| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > con2bid | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: A contraposition deduction. (Contributed by NM, 15-Apr-1995.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| con2bid.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜒)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| con2bid | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | con2bid.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜒)) | |
| 2 | con2bi 356 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜒)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | sylibr 237 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 |
| This theorem is used by: con1bid 358 sotric 5589 sotrieq 5590 sotr2 5593 isso2i 5596 sotr3 5600 sotri2 6125 sotri3 6126 somin1 6129 somincom 6130 ordtri2 6401 ordtr3 6412 ordintdif 6417 ord0eln0 6422 soisoi 7340 weniso 7368 ordunisuc2 7859 limsssuc 7865 nlimon 7866 tfrlem15 8407 oawordeulem 8569 nnawordex 8653 fimaxg 9285 suplub2 9460 fiming 9499 wemapsolem 9551 cantnflem1 9697 rankval3b 9843 cardsdomel 10062 harsdom 10083 isfin1-2 10470 fin1a2lem7 10491 suplem2pr 11145 xrltnle 11383 ltnle 11396 leloe 11403 xrlttri 13275 xrleloe 13280 xrrebnd 13305 supxrbnd2 13459 supxrbnd 13465 om2uzf1oi 14103 rabssnn0fi 14136 sgnneg 15262 cnpart 15416 bits0e 16608 bitsmod 16615 bitsinv1lem 16620 sadcaddlem 16636 trfil2 24215 xrsxmet 25138 metdsge 25178 ovolunlem1a 25826 ovolunlem1 25827 itg2seq 26072 noetasuplem4 28102 noetainflem4 28106 ltnles 28119 lesloe 28120 toslublem 33583 tosglblem 33585 isarchi2 33796 gsumesum 34741 infinfnum 35817 elfuns 36773 naddle 37064 finminlem 37202 bj-bibibi 37552 itg2addnclem 38698 heiborlem10 38863 aks4d1p8 43246 cantnfresb 44435 naddwordnexlem4 44512 ontric3g 44632 or3or 45132 ntrclselnel2 45167 clsneifv3 45219 islininds2 49704 resinsnlem 50092 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |