Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6601-6700 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
Type | Label | Description |
Statement |
|
Theorem | 2ecoptocl 6601* |
Implicit substitution of classes for equivalence classes of ordered
pairs. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
|
⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐶 × 𝐷) / 𝑅)
& ⊢ ([〈𝑥, 𝑦〉]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ ([〈𝑧, 𝑤〉]𝑅 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝜒) |
|
Theorem | 3ecoptocl 6602* |
Implicit substitution of classes for equivalence classes of ordered
pairs. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
|
⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐷 × 𝐷) / 𝑅)
& ⊢ ([〈𝑥, 𝑦〉]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ ([〈𝑧, 𝑤〉]𝑅 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ([〈𝑣, 𝑢〉]𝑅 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐷)) → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝜃) |
|
Theorem | brecop 6603* |
Binary relation on a quotient set. Lemma for real number construction.
(Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1996.)
|
⊢ ∼ ∈
V
& ⊢ ∼ Er (𝐺 × 𝐺)
& ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝐺 × 𝐺) / ∼ ) & ⊢ ≤ =
{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = [〈𝑧, 𝑤〉] ∼ ∧ 𝑦 = [〈𝑣, 𝑢〉] ∼ ) ∧ 𝜑))} & ⊢ ((((𝑧 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺))) → (([〈𝑧, 𝑤〉] ∼ = [〈𝐴, 𝐵〉] ∼ ∧ [〈𝑣, 𝑢〉] ∼ = [〈𝐶, 𝐷〉] ∼ ) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺)) → ([〈𝐴, 𝐵〉] ∼ ≤ [〈𝐶, 𝐷〉] ∼ ↔ 𝜓)) |
|
Theorem | eroveu 6604* |
Lemma for eroprf 6606. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
|
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐴 / 𝑅)
& ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐵 / 𝑆)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑍)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑈)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Er 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Er 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → + :(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐵))) → ((𝑟𝑅𝑠 ∧ 𝑡𝑆𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡)𝑇(𝑠 + 𝑢))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐾)) → ∃!𝑧∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 = [𝑝]𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇)) |
|
Theorem | erovlem 6605* |
Lemma for eroprf 6606. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
|
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐴 / 𝑅)
& ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐵 / 𝑆)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑍)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑈)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Er 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Er 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → + :(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐵))) → ((𝑟𝑅𝑠 ∧ 𝑡𝑆𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡)𝑇(𝑠 + 𝑢))) & ⊢ ⨣ =
{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 = [𝑝]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨣ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐽, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐾 ↦ (℩𝑧∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 = [𝑝]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇)))) |
|
Theorem | eroprf 6606* |
Functionality of an operation defined on equivalence classes.
(Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
30-Dec-2014.)
|
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐴 / 𝑅)
& ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐵 / 𝑆)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑍)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑈)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Er 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Er 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → + :(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐵))) → ((𝑟𝑅𝑠 ∧ 𝑡𝑆𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡)𝑇(𝑠 + 𝑢))) & ⊢ ⨣ =
{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 = [𝑝]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇)} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑋)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌)
& ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶 / 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨣ :(𝐽 × 𝐾)⟶𝐿) |
|
Theorem | eroprf2 6607* |
Functionality of an operation defined on equivalence classes.
(Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)
|
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐴 / ∼ ) & ⊢ ⨣ =
{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥 = [𝑝] ∼ ∧ 𝑦 = [𝑞] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)] ∼ )} & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∼ ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∼ Er 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → + :(𝐴 × 𝐴)⟶𝐴)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐴))) → ((𝑟 ∼ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑡 ∼ 𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡) ∼ (𝑠 + 𝑢))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨣ :(𝐽 × 𝐽)⟶𝐽) |
|
Theorem | ecopoveq 6608* |
This is the first of several theorems about equivalence relations of
the kind used in construction of fractions and signed reals, involving
operations on equivalent classes of ordered pairs. This theorem
expresses the relation ∼ (specified
by the hypothesis) in terms
of its operation 𝐹. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1995.)
|
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑣, 𝑢〉) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))} ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∼ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐷) = (𝐵 + 𝐶))) |
|
Theorem | ecopovsym 6609* |
Assuming the operation 𝐹 is commutative, show that the
relation
∼, specified
by the first hypothesis, is symmetric.
(Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
26-Apr-2015.)
|
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑣, 𝑢〉) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))} & ⊢ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∼ 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | ecopovtrn 6610* |
Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis),
closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has
the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation
∼, specified
by the first hypothesis, is transitive.
(Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
26-Apr-2015.)
|
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑣, 𝑢〉) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))} & ⊢ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)
& ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
& ⊢ ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))
& ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∼ 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | ecopover 6611* |
Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis),
closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has
the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation
∼, specified
by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence
relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
|
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑣, 𝑢〉) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))} & ⊢ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)
& ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
& ⊢ ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))
& ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆) |
|
Theorem | ecopovsymg 6612* |
Assuming the operation 𝐹 is commutative, show that the
relation
∼, specified
by the first hypothesis, is symmetric.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
|
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑣, 𝑢〉) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))} & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∼ 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | ecopovtrng 6613* |
Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis),
closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has
the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation
∼, specified
by the first hypothesis, is transitive.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
|
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑣, 𝑢〉) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))} & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥))
& ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
& ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∼ 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | ecopoverg 6614* |
Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis),
closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has
the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation
∼, specified
by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence
relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
|
⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑣, 𝑢〉) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))} & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥))
& ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
& ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆) |
|
Theorem | th3qlem1 6615* |
Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60. The
third hypothesis is the compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM,
3-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
|
⊢ ∼ Er 𝑆 & ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑦 ∼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑧 ∼ 𝑣) → (𝑦 + 𝑧) ∼ (𝑤 + 𝑣))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑆 / ∼ ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑆 / ∼ )) →
∃*𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝐴 = [𝑦] ∼ ∧ 𝐵 = [𝑧] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑥 = [(𝑦 + 𝑧)] ∼
)) |
|
Theorem | th3qlem2 6616* |
Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60,
extended to operations on ordered pairs. The fourth hypothesis is the
compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by
Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
|
⊢ ∼ ∈
V
& ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)
& ⊢ ((((𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆))) → ((〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 ∼ 〈𝑢, 𝑡〉 ∧ 〈𝑠, 𝑓〉 ∼ 〈𝑔, ℎ〉) → (〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 + 〈𝑠, 𝑓〉) ∼ (〈𝑢, 𝑡〉 + 〈𝑔, ℎ〉))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )) →
∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡((𝐴 = [〈𝑤, 𝑣〉] ∼ ∧ 𝐵 = [〈𝑢, 𝑡〉] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 + 〈𝑢, 𝑡〉)] ∼
)) |
|
Theorem | th3qcor 6617* |
Corollary of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60.
(Contributed by NM,
12-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|
⊢ ∼ ∈
V
& ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)
& ⊢ ((((𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆))) → ((〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 ∼ 〈𝑢, 𝑡〉 ∧ 〈𝑠, 𝑓〉 ∼ 〈𝑔, ℎ〉) → (〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 + 〈𝑠, 𝑓〉) ∼ (〈𝑢, 𝑡〉 + 〈𝑔, ℎ〉))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )) ∧
∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡((𝑥 = [〈𝑤, 𝑣〉] ∼ ∧ 𝑦 = [〈𝑢, 𝑡〉] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 + 〈𝑢, 𝑡〉)] ∼
))} ⇒ ⊢ Fun 𝐺 |
|
Theorem | th3q 6618* |
Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60, extended to
operations on ordered
pairs. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
19-Dec-2013.)
|
⊢ ∼ ∈
V
& ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)
& ⊢ ((((𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆))) → ((〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 ∼ 〈𝑢, 𝑡〉 ∧ 〈𝑠, 𝑓〉 ∼ 〈𝑔, ℎ〉) → (〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 + 〈𝑠, 𝑓〉) ∼ (〈𝑢, 𝑡〉 + 〈𝑔, ℎ〉))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )) ∧
∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡((𝑥 = [〈𝑤, 𝑣〉] ∼ ∧ 𝑦 = [〈𝑢, 𝑡〉] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 + 〈𝑢, 𝑡〉)] ∼
))} ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝐴, 𝐵〉] ∼ 𝐺[〈𝐶, 𝐷〉] ∼ ) = [(〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 + 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)] ∼ ) |
|
Theorem | oviec 6619* |
Express an operation on equivalence classes of ordered pairs in terms of
equivalence class of operations on ordered pairs. See iset.mm for
additional comments describing the hypotheses. (Unnecessary distinct
variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
(Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
4-Jun-2013.)
|
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ (((𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ (((𝑐 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐿 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) & ⊢ ∼
∈ V
& ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)
& ⊢ ∼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑣, 𝑢〉) ∧ 𝜑))} & ⊢ (((𝑧 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑏) ∧ (𝑣 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑑)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (((𝑧 = 𝑔 ∧ 𝑤 = ℎ) ∧ (𝑣 = 𝑡 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑠)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ + =
{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = 〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑢, 𝑓〉) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐽))} & ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝑏) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝑔 ∧ 𝑓 = ℎ)) → 𝐽 = 𝐾)
& ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝑑) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝑡 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝑠)) → 𝐽 = 𝐿)
& ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐷)) → 𝐽 = 𝐻)
& ⊢ ⨣ =
{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑄) ∧ ∃𝑎∃𝑏∃𝑐∃𝑑((𝑥 = [〈𝑎, 𝑏〉] ∼ ∧ 𝑦 = [〈𝑐, 𝑑〉] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 + 〈𝑐, 𝑑〉)] ∼ ))} & ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) & ⊢ ((((𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝑆))) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝐾 ∼ 𝐿)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝐴, 𝐵〉] ∼ ⨣ [〈𝐶, 𝐷〉] ∼ ) = [𝐻] ∼ ) |
|
Theorem | ecovcom 6620* |
Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation.
Most uses will want ecovicom 6621 instead. (Contributed by NM,
29-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|
⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑥, 𝑦〉] ∼ + [〈𝑧, 𝑤〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝐷, 𝐺〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑧, 𝑤〉] ∼ + [〈𝑥, 𝑦〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝐻, 𝐽〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐻
& ⊢ 𝐺 = 𝐽 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | ecovicom 6621* |
Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2019.)
|
⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑥, 𝑦〉] ∼ + [〈𝑧, 𝑤〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝐷, 𝐺〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑧, 𝑤〉] ∼ + [〈𝑥, 𝑦〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝐻, 𝐽〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐷 = 𝐻)
& ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐺 = 𝐽) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | ecovass 6622* |
Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation.
In most cases ecoviass 6623 will be more useful. (Contributed by NM,
31-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|
⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑥, 𝑦〉] ∼ + [〈𝑧, 𝑤〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝐺, 𝐻〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑧, 𝑤〉] ∼ + [〈𝑣, 𝑢〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝑁, 𝑄〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝐺, 𝐻〉] ∼ + [〈𝑣, 𝑢〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝐽, 𝐾〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑥, 𝑦〉] ∼ + [〈𝑁, 𝑄〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝐿, 𝑀〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐺 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆)) & ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑁 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝑆)) & ⊢ 𝐽 = 𝐿
& ⊢ 𝐾 = 𝑀 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶))) |
|
Theorem | ecoviass 6623* |
Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2019.)
|
⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑥, 𝑦〉] ∼ + [〈𝑧, 𝑤〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝐺, 𝐻〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑧, 𝑤〉] ∼ + [〈𝑣, 𝑢〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝑁, 𝑄〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝐺, 𝐻〉] ∼ + [〈𝑣, 𝑢〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝐽, 𝐾〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑥, 𝑦〉] ∼ + [〈𝑁, 𝑄〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝐿, 𝑀〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐺 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆)) & ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑁 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝑆)) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐽 = 𝐿)
& ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐾 = 𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶))) |
|
Theorem | ecovdi 6624* |
Lemma used to transfer a distributive law via an equivalence relation.
Most likely ecovidi 6625 will be more helpful. (Contributed by NM,
2-Sep-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|
⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑧, 𝑤〉] ∼ + [〈𝑣, 𝑢〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝑀, 𝑁〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑥, 𝑦〉] ∼ · [〈𝑀, 𝑁〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝐻, 𝐽〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑥, 𝑦〉] ∼ · [〈𝑧, 𝑤〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝑊, 𝑋〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑥, 𝑦〉] ∼ · [〈𝑣, 𝑢〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝑌, 𝑍〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑊 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑊, 𝑋〉] ∼ + [〈𝑌, 𝑍〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝐾, 𝐿〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑀 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑆)) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑊 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆)) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑌 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = 𝐾
& ⊢ 𝐽 = 𝐿 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶))) |
|
Theorem | ecovidi 6625* |
Lemma used to transfer a distributive law via an equivalence relation.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Sep-2019.)
|
⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑧, 𝑤〉] ∼ + [〈𝑣, 𝑢〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝑀, 𝑁〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑥, 𝑦〉] ∼ · [〈𝑀, 𝑁〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝐻, 𝐽〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑥, 𝑦〉] ∼ · [〈𝑧, 𝑤〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝑊, 𝑋〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑥, 𝑦〉] ∼ · [〈𝑣, 𝑢〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝑌, 𝑍〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑊 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([〈𝑊, 𝑋〉] ∼ + [〈𝑌, 𝑍〉] ∼ ) = [〈𝐾, 𝐿〉] ∼ ) & ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑀 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑆)) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑊 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆)) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑌 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆)) & ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐻 = 𝐾)
& ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐽 = 𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶))) |
|
2.6.26 The mapping operation
|
|
Syntax | cmap 6626 |
Extend the definition of a class to include the mapping operation. (Read
for 𝐴
↑𝑚 𝐵, "the set of all functions that
map from 𝐵 to
𝐴.)
|
class ↑𝑚 |
|
Syntax | cpm 6627 |
Extend the definition of a class to include the partial mapping operation.
(Read for 𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵, "the set of all
partial functions that map from
𝐵 to 𝐴.)
|
class ↑pm |
|
Definition | df-map 6628* |
Define the mapping operation or set exponentiation. The set of all
functions that map from 𝐵 to 𝐴 is written (𝐴
↑𝑚 𝐵) (see
mapval 6638). Many authors write 𝐴 followed by 𝐵 as a
superscript
for this operation and rely on context to avoid confusion other
exponentiation operations (e.g., Definition 10.42 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 95). Other authors show 𝐵 as a prefixed superscript, which is
read "𝐴 pre 𝐵 " (e.g., definition
of [Enderton] p. 52).
Definition 8.21 of [Eisenberg] p. 125
uses the notation Map(𝐵,
𝐴) for our (𝐴 ↑𝑚
𝐵). The up-arrow is
used by Donald Knuth
for iterated exponentiation (Science 194, 1235-1242, 1976). We
adopt
the first case of his notation (simple exponentiation) and subscript it
with m to distinguish it from other kinds of exponentiation.
(Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.)
|
⊢ ↑𝑚 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:𝑦⟶𝑥}) |
|
Definition | df-pm 6629* |
Define the partial mapping operation. A partial function from 𝐵 to
𝐴 is a function from a subset of 𝐵 to
𝐴.
The set of all
partial functions from 𝐵 to 𝐴 is written (𝐴
↑pm 𝐵) (see
pmvalg 6637). A notation for this operation apparently
does not appear in
the literature. We use ↑pm to distinguish it from the less
general
set exponentiation operation ↑𝑚 (df-map 6628) . See mapsspm 6660 for
its relationship to set exponentiation. (Contributed by NM,
15-Nov-2007.)
|
⊢ ↑pm = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑦 × 𝑥) ∣ Fun 𝑓}) |
|
Theorem | mapprc 6630* |
When 𝐴 is a proper class, the class of all
functions mapping 𝐴
to 𝐵 is empty. Exercise 4.41 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed
by NM, 8-Dec-2003.)
|
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵} = ∅) |
|
Theorem | pmex 6631* |
The class of all partial functions from one set to another is a set.
(Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2007.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → {𝑓 ∣ (Fun 𝑓 ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))} ∈ V) |
|
Theorem | mapex 6632* |
The class of all functions mapping one set to another is a set. Remark
after Definition 10.24 of [Kunen] p. 31.
(Contributed by Raph Levien,
4-Dec-2003.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵} ∈ V) |
|
Theorem | fnmap 6633 |
Set exponentiation has a universal domain. (Contributed by NM,
8-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|
⊢ ↑𝑚 Fn (V ×
V) |
|
Theorem | fnpm 6634 |
Partial function exponentiation has a universal domain. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2013.)
|
⊢ ↑pm Fn (V ×
V) |
|
Theorem | reldmmap 6635 |
Set exponentiation is a well-behaved binary operator. (Contributed by
Stefan O'Rear, 27-Feb-2015.)
|
⊢ Rel dom
↑𝑚 |
|
Theorem | mapvalg 6636* |
The value of set exponentiation. (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) is the set of all
functions that map from 𝐵 to 𝐴. Definition 10.24 of
[Kunen]
p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
8-Sep-2013.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:𝐵⟶𝐴}) |
|
Theorem | pmvalg 6637* |
The value of the partial mapping operation. (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) is the set
of all partial functions that map from 𝐵 to 𝐴.
(Contributed by
NM, 15-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) = {𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐵 × 𝐴) ∣ Fun 𝑓}) |
|
Theorem | mapval 6638* |
The value of set exponentiation (inference version). (𝐴 ↑𝑚
𝐵) is
the set of all functions that map from 𝐵 to 𝐴.
Definition
10.24 of [Kunen] p. 24. (Contributed by
NM, 8-Dec-2003.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:𝐵⟶𝐴} |
|
Theorem | elmapg 6639 |
Membership relation for set exponentiation. (Contributed by NM,
17-Oct-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ↔ 𝐶:𝐵⟶𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | elmapd 6640 |
Deduction form of elmapg 6639. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2020.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ↔ 𝐶:𝐵⟶𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | mapdm0 6641 |
The empty set is the only map with empty domain. (Contributed by Glauco
Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.) (Proof shortened by Thierry Arnoux,
3-Dec-2021.)
|
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ↑𝑚 ∅) =
{∅}) |
|
Theorem | elpmg 6642 |
The predicate "is a partial function". (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro,
14-Nov-2013.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) ↔ (Fun 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐵 × 𝐴)))) |
|
Theorem | elpm2g 6643 |
The predicate "is a partial function". (Contributed by NM,
31-Dec-2013.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐵))) |
|
Theorem | elpm2r 6644 |
Sufficient condition for being a partial function. (Contributed by NM,
31-Dec-2013.)
|
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐹:𝐶⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | elpmi 6645 |
A partial function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
15-Sep-2015.)
|
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) → (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | pmfun 6646 |
A partial function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
30-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) → Fun 𝐹) |
|
Theorem | elmapex 6647 |
Eliminate antecedent for mapping theorems: domain can be taken to be a
set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶) → (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐶 ∈ V)) |
|
Theorem | elmapi 6648 |
A mapping is a function, forward direction only with superfluous
antecedent removed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶) → 𝐴:𝐶⟶𝐵) |
|
Theorem | elmapfn 6649 |
A mapping is a function with the appropriate domain. (Contributed by AV,
6-Apr-2019.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶) → 𝐴 Fn 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | elmapfun 6650 |
A mapping is always a function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶) → Fun 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | elmapssres 6651 |
A restricted mapping is a mapping. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶) ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐷) ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐷)) |
|
Theorem | fpmg 6652 |
A total function is a partial function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
31-Dec-2013.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑pm 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | pmss12g 6653 |
Subset relation for the set of partial functions. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 31-Dec-2013.)
|
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ↑pm 𝐷)) |
|
Theorem | pmresg 6654 |
Elementhood of a restricted function in the set of partial functions.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2013.)
|
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐶)) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | elmap 6655 |
Membership relation for set exponentiation. (Contributed by NM,
8-Dec-2003.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ↔ 𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐴) |
|
Theorem | mapval2 6656* |
Alternate expression for the value of set exponentiation. (Contributed
by NM, 3-Nov-2007.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = (𝒫 (𝐵 × 𝐴) ∩ {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓 Fn 𝐵}) |
|
Theorem | elpm 6657 |
The predicate "is a partial function". (Contributed by NM,
15-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2013.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) ↔ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ (𝐵 × 𝐴))) |
|
Theorem | elpm2 6658 |
The predicate "is a partial function". (Contributed by NM,
15-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2013.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | fpm 6659 |
A total function is a partial function. (Contributed by NM,
15-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2013.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑pm 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | mapsspm 6660 |
Set exponentiation is a subset of partial maps. (Contributed by NM,
15-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Feb-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | pmsspw 6661 |
Partial maps are a subset of the power set of the Cartesian product of
its arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) ⊆ 𝒫 (𝐵 × 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | mapsspw 6662 |
Set exponentiation is a subset of the power set of the Cartesian product
of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2006.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ⊆ 𝒫 (𝐵 × 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | fvmptmap 6663* |
Special case of fvmpt 5573 for operator theorems. (Contributed by NM,
27-Nov-2007.)
|
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
& ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑅 ↑𝑚 𝐷) ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴:𝐷⟶𝑅 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | map0e 6664 |
Set exponentiation with an empty exponent (ordinal number 0) is ordinal
number 1. Exercise 4.42(a) of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM,
10-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 ∅) =
1o) |
|
Theorem | map0b 6665 |
Set exponentiation with an empty base is the empty set, provided the
exponent is nonempty. Theorem 96 of [Suppes] p. 89. (Contributed by
NM, 10-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∅
↑𝑚 𝐴) = ∅) |
|
Theorem | map0g 6666 |
Set exponentiation is empty iff the base is empty and the exponent is
not empty. Theorem 97 of [Suppes] p. 89.
(Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠
∅))) |
|
Theorem | map0 6667 |
Set exponentiation is empty iff the base is empty and the exponent is
not empty. Theorem 97 of [Suppes] p. 89.
(Contributed by NM,
10-Dec-2003.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠
∅)) |
|
Theorem | mapsn 6668* |
The value of set exponentiation with a singleton exponent. Theorem 98
of [Suppes] p. 89. (Contributed by NM,
10-Dec-2003.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 {𝐵}) = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑓 = {〈𝐵, 𝑦〉}} |
|
Theorem | mapss 6669 |
Subset inheritance for set exponentiation. Theorem 99 of [Suppes]
p. 89. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
26-Apr-2015.)
|
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶)) |
|
Theorem | fdiagfn 6670* |
Functionality of the diagonal map. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
24-Jan-2015.)
|
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐼 × {𝑥})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹:𝐵⟶(𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐼)) |
|
Theorem | fvdiagfn 6671* |
Functionality of the diagonal map. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
24-Jan-2015.)
|
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐼 × {𝑥})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝐼 × {𝑋})) |
|
Theorem | mapsnconst 6672 |
Every singleton map is a constant function. (Contributed by Stefan
O'Rear, 25-Mar-2015.)
|
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑋}
& ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑋 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝑆) → 𝐹 = (𝑆 × {(𝐹‘𝑋)})) |
|
Theorem | mapsncnv 6673* |
Expression for the inverse of the canonical map between a set and its
set of singleton functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
21-Mar-2015.)
|
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑋}
& ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝑆) ↦ (𝑥‘𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ ◡𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑆 × {𝑦})) |
|
Theorem | mapsnf1o2 6674* |
Explicit bijection between a set and its singleton functions.
(Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)
|
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑋}
& ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝑆) ↦ (𝑥‘𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹:(𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝑆)–1-1-onto→𝐵 |
|
Theorem | mapsnf1o3 6675* |
Explicit bijection in the reverse of mapsnf1o2 6674. (Contributed by
Stefan O'Rear, 24-Mar-2015.)
|
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑋}
& ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑆 × {𝑦})) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→(𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝑆) |
|
2.6.27 Infinite Cartesian products
|
|
Syntax | cixp 6676 |
Extend class notation to include infinite Cartesian products.
|
class X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
|
Definition | df-ixp 6677* |
Definition of infinite Cartesian product of [Enderton] p. 54. Enderton
uses a bold "X" with 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 written underneath or as a
subscript, as
does Stoll p. 47. Some books use a capital pi, but we will reserve that
notation for products of numbers. Usually 𝐵 represents a class
expression containing 𝑥 free and thus can be thought of as
𝐵(𝑥). Normally, 𝑥 is not free in 𝐴,
although this is
not a requirement of the definition. (Contributed by NM,
28-Sep-2006.)
|
⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓 Fn {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)} |
|
Theorem | dfixp 6678* |
Eliminate the expression {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} in df-ixp 6677, under the
assumption that 𝐴 and 𝑥 are disjoint. This way,
we can say that
𝑥 is bound in X𝑥 ∈
𝐴𝐵 even if it appears free in 𝐴.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2016.)
|
⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)} |
|
Theorem | ixpsnval 6679* |
The value of an infinite Cartesian product with a singleton.
(Contributed by AV, 3-Dec-2018.)
|
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → X𝑥 ∈ {𝑋}𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓 Fn {𝑋} ∧ (𝑓‘𝑋) ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)}) |
|
Theorem | elixp2 6680* |
Membership in an infinite Cartesian product. See df-ixp 6677 for
discussion of the notation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | fvixp 6681* |
Projection of a factor of an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐷) |
|
Theorem | ixpfn 6682* |
A nuple is a function. (Contributed by FL, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by
Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2014.)
|
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | elixp 6683* |
Membership in an infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM,
28-Sep-2006.)
|
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)) |
|
Theorem | elixpconst 6684* |
Membership in an infinite Cartesian product of a constant 𝐵.
(Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2008.)
|
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) |
|
Theorem | ixpconstg 6685* |
Infinite Cartesian product of a constant 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 11-Jan-2015.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴)) |
|
Theorem | ixpconst 6686* |
Infinite Cartesian product of a constant 𝐵. (Contributed by NM,
28-Sep-2006.)
|
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐴) |
|
Theorem | ixpeq1 6687* |
Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM,
29-Sep-2006.)
|
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | ixpeq1d 6688* |
Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | ss2ixp 6689 |
Subclass theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM,
29-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2016.)
|
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | ixpeq2 6690 |
Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM,
29-Sep-2006.)
|
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | ixpeq2dva 6691* |
Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | ixpeq2dv 6692* |
Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶) |
|
Theorem | cbvixp 6693* |
Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by
Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2011.)
|
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
& ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
|
Theorem | cbvixpv 6694* |
Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by
Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = X𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 |
|
Theorem | nfixpxy 6695* |
Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed Cartesian product.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon,
15-Feb-2023.)
|
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
|
Theorem | nfixp1 6696 |
The index variable in an indexed Cartesian product is not free.
(Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
15-Oct-2016.)
|
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 |
|
Theorem | ixpprc 6697* |
A cartesian product of proper-class many sets is empty, because any
function in the cartesian product has to be a set with domain 𝐴,
which is not possible for a proper class domain. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 25-Jan-2015.)
|
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → X𝑥 ∈
𝐴 𝐵 = ∅) |
|
Theorem | ixpf 6698* |
A member of an infinite Cartesian product maps to the indexed union of
the product argument. Remark in [Enderton] p. 54. (Contributed by NM,
28-Sep-2006.)
|
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | uniixp 6699* |
The union of an infinite Cartesian product is included in a Cartesian
product. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
24-Jun-2015.)
|
⊢ ∪ X𝑥 ∈
𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 × ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) |
|
Theorem | ixpexgg 6700* |
The existence of an infinite Cartesian product. 𝑥 is normally a
free-variable parameter in 𝐵. Remark in Enderton p. 54.
(Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon,
15-Feb-2023.)
|
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V) |