Theorem cdleme31id 40395

Description: Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
cdleme31fv2.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cdleme31id	⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥, ≤   𝑥,𝑃   𝑥,𝑄   𝑥,𝑊   𝑥,𝑋

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐹(𝑥)   𝑂(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem cdleme31id

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 482	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)
2	1	necon2bi 2956	. 2 ⊢ (𝑃 = 𝑄 → ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊))
3		cdleme31fv2.f	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))
4	3	cdleme31fv2 40394	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋)
5	2, 4	sylan2 593	1 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109   ≠ wne 2926  ifcif 4491   class class class wbr 5110   ↦ cmpt 5191  ‘cfv 6514

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5254  ax-nul 5264  ax-pr 5390

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3757  df-csb 3866  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-ss 3934  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-id 5536  df-xp 5647  df-rel 5648  df-cnv 5649  df-co 5650  df-dm 5651  df-iota 6467  df-fun 6516  df-fv 6522

This theorem is referenced by:  cdleme32fvaw  40440  cdleme42keg  40487  cdleme42mgN  40489  cdleme17d4  40498  cdleme48fvg  40501  cdleme50trn3  40554  cdlemg1idlemN  40573  cdlemg2idN  40597