Theorem iccid 10306

Description: A closed interval with identical lower and upper bounds is a singleton. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Jul-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iccid	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴[,]𝐴) = {𝐴})

Proof of Theorem iccid

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elicc1 10305	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴)))
2	1	anidms 401	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴)))
3		xrlenlt 8380	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴))
4		xrlenlt 8380	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥))
5	4	ancoms 268	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥))
6		xrlttri3 10178	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥)))
7	6	biimprd 158	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝐴))
8	7	ancoms 268	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → ((¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝐴))
9	8	expcomd 1491	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥 → (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
10	5, 9	sylbid 150	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
11	10	com23 78	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
12	3, 11	sylbid 150	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
13	12	ex 115	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴))))
14	13	3impd 1252	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴) → 𝑥 = 𝐴))
15		eleq1a 2310	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*))
16		xrleid 10181	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴)
17		breq2 4129	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴))
18	16, 17	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥))
19		breq1 4128	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴))
20	16, 19	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴))
21	15, 18, 20	3jcad 1209	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴)))
22	14, 21	impbid 129	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
23		velsn 3722	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)
24	22, 23	bitr4di 198	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}))
25	2, 24	bitrd 188	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}))
26	25	eqrdv 2236	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴[,]𝐴) = {𝐴})

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∧ w3a 1009   = wceq 1402   ∈ wcel 2209  {csn 3705   class class class wbr 4125  (class class class)co 6075  ℝ^*cxr 8349   < clt 8350   ≤ cle 8351  [,]cicc 10272

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4244  ax-pow 4306  ax-pr 4341  ax-un 4573  ax-setind 4679  ax-cnex 8260  ax-resscn 8261  ax-pre-ltirr 8281  ax-pre-apti 8284

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1010  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-nel 2516  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3687  df-sn 3711  df-pr 3712  df-op 3714  df-uni 3931  df-br 4126  df-opab 4188  df-id 4433  df-xp 4775  df-rel 4776  df-cnv 4777  df-co 4778  df-dm 4779  df-iota 5332  df-fun 5374  df-fv 5380  df-ov 6078  df-oprab 6079  df-mpo 6080  df-pnf 8352  df-mnf 8353  df-xr 8354  df-ltxr 8355  df-le 8356  df-icc 10276

This theorem is referenced by: (None)