Theorem satefv 36387

Description: The simplified satisfaction predicate as function over wff codes in the model 𝑀 at the code 𝑈. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
satefv	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈))

Proof of Theorem satefv

Dummy variables 𝑚 𝑢 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-sate 36317	. . 3 ⊢ Sat∈ = (𝑚 ∈ V, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω)‘𝑢))
2	1	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → Sat∈ = (𝑚 ∈ V, 𝑢 ∈ V ↦ (((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω)‘𝑢)))
3		id 23	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → 𝑚 = 𝑀)
4	3	sqxpeqd 5690	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑚 × 𝑚) = (𝑀 × 𝑀))
5	4	ineq2d 4120	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)) = ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))
6	3, 5	oveq12d 7469	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚))) = (𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀))))
7	6	fveq1d 6918	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω) = ((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω))
8	7	adantr 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈) → ((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω) = ((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω))
9		simpr 490	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈) → 𝑢 = 𝑈)
10	8, 9	fveq12d 6923	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈) → (((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω)‘𝑢) = (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
11	10	adantl 487	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑚 = 𝑀 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑈)) → (((𝑚 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑚 × 𝑚)))‘ω)‘𝑢) = (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈))
12		elex 3475	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑀 ∈ V)
13	12	adantr 486	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑀 ∈ V)
14		elex 3475	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑈 ∈ V)
15	14	adantl 487	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑈 ∈ V)
16		fvexd 6931	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈) ∈ V)
17	2, 11, 13, 15, 16	ovmpod 7604	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀 Sat∈ 𝑈) = (((𝑀 Sat ( E ∩ (𝑀 × 𝑀)))‘ω)‘𝑈))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  Vcvv 3454   ∩ cin 4092   E cep 5557   × cxp 5656  ‘cfv 6566  (class class class)co 7451   ∈ cmpo 7453  ωcom 7911   Sat csat 36309   Sat_∈ csate 36311

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-id 5553  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fv 6574  df-ov 7454  df-oprab 7455  df-mpo 7456  df-sate 36317

This theorem is used by:  sate0  36388  satef  36389  satefvfmla0  36391  satefvfmla1  36398