Theorem cdleme31id 38335

Description: Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
cdleme31fv2.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cdleme31id	⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥, ≤   𝑥,𝑃   𝑥,𝑄   𝑥,𝑊   𝑥,𝑋

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐹(𝑥)   𝑂(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem cdleme31id

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 482	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)
2	1	necon2bi 2973	. 2 ⊢ (𝑃 = 𝑄 → ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊))
3		cdleme31fv2.f	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))
4	3	cdleme31fv2 38334	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋)
5	2, 4	sylan2 592	1 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108   ≠ wne 2942  ifcif 4456   class class class wbr 5070   ↦ cmpt 5153  ‘cfv 6418

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fv 6426

This theorem is referenced by:  cdleme32fvaw  38380  cdleme42keg  38427  cdleme42mgN  38429  cdleme17d4  38438  cdleme48fvg  38441  cdleme50trn3  38494  cdlemg1idlemN  38513  cdlemg2idN  38537