 4580  df-pr 4582  df-op 4586  df-uni 4862  df-br 5096  df-opab 5158  df-id 5518  df-xp 5629  df-rel 5630  df-cnv 5631  df-co 5632  df-dm 5633  df-iota 6442  df-fun 6488  df-fv 6494  df-ov 7356  df-oprab 7357  df-mpo 7358  df-sate 35319

This theorem is referenced by:  prv0  35405