Theorem iccid 10117

Description: A closed interval with identical lower and upper bounds is a singleton. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Jul-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iccid	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴[,]𝐴) = {𝐴})

Proof of Theorem iccid

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elicc1 10116	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴)))
2	1	anidms 397	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴)))
3		xrlenlt 8207	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴))
4		xrlenlt 8207	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥))
5	4	ancoms 268	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥))
6		xrlttri3 9989	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥)))
7	6	biimprd 158	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝐴))
8	7	ancoms 268	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → ((¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝐴))
9	8	expcomd 1484	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (¬ 𝐴 < 𝑥 → (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
10	5, 9	sylbid 150	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
11	10	com23 78	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (¬ 𝑥 < 𝐴 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
12	3, 11	sylbid 150	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
13	12	ex 115	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝐴))))
14	13	3impd 1245	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴) → 𝑥 = 𝐴))
15		eleq1a 2301	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ ℝ*))
16		xrleid 9992	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴)
17		breq2 4086	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴))
18	16, 17	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥))
19		breq1 4085	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐴))
20	16, 19	syl5ibrcom 157	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴))
21	15, 18, 20	3jcad 1202	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴)))
22	14, 21	impbid 129	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
23		velsn 3683	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)
24	22, 23	bitr4di 198	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}))
25	2, 24	bitrd 188	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}))
26	25	eqrdv 2227	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ* → (𝐴[,]𝐴) = {𝐴})

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∧ w3a 1002   = wceq 1395   ∈ wcel 2200  {csn 3666   class class class wbr 4082  (class class class)co 6000  ℝ^*cxr 8176   < clt 8177   ≤ cle 8178  [,]cicc 10083

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-13 2202  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-sep 4201  ax-pow 4257  ax-pr 4292  ax-un 4523  ax-setind 4628  ax-cnex 8086  ax-resscn 8087  ax-pre-ltirr 8107  ax-pre-apti 8110

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1003  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-fal 1401  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-eu 2080  df-mo 2081  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ne 2401  df-nel 2496  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-rab 2517  df-v 2801  df-sbc 3029  df-dif 3199  df-un 3201  df-in 3203  df-ss 3210  df-pw 3651  df-sn 3672  df-pr 3673  df-op 3675  df-uni 3888  df-br 4083  df-opab 4145  df-id 4383  df-xp 4724  df-rel 4725  df-cnv 4726  df-co 4727  df-dm 4728  df-iota 5277  df-fun 5319  df-fv 5325  df-ov 6003  df-oprab 6004  df-mpo 6005  df-pnf 8179  df-mnf 8180  df-xr 8181  df-ltxr 8182  df-le 8183  df-icc 10087

This theorem is referenced by: (None)