Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > sotrieq | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Trichotomy law for strict order relation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
sotrieq | ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sonr 5489 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐵) | |
2 | 1 | adantrr 713 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐵) |
3 | pm1.2 897 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐵𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐵𝑅𝐵) → 𝐵𝑅𝐵) | |
4 | 2, 3 | nsyl 142 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐵𝑅𝐵)) |
5 | breq2 5061 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝐵𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐶)) | |
6 | breq1 5060 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝐵𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐶𝑅𝐵)) | |
7 | 5, 6 | orbi12d 912 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → ((𝐵𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐵𝑅𝐵) ↔ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
8 | 7 | notbid 319 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐵𝑅𝐵) ↔ ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
9 | 4, 8 | syl5ibcom 246 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 = 𝐶 → ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
10 | 9 | con2d 136 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) → ¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) |
11 | solin 5491 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵)) | |
12 | 3orass 1082 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) ↔ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ (𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) | |
13 | 11, 12 | sylib 219 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ (𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
14 | or12 914 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ (𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵)) ↔ (𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) | |
15 | 13, 14 | sylib 219 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
16 | 15 | ord 858 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
17 | 10, 16 | impbid 213 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) |
18 | 17 | con2bid 356 | 1 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 207 ∧ wa 396 ∨ wo 841 ∨ w3o 1078 = wceq 1528 ∈ wcel 2105 class class class wbr 5057 Or wor 5466 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1787 ax-4 1801 ax-5 1902 ax-6 1961 ax-7 2006 ax-8 2107 ax-9 2115 ax-10 2136 ax-11 2151 ax-12 2167 ax-ext 2790 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 208 df-an 397 df-or 842 df-3or 1080 df-3an 1081 df-tru 1531 df-ex 1772 df-nf 1776 df-sb 2061 df-clab 2797 df-cleq 2811 df-clel 2890 df-nfc 2960 df-ral 3140 df-rab 3144 df-v 3494 df-dif 3936 df-un 3938 df-in 3940 df-ss 3949 df-nul 4289 df-if 4464 df-sn 4558 df-pr 4560 df-op 4564 df-br 5058 df-po 5467 df-so 5468 |
This theorem is referenced by: sotrieq2 5496 sossfld 6036 soisores 7069 soisoi 7070 weniso 7096 wemapsolem 9002 distrlem4pr 10436 addcanpr 10456 sqgt0sr 10516 lttri2 10711 xrlttri2 12523 xrltne 12544 sotrine 32900 soseq 32993 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |