P. 67 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6601-6700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ersymb 6601	An equivalence relation is symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	ertr 6602	An equivalence relation is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝐶) → 𝐴𝑅𝐶))
Theorem	ertrd 6603	A transitivity relation for equivalences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑅𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	ertr2d 6604	A transitivity relation for equivalences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑅𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	ertr3d 6605	A transitivity relation for equivalences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑅𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑅𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	ertr4d 6606	A transitivity relation for equivalences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐶)
Theorem	erref 6607	An equivalence relation is reflexive on its field. Compare Theorem 3M of [Enderton] p. 56. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	ercnv 6608	The converse of an equivalence relation is itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)
Theorem	errn 6609	The range and domain of an equivalence relation are equal. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 11-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → ran 𝑅 = 𝐴)
Theorem	erssxp 6610	An equivalence relation is a subset of the cartesian product of the field. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	erex 6611	An equivalence relation is a set if its domain is a set. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 15-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑅 ∈ V))
Theorem	erexb 6612	An equivalence relation is a set if and only if its domain is a set. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 15-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → (𝑅 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ V))
Theorem	iserd 6613*	A reflexive, symmetric, transitive relation is an equivalence relation on its domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝐴)
Theorem	brdifun 6614	Evaluate the incomparability relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑋 × 𝑋) ∖ ( < ∪ ◡ < ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ¬ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴)))
Theorem	swoer 6615*	Incomparability under a strict weak partial order is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑋 × 𝑋) ∖ ( < ∪ ◡ < ))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑦 < 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 < 𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥 < 𝑦 → (𝑥 < 𝑧 ∨ 𝑧 < 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)
Theorem	swoord1 6616*	The incomparability equivalence relation is compatible with the original order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑋 × 𝑋) ∖ ( < ∪ ◡ < ))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑦 < 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 < 𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥 < 𝑦 → (𝑥 < 𝑧 ∨ 𝑧 < 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 < 𝐶))
Theorem	swoord2 6617*	The incomparability equivalence relation is compatible with the original order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑋 × 𝑋) ∖ ( < ∪ ◡ < ))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑦 < 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 < 𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥 < 𝑦 → (𝑥 < 𝑧 ∨ 𝑧 < 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 < 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 < 𝐵))
Theorem	eqerlem 6618*	Lemma for eqer 6619. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝐴 = 𝐵}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧𝑅𝑤 ↔ ⦋𝑧 / 𝑥⦌𝐴 = ⦋𝑤 / 𝑥⦌𝐴)
Theorem	eqer 6619*	Equivalence relation involving equality of dependent classes 𝐴(𝑥) and 𝐵(𝑦). (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝐴 = 𝐵}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅 Er V
Theorem	ider 6620	The identity relation is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ I Er V
Theorem	0er 6621	The empty set is an equivalence relation on the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ∅ Er ∅
Theorem	eceq1 6622	Equality theorem for equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → [𝐴]𝐶 = [𝐵]𝐶)
Theorem	eceq1d 6623	Equality theorem for equivalence class (deduction form). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐴]𝐶 = [𝐵]𝐶)
Theorem	eceq2 6624	Equality theorem for equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → [𝐶]𝐴 = [𝐶]𝐵)
Theorem	eceq2i 6625	Equality theorem for the 𝐴-coset and 𝐵-coset of 𝐶, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ [𝐶]𝐴 = [𝐶]𝐵
Theorem	eceq2d 6626	Equality theorem for the 𝐴-coset and 𝐵-coset of 𝐶, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐶]𝐴 = [𝐶]𝐵)
Theorem	elecg 6627	Membership in an equivalence class. Theorem 72 of [Suppes] p. 82. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	elec 6628	Membership in an equivalence class. Theorem 72 of [Suppes] p. 82. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	relelec 6629	Membership in an equivalence class when 𝑅 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	ecss 6630	An equivalence class is a subset of the domain. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐴]𝑅 ⊆ 𝑋)
Theorem	ecdmn0m 6631*	A representative of an inhabited equivalence class belongs to the domain of the equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅)
Theorem	ereldm 6632	Equality of equivalence classes implies equivalence of domain membership. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋))
Theorem	erth 6633	Basic property of equivalence relations. Theorem 73 of [Suppes] p. 82. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
Theorem	erth2 6634	Basic property of equivalence relations. Compare Theorem 73 of [Suppes] p. 82. Assumes membership of the second argument in the domain. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
Theorem	erthi 6635	Basic property of equivalence relations. Part of Lemma 3N of [Enderton] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅)
Theorem	ecidsn 6636	An equivalence class modulo the identity relation is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2004.)
⊢ [𝐴] I = {𝐴}
Theorem	qseq1 6637	Equality theorem for quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 / 𝐶) = (𝐵 / 𝐶))
Theorem	qseq2 6638	Equality theorem for quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 / 𝐴) = (𝐶 / 𝐵))
Theorem	elqsg 6639*	Closed form of elqs 6640. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 12-Oct-2010.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = [𝑥]𝑅))
Theorem	elqs 6640*	Membership in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = [𝑥]𝑅)
Theorem	elqsi 6641*	Membership in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = [𝑥]𝑅)
Theorem	ecelqsg 6642	Membership of an equivalence class in a quotient set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅))
Theorem	ecelqsi 6643	Membership of an equivalence class in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅))
Theorem	ecopqsi 6644	"Closure" law for equivalence class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1996.)
⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐴 × 𝐴) / 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → [⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩]𝑅 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	qsexg 6645	A quotient set exists. (Contributed by FL, 19-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 / 𝑅) ∈ V)
Theorem	qsex 6646	A quotient set exists. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ∈ V
Theorem	uniqs 6647	The union of a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ (𝐴 / 𝑅) = (𝑅 “ 𝐴))
Theorem	qsss 6648	A quotient set is a set of subsets of the base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 / 𝑅) ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	uniqs2 6649	The union of a quotient set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ (𝐴 / 𝑅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	snec 6650	The singleton of an equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {[𝐴]𝑅} = ({𝐴} / 𝑅)
Theorem	ecqs 6651	Equivalence class in terms of quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1999.)
⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ [𝐴]𝑅 = ∪ ({𝐴} / 𝑅)
Theorem	ecid 6652	A set is equal to its converse epsilon coset. (Note: converse epsilon is not an equivalence relation.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ [𝐴]◡ E = 𝐴
Theorem	ecidg 6653	A set is equal to its converse epsilon coset. (Note: converse epsilon is not an equivalence relation.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴]◡ E = 𝐴)
Theorem	qsid 6654	A set is equal to its quotient set mod converse epsilon. (Note: converse epsilon is not an equivalence relation.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 / ◡ E ) = 𝐴
Theorem	ectocld 6655*	Implicit substitution of class for equivalence class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐵 / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ([𝑥]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝜓)
Theorem	ectocl 6656*	Implicit substitution of class for equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝐵 / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ([𝑥]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 → 𝜓)
Theorem	elqsn0m 6657*	An element of a quotient set is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Aug-2019.)
⊢ ((dom 𝑅 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅)) → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	elqsn0 6658	A quotient set doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ((dom 𝑅 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅)) → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	ecelqsdm 6659	Membership of an equivalence class in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.)
⊢ ((dom 𝑅 = 𝐴 ∧ [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅)) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	xpider 6660	A square Cartesian product is an equivalence relation (in general it's not a poset). (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐴) Er 𝐴
Theorem	iinerm 6661*	The intersection of a nonempty family of equivalence relations is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑅 Er 𝐵) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑅 Er 𝐵)
Theorem	riinerm 6662*	The relative intersection of a family of equivalence relations is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑅 Er 𝐵) → ((𝐵 × 𝐵) ∩ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑅) Er 𝐵)
Theorem	erinxp 6663	A restricted equivalence relation is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) Er 𝐵)
Theorem	ecinxp 6664	Restrict the relation in an equivalence class to a base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → [𝐵]𝑅 = [𝐵](𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
Theorem	qsinxp 6665	Restrict the equivalence relation in a quotient set to the base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 / 𝑅) = (𝐴 / (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))))
Theorem	qsel 6666	If an element of a quotient set contains a given element, it is equal to the equivalence class of the element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Er 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 = [𝐶]𝑅)
Theorem	qliftlem 6667*	𝐹, a function lift, is a subset of 𝑅 × 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → [𝑥]𝑅 ∈ (𝑋 / 𝑅))
Theorem	qliftrel 6668*	𝐹, a function lift, is a subset of 𝑅 × 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ ((𝑋 / 𝑅) × 𝑌))
Theorem	qliftel 6669*	Elementhood in the relation 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐶]𝑅𝐹𝐷 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐶𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐷 = 𝐴)))
Theorem	qliftel1 6670*	Elementhood in the relation 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → [𝑥]𝑅𝐹𝐴)
Theorem	qliftfun 6671*	The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘[𝑥] = 𝐴, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	qliftfund 6672*	The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘[𝑥] = 𝐴, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)
Theorem	qliftfuns 6673*	The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘[𝑥] = 𝐴, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝑦𝑅𝑧 → ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐴 = ⦋𝑧 / 𝑥⦌𝐴)))
Theorem	qliftf 6674*	The domain and codomain of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ 𝐹:(𝑋 / 𝑅)⟶𝑌))
Theorem	qliftval 6675*	The value of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘[𝐶]𝑅) = 𝐵)
Theorem	ecoptocl 6676*	Implicit substitution of class for equivalence class of ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐵 × 𝐶) / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 → 𝜓)
Theorem	2ecoptocl 6677*	Implicit substitution of classes for equivalence classes of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐶 × 𝐷) / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩]𝑅 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝜒)
Theorem	3ecoptocl 6678*	Implicit substitution of classes for equivalence classes of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐷 × 𝐷) / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩]𝑅 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ([⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩]𝑅 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐷)) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝜃)
Theorem	brecop 6679*	Binary relation on a quotient set. Lemma for real number construction. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1996.)
⊢ ∼ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∼ Er (𝐺 × 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝐺 × 𝐺) / ∼ )    &   ⊢ ≤ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ∧ 𝑦 = [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ∼ ) ∧ 𝜑))}    &   ⊢ ((((𝑧 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺))) → (([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ = [⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ ∧ [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ∼ = [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ ≤ [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	eroveu 6680*	Lemma for eroprf 6682. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐴 / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐵 / 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Er 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Er 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → + :(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐵))) → ((𝑟𝑅𝑠 ∧ 𝑡𝑆𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡)𝑇(𝑠 + 𝑢)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐾)) → ∃!𝑧∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 = [𝑝]𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇))
Theorem	erovlem 6681*	Lemma for eroprf 6682. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐴 / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐵 / 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Er 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Er 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → + :(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐵))) → ((𝑟𝑅𝑠 ∧ 𝑡𝑆𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡)𝑇(𝑠 + 𝑢)))    &   ⊢ ⨣ = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 = [𝑝]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨣ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐽, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐾 ↦ (℩𝑧∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 = [𝑝]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇))))
Theorem	eroprf 6682*	Functionality of an operation defined on equivalence classes. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐴 / 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐵 / 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Er 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Er 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Er 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → + :(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐵))) → ((𝑟𝑅𝑠 ∧ 𝑡𝑆𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡)𝑇(𝑠 + 𝑢)))    &   ⊢ ⨣ = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 = [𝑝]𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶 / 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨣ :(𝐽 × 𝐾)⟶𝐿)
Theorem	eroprf2 6683*	Functionality of an operation defined on equivalence classes. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐴 / ∼ )    &   ⊢ ⨣ = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥 = [𝑝] ∼ ∧ 𝑦 = [𝑞] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)] ∼ )}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∼ ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∼ Er 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → + :(𝐴 × 𝐴)⟶𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐴))) → ((𝑟 ∼ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑡 ∼ 𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡) ∼ (𝑠 + 𝑢)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨣ :(𝐽 × 𝐽)⟶𝐽)
Theorem	ecopoveq 6684*	This is the first of several theorems about equivalence relations of the kind used in construction of fractions and signed reals, involving operations on equivalent classes of ordered pairs. This theorem expresses the relation ∼ (specified by the hypothesis) in terms of its operation 𝐹. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∼ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐷) = (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	ecopovsym 6685*	Assuming the operation 𝐹 is commutative, show that the relation ∼, specified by the first hypothesis, is symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   ⊢ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∼ 𝐴)
Theorem	ecopovtrn 6686*	Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation ∼, specified by the first hypothesis, is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   ⊢ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∼ 𝐶)
Theorem	ecopover 6687*	Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation ∼, specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   ⊢ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)
Theorem	ecopovsymg 6688*	Assuming the operation 𝐹 is commutative, show that the relation ∼, specified by the first hypothesis, is symmetric. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∼ 𝐴)
Theorem	ecopovtrng 6689*	Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation ∼, specified by the first hypothesis, is transitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∼ 𝐶)
Theorem	ecopoverg 6690*	Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation ∼, specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)
Theorem	th3qlem1 6691*	Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60. The third hypothesis is the compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ∼ Er 𝑆    &   ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑦 ∼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑧 ∼ 𝑣) → (𝑦 + 𝑧) ∼ (𝑤 + 𝑣)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑆 / ∼ ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑆 / ∼ )) → ∃*𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧((𝐴 = [𝑦] ∼ ∧ 𝐵 = [𝑧] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑥 = [(𝑦 + 𝑧)] ∼ ))
Theorem	th3qlem2 6692*	Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60, extended to operations on ordered pairs. The fourth hypothesis is the compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ∼ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((((𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆))) → ((⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩) → (⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ + ⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩) ∼ (⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩ + ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )) → ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡((𝐴 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ∼ ∧ 𝐵 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ + ⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩)] ∼ ))
Theorem	th3qcor 6693*	Corollary of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ∼ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((((𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆))) → ((⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩) → (⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ + ⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩) ∼ (⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩ + ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡((𝑥 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ∼ ∧ 𝑦 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ + ⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩)] ∼ ))}    ⇒   ⊢ Fun 𝐺
Theorem	th3q 6694*	Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60, extended to operations on ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ∼ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((((𝑤 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆))) → ((⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩ ∼ ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩) → (⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ + ⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩) ∼ (⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩ + ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑡((𝑥 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] ∼ ∧ 𝑦 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ + ⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩)] ∼ ))}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ 𝐺[⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ) = [(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ + ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)] ∼ )
Theorem	oviec 6695*	Express an operation on equivalence classes of ordered pairs in terms of equivalence class of operations on ordered pairs. See iset.mm for additional comments describing the hypotheses. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (((𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (((𝑐 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐿 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆))    &   ⊢ ∼ ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∼ Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ 𝜑))}    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑏) ∧ (𝑣 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑑)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 = 𝑔 ∧ 𝑤 = ℎ) ∧ (𝑣 = 𝑡 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝑠)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ + = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐽))}    &   ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝑏) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝑔 ∧ 𝑓 = ℎ)) → 𝐽 = 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝑑) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝑡 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝑠)) → 𝐽 = 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑓 = 𝐷)) → 𝐽 = 𝐻)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑄) ∧ ∃𝑎∃𝑏∃𝑐∃𝑑((𝑥 = [⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩] ∼ ∧ 𝑦 = [⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩] ∼ ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ + ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩)] ∼ ))}    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )    &   ⊢ ((((𝑎 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑔 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝑆))) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝐾 ∼ 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ ⨣ [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ) = [𝐻] ∼ )
Theorem	ecovcom 6696*	Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. Most uses will want ecovicom 6697 instead. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐻    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = 𝐽    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	ecovicom 6697*	Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2019.)
⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐷 = 𝐻)    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐺 = 𝐽)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
Theorem	ecovass 6698*	Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation. In most cases ecoviass 6699 will be more useful. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝑁, 𝑄⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐽, 𝐾⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑁, 𝑄⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐿, 𝑀⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐺 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑁 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = 𝐿    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = 𝑀    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	ecoviass 6699*	Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2019.)
⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝑁, 𝑄⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐽, 𝐾⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑁, 𝑄⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐿, 𝑀⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐺 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑁 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐽 = 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → 𝐾 = 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	ecovdi 6700*	Lemma used to transfer a distributive law via an equivalence relation. Most likely ecovidi 6701 will be more helpful. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ · [⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ · [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝑊, 𝑋⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ∼ · [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝑌, 𝑍⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑊 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑊, 𝑋⟩] ∼ + [⟨𝑌, 𝑍⟩] ∼ ) = [⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩] ∼ )    &   ⊢ (((𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑀 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑊 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑌 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = 𝐾    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = 𝐿    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))