ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  ivthinclemum Unicode version

Theorem ivthinclemum 15358
Description: Lemma for ivthinc 15366. The upper cut is bounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2024.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
ivth.1  |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  RR )
ivth.2  |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  RR )
ivth.3  |-  ( ph  ->  U  e.  RR )
ivth.4  |-  ( ph  ->  A  <  B )
ivth.5  |-  ( ph  ->  ( A [,] B
)  C_  D )
ivth.7  |-  ( ph  ->  F  e.  ( D
-cn-> CC ) )
ivth.8  |-  ( (
ph  /\  x  e.  ( A [,] B ) )  ->  ( F `  x )  e.  RR )
ivth.9  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ( F `  A )  <  U  /\  U  <  ( F `
 B ) ) )
ivthinc.i  |-  ( ( ( ph  /\  x  e.  ( A [,] B
) )  /\  (
y  e.  ( A [,] B )  /\  x  <  y ) )  ->  ( F `  x )  <  ( F `  y )
)
ivthinclem.l  |-  L  =  { w  e.  ( A [,] B )  |  ( F `  w )  <  U }
ivthinclem.r  |-  R  =  { w  e.  ( A [,] B )  |  U  <  ( F `  w ) }
Assertion
Ref Expression
ivthinclemum  |-  ( ph  ->  E. r  e.  ( A [,] B ) r  e.  R )
Distinct variable groups:    A, r    w, A    B, r    w, B   
w, F    R, r    w, U
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x, y, w, r)    A( x, y)    B( x, y)    D( x, y, w, r)    R( x, y, w)    U( x, y, r)    F( x, y, r)    L( x, y, w, r)

Proof of Theorem ivthinclemum
StepHypRef Expression
1 ivth.1 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  RR )
21rexrd 8228 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  RR* )
3 ivth.2 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  RR )
43rexrd 8228 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  RR* )
5 ivth.4 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  A  <  B )
61, 3, 5ltled 8297 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  A  <_  B )
7 ubicc2 10219 . . 3  |-  ( ( A  e.  RR*  /\  B  e.  RR*  /\  A  <_  B )  ->  B  e.  ( A [,] B
) )
82, 4, 6, 7syl3anc 1273 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  ( A [,] B ) )
9 ivth.9 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ( F `  A )  <  U  /\  U  <  ( F `
 B ) ) )
109simprd 114 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  U  <  ( F `
 B ) )
11 fveq2 5639 . . . . 5  |-  ( w  =  B  ->  ( F `  w )  =  ( F `  B ) )
1211breq2d 4100 . . . 4  |-  ( w  =  B  ->  ( U  <  ( F `  w )  <->  U  <  ( F `  B ) ) )
13 ivthinclem.r . . . 4  |-  R  =  { w  e.  ( A [,] B )  |  U  <  ( F `  w ) }
1412, 13elrab2 2965 . . 3  |-  ( B  e.  R  <->  ( B  e.  ( A [,] B
)  /\  U  <  ( F `  B ) ) )
158, 10, 14sylanbrc 417 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  R )
16 eleq1 2294 . . 3  |-  ( r  =  B  ->  (
r  e.  R  <->  B  e.  R ) )
1716rspcev 2910 . 2  |-  ( ( B  e.  ( A [,] B )  /\  B  e.  R )  ->  E. r  e.  ( A [,] B ) r  e.  R )
188, 15, 17syl2anc 411 1  |-  ( ph  ->  E. r  e.  ( A [,] B ) r  e.  R )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 104    = wceq 1397    e. wcel 2202   E.wrex 2511   {crab 2514    C_ wss 3200   class class class wbr 4088   ` cfv 5326  (class class class)co 6017   CCcc 8029   RRcr 8030   RR*cxr 8212    < clt 8213    <_ cle 8214   [,]cicc 10125   -cn->ccncf 15293
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4207  ax-pow 4264  ax-pr 4299  ax-un 4530  ax-setind 4635  ax-cnex 8122  ax-resscn 8123  ax-pre-ltirr 8143  ax-pre-lttrn 8145
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1005  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-fal 1403  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-eu 2082  df-mo 2083  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ne 2403  df-nel 2498  df-ral 2515  df-rex 2516  df-rab 2519  df-v 2804  df-sbc 3032  df-dif 3202  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-pw 3654  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-op 3678  df-uni 3894  df-br 4089  df-opab 4151  df-id 4390  df-xp 4731  df-rel 4732  df-cnv 4733  df-co 4734  df-dm 4735  df-iota 5286  df-fun 5328  df-fv 5334  df-ov 6020  df-oprab 6021  df-mpo 6022  df-pnf 8215  df-mnf 8216  df-xr 8217  df-ltxr 8218  df-le 8219  df-icc 10129
This theorem is referenced by:  ivthinclemex  15365
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator