Theorem cdleme31id 40388

Description: Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
cdleme31fv2.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cdleme31id	⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥, ≤   𝑥,𝑃   𝑥,𝑄   𝑥,𝑊   𝑥,𝑋

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐹(𝑥)   𝑂(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem cdleme31id

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 482	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)
2	1	necon2bi 2955	. 2 ⊢ (𝑃 = 𝑄 → ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊))
3		cdleme31fv2.f	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))
4	3	cdleme31fv2 40387	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋)
5	2, 4	sylan2 593	1 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109   ≠ wne 2925  ifcif 4488   class class class wbr 5107   ↦ cmpt 5188  ‘cfv 6511

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3863  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fv 6519

This theorem is referenced by:  cdleme32fvaw  40433  cdleme42keg  40480  cdleme42mgN  40482  cdleme17d4  40491  cdleme48fvg  40494  cdleme50trn3  40547  cdlemg1idlemN  40566  cdlemg2idN  40590