ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  ivthinclemum Unicode version

Theorem ivthinclemum 13253
Description: Lemma for ivthinc 13261. The upper cut is bounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2024.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
ivth.1  |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  RR )
ivth.2  |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  RR )
ivth.3  |-  ( ph  ->  U  e.  RR )
ivth.4  |-  ( ph  ->  A  <  B )
ivth.5  |-  ( ph  ->  ( A [,] B
)  C_  D )
ivth.7  |-  ( ph  ->  F  e.  ( D
-cn-> CC ) )
ivth.8  |-  ( (
ph  /\  x  e.  ( A [,] B ) )  ->  ( F `  x )  e.  RR )
ivth.9  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ( F `  A )  <  U  /\  U  <  ( F `
 B ) ) )
ivthinc.i  |-  ( ( ( ph  /\  x  e.  ( A [,] B
) )  /\  (
y  e.  ( A [,] B )  /\  x  <  y ) )  ->  ( F `  x )  <  ( F `  y )
)
ivthinclem.l  |-  L  =  { w  e.  ( A [,] B )  |  ( F `  w )  <  U }
ivthinclem.r  |-  R  =  { w  e.  ( A [,] B )  |  U  <  ( F `  w ) }
Assertion
Ref Expression
ivthinclemum  |-  ( ph  ->  E. r  e.  ( A [,] B ) r  e.  R )
Distinct variable groups:    A, r    w, A    B, r    w, B   
w, F    R, r    w, U
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x, y, w, r)    A( x, y)    B( x, y)    D( x, y, w, r)    R( x, y, w)    U( x, y, r)    F( x, y, r)    L( x, y, w, r)

Proof of Theorem ivthinclemum
StepHypRef Expression
1 ivth.1 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  RR )
21rexrd 7948 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  RR* )
3 ivth.2 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  RR )
43rexrd 7948 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  RR* )
5 ivth.4 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  A  <  B )
61, 3, 5ltled 8017 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  A  <_  B )
7 ubicc2 9921 . . 3  |-  ( ( A  e.  RR*  /\  B  e.  RR*  /\  A  <_  B )  ->  B  e.  ( A [,] B
) )
82, 4, 6, 7syl3anc 1228 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  ( A [,] B ) )
9 ivth.9 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ( F `  A )  <  U  /\  U  <  ( F `
 B ) ) )
109simprd 113 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  U  <  ( F `
 B ) )
11 fveq2 5486 . . . . 5  |-  ( w  =  B  ->  ( F `  w )  =  ( F `  B ) )
1211breq2d 3994 . . . 4  |-  ( w  =  B  ->  ( U  <  ( F `  w )  <->  U  <  ( F `  B ) ) )
13 ivthinclem.r . . . 4  |-  R  =  { w  e.  ( A [,] B )  |  U  <  ( F `  w ) }
1412, 13elrab2 2885 . . 3  |-  ( B  e.  R  <->  ( B  e.  ( A [,] B
)  /\  U  <  ( F `  B ) ) )
158, 10, 14sylanbrc 414 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  R )
16 eleq1 2229 . . 3  |-  ( r  =  B  ->  (
r  e.  R  <->  B  e.  R ) )
1716rspcev 2830 . 2  |-  ( ( B  e.  ( A [,] B )  /\  B  e.  R )  ->  E. r  e.  ( A [,] B ) r  e.  R )
188, 15, 17syl2anc 409 1  |-  ( ph  ->  E. r  e.  ( A [,] B ) r  e.  R )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 103    = wceq 1343    e. wcel 2136   E.wrex 2445   {crab 2448    C_ wss 3116   class class class wbr 3982   ` cfv 5188  (class class class)co 5842   CCcc 7751   RRcr 7752   RR*cxr 7932    < clt 7933    <_ cle 7934   [,]cicc 9827   -cn->ccncf 13197
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-13 2138  ax-14 2139  ax-ext 2147  ax-sep 4100  ax-pow 4153  ax-pr 4187  ax-un 4411  ax-setind 4514  ax-cnex 7844  ax-resscn 7845  ax-pre-ltirr 7865  ax-pre-lttrn 7867
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3or 969  df-3an 970  df-tru 1346  df-fal 1349  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-eu 2017  df-mo 2018  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-ne 2337  df-nel 2432  df-ral 2449  df-rex 2450  df-rab 2453  df-v 2728  df-sbc 2952  df-dif 3118  df-un 3120  df-in 3122  df-ss 3129  df-pw 3561  df-sn 3582  df-pr 3583  df-op 3585  df-uni 3790  df-br 3983  df-opab 4044  df-id 4271  df-xp 4610  df-rel 4611  df-cnv 4612  df-co 4613  df-dm 4614  df-iota 5153  df-fun 5190  df-fv 5196  df-ov 5845  df-oprab 5846  df-mpo 5847  df-pnf 7935  df-mnf 7936  df-xr 7937  df-ltxr 7938  df-le 7939  df-icc 9831
This theorem is referenced by:  ivthinclemex  13260
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator