Theorem satefv 36158

Description: The simplified satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the model 𝑀 at the code 𝑈. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
satefv	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈))

Proof of Theorem satefv

Dummy variables 𝑚 𝑢 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-sate 36088	. . 3 ⊢ Sat∈ = (𝑚 ∈ V, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω)‘𝑢))
2	1	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → Sat∈ = (𝑚 ∈ V, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω)‘𝑢)))
3		id 23	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → 𝑚 = 𝑀)
4	3	sqxpeqd 5683	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑚 × 𝑚) = (𝑀 × 𝑀))
5	4	ineq2d 4166	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)) = ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))
6	3, 5	oveq12d 7436	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚))) = (𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀))))
7	6	fveq1d 6885	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω) = ((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω))
8	7	adantr 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈) → ((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω) = ((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω))
9		simpr 490	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈) → 𝑢 = 𝑈)
10	8, 9	fveq12d 6890	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈) → (((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω)‘𝑢) = (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
11	10	adantl 487	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈)) → (((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω)‘𝑢) = (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
12		elex 3472	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑀 ∈ V)
13	12	adantr 486	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑀 ∈ V)
14		elex 3472	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑈 ∈ V)
15	14	adantl 487	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑈 ∈ V)
16		fvexd 6898	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈) ∈ V)
17	2, 11, 13, 15, 16	ovmpod 7570	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  Vcvv 3451   ∩ cin 3898   E cep 5550   × cxp 5649  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7418   ∈ cmpo 7420  ωcom 7875   Sat csat 36080   Sat_∈ csate 36082

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pr 5391

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7421  df-oprab 7422  df-mpo 7423  df-sate 36088

This theorem is used by:  sate0  36159  satef  36160  satefvfmla0  36162  satefvfmla1  36169