Theorem iccid 10159

Description: A closed interval with identical lower and upper bounds is a singleton. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Jul-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iccid	|- ( A e. RR* -> ( A [,] A ) = { A } )

Proof of Theorem iccid

Dummy variable x is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elicc1 10158	. . . 4 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ A e. RR* ) -> ( x e. ( A [,] A ) <-> ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) ) )
2	1	anidms 397	. . 3 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x e. ( A [,] A ) <-> ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) ) )
3		xrlenlt 8243	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( A <_ x <-> -. x < A ) )
4		xrlenlt 8243	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( ( x e. RR* /\ A e. RR* ) -> ( x <_ A <-> -. A < x ) )
5	4	ancoms 268	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( x <_ A <-> -. A < x ) )
6		xrlttri3 10031	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 |- ( ( x e. RR* /\ A e. RR* ) -> ( x = A <-> ( -. x < A /\ -. A < x ) ) )
7	6	biimprd 158	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- ( ( x e. RR* /\ A e. RR* ) -> ( ( -. x < A /\ -. A < x ) -> x = A ) )
8	7	ancoms 268	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( ( -. x < A /\ -. A < x ) -> x = A ) )
9	8	expcomd 1486	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( -. A < x -> ( -. x < A -> x = A ) ) )
10	5, 9	sylbid 150	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( x <_ A -> ( -. x < A -> x = A ) ) )
11	10	com23 78	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( -. x < A -> ( x <_ A -> x = A ) ) )
12	3, 11	sylbid 150	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( A <_ x -> ( x <_ A -> x = A ) ) )
13	12	ex 115	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x e. RR* -> ( A <_ x -> ( x <_ A -> x = A ) ) ) )
14	13	3impd 1247	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) -> x = A ) )
15		eleq1a 2303	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x = A -> x e. RR* ) )
16		xrleid 10034	. . . . . . 7 |- ( A e. RR* -> A <_ A )
17		breq2 4092	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = A -> ( A <_ x <-> A <_ A ) )
18	16, 17	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x = A -> A <_ x ) )
19		breq1 4091	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = A -> ( x <_ A <-> A <_ A ) )
20	16, 19	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x = A -> x <_ A ) )
21	15, 18, 20	3jcad 1204	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x = A -> ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) ) )
22	14, 21	impbid 129	. . . 4 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) <-> x = A ) )
23		velsn 3686	. . . 4 |- ( x e. { A } <-> x = A )
24	22, 23	bitr4di 198	. . 3 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) <-> x e. { A } ) )
25	2, 24	bitrd 188	. 2 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x e. ( A [,] A ) <-> x e. { A } ) )
26	25	eqrdv 2229	1 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( A [,] A ) = { A } )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   /\ w3a 1004   = wceq 1397   e. wcel 2202   {csn 3669   class class class wbr 4088  (class class class)co 6017   RR*cxr 8212   < clt 8213   <_ cle 8214   [,]cicc 10125

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4207  ax-pow 4264  ax-pr 4299  ax-un 4530  ax-setind 4635  ax-cnex 8122  ax-resscn 8123  ax-pre-ltirr 8143  ax-pre-apti 8146

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1005  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-fal 1403  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-eu 2082  df-mo 2083  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ne 2403  df-nel 2498  df-ral 2515  df-rex 2516  df-rab 2519  df-v 2804  df-sbc 3032  df-dif 3202  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-pw 3654  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-op 3678  df-uni 3894  df-br 4089  df-opab 4151  df-id 4390  df-xp 4731  df-rel 4732  df-cnv 4733  df-co 4734  df-dm 4735  df-iota 5286  df-fun 5328  df-fv 5334  df-ov 6020  df-oprab 6021  df-mpo 6022  df-pnf 8215  df-mnf 8216  df-xr 8217  df-ltxr 8218  df-le 8219  df-icc 10129

This theorem is referenced by: (None)