Theorem iccid 9919

Description: A closed interval with identical lower and upper bounds is a singleton. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Jul-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iccid	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴[,]𝐴) = {𝐴})

Proof of Theorem iccid

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elicc1 9918	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴)))
2	1	anidms 397	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴)))
3		xrlenlt 8016	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴))
4		xrlenlt 8016	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥))
5	4	ancoms 268	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥))
6		xrlttri3 9791	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥)))
7	6	biimprd 158	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝐴))
8	7	ancoms 268	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → ((¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝐴))
9	8	expcomd 1441	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥 → (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
10	5, 9	sylbid 150	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
11	10	com23 78	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
12	3, 11	sylbid 150	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
13	12	ex 115	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴))))
14	13	3impd 1221	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴) → 𝑥 = 𝐴))
15		eleq1a 2249	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*))
16		xrleid 9794	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴)
17		breq2 4005	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴))
18	16, 17	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥))
19		breq1 4004	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴))
20	16, 19	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴))
21	15, 18, 20	3jcad 1178	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴)))
22	14, 21	impbid 129	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
23		velsn 3609	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)
24	22, 23	bitr4di 198	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}))
25	2, 24	bitrd 188	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}))
26	25	eqrdv 2175	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴[,]𝐴) = {𝐴})

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∧ w3a 978   = wceq 1353   ∈ wcel 2148  {csn 3592   class class class wbr 4001  (class class class)co 5870  ℝ^*cxr 7985   < clt 7986   ≤ cle 7987  [,]cicc 9885

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 614  ax-in2 615  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-13 2150  ax-14 2151  ax-ext 2159  ax-sep 4119  ax-pow 4172  ax-pr 4207  ax-un 4431  ax-setind 4534  ax-cnex 7897  ax-resscn 7898  ax-pre-ltirr 7918  ax-pre-apti 7921

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 979  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-fal 1359  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-eu 2029  df-mo 2030  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ne 2348  df-nel 2443  df-ral 2460  df-rex 2461  df-rab 2464  df-v 2739  df-sbc 2963  df-dif 3131  df-un 3133  df-in 3135  df-ss 3142  df-pw 3577  df-sn 3598  df-pr 3599  df-op 3601  df-uni 3809  df-br 4002  df-opab 4063  df-id 4291  df-xp 4630  df-rel 4631  df-cnv 4632  df-co 4633  df-dm 4634  df-iota 5175  df-fun 5215  df-fv 5221  df-ov 5873  df-oprab 5874  df-mpo 5875  df-pnf 7988  df-mnf 7989  df-xr 7990  df-ltxr 7991  df-le 7992  df-icc 9889

This theorem is referenced by: (None)