Theorem iccid 10258

Description: A closed interval with identical lower and upper bounds is a singleton. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Jul-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iccid	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴[,]𝐴) = {𝐴})

Proof of Theorem iccid

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elicc1 10257	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴)))
2	1	anidms 397	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴)))
3		xrlenlt 8338	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴))
4		xrlenlt 8338	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥))
5	4	ancoms 268	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥))
6		xrlttri3 10130	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥)))
7	6	biimprd 158	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝐴))
8	7	ancoms 268	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → ((¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝐴))
9	8	expcomd 1487	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥 → (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
10	5, 9	sylbid 150	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
11	10	com23 78	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
12	3, 11	sylbid 150	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
13	12	ex 115	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴))))
14	13	3impd 1248	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴) → 𝑥 = 𝐴))
15		eleq1a 2304	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*))
16		xrleid 10133	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴)
17		breq2 4113	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴))
18	16, 17	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥))
19		breq1 4112	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴))
20	16, 19	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴))
21	15, 18, 20	3jcad 1205	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴)))
22	14, 21	impbid 129	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
23		velsn 3706	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)
24	22, 23	bitr4di 198	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}))
25	2, 24	bitrd 188	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}))
26	25	eqrdv 2230	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴[,]𝐴) = {𝐴})

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∧ w3a 1005   = wceq 1398   ∈ wcel 2203  {csn 3689   class class class wbr 4109  (class class class)co 6050  ℝ^*cxr 8307   < clt 8308   ≤ cle 8309  [,]cicc 10224

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2205  ax-14 2206  ax-ext 2214  ax-sep 4228  ax-pow 4287  ax-pr 4322  ax-un 4554  ax-setind 4659  ax-cnex 8218  ax-resscn 8219  ax-pre-ltirr 8239  ax-pre-apti 8242

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1006  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-eu 2083  df-mo 2084  df-clab 2219  df-cleq 2225  df-clel 2228  df-nfc 2373  df-ne 2413  df-nel 2508  df-ral 2525  df-rex 2526  df-rab 2529  df-v 2815  df-sbc 3043  df-dif 3213  df-un 3215  df-in 3217  df-ss 3224  df-pw 3671  df-sn 3695  df-pr 3696  df-op 3698  df-uni 3915  df-br 4110  df-opab 4172  df-id 4414  df-xp 4755  df-rel 4756  df-cnv 4757  df-co 4758  df-dm 4759  df-iota 5312  df-fun 5354  df-fv 5360  df-ov 6053  df-oprab 6054  df-mpo 6055  df-pnf 8310  df-mnf 8311  df-xr 8312  df-ltxr 8313  df-le 8314  df-icc 10228

This theorem is referenced by: (None)