Theorem cdleme31id 40376

Description: Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
cdleme31fv2.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cdleme31id	⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥, ≤   𝑥,𝑃   𝑥,𝑄   𝑥,𝑊   𝑥,𝑋

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐹(𝑥)   𝑂(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem cdleme31id

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 482	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)
2	1	necon2bi 2968	. 2 ⊢ (𝑃 = 𝑄 → ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊))
3		cdleme31fv2.f	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))
4	3	cdleme31fv2 40375	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋)
5	2, 4	sylan2 593	1 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1536   ∈ wcel 2105   ≠ wne 2937  ifcif 4530   class class class wbr 5147   ↦ cmpt 5230  ‘cfv 6562

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1791  ax-4 1805  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2174  ax-ext 2705  ax-sep 5301  ax-nul 5311  ax-pr 5437

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1539  df-fal 1549  df-ex 1776  df-nf 1780  df-sb 2062  df-mo 2537  df-eu 2566  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2813  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2938  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-rab 3433  df-v 3479  df-sbc 3791  df-csb 3908  df-dif 3965  df-un 3967  df-ss 3979  df-nul 4339  df-if 4531  df-sn 4631  df-pr 4633  df-op 4637  df-uni 4912  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-mpt 5231  df-id 5582  df-xp 5694  df-rel 5695  df-cnv 5696  df-co 5697  df-dm 5698  df-iota 6515  df-fun 6564  df-fv 6570

This theorem is referenced by:  cdleme32fvaw  40421  cdleme42keg  40468  cdleme42mgN  40470  cdleme17d4  40479  cdleme48fvg  40482  cdleme50trn3  40535  cdlemg1idlemN  40554  cdlemg2idN  40578