Theorem iccid 10159

Description: A closed interval with identical lower and upper bounds is a singleton. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Jul-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iccid	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴[,]𝐴) = {𝐴})

Proof of Theorem iccid

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elicc1 10158	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴)))
2	1	anidms 397	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴)))
3		xrlenlt 8243	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴))
4		xrlenlt 8243	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥))
5	4	ancoms 268	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥))
6		xrlttri3 10031	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥)))
7	6	biimprd 158	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝐴))
8	7	ancoms 268	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → ((¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝐴))
9	8	expcomd 1486	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥 → (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
10	5, 9	sylbid 150	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
11	10	com23 78	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
12	3, 11	sylbid 150	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
13	12	ex 115	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴))))
14	13	3impd 1247	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴) → 𝑥 = 𝐴))
15		eleq1a 2303	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*))
16		xrleid 10034	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴)
17		breq2 4092	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴))
18	16, 17	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥))
19		breq1 4091	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴))
20	16, 19	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴))
21	15, 18, 20	3jcad 1204	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴)))
22	14, 21	impbid 129	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
23		velsn 3686	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)
24	22, 23	bitr4di 198	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}))
25	2, 24	bitrd 188	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}))
26	25	eqrdv 2229	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴[,]𝐴) = {𝐴})

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∧ w3a 1004   = wceq 1397   ∈ wcel 2202  {csn 3669   class class class wbr 4088  (class class class)co 6017  ℝ^*cxr 8212   < clt 8213   ≤ cle 8214  [,]cicc 10125

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4207  ax-pow 4264  ax-pr 4299  ax-un 4530  ax-setind 4635  ax-cnex 8122  ax-resscn 8123  ax-pre-ltirr 8143  ax-pre-apti 8146

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1005  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-fal 1403  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-eu 2082  df-mo 2083  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ne 2403  df-nel 2498  df-ral 2515  df-rex 2516  df-rab 2519  df-v 2804  df-sbc 3032  df-dif 3202  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-pw 3654  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-op 3678  df-uni 3894  df-br 4089  df-opab 4151  df-id 4390  df-xp 4731  df-rel 4732  df-cnv 4733  df-co 4734  df-dm 4735  df-iota 5286  df-fun 5328  df-fv 5334  df-ov 6020  df-oprab 6021  df-mpo 6022  df-pnf 8215  df-mnf 8216  df-xr 8217  df-ltxr 8218  df-le 8219  df-icc 10129

This theorem is referenced by: (None)