Theorem cdleme31id 41717

Description: Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
cdleme31fv2.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cdleme31id	⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥, ≤   𝑥,𝑃   𝑥,𝑄   𝑥,𝑊   𝑥,𝑋

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐹(𝑥)   𝑂(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem cdleme31id

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 488	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊) → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)
2	1	necon2bi 2989	. 2 ⊢ (𝑃 = 𝑄 → ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊))
3		cdleme31fv2.f	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑊), 𝑂, 𝑥))
4	3	cdleme31fv2 41716	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑊)) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋)
5	2, 4	sylan2 605	1 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959  ifcif 4485   class class class wbr 5108   ↦ cmpt 5192  ‘cfv 6566

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5255  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fv 6574

This theorem is used by:  cdleme32fvaw  41762  cdleme42keg  41809  cdleme42mgN  41811  cdleme17d4  41820  cdleme48fvg  41823  cdleme50trn3  41876  cdlemg1idlemN  41895  cdlemg2idN  41919