| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > con2bid | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: A contraposition deduction. (Contributed by NM, 15-Apr-1995.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| con2bid.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜒)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| con2bid | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | con2bid.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜒)) | |
| 2 | con2bi 356 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜒)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | sylibr 237 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 |
| This theorem is used by: con1bid 358 sotric 5601 sotrieq 5602 sotr2 5605 isso2i 5608 sotr3 5612 sotri2 6131 sotri3 6132 somin1 6135 somincom 6136 ordtri2 6400 ordtr3 6411 ordintdif 6416 ord0eln0 6421 soisoi 7335 weniso 7363 ordunisuc2 7846 limsssuc 7852 nlimon 7853 tfrlem15 8385 oawordeulem 8545 nnawordex 8629 fimaxg 9254 suplub2 9428 fiming 9467 wemapsolem 9519 cantnflem1 9665 rankval3b 9805 cardsdomel 9976 harsdom 9997 isfin1-2 10384 fin1a2lem7 10405 suplem2pr 11053 xrltnle 11291 ltnle 11304 leloe 11311 xrlttri 13180 xrleloe 13185 xrrebnd 13210 supxrbnd2 13364 supxrbnd 13370 om2uzf1oi 14007 rabssnn0fi 14040 sgnneg 15161 cnpart 15315 bits0e 16509 bitsmod 16516 bitsinv1lem 16521 sadcaddlem 16537 trfil2 24095 xrsxmet 25018 metdsge 25058 ovolunlem1a 25706 ovolunlem1 25707 itg2seq 25952 noetasuplem4 27951 noetainflem4 27955 ltnles 27968 lesloe 27969 toslublem 33356 tosglblem 33358 isarchi2 33569 gsumesum 34513 elfuns 36442 naddle 36748 finminlem 36886 bj-bibibi 37236 itg2addnclem 38379 heiborlem10 38529 aks4d1p8 42912 cantnfresb 44109 naddwordnexlem4 44186 ontric3g 44306 or3or 44807 ntrclselnel2 44842 clsneifv3 44894 islininds2 49321 resinsnlem 49706 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |