Theorem ecovicom 6917

Description: Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ecovicom.1	⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )
ecovicom.2	⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩] ∼ )
ecovicom.3	⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] ∼ )
ecovicom.4	⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐷 = 𝐻)
ecovicom.5	⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐺 = 𝐽)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ecovicom	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝐴   𝑧,𝐵,𝑤   𝑥, + ,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝑥, ∼ ,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝑧,𝐶,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐷(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤)   𝐺(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤)   𝐻(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤)   𝐽(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤)

Proof of Theorem ecovicom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ecovicom.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )
2		oveq1 6092	. . 3 ⊢ ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ = 𝐴 → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = (𝐴 + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ))
3		oveq2 6093	. . 3 ⊢ ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ = 𝐴 → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ) = ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + 𝐴))
4	2, 3	eqeq12d 2253	. 2 ⊢ ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ = 𝐴 → (([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ) ↔ (𝐴 + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + 𝐴)))
5		oveq2 6093	. . 3 ⊢ ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ = 𝐵 → (𝐴 + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = (𝐴 + 𝐵))
6		oveq1 6092	. . 3 ⊢ ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ = 𝐵 → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + 𝐴) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
7	5, 6	eqeq12d 2253	. 2 ⊢ ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)))
8		ecovicom.4	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐷 = 𝐻)
9		ecovicom.5	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐺 = 𝐽)
10		opeq12 3906	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐷 = 𝐻 ∧ 𝐺 = 𝐽) → ⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩ = ⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩)
11	10	eceq1d 6843	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐷 = 𝐻 ∧ 𝐺 = 𝐽) → [⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩] ∼ = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] ∼ )
12	8, 9, 11	syl2anc 415	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → [⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩] ∼ = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] ∼ )
13		ecovicom.2	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩] ∼ )
14		ecovicom.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] ∼ )
15	14	ancoms 268	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] ∼ )
16	12, 13, 15	3eqtr4d 2281	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ))
17	1, 4, 7, 16	2ecoptocl 6897	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1402   ∈ wcel 2209  ⟨cop 3712   × cxp 4772  (class class class)co 6085  [cec 6805   / cqs 6806

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-v 2823  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-xp 4780  df-cnv 4782  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-iota 5337  df-fv 5385  df-ov 6088  df-ec 6809  df-qs 6813

This theorem is used by:  addcomnqg  7748  mulcomnqg  7750  addcomsrg  8122  mulcomsrg  8124  axmulcom  8238