P. 400 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39901-40000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	elfunsALTV 39901	Elementhood in the class of functions. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ FunsALTV ↔ ( ≀ 𝐹 ∈ CnvRefRels ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elfunsALTV2 39902	Elementhood in the class of functions. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ FunsALTV ↔ ( ≀ 𝐹 ⊆ I ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elfunsALTV3 39903*	Elementhood in the class of functions. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ FunsALTV ↔ (∀𝑢∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑢𝐹𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝐹𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elfunsALTV4 39904*	Elementhood in the class of functions. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ FunsALTV ↔ (∀𝑢∃*𝑥 𝑢𝐹𝑥 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elfunsALTV5 39905*	Elementhood in the class of functions. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ FunsALTV ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐹(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝑥]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑦]◡𝐹) = ∅) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elfunsALTVfunALTV 39906	The element of the class of functions and the function predicate are the same when 𝐹 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 ∈ FunsALTV ↔ FunALTV 𝐹))
Theorem	funALTVfun 39907	Our definition of the function predicate df-funALTV 39891 (based on a more general, converse reflexive, relation) and the original definition of function in set.mm df-fun 6560, are always the same and interchangeable. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( FunALTV 𝐹 ↔ Fun 𝐹)
Theorem	funALTVss 39908	Subclass theorem for function. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( FunALTV 𝐵 → FunALTV 𝐴))
Theorem	funALTVeq 39909	Equality theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ( FunALTV 𝐴 ↔ FunALTV 𝐵))
Theorem	funALTVeqi 39910	Equality inference for the function predicate. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ( FunALTV 𝐴 ↔ FunALTV 𝐵)
Theorem	funALTVeqd 39911	Equality deduction for the function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( FunALTV 𝐴 ↔ FunALTV 𝐵))
21.28.19  Disjoints vs. converse functions
Definition	df-disjss 39912	Define the class of all disjoint sets (but not necessarily disjoint relations, cf. df-disjs 39913). It is used only by df-disjs 39913. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ Disjss = {𝑥 ∣ ≀ ◡𝑥 ∈ CnvRefRels }
Definition	df-disjs 39913	Define the disjoint relations class, i.e., the class of disjoints. We need Disjs for the definition of Parts and Part for the Partition-Equivalence Theorems: this need for Parts as disjoint relations on their domain quotients is the reason why we must define Disjs instead of simply using converse functions (cf. dfdisjALTV 39922). The element of the class of disjoints and the disjoint predicate are the same, that is (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ Disj 𝑅) when 𝑅 is a set, see eldisjsdisj 39948. Alternate definitions are dfdisjs 39917, ... , dfdisjs5 39921. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ Disjs = ( Disjss ∩ Rels )
Definition	df-disjALTV 39914	Define the disjoint relation predicate, i.e., the disjoint predicate. A disjoint relation is a converse function of the relation by dfdisjALTV 39922, see the comment of df-disjs 39913 why we need disjoint relations instead of converse functions anyway. The element of the class of disjoints and the disjoint predicate are the same, that is (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ Disj 𝑅) when 𝑅 is a set, see eldisjsdisj 39948. Alternate definitions are dfdisjALTV 39922, ... , dfdisjALTV5 39926. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ ( CnvRefRel ≀ ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Definition	df-eldisjs 39915	Define the disjoint element relations class, i.e., the disjoint elements class. The element of the disjoint elements class and the disjoint elementhood predicate are the same, that is (𝐴 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj 𝐴) when 𝐴 is a set, see eleldisjseldisj 39953. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ElDisjs = {𝑎 ∣ (◡ E ↾ 𝑎) ∈ Disjs }
Definition	df-eldisj 39916	Define the disjoint element relation predicate, i.e., the disjoint elementhood predicate. Read: the elements of 𝐴 are disjoint. The element of the disjoint elements class and the disjoint elementhood predicate are the same, that is (𝐴 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj 𝐴) when 𝐴 is a set, see eleldisjseldisj 39953. As of now, disjoint elementhood is defined as "partition" in set.mm : compare df-prt 40121 with dfeldisj5 39937. See also the comments of dfmembpart2 39997 and of df-parts 39992. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ Disj (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	dfdisjs 39917	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Jul-2021.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ≀ ◡𝑟 ∈ CnvRefRels }
Theorem	dfdisjs2 39918	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ≀ ◡𝑟 ⊆ I }
Theorem	dfdisjs3 39919*	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑢∀𝑣∀𝑥((𝑢𝑟𝑥 ∧ 𝑣𝑟𝑥) → 𝑢 = 𝑣)}
Theorem	dfdisjs4 39920*	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑟𝑥}
Theorem	dfdisjs5 39921*	Alternate definition of the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disjs = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑟∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑟(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑟 ∩ [𝑣]𝑟) = ∅)}
Theorem	dfdisjALTV 39922	Alternate definition of the disjoint relation predicate. A disjoint relation is a converse function of the relation, see the comment of df-disjs 39913 why we need disjoint relations instead of converse functions anyway. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ ( FunALTV ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfdisjALTV2 39923	Alternate definition of the disjoint relation predicate, cf. dffunALTV2 39897. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ ( ≀ ◡𝑅 ⊆ I ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfdisjALTV3 39924*	Alternate definition of the disjoint relation predicate, cf. dffunALTV3 39898. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑢∀𝑣∀𝑥((𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑣𝑅𝑥) → 𝑢 = 𝑣) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfdisjALTV4 39925*	Alternate definition of the disjoint relation predicate, cf. dffunALTV4 39899. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfdisjALTV5 39926*	Alternate definition of the disjoint relation predicate, cf. dffunALTV5 39900. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfdisjALTV5a 39927*	Alternate definition of the disjoint relation predicate. Disj 𝑅 means: different domain generators have disjoint cosets (unless the generators are equal), plus Rel 𝑅 for relation-typedness. This is the characterization that makes canonicity/uniqueness arguments modular. It is the starting point for the entire "Disj ↔ unique representative per block" pipeline that feeds into Disjs, see dfdisjs7 40067. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	disjimeceqim 39928*	Disj implies coset-equality injectivity (domain-wise). Extracts the practical consequence of Disj: the map 𝑢 ↦ [𝑢]𝑅 is injective on dom 𝑅. This is exactly the "canonicity" property used repeatedly when turning ∃* into ∃! and when reasoning about uniqueness of representatives. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
Theorem	disjimeceqim2 39929	Disj implies injectivity (pairwise form). The same content as disjimeceqim 39928 but packaged for direct use with explicit hypotheses (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅) → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	disjimeceqbi 39930*	Disj gives biconditional injectivity (domain-wise). Strengthens injectivity to an iff. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣))
Theorem	disjimeceqbi2 39931	Injectivity of the block constructor under disjointness. suc11reg 9647 analogue: under disjointness, equal blocks force equal generators (on dom 𝑅). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅) → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	disjimrmoeqec 39932*	Under Disj, every block has a unique generator (∃* form). If 𝑡 is a block in the quotient sense, then there is a uniquely determined 𝑢 in dom 𝑅 such that 𝑡 = [𝑢]𝑅. This is the existence+uniqueness engine behind Disjs and QMap characterizations: it is the "representative theorem" from which the ∃! forms are obtained. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ∃*𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑡 = [𝑢]𝑅)
Theorem	disjimdmqseq 39933*	Disjointness implies unique-generation of quotient blocks. Converts existence-quotient comprehension (see df-qs 8751) into a uniqueness-comprehension under disjointness; rewrites (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) carriers as exactly the class of blocks with a unique representative. This is the "unique generator per block" content in a carrier-normal form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = {𝑡 ∣ ∃!𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑡 = [𝑢]𝑅})
Theorem	dfeldisj2 39934	Alternate definition of the disjoint elementhood predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ≀ ◡(◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ I )
Theorem	dfeldisj3 39935*	Alternate definition of the disjoint elementhood predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣)𝑢 = 𝑣)
Theorem	dfeldisj4 39936*	Alternate definition of the disjoint elementhood predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢)
Theorem	dfeldisj5 39937*	Alternate definition of the disjoint elementhood predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = ∅))
Theorem	dfeldisj5a 39938*	Alternate definition of the disjoint elementhood predicate. Members of 𝐴 are pairwise disjoint: if two members overlap, they are equal. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
Theorem	eldisjim3 39939	ElDisj elimination (two chosen elements). Standard specialization lemma: from ElDisj 𝐴 infer the disjointness condition for two specific elements. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅ → 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	eldisjdmqsim2 39940	ElDisj of quotient implies coset-disjointness (domain form). Converts element-disjointness of the quotient carrier into a usable "cosets don't overlap unless equal" rule. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (( ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ) → ((𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅) → (([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅)))
Theorem	eldisjdmqsim 39941*	Shared output implies equal cosets (under ElDisj of quotient): if 𝑢 and 𝑣 both relate to the same 𝑥, then their cosets intersect, hence must coincide under quotient ElDisj. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (( ElDisj (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ) → ((𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑣𝑅𝑥) → [𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅))
Theorem	suceldisj 39942*	Disjointness of successor enforces element-carrier separation: If 𝐵 is the successor of 𝐴 and 𝐵 is element-disjoint as a family, then no element of 𝐴 can itself be a member of 𝐴 (equivalently, every 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 has empty intersection with the carrier 𝐴). Provides a clean bridge between "disjoint family at the next grade" and "no block contains a block of the same family" at the previous grade: MembPart alone does not enforce this, see dfmembpart2 39997 (it gives disjoint blocks and excludes the empty block, but does not prevent 𝑢 ∈ 𝑚 from also being a member of the carrier 𝑚). This lemma is used to justify when grade-stability (via successor-shift) supplies the extra separation axioms needed in roof/root-style carrier reasoning. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ElDisj 𝐵 ∧ suc 𝐴 = 𝐵) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	eldisjs 39943	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ ( ≀ ◡𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	eldisjs2 39944	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ ( ≀ ◡𝑅 ⊆ I ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	eldisjs3 39945*	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ (∀𝑢∀𝑣∀𝑥((𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑣𝑅𝑥) → 𝑢 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	eldisjs4 39946*	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	eldisjs5 39947*	Elementhood in the class of disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels )))
Theorem	eldisjsdisj 39948	The element of the class of disjoint relations and the disjoint relation predicate are the same, that is (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ Disj 𝑅) when 𝑅 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ Disj 𝑅))
Theorem	qmapeldisjs 39949	When 𝑅 is a set (e.g., when it is an element of the class of relations df-rels 39564), the quotient map element of the class of disjoint relations and the disjoint relation predicate for quotient maps are the same. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ( QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs ↔ Disj QMap 𝑅))
Theorem	disjqmap2 39950*	Disjointness of QMap equals ∃*-generation. Pairs with disjqmap 39951 and raldmqseu 39489 to move between ∃* and ∃! depending on context. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ( Disj QMap 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑢∃*𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑅))
Theorem	disjqmap 39951*	Disjointness of QMap equals unique generation of the quotient carrier. The cleaned, carrier-respecting version of disjqmap2 39950. This is the statement "each equivalence class has a unique representative" for the general coset carrier (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ( Disj QMap 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)∃!𝑡 ∈ dom 𝑅 𝑢 = [𝑡]𝑅))
Theorem	eleldisjs 39952	Elementhood in the disjoint elements class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ∈ Disjs ))
Theorem	eleldisjseldisj 39953	The element of the disjoint elements class and the disjoint elementhood predicate are the same, that is (𝐴 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj 𝐴) when 𝐴 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ ElDisjs ↔ ElDisj 𝐴))
Theorem	disjrel 39954	Disjoint relation is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → Rel 𝑅)
Theorem	disjss 39955	Subclass theorem for disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Oct-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( Disj 𝐵 → Disj 𝐴))
Theorem	disjssi 39956	Subclass theorem for disjoints, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ( Disj 𝐵 → Disj 𝐴)
Theorem	disjssd 39957	Subclass theorem for disjoints, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( Disj 𝐵 → Disj 𝐴))
Theorem	disjeq 39958	Equality theorem for disjoints. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ( Disj 𝐴 ↔ Disj 𝐵))
Theorem	disjeqi 39959	Equality theorem for disjoints, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ( Disj 𝐴 ↔ Disj 𝐵)
Theorem	disjeqd 39960	Equality theorem for disjoints, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( Disj 𝐴 ↔ Disj 𝐵))
Theorem	disjdmqseqeq1 39961	Lemma for the equality theorem for partition parteq1 40001. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴) ↔ ( Disj 𝑆 ∧ (dom 𝑆 / 𝑆) = 𝐴)))
Theorem	eldisjss 39962	Subclass theorem for disjoint elementhood. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ( ElDisj 𝐵 → ElDisj 𝐴))
Theorem	eldisjssi 39963	Subclass theorem for disjoint elementhood, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐵 → ElDisj 𝐴)
Theorem	eldisjssd 39964	Subclass theorem for disjoint elementhood, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( ElDisj 𝐵 → ElDisj 𝐴))
Theorem	eldisjeq 39965	Equality theorem for disjoint elementhood. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ElDisj 𝐵))
Theorem	eldisjeqi 39966	Equality theorem for disjoint elementhood, inference version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ElDisj 𝐵)
Theorem	eldisjeqd 39967	Equality theorem for disjoint elementhood, deduction version. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( ElDisj 𝐴 ↔ ElDisj 𝐵))
Theorem	disjres 39968*	Disjoint restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ( Disj (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅)))
Theorem	eldisjn0elb 39969	Two forms of disjoint elements when the empty set is not an element of the class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ( Disj (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) ∧ (dom (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) / (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) = 𝐴))
Theorem	disjxrn 39970	Two ways of saying that a range Cartesian product is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↔ ( ≀ ◡𝑅 ∩ ≀ ◡𝑆) ⊆ I )
Theorem	disjxrnres5 39971*	Disjoint range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = ∅))
Theorem	disjorimxrn 39972	Disjointness condition for range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jul-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( Disj 𝑅 ∨ Disj 𝑆) → Disj (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆))
Theorem	disjimxrn 39973	Disjointness condition for range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Dec-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑆 → Disj (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆))
Theorem	disjimres 39974	Disjointness condition for restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → Disj (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	disjimin 39975	Disjointness condition for intersection. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 28-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑆 → Disj (𝑅 ∩ 𝑆))
Theorem	disjiminres 39976	Disjointness condition for intersection with restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑆 → Disj (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	disjimxrnres 39977	Disjointness condition for range Cartesian product with restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( Disj 𝑆 → Disj (𝑅 ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	disjALTV0 39978	The null class is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj ∅
Theorem	disjALTVid 39979	The class of identity relations is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jun-2021.)
⊢ Disj I
Theorem	disjALTVidres 39980	The class of identity relations restricted is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj ( I ↾ 𝐴)
Theorem	disjALTVinidres 39981	The intersection with restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ Disj (𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	disjALTVxrnidres 39982	The class of range Cartesian product with restricted identity relation is disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ Disj (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	disjsuc 39983*	Disjoint range Cartesian product, special case. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ suc 𝐴)) ↔ ( Disj (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅))))
Theorem	qmapeldisjsim 39984	Injectivity of coset map from QMap being disjoint (implication form): under the Disjs condition on QMap 𝑅, the coset assignment is injective on dom 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	qmapeldisjsbi 39985	Injectivity of coset map from QMap being disjoint (biconditional form). Convenience version of qmapeldisjsim 39984. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ QMap 𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	rnqmapeleldisjsim 39986	Element-disjointness of the quotient carrier forces coset disjointness. Supplies the "cosets don't overlap unless equal" direction, but expressed via ran QMap 𝑅 (the quotient carrier) and ElDisjs. This is the structural reason Disjs needs a "carrier disjointness" level distinct from the "unique representatives" level. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ran QMap 𝑅 ∈ ElDisjs ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅)) → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
21.28.20  Antisymmetry
Definition	df-antisymrel 39987	Define the antisymmetric relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is an antisymmetric relation.) (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel 𝑅 ↔ ( CnvRefRel (𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfantisymrel4 39988	Alternate definition of the antisymmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel 𝑅 ↔ ((𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑅) ⊆ I ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfantisymrel5 39989*	Alternate definition of the antisymmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	antisymrelres 39990*	(Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ( AntisymRel (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	antisymrelressn 39991	(Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Jun-2024.)
⊢ AntisymRel (𝑅 ↾ {𝐴})
21.28.21  Partitions: disjoints on domain quotients
Definition	df-parts 39992	Define the class of all partitions, cf. the comment of df-disjs 39913. Partitions are disjoints on domain quotients (or: domain quotients restricted to disjoints). This is a more general meaning of partition than we we are familiar with: the conventional meaning of partition (e.g. partition 𝐴 of 𝑋, [Halmos] p. 28: "A partition of 𝑋 is a disjoint collection 𝐴 of non-empty subsets of 𝑋 whose union is 𝑋", or Definition 35, [Suppes] p. 83., cf. https://oeis.org/A000110 39913) is what we call membership partition here, cf. dfmembpart2 39997. The binary partitions relation and the partition predicate are the same, that is, (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Part 𝐴) if 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets, cf. brpartspart 40000. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ Parts = ( DomainQss ↾ Disjs )
Definition	df-part 39993	Define the partition predicate (read: 𝐴 is a partition by 𝑅). Alternative definition is dfpart2 39996. The binary partition and the partition predicate are the same if 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets, cf. brpartspart 40000. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ ( Disj 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 DomainQs 𝐴))
Definition	df-membparts 39994	Define the class of member partition relations on their domain quotients. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ MembParts = {𝑎 ∣ (◡ E ↾ 𝑎) Parts 𝑎}
Definition	df-membpart 39995	Define the member partition predicate, or the disjoint restricted element relation on its domain quotient predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a member partition.) A alternative definition is dfmembpart2 39997. Member partition is the conventional meaning of partition (see the notes of df-parts 39992 and dfmembpart2 39997), we generalize the concept in df-parts 39992 and df-part 39993. Member partition and comember equivalence are the same by mpet 40077. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ( MembPart 𝐴 ↔ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) Part 𝐴)
Theorem	dfpart2 39996	Alternate definition of the partition predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 Part 𝐴 ↔ ( Disj 𝑅 ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴))
Theorem	dfmembpart2 39997	Alternate definition of the conventional membership case of partition. Partition 𝐴 of 𝑋, [Halmos] p. 28: "A partition of 𝑋 is a disjoint collection 𝐴 of non-empty subsets of 𝑋 whose union is 𝑋", or Definition 35, [Suppes] p. 83., cf. https://oeis.org/A000110 . (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( MembPart 𝐴 ↔ ( ElDisj 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	brparts 39998	Binary partitions relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ 𝑅 DomainQss 𝐴)))
Theorem	brparts2 39999	Binary partitions relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Disjs ∧ (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅) = 𝐴)))
Theorem	brpartspart 40000	Binary partition and the partition predicate are the same if 𝐴 and 𝑅 are sets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 Parts 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Part 𝐴))