![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 400 of 454) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-28701) |
![]() (28702-30224) |
![]() (30225-45333) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | jm2.17a 39901 | First half of lemma 2.17 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (((2 · 𝐴) − 1)↑𝑁) ≤ (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + 1))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.17b 39902 | Weak form of the second half of lemma 2.17 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696, allowing induction to start lower. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 15-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ ((2 · 𝐴)↑𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | jm2.17c 39903 | Second half of lemma 2.17 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 15-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 Yrm ((𝑁 + 1) + 1)) < ((2 · 𝐴)↑(𝑁 + 1))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.24 39904 | Lemma 2.24 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 697 extended to ℤ. Could be eliminated with a more careful proof of jm2.26lem3 39942. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 − 1)) + (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)) < (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | rmygeid 39905 | Y(n) increases faster than n. Used implicitly without proof or comment in lemma 2.27 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 697. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝑁 ≤ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | congtr 39906 | A wff of the form 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) is interpreted as a congruential equation. This is similar to (𝐵 mod 𝐴) = (𝐶 mod 𝐴), but is defined such that behavior is regular for zero and negative values of 𝐴. To use this concept effectively, we need to show that congruential equations behave similarly to normal equations; first a transitivity law. Idea for the future: If there was a congruential equation symbol, it could incorporate type constraints, so that most of these would not need them. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∧ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐷))) → 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | congadd 39907 | If two pairs of numbers are componentwise congruent, so are their sums. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∧ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐷 − 𝐸))) → 𝐴 ∥ ((𝐵 + 𝐷) − (𝐶 + 𝐸))) | ||
Theorem | congmul 39908 | If two pairs of numbers are componentwise congruent, so are their products. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∧ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐷 − 𝐸))) → 𝐴 ∥ ((𝐵 · 𝐷) − (𝐶 · 𝐸))) | ||
Theorem | congsym 39909 | Congruence mod 𝐴 is a symmetric/commutative relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶))) → 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | congneg 39910 | If two integers are congruent mod 𝐴, so are their negatives. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶))) → 𝐴 ∥ (-𝐵 − -𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | congsub 39911 | If two pairs of numbers are componentwise congruent, so are their differences. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∧ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐷 − 𝐸))) → 𝐴 ∥ ((𝐵 − 𝐷) − (𝐶 − 𝐸))) | ||
Theorem | congid 39912 | Every integer is congruent to itself mod every base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | mzpcong 39913* | Polynomials commute with congruences. (Does this characterize them?) (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉)) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑉 𝑁 ∥ ((𝑋‘𝑘) − (𝑌‘𝑘)))) → 𝑁 ∥ ((𝐹‘𝑋) − (𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | congrep 39914* | Every integer is congruent to some number in the fundamental domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ∃𝑎 ∈ (0...(𝐴 − 1))𝐴 ∥ (𝑎 − 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | congabseq 39915 | If two integers are congruent, they are either equal or separated by at least the congruence base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) → ((abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | acongid 39916 |
A wff like that in this theorem will be known as an "alternating
congruence". A special symbol might be considered if more uses come
up.
They have many of the same properties as normal congruences, starting with
reflexivity.
JonesMatijasevic uses "a ≡ ± b (mod c)" for this construction. The disjunction of divisibility constraints seems to adequately capture the concept, but it's rather verbose and somewhat inelegant. Use of an explicit equivalence relation might also work. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | acongsym 39917 | Symmetry of alternating congruence. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶))) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | acongneg2 39918 | Negate right side of alternating congruence. Makes essential use of the "alternating" part. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − --𝐶))) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | acongtr 39919 | Transitivity of alternating congruence. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ((𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶)) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐷)))) → (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐷) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | acongeq12d 39920 | Substitution deduction for alternating congruence. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐷) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐸) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐸)))) | ||
Theorem | acongrep 39921* | Every integer is alternating-congruent to some number in the first half of the fundamental domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ∃𝑎 ∈ (0...𝐴)((2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝑎 − 𝑁) ∨ (2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝑎 − -𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | fzmaxdif 39922 | Bound on the difference between two integers constrained to two possibly overlapping finite ranges. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵...𝐶)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐸...𝐹)) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝐸) ≤ (𝐹 − 𝐵)) → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐷)) ≤ (𝐹 − 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | fzneg 39923 | Reflection of a finite range of integers about 0. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵...𝐶) ↔ -𝐴 ∈ (-𝐶...-𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | acongeq 39924 | Two numbers in the fundamental domain are alternating-congruent iff they are equal. TODO: could be used to shorten jm2.26 39943. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0...𝐴) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (0...𝐴)) → (𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ((2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ (2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶)))) | ||
Theorem | dvdsacongtr 39925 | Alternating congruence passes from a base to a dividing base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐷 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶)))) → (𝐷 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐷 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | coprmdvdsb 39926 | Multiplication by a coprime number does not affect divisibility. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐾 gcd 𝑀) = 1)) → (𝐾 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | modabsdifz 39927 | Divisibility in terms of modular reduction by the absolute value of the base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 0) → ((𝑁 − (𝑁 mod (abs‘𝑀))) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ) | ||
Theorem | dvdsabsmod0 39928 | Divisibility in terms of modular reduction by the absolute value of the base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 0) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑁 mod (abs‘𝑀)) = 0)) | ||
Theorem | jm2.18 39929 | Theorem 2.18 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696. Direct relationship of the exponential function to X and Y sequences. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((((2 · 𝐴) · 𝐾) − (𝐾↑2)) − 1) ∥ (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) − ((𝐴 − 𝐾) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))) − (𝐾↑𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.19lem1 39930 | Lemma for jm2.19 39934. X and Y values are coprime. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑀) gcd (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) = 1) | ||
Theorem | jm2.19lem2 39931 | Lemma for jm2.19 39934. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + 𝑀)))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.19lem3 39932 | Lemma for jm2.19 39934. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + (𝐼 · 𝑀))))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.19lem4 39933 | Lemma for jm2.19 39934. Extend to ZZ by symmetry. TODO: use zindbi 39887. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + (𝐼 · 𝑀))))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.19 39934 | Lemma 2.19 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696. Transfer divisibility constraints between Y-values and their indices. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.21 39935 | Lemma for jm2.20nn 39938. Express X and Y values as a binomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Xrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)) + ((√‘((𝐴↑2) − 1)) · (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)))) = (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) + ((√‘((𝐴↑2) − 1)) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))↑𝐽)) | ||
Theorem | jm2.22 39936* | Lemma for jm2.20nn 39938. Applying binomial theorem and taking irrational part. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)) = Σ𝑖 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (0...𝐽) ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑥} ((𝐽C𝑖) · (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)↑(𝐽 − 𝑖)) · (((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)↑𝑖) · (((𝐴↑2) − 1)↑((𝑖 − 1) / 2)))))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.23 39937 | Lemma for jm2.20nn 39938. Truncate binomial expansion p-adicly. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)↑3) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)) − (𝐽 · (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)↑(𝐽 − 1)) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.20nn 39938 | Lemma 2.20 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696, the "first step down lemma". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)↑2) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ↔ (𝑁 · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)) ∥ 𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | jm2.25lem1 39939 | Lemma for jm2.26 39943. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐷))) → ((𝐴 ∥ (𝐷 − 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐷 − -𝐵)) ↔ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.25 39940 | Lemma for jm2.26 39943. Remainders mod X(2n) are negaperiodic mod 2n. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm (𝑀 + (𝐼 · (2 · 𝑁)))) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm (𝑀 + (𝐼 · (2 · 𝑁)))) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.26a 39941 | Lemma for jm2.26 39943. Reverse direction is required to prove forward direction, so do it separately. Induction on difference between K and M, together with the addition formula fact that adding 2N only inverts sign. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)) → (((2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − 𝑀) ∨ (2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − -𝑀)) → ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀))))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.26lem3 39942 | Lemma for jm2.26 39943. Use acongrep 39921 to find K', M' ~ K, M in [ 0,N ]. Thus Y(K') ~ Y(M') and both are small; K' = M' on pain of contradicting 2.24, so K ~ M. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (0...𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)))) → 𝐾 = 𝑀) | ||
Theorem | jm2.26 39943 | Lemma 2.26 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 697, the "second step down lemma". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)) → (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀))) ↔ ((2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − 𝑀) ∨ (2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − -𝑀)))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.15nn0 39944 | Lemma 2.15 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. Yrm is a polynomial for fixed N, so has the expected congruence property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) − (𝐵 Yrm 𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.16nn0 39945 | Lemma 2.16 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. This may be regarded as a special case of jm2.15nn0 39944 if Yrm is redefined as described in rmyluc 39878. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 − 1) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) − 𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | jm2.27a 39946 | Lemma for jm2.27 39949. Reverse direction after existential quantifiers are expanded. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐷↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐸↑2))) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐼↑2) − (((𝐺↑2) − 1) · (𝐻↑2))) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = ((𝐽 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐺 − 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐺 − 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝑃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝑄)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝑄)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 = (𝐺 Xrm 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝐺 Yrm 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | jm2.27b 39947 | Lemma for jm2.27 39949. Expand existential quantifiers for reverse direction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐷↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐸↑2))) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐼↑2) − (((𝐺↑2) − 1) · (𝐻↑2))) = 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = ((𝐽 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐺 − 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐺 − 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | jm2.27c 39948 | Lemma for jm2.27 39949. Forward direction with substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵)) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐵 · (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵)) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐴 Yrm (2 · 𝑄)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝐴 Xrm (2 · 𝑄)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐴 + ((𝐹↑2) · ((𝐹↑2) − 𝐴))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 Yrm 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐺 Xrm 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐽 = ((𝐸 / (2 · (𝐶↑2))) − 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐷 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0)) ∧ (𝐽 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (((((𝐷↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1 ∧ ((𝐹↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐸↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) ∧ (((𝐼↑2) − (((𝐺↑2) − 1) · (𝐻↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝐸 = ((𝐽 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2))) ∧ 𝐹 ∥ (𝐺 − 𝐴))) ∧ (((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐺 − 1) ∧ 𝐹 ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐶)) ∧ ((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)))))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.27 39949* | Lemma 2.27 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 697; rmY is a diophantine relation. 0 was excluded from the range of B and the lower limit of G was imposed because the source proof does not seem to work otherwise; quite possible I'm just missing something. The source proof uses both i and I; i has been changed to j to avoid collision. This theorem is basically nothing but substitution instances, all the work is done in jm2.27a 39946 and jm2.27c 39948. Once Diophantine relations have been defined, the content of the theorem is "rmY is Diophantine". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑒 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑔 ∈ ℕ0 ∃ℎ ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 (((((𝑑↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1 ∧ ((𝑓↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝑒↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) ∧ (((𝑖↑2) − (((𝑔↑2) − 1) · (ℎ↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝑒 = ((𝑗 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2))) ∧ 𝑓 ∥ (𝑔 − 𝐴))) ∧ (((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝑔 − 1) ∧ 𝑓 ∥ (ℎ − 𝐶)) ∧ ((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (ℎ − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶))))) | ||
Theorem | jm2.27dlem1 39950* | Lemma for rmydioph 39955. Substitution of a tuple restriction into a projection that doesn't care. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑎 = (𝑏 ↾ (1...𝐵)) → (𝑎‘𝐴) = (𝑏‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | jm2.27dlem2 39951 | Lemma for rmydioph 39955. This theorem is used along with the next three to efficiently infer steps like 7 ∈ (1...;10). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐵 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐶) | ||
Theorem | jm2.27dlem3 39952 | Lemma for rmydioph 39955. Infer membership of the endpoint of a range. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐴) | ||
Theorem | jm2.27dlem4 39953 | Lemma for rmydioph 39955. Infer ℕ-hood of large numbers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐴 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ | ||
Theorem | jm2.27dlem5 39954 | Lemma for rmydioph 39955. Used with sselii 3912 to infer membership of midpoints of range; jm2.27dlem2 39951 is deprecated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐴 + 1) & ⊢ (1...𝐵) ⊆ (1...𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (1...𝐴) ⊆ (1...𝐶) | ||
Theorem | rmydioph 39955 | jm2.27 39949 restated in terms of Diophantine sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
⊢ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ ((𝑎‘1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑎‘3) = ((𝑎‘1) Yrm (𝑎‘2)))} ∈ (Dioph‘3) | ||
Theorem | rmxdiophlem 39956* | X can be expressed in terms of Y, so it is also Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 15-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑋 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑦 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ∧ ((𝑋↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝑦↑2))) = 1))) | ||
Theorem | rmxdioph 39957 | X is a Diophantine function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ ((𝑎‘1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑎‘3) = ((𝑎‘1) Xrm (𝑎‘2)))} ∈ (Dioph‘3) | ||
Theorem | jm3.1lem1 39958 | Lemma for jm3.1 39961. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾↑𝑁) < 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | jm3.1lem2 39959 | Lemma for jm3.1 39961. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾↑𝑁) < ((((2 · 𝐴) · 𝐾) − (𝐾↑2)) − 1)) | ||
Theorem | jm3.1lem3 39960 | Lemma for jm3.1 39961. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((2 · 𝐴) · 𝐾) − (𝐾↑2)) − 1) ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | jm3.1 39961 | Diophantine expression for exponentiation. Lemma 3.1 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 698. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐾 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ 𝐴) → (𝐾↑𝑁) = (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) − ((𝐴 − 𝐾) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))) mod ((((2 · 𝐴) · 𝐾) − (𝐾↑2)) − 1))) | ||
Theorem | expdiophlem1 39962* | Lemma for expdioph 39964. Fully expanded expression for exponential. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 → (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ 𝐶 = (𝐴↑𝐵)) ↔ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑒 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑑 = (𝐴 Yrm (𝐵 + 1))) ∧ ((𝑑 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑒 = (𝑑 Yrm 𝐵)) ∧ ((𝑑 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑓 = (𝑑 Xrm 𝐵)) ∧ (𝐶 < ((((2 · 𝑑) · 𝐴) − (𝐴↑2)) − 1) ∧ ((((2 · 𝑑) · 𝐴) − (𝐴↑2)) − 1) ∥ ((𝑓 − ((𝑑 − 𝐴) · 𝑒)) − 𝐶)))))))) | ||
Theorem | expdiophlem2 39963 | Lemma for expdioph 39964. Exponentiation on a restricted domain is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ (((𝑎‘1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑎‘2) ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝑎‘3) = ((𝑎‘1)↑(𝑎‘2)))} ∈ (Dioph‘3) | ||
Theorem | expdioph 39964 | The exponential function is Diophantine. This result completes and encapsulates our development using Pell equation solution sequences and is sometimes regarded as Matiyasevich's theorem properly. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ (𝑎‘3) = ((𝑎‘1)↑(𝑎‘2))} ∈ (Dioph‘3) | ||
Theorem | setindtr 39965* | Set induction for sets contained in a transitive set. If we are allowed to assume Infinity, then all sets have a transitive closure and this reduces to setind 9160; however, this version is useful without Infinity. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦(Tr 𝑦 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | setindtrs 39966* | Set induction scheme without Infinity. See comments at setindtr 39965. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑧(Tr 𝑧 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | dford3lem1 39967* | Lemma for dford3 39969. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((Tr 𝑁 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 Tr 𝑦) → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑁 (Tr 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 Tr 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | dford3lem2 39968* | Lemma for dford3 39969. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ∈ On) | ||
Theorem | dford3 39969* | Ordinals are precisely the hereditarily transitive classes. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (Ord 𝑁 ↔ (Tr 𝑁 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑁 Tr 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | dford4 39970* | dford3 39969 expressed in primitives to demonstrate shortness. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (Ord 𝑁 ↔ ∀𝑎∀𝑏∀𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑎) → (𝑏 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 → 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎)))) | ||
Theorem | wopprc 39971 | Unrelated: Wiener pairs treat proper classes symmetrically. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ↔ ¬ 1o ∈ {{{𝐴}, ∅}, {{𝐵}}}) | ||
Theorem | rpnnen3lem 39972* | Lemma for rpnnen3 39973. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℝ) ∧ 𝑎 < 𝑏) → {𝑐 ∈ ℚ ∣ 𝑐 < 𝑎} ≠ {𝑐 ∈ ℚ ∣ 𝑐 < 𝑏}) | ||
Theorem | rpnnen3 39973 | Dedekind cut injection of ℝ into 𝒫 ℚ. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ℝ ≼ 𝒫 ℚ | ||
Theorem | axac10 39974 | Characterization of choice similar to dffin1-5 9799. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ( ≈ “ On) = V | ||
Theorem | harinf 39975 | The Hartogs number of an infinite set is at least ω. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) → ω ⊆ (har‘𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | wdom2d2 39976* | Deduction for weak dominance by a Cartesian product. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼* (𝐵 × 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | ttac 39977 | Tarski's theorem about choice: infxpidm 9973 is equivalent to ax-ac 9870. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.) |
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑐(ω ≼ 𝑐 → (𝑐 × 𝑐) ≈ 𝑐)) | ||
Theorem | pw2f1ocnv 39978* | Define a bijection between characteristic functions and subsets. EDITORIAL: extracted from pw2en 8607, which can be easily reproved in terms of this. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹:(2o ↑m 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐴 ∧ ◡𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦, 1o, ∅))))) | ||
Theorem | pw2f1o2 39979* | Define a bijection between characteristic functions and subsets. EDITORIAL: extracted from pw2en 8607, which can be easily reproved in terms of this. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:(2o ↑m 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | pw2f1o2val 39980* | Function value of the pw2f1o2 39979 bijection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (◡𝑋 “ {1o})) | ||
Theorem | pw2f1o2val2 39981* | Membership in a mapped set under the pw2f1o2 39979 bijection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ (𝑋‘𝑌) = 1o)) | ||
Theorem | soeq12d 39982 | Equality deduction for total orderings. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Or 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | freq12d 39983 | Equality deduction for founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | weeq12d 39984 | Equality deduction for well-orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 We 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | limsuc2 39985 | Limit ordinals in the sense inclusive of zero contain all successors of their members. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | wepwsolem 39986* | Transfer an ordering on characteristic functions by isomorphism to the power set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))} & ⊢ 𝑈 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → 𝐹 Isom 𝑈, 𝑇 ((2o ↑m 𝐴), 𝒫 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | wepwso 39987* | A well-ordering induces a strict ordering on the power set. EDITORIAL: when well-orderings are set like, this can be strengthened to remove 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | dnnumch1 39988* | Define an enumeration of a set from a choice function; second part, it restricts to a bijection. EDITORIAL: overlaps dfac8a 9441. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝐹 ↾ 𝑥):𝑥–1-1-onto→𝐴) | ||
Theorem | dnnumch2 39989* | Define an enumeration (weak dominance version) of a set from a choice function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | dnnumch3lem 39990* | Value of the ordinal injection function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}))‘𝑤) = ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑤})) | ||
Theorem | dnnumch3 39991* | Define an injection from a set into the ordinals using a choice function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑥})):𝐴–1-1→On) | ||
Theorem | dnwech 39992* | Define a well-ordering from a choice function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = {〈𝑣, 𝑤〉 ∣ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑣}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑤})} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 We 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | fnwe2val 39993* | Lemma for fnwe2 39997. Substitute variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑎𝑇𝑏 ↔ ((𝐹‘𝑎)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑏) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎⦋(𝐹‘𝑎) / 𝑧⦌𝑆𝑏))) | ||
Theorem | fnwe2lem1 39994* | Lemma for fnwe2 39997. Substitution in well-ordering hypothesis. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))} & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴) → ⦋(𝐹‘𝑎) / 𝑧⦌𝑆 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑎)}) | ||
Theorem | fnwe2lem2 39995* | Lemma for fnwe2 39997. An element which is in a minimal fiber and minimal within its fiber is minimal globally; thus 𝑇 is well-founded. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))} & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑇𝑏) | ||
Theorem | fnwe2lem3 39996* | Lemma for fnwe2 39997. Trichotomy. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))} & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑏 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎𝑇𝑏 ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑏 ∨ 𝑏𝑇𝑎)) | ||
Theorem | fnwe2 39997* | A well-ordering can be constructed on a partitioned set by patching together well-orderings on each partition using a well-ordering on the partitions themselves. Similar to fnwe 7809 but does not require the within-partition ordering to be globally well. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))} & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)}) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 We 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | aomclem1 39998* |
Lemma for dfac11 40006. This is the beginning of the proof that
multiple
choice is equivalent to choice. Our goal is to construct, by
transfinite recursion, a well-ordering of (𝑅1‘𝐴). In what
follows, 𝐴 is the index of the rank we wish to
well-order, 𝑧 is
the collection of well-orderings constructed so far, dom 𝑧 is
the
set of ordinal indices of constructed ranks i.e. the next rank to
construct, and 𝑦 is a postulated multiple-choice
function.
Successor case 1, define a simple ordering from the well-ordered predecessor. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 = suc ∪ dom 𝑧) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 Or (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | aomclem2 39999* | Lemma for dfac11 40006. Successor case 2, a choice function for subsets of (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))} & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 = suc ∪ dom 𝑧) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶‘𝑎) ∈ 𝑎)) | ||
Theorem | aomclem3 40000* | Lemma for dfac11 40006. Successor case 3, our required well-ordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))} & ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵)) & ⊢ 𝐷 = recs((𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (𝐶‘((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) ∖ ran 𝑎)))) & ⊢ 𝐸 = {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑎}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑏})} & ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 = suc ∪ dom 𝑧) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 We (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧)) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |