ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  ivthinclemum Unicode version

Theorem ivthinclemum 15659
Description: Lemma for ivthinc 15667. The upper cut is bounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2024.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
ivth.1  |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  RR )
ivth.2  |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  RR )
ivth.3  |-  ( ph  ->  U  e.  RR )
ivth.4  |-  ( ph  ->  A  <  B )
ivth.5  |-  ( ph  ->  ( A [,] B
)  C_  D )
ivth.7  |-  ( ph  ->  F  e.  ( D
-cn-> CC ) )
ivth.8  |-  ( (
ph  /\  x  e.  ( A [,] B ) )  ->  ( F `  x )  e.  RR )
ivth.9  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ( F `  A )  <  U  /\  U  <  ( F `
 B ) ) )
ivthinc.i  |-  ( ( ( ph  /\  x  e.  ( A [,] B
) )  /\  (
y  e.  ( A [,] B )  /\  x  <  y ) )  ->  ( F `  x )  <  ( F `  y )
)
ivthinclem.l  |-  L  =  { w  e.  ( A [,] B )  |  ( F `  w )  <  U }
ivthinclem.r  |-  R  =  { w  e.  ( A [,] B )  |  U  <  ( F `  w ) }
Assertion
Ref Expression
ivthinclemum  |-  ( ph  ->  E. r  e.  ( A [,] B ) r  e.  R )
Distinct variable groups:    A, r    w, A    B, r    w, B   
w, F    R, r    w, U
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x, y, w, r)    A( x, y)    B( x, y)    D( x, y, w, r)    R( x, y, w)    U( x, y, r)    F( x, y, r)    L( x, y, w, r)

Proof of Theorem ivthinclemum
StepHypRef Expression
1 ivth.1 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  RR )
21rexrd 8365 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  A  e.  RR* )
3 ivth.2 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  RR )
43rexrd 8365 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  RR* )
5 ivth.4 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  A  <  B )
61, 3, 5ltled 8435 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  A  <_  B )
7 ubicc2 10366 . . 3  |-  ( ( A  e.  RR*  /\  B  e.  RR*  /\  A  <_  B )  ->  B  e.  ( A [,] B
) )
82, 4, 6, 7syl3anc 1278 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  ( A [,] B ) )
9 ivth.9 . . . 4  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ( F `  A )  <  U  /\  U  <  ( F `
 B ) ) )
109simprd 114 . . 3  |-  ( ph  ->  U  <  ( F `
 B ) )
11 fveq2 5690 . . . . 5  |-  ( w  =  B  ->  ( F `  w )  =  ( F `  B ) )
1211breq2d 4137 . . . 4  |-  ( w  =  B  ->  ( U  <  ( F `  w )  <->  U  <  ( F `  B ) ) )
13 ivthinclem.r . . . 4  |-  R  =  { w  e.  ( A [,] B )  |  U  <  ( F `  w ) }
1412, 13elrab2 2985 . . 3  |-  ( B  e.  R  <->  ( B  e.  ( A [,] B
)  /\  U  <  ( F `  B ) ) )
158, 10, 14sylanbrc 421 . 2  |-  ( ph  ->  B  e.  R )
16 eleq1 2301 . . 3  |-  ( r  =  B  ->  (
r  e.  R  <->  B  e.  R ) )
1716rspcev 2929 . 2  |-  ( ( B  e.  ( A [,] B )  /\  B  e.  R )  ->  E. r  e.  ( A [,] B ) r  e.  R )
188, 15, 17syl2anc 415 1  |-  ( ph  ->  E. r  e.  ( A [,] B ) r  e.  R )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 104    = wceq 1402    e. wcel 2209   E.wrex 2529   {crab 2532    C_ wss 3220   class class class wbr 4125   ` cfv 5372  (class class class)co 6075   CCcc 8167   RRcr 8168   RR*cxr 8349    < clt 8350    <_ cle 8351   [,]cicc 10272   -cn->ccncf 15594
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4244  ax-pow 4306  ax-pr 4341  ax-un 4573  ax-setind 4679  ax-cnex 8260  ax-resscn 8261  ax-pre-ltirr 8281  ax-pre-lttrn 8283
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1010  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-nel 2516  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3687  df-sn 3711  df-pr 3712  df-op 3714  df-uni 3931  df-br 4126  df-opab 4188  df-id 4433  df-xp 4775  df-rel 4776  df-cnv 4777  df-co 4778  df-dm 4779  df-iota 5332  df-fun 5374  df-fv 5380  df-ov 6078  df-oprab 6079  df-mpo 6080  df-pnf 8352  df-mnf 8353  df-xr 8354  df-ltxr 8355  df-le 8356  df-icc 10276
This theorem is referenced by:  ivthinclemex  15666
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator