Theorem iccid 10150

Description: A closed interval with identical lower and upper bounds is a singleton. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Jul-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iccid	|- ( A e. RR* -> ( A [,] A ) = { A } )

Proof of Theorem iccid

Dummy variable x is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elicc1 10149	. . . 4 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ A e. RR* ) -> ( x e. ( A [,] A ) <-> ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) ) )
2	1	anidms 397	. . 3 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x e. ( A [,] A ) <-> ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) ) )
3		xrlenlt 8234	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( A <_ x <-> -. x < A ) )
4		xrlenlt 8234	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( ( x e. RR* /\ A e. RR* ) -> ( x <_ A <-> -. A < x ) )
5	4	ancoms 268	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( x <_ A <-> -. A < x ) )
6		xrlttri3 10022	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 |- ( ( x e. RR* /\ A e. RR* ) -> ( x = A <-> ( -. x < A /\ -. A < x ) ) )
7	6	biimprd 158	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- ( ( x e. RR* /\ A e. RR* ) -> ( ( -. x < A /\ -. A < x ) -> x = A ) )
8	7	ancoms 268	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( ( -. x < A /\ -. A < x ) -> x = A ) )
9	8	expcomd 1484	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( -. A < x -> ( -. x < A -> x = A ) ) )
10	5, 9	sylbid 150	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( x <_ A -> ( -. x < A -> x = A ) ) )
11	10	com23 78	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( -. x < A -> ( x <_ A -> x = A ) ) )
12	3, 11	sylbid 150	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( A e. RR* /\ x e. RR* ) -> ( A <_ x -> ( x <_ A -> x = A ) ) )
13	12	ex 115	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x e. RR* -> ( A <_ x -> ( x <_ A -> x = A ) ) ) )
14	13	3impd 1245	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) -> x = A ) )
15		eleq1a 2301	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x = A -> x e. RR* ) )
16		xrleid 10025	. . . . . . 7 |- ( A e. RR* -> A <_ A )
17		breq2 4090	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = A -> ( A <_ x <-> A <_ A ) )
18	16, 17	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x = A -> A <_ x ) )
19		breq1 4089	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = A -> ( x <_ A <-> A <_ A ) )
20	16, 19	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x = A -> x <_ A ) )
21	15, 18, 20	3jcad 1202	. . . . 5 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x = A -> ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) ) )
22	14, 21	impbid 129	. . . 4 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) <-> x = A ) )
23		velsn 3684	. . . 4 |- ( x e. { A } <-> x = A )
24	22, 23	bitr4di 198	. . 3 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( ( x e. RR* /\ A <_ x /\ x <_ A ) <-> x e. { A } ) )
25	2, 24	bitrd 188	. 2 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( x e. ( A [,] A ) <-> x e. { A } ) )
26	25	eqrdv 2227	1 |- ( A e. RR* -> ( A [,] A ) = { A } )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   /\ w3a 1002   = wceq 1395   e. wcel 2200   {csn 3667   class class class wbr 4086  (class class class)co 6013   RR*cxr 8203   < clt 8204   <_ cle 8205   [,]cicc 10116

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-13 2202  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-sep 4205  ax-pow 4262  ax-pr 4297  ax-un 4528  ax-setind 4633  ax-cnex 8113  ax-resscn 8114  ax-pre-ltirr 8134  ax-pre-apti 8137

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1003  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-fal 1401  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-eu 2080  df-mo 2081  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ne 2401  df-nel 2496  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-rab 2517  df-v 2802  df-sbc 3030  df-dif 3200  df-un 3202  df-in 3204  df-ss 3211  df-pw 3652  df-sn 3673  df-pr 3674  df-op 3676  df-uni 3892  df-br 4087  df-opab 4149  df-id 4388  df-xp 4729  df-rel 4730  df-cnv 4731  df-co 4732  df-dm 4733  df-iota 5284  df-fun 5326  df-fv 5332  df-ov 6016  df-oprab 6017  df-mpo 6018  df-pnf 8206  df-mnf 8207  df-xr 8208  df-ltxr 8209  df-le 8210  df-icc 10120

This theorem is referenced by: (None)