P. 67 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6601-6700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	tfrex 6601*	The transfinite recursion function is set-like if the input is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ V))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ V)
2.6.22  Recursive definition generator
Syntax	crdg 6602	Extend class notation with the recursive definition generator, with characteristic function 𝐹 and initial value 𝐼.
class rec(𝐹, 𝐼)
Definition	df-irdg 6603*	Define a recursive definition generator on On (the class of ordinal numbers) with characteristic function 𝐹 and initial value 𝐼. This rather amazing operation allows us to define, with compact direct definitions, functions that are usually defined in textbooks only with indirect self-referencing recursive definitions. A recursive definition requires advanced metalogic to justify - in particular, eliminating a recursive definition is very difficult and often not even shown in textbooks. On the other hand, the elimination of a direct definition is a matter of simple mechanical substitution. The price paid is the daunting complexity of our rec operation (especially when df-recs 6538 that it is built on is also eliminated). But once we get past this hurdle, definitions that would otherwise be recursive become relatively simple. In classical logic it would be easier to divide this definition into cases based on whether the domain of 𝑔 is zero, a successor, or a limit ordinal. Cases do not (in general) work that way in intuitionistic logic, so instead we choose a definition which takes the union of all the results of the characteristic function for ordinals in the domain of 𝑔. This means that this definition has the expected properties for increasing and continuous ordinal functions, which include ordinal addition and multiplication. For finite recursion we also define df-frec 6624 and for suitable characteristic functions df-frec 6624 yields the same result as rec restricted to ω, as seen at frecrdg 6641. Note: We introduce rec with the philosophical goal of being able to eliminate all definitions with direct mechanical substitution and to verify easily the soundness of definitions. Metamath itself has no built-in technical limitation that prevents multiple-part recursive definitions in the traditional textbook style. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2019.)
⊢ rec(𝐹, 𝐼) = recs((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝐼 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑔(𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑥)))))
Theorem	rdgeq1 6604	Equality theorem for the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → rec(𝐹, 𝐴) = rec(𝐺, 𝐴))
Theorem	rdgeq2 6605	Equality theorem for the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → rec(𝐹, 𝐴) = rec(𝐹, 𝐵))
Theorem	rdgfun 6606	The recursive definition generator is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ Fun rec(𝐹, 𝐴)
Theorem	rdgtfr 6607*	The recursion rule for the recursive definition generator is defined everywhere. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-May-2020.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (Fun (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑔(𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑥)))) ∧ ((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑔(𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑥))))‘𝑓) ∈ V))
Theorem	rdgruledefgg 6608*	The recursion rule for the recursive definition generator is defined everywhere. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (Fun (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑔(𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑥)))) ∧ ((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑔(𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑥))))‘𝑓) ∈ V))
Theorem	rdgruledefg 6609*	The recursion rule for the recursive definition generator is defined everywhere. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 Fn V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Fun (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑔(𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑥)))) ∧ ((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑔(𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑥))))‘𝑓) ∈ V))
Theorem	rdgexggg 6610	The recursive definition generator produces a set on a set input. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	rdgexgg 6611	The recursive definition generator produces a set on a set input. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 Fn V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	rdgifnon 6612	The recursive definition generator is a function on ordinal numbers. The 𝐹 Fn V condition states that the characteristic function is defined for all sets (being defined for all ordinals might be enough if being used in a manner similar to rdgon 6619; in cases like df-oadd 6653 either presumably could work). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → rec(𝐹, 𝐴) Fn On)
Theorem	rdgifnon2 6613*	The recursive definition generator is a function on ordinal numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-May-2020.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → rec(𝐹, 𝐴) Fn On)
Theorem	rdgivallem 6614*	Value of the recursive definition generator. Lemma for rdgival 6615 which simplifies the value further. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘((rec(𝐹, 𝐴) ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥))))
Theorem	rdgival 6615*	Value of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑥))))
Theorem	rdgss 6616	Subset and recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rec(𝐹, 𝐼)‘𝐴) ⊆ (rec(𝐹, 𝐼)‘𝐵))
Theorem	rdgisuc1 6617*	One way of describing the value of the recursive definition generator at a successor. There is no condition on the characteristic function 𝐹 other than 𝐹 Fn V. Given that, the resulting expression encompasses both the expected successor term (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)) but also terms that correspond to the initial value 𝐴 and to limit ordinals ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵(𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑥)). If we add conditions on the characteristic function, we can show tighter results such as rdgisucinc 6618. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑥)) ∪ (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)))))
Theorem	rdgisucinc 6618*	Value of the recursive definition generator at a successor. This can be thought of as a generalization of oasuc 6699 and omsuc 6707. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)))
Theorem	rdgon 6619*	Evaluating the recursive definition generator produces an ordinal. There is a hypothesis that the characteristic function produces ordinals on ordinal arguments. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ On)
Theorem	rdg0 6620	The initial value of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘∅) = 𝐴
Theorem	rdg0g 6621	The initial value of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘∅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	rdgexg 6622	The recursive definition generator produces a set on a set input. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 Fn V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ V)
2.6.23  Finite recursion
Syntax	cfrec 6623	Extend class notation with the finite recursive definition generator, with characteristic function 𝐹 and initial value 𝐼.
class frec(𝐹, 𝐼)
Definition	df-frec 6624*	Define a recursive definition generator on ω (the class of finite ordinals) with characteristic function 𝐹 and initial value 𝐼. This rather amazing operation allows us to define, with compact direct definitions, functions that are usually defined in textbooks only with indirect self-referencing recursive definitions. A recursive definition requires advanced metalogic to justify - in particular, eliminating a recursive definition is very difficult and often not even shown in textbooks. On the other hand, the elimination of a direct definition is a matter of simple mechanical substitution. The price paid is the daunting complexity of our frec operation (especially when df-recs 6538 that it is built on is also eliminated). But once we get past this hurdle, definitions that would otherwise be recursive become relatively simple; see frec0g 6630 and frecsuc 6640. Unlike with transfinite recursion, finite recurson can readily divide definitions and proofs into zero and successor cases, because even without excluded middle we have theorems such as nn0suc 4728. The analogous situation with transfinite recursion - being able to say that an ordinal is zero, successor, or limit - is enabled by excluded middle and thus is not available to us. For the characteristic functions which satisfy the conditions given at frecrdg 6641, this definition and df-irdg 6603 restricted to ω produce the same result. Note: We introduce frec with the philosophical goal of being able to eliminate all definitions with direct mechanical substitution and to verify easily the soundness of definitions. Metamath itself has no built-in technical limitation that prevents multiple-part recursive definitions in the traditional textbook style. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2019.)
⊢ frec(𝐹, 𝐼) = (recs((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼))})) ↾ ω)
Theorem	freceq1 6625	Equality theorem for the finite recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) = frec(𝐺, 𝐴))
Theorem	freceq2 6626	Equality theorem for the finite recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) = frec(𝐹, 𝐵))
Theorem	frecex 6627	Finite recursion produces a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Aug-2021.)
⊢ frec(𝐹, 𝐴) ∈ V
Theorem	frecfun 6628	Finite recursion produces a function. See also frecfnom 6634 which also states that the domain of that function is ω but which puts conditions on 𝐴 and 𝐹. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Fun frec(𝐹, 𝐴)
Theorem	nffrec 6629	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the finite recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥frec(𝐹, 𝐴)
Theorem	frec0g 6630	The initial value resulting from finite recursive definition generation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘∅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	frecabex 6631*	The class abstraction from df-frec 6624 exists. This is a lemma for other finite recursion proofs. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑆 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑆‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑆 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))} ∈ V)
Theorem	frecabcl 6632*	The class abstraction from df-frec 6624 exists. Unlike frecabex 6631 the function 𝐹 only needs to be defined on 𝑆, not all sets. This is a lemma for other finite recursion proofs. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑁⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝐺 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝐺 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))} ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	frectfr 6633*	Lemma to connect transfinite recursion theorems with finite recursion. That is, given the conditions 𝐹 Fn V and 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 on frec(𝐹, 𝐴), we want to be able to apply tfri1d 6568 or tfri2d 6569, and this lemma lets us satisfy hypotheses of those theorems. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))})    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∀𝑦(Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ V))
Theorem	frecfnom 6634*	The function generated by finite recursive definition generation is a function on omega. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-May-2020.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) Fn ω)
Theorem	freccllem 6635*	Lemma for freccl 6636. Just giving a name to a common expression to simplify the proof. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = recs((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	freccl 6636*	Closure for finite recursion. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	frecfcllem 6637*	Lemma for frecfcl 6638. Just giving a name to a common expression to simplify the proof. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝐺 = recs((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → frec(𝐹, 𝐴):ω⟶𝑆)
Theorem	frecfcl 6638*	Finite recursion yields a function on the natural numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → frec(𝐹, 𝐴):ω⟶𝑆)
Theorem	frecsuclem 6639*	Lemma for frecsuc 6640. Just giving a name to a common expression to simplify the proof. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))})    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐹‘(frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)))
Theorem	frecsuc 6640*	The successor value resulting from finite recursive definition generation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐹‘(frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)))
Theorem	frecrdg 6641*	Transfinite recursion restricted to omega. Given a suitable characteristic function, df-frec 6624 produces the same results as df-irdg 6603 restricted to ω. Presumably the theorem would also hold if 𝐹 Fn V were changed to ∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) = (rec(𝐹, 𝐴) ↾ ω))
2.6.24  Ordinal arithmetic
Syntax	c1o 6642	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 1.
class 1o
Syntax	c2o 6643	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 2.
class 2o
Syntax	c3o 6644	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 3.
class 3o
Syntax	c4o 6645	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 4.
class 4o
Syntax	coa 6646	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal addition operation.
class +o
Syntax	comu 6647	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal multiplication operation.
class ·o
Syntax	coei 6648	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal exponentiation operation.
class ↑o
Definition	df-1o 6649	Define the ordinal number 1. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.)
⊢ 1o = suc ∅
Definition	df-2o 6650	Define the ordinal number 2. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
⊢ 2o = suc 1o
Definition	df-3o 6651	Define the ordinal number 3. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 3o = suc 2o
Definition	df-4o 6652	Define the ordinal number 4. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 4o = suc 3o
Definition	df-oadd 6653*	Define the ordinal addition operation. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1995.)
⊢ +o = (𝑥 ∈ On, 𝑦 ∈ On ↦ (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑧), 𝑥)‘𝑦))
Definition	df-omul 6654*	Define the ordinal multiplication operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ·o = (𝑥 ∈ On, 𝑦 ∈ On ↦ (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 +o 𝑥)), ∅)‘𝑦))
Definition	df-oexpi 6655*	Define the ordinal exponentiation operation. This definition is similar to a conventional definition of exponentiation except that it defines ∅ ↑o 𝐴 to be 1o for all 𝐴 ∈ On, in order to avoid having different cases for whether the base is ∅ or not. We do not yet have an extensive development of ordinal exponentiation. For background on ordinal exponentiation without excluded middle, see Tom de Jong, Nicolai Kraus, Fredrik Nordvall Forsberg, and Chuangjie Xu (2025), "Ordinal Exponentiation in Homotopy Type Theory", arXiv:2501.14542 , https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14542 which is formalized in the TypeTopology proof library at https://ordinal-exponentiation-hott.github.io/. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ↑o = (𝑥 ∈ On, 𝑦 ∈ On ↦ (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ·o 𝑥)), 1o)‘𝑦))
Theorem	1on 6656	Ordinal 1 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.)
⊢ 1o ∈ On
Theorem	1oex 6657	Ordinal 1 is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Jul-2022.)
⊢ 1o ∈ V
Theorem	2on 6658	Ordinal 2 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
⊢ 2o ∈ On
Theorem	2on0 6659	Ordinal two is not zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 2o ≠ ∅
Theorem	3on 6660	Ordinal 3 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
⊢ 3o ∈ On
Theorem	ord3 6661	Ordinal 3 is an ordinal class. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 6-Jan-2025.)
⊢ Ord 3o
Theorem	4on 6662	Ordinal 4 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
⊢ 4o ∈ On
Theorem	df1o2 6663	Expanded value of the ordinal number 1. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.)
⊢ 1o = {∅}
Theorem	df2o3 6664	Expanded value of the ordinal number 2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 2o = {∅, 1o}
Theorem	df2o2 6665	Expanded value of the ordinal number 2. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2004.)
⊢ 2o = {∅, {∅}}
Theorem	2oex 6666	2o is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 2o ∈ V
Theorem	1n0 6667	Ordinal one is not equal to ordinal zero. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-2004.)
⊢ 1o ≠ ∅
Theorem	xp01disj 6668	Cartesian products with the singletons of ordinals 0 and 1 are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × {∅}) ∩ (𝐶 × {1o})) = ∅
Theorem	xp01disjl 6669	Cartesian products with the singletons of ordinals 0 and 1 are disjoint. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (({∅} × 𝐴) ∩ ({1o} × 𝐶)) = ∅
Theorem	ordgt0ge1 6670	Two ways to express that an ordinal class is positive. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 1o ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	ordge1n0im 6671	An ordinal greater than or equal to 1 is nonzero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (1o ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	el1o 6672	Membership in ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 1o ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	dif1o 6673	Two ways to say that 𝐴 is a nonzero number of the set 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 1o) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	2oconcl 6674	Closure of the pair swapping function on 2o. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 2o → (1o ∖ 𝐴) ∈ 2o)
Theorem	0lt1o 6675	Ordinal zero is less than ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ 1o
Theorem	0lt2o 6676	Ordinal zero is less than ordinal two. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2022.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ 2o
Theorem	1lt2o 6677	Ordinal one is less than ordinal two. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2022.)
⊢ 1o ∈ 2o
Theorem	el2oss1o 6678	Being an element of ordinal two implies being a subset of ordinal one. The converse is equivalent to excluded middle by ss1oel2o 16810. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 2o → 𝐴 ⊆ 1o)
Theorem	oafnex 6679	The characteristic function for ordinal addition is defined everywhere. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑥) Fn V
Theorem	sucinc 6680*	Successor is increasing. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑧)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)
Theorem	sucinc2 6681*	Successor is increasing. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑧)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))
Theorem	fnoa 6682	Functionality and domain of ordinal addition. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ +o Fn (On × On)
Theorem	oaexg 6683	Ordinal addition is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	omfnex 6684*	The characteristic function for ordinal multiplication is defined everywhere. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 +o 𝐴)) Fn V)
Theorem	fnom 6685	Functionality and domain of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ·o Fn (On × On)
Theorem	omexg 6686	Ordinal multiplication is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	fnoei 6687	Functionality and domain of ordinal exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ↑o Fn (On × On)
Theorem	oeiexg 6688	Ordinal exponentiation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	oav 6689*	Value of ordinal addition. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑥), 𝐴)‘𝐵))
Theorem	omv 6690*	Value of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 +o 𝐴)), ∅)‘𝐵))
Theorem	oeiv 6691*	Value of ordinal exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ·o 𝐴)), 1o)‘𝐵))
Theorem	oa0 6692	Addition with zero. Proposition 8.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +o ∅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	om0 6693	Ordinal multiplication with zero. Definition 8.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ·o ∅) = ∅)
Theorem	oei0 6694	Ordinal exponentiation with zero exponent. Definition 8.30 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ↑o ∅) = 1o)
Theorem	oacl 6695	Closure law for ordinal addition. Proposition 8.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1995.) (Constructive proof by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ On)
Theorem	omcl 6696	Closure law for ordinal multiplication. Proposition 8.16 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2004.) (Constructive proof by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ On)
Theorem	oeicl 6697	Closure law for ordinal exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ On)
Theorem	oav2 6698*	Value of ordinal addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 suc (𝐴 +o 𝑥)))
Theorem	oasuc 6699	Addition with successor. Definition 8.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 56. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o suc 𝐵) = suc (𝐴 +o 𝐵))
Theorem	omv2 6700*	Value of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐴 ·o 𝑥) +o 𝐴))