Theorem ecovicom 6729

Description: Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ecovicom.1	⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )
ecovicom.2	⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩] ∼ )
ecovicom.3	⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] ∼ )
ecovicom.4	⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐷 = 𝐻)
ecovicom.5	⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐺 = 𝐽)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ecovicom	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝐴   𝑧,𝐵,𝑤   𝑥, + ,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝑥, ∼ ,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝑧,𝐶,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐷(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)   𝐻(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)   𝐽(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem ecovicom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ecovicom.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )
2		oveq1 5950	. . 3 ⊢ ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ = 𝐴 → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = (𝐴 + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ))
3		oveq2 5951	. . 3 ⊢ ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ = 𝐴 → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ) = ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + 𝐴))
4	2, 3	eqeq12d 2219	. 2 ⊢ ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ = 𝐴 → (([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ) ↔ (𝐴 + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + 𝐴)))
5		oveq2 5951	. . 3 ⊢ ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ = 𝐵 → (𝐴 + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = (𝐴 + 𝐵))
6		oveq1 5950	. . 3 ⊢ ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ = 𝐵 → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + 𝐴) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
7	5, 6	eqeq12d 2219	. 2 ⊢ ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)))
8		ecovicom.4	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐷 = 𝐻)
9		ecovicom.5	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐺 = 𝐽)
10		opeq12 3820	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐷 = 𝐻 ∧ 𝐺 = 𝐽) → ⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩ = ⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩)
11	10	eceq1d 6655	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐷 = 𝐻 ∧ 𝐺 = 𝐽) → [⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩] ∼ = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] ∼ )
12	8, 9, 11	syl2anc 411	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → [⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩] ∼ = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] ∼ )
13		ecovicom.2	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩] ∼ )
14		ecovicom.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] ∼ )
15	14	ancoms 268	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] ∼ )
16	12, 13, 15	3eqtr4d 2247	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ))
17	1, 4, 7, 16	2ecoptocl 6709	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1372   ∈ wcel 2175  ⟨cop 3635   × cxp 4672  (class class class)co 5943  [cec 6617   / cqs 6618

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1469  ax-7 1470  ax-gen 1471  ax-ie1 1515  ax-ie2 1516  ax-8 1526  ax-10 1527  ax-11 1528  ax-i12 1529  ax-bndl 1531  ax-4 1532  ax-17 1548  ax-i9 1552  ax-ial 1556  ax-i5r 1557  ax-14 2178  ax-ext 2186  ax-sep 4161  ax-pow 4217  ax-pr 4252

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1375  df-nf 1483  df-sb 1785  df-clab 2191  df-cleq 2197  df-clel 2200  df-nfc 2336  df-ral 2488  df-rex 2489  df-v 2773  df-un 3169  df-in 3171  df-ss 3178  df-pw 3617  df-sn 3638  df-pr 3639  df-op 3641  df-uni 3850  df-br 4044  df-opab 4105  df-xp 4680  df-cnv 4682  df-dm 4684  df-rn 4685  df-res 4686  df-ima 4687  df-iota 5231  df-fv 5278  df-ov 5946  df-ec 6621  df-qs 6625

This theorem is referenced by:  addcomnqg  7493  mulcomnqg  7495  addcomsrg  7867  mulcomsrg  7869  axmulcom  7983