Theorem satefv 36267

Description: The simplified satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the model 𝑀 at the code 𝑈. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
satefv	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈))

Proof of Theorem satefv

Dummy variables 𝑚 𝑢 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-sate 36197	. . 3 ⊢ Sat∈ = (𝑚 ∈ V, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω)‘𝑢))
2	1	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → Sat∈ = (𝑚 ∈ V, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω)‘𝑢)))
3		id 23	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → 𝑚 = 𝑀)
4	3	sqxpeqd 5682	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑚 × 𝑚) = (𝑀 × 𝑀))
5	4	ineq2d 4116	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)) = ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))
6	3, 5	oveq12d 7440	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚))) = (𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀))))
7	6	fveq1d 6890	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω) = ((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω))
8	7	adantr 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈) → ((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω) = ((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω))
9		simpr 490	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈) → 𝑢 = 𝑈)
10	8, 9	fveq12d 6895	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈) → (((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω)‘𝑢) = (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
11	10	adantl 487	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈)) → (((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω)‘𝑢) = (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
12		elex 3471	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑀 ∈ V)
13	12	adantr 486	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑀 ∈ V)
14		elex 3471	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑈 ∈ V)
15	14	adantl 487	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑈 ∈ V)
16		fvexd 6903	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈) ∈ V)
17	2, 11, 13, 15, 16	ovmpod 7574	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  Vcvv 3450   ∩ cin 4088   E cep 5549   × cxp 5648  ‘cfv 6541  (class class class)co 7422   ∈ cmpo 7424  ωcom 7879   Sat csat 36189   Sat_∈ csate 36191

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-ss 3897  df-dif 4046  df-in 4090  df-un 4150  df-nul 4278  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6543  df-fv 6549  df-ov 7425  df-oprab 7426  df-mpo 7427  df-sate 36197

This theorem is used by:  sate0  36268  satef  36269  satefvfmla0  36271  satefvfmla1  36278