Theorem fzval2 10207

Description: An alternate way of expressing a finite set of sequential integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fzval2	|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M ... N ) = ( ( M [,] N ) i^i ZZ ) )

Proof of Theorem fzval2

Dummy variable k is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fzval 10206	. 2 |- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M ... N ) = { k e. ZZ | ( M <_ k /\ k <_ N ) } )
2		zssre 9453	. . . . . . 7 |- ZZ C_ RR
3		ressxr 8190	. . . . . . 7 |- RR C_ RR*
4	2, 3	sstri 3233	. . . . . 6 |- ZZ C_ RR*
5	4	sseli 3220	. . . . 5 |- ( M e. ZZ -> M e. RR* )
6	4	sseli 3220	. . . . 5 |- ( N e. ZZ -> N e. RR* )
7		iccval 10116	. . . . 5 |- ( ( M e. RR* /\ N e. RR* ) -> ( M [,] N ) = { k e. RR* | ( M <_ k /\ k <_ N ) } )
8	5, 6, 7	syl2an 289	. . . 4 |- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M [,] N ) = { k e. RR* | ( M <_ k /\ k <_ N ) } )
9	8	ineq1d 3404	. . 3 |- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( ( M [,] N ) i^i ZZ ) = ( { k e. RR* | ( M <_ k /\ k <_ N ) } i^i ZZ ) )
10		inrab2 3477	. . . 4 |- ( { k e. RR* | ( M <_ k /\ k <_ N ) } i^i ZZ ) = { k e. ( RR* i^i ZZ ) | ( M <_ k /\ k <_ N ) }
11		sseqin2 3423	. . . . . 6 |- ( ZZ C_ RR* <-> ( RR* i^i ZZ ) = ZZ )
12	4, 11	mpbi 145	. . . . 5 |- ( RR* i^i ZZ ) = ZZ
13		rabeq 2791	. . . . 5 |- ( ( RR* i^i ZZ ) = ZZ -> { k e. ( RR* i^i ZZ ) | ( M <_ k /\ k <_ N ) } = { k e. ZZ | ( M <_ k /\ k <_ N ) } )
14	12, 13	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 |- { k e. ( RR* i^i ZZ ) | ( M <_ k /\ k <_ N ) } = { k e. ZZ | ( M <_ k /\ k <_ N ) }
15	10, 14	eqtri 2250	. . 3 |- ( { k e. RR* | ( M <_ k /\ k <_ N ) } i^i ZZ ) = { k e. ZZ | ( M <_ k /\ k <_ N ) }
16	9, 15	eqtr2di 2279	. 2 |- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> { k e. ZZ | ( M <_ k /\ k <_ N ) } = ( ( M [,] N ) i^i ZZ ) )
17	1, 16	eqtrd 2262	1 |- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( M ... N ) = ( ( M [,] N ) i^i ZZ ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1395   e. wcel 2200   {crab 2512   i^i cin 3196   C_ wss 3197   class class class wbr 4083  (class class class)co 6001   RRcr 7998   RR*cxr 8180   <_ cle 8182   ZZcz 9446   [,]cicc 10087   ...cfz 10204

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-13 2202  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-sep 4202  ax-pow 4258  ax-pr 4293  ax-un 4524  ax-setind 4629  ax-cnex 8090  ax-resscn 8091

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1003  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-fal 1401  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-eu 2080  df-mo 2081  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ne 2401  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-rab 2517  df-v 2801  df-sbc 3029  df-dif 3199  df-un 3201  df-in 3203  df-ss 3210  df-pw 3651  df-sn 3672  df-pr 3673  df-op 3675  df-uni 3889  df-br 4084  df-opab 4146  df-id 4384  df-xp 4725  df-rel 4726  df-cnv 4727  df-co 4728  df-dm 4729  df-iota 5278  df-fun 5320  df-fv 5326  df-ov 6004  df-oprab 6005  df-mpo 6006  df-pnf 8183  df-mnf 8184  df-xr 8185  df-neg 8320  df-z 9447  df-icc 10091  df-fz 10205

This theorem is referenced by: (None)