Theorem eqvreldisj 38570

Description: Equivalence classes do not overlap. In other words, two equivalence classes are either equal or disjoint. Theorem 74 of [Suppes] p. 83. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 2-Jun-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqvreldisj	⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 ∨ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅))

Proof of Theorem eqvreldisj

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		neq0 4375	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅))
2		simpl 482	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → EqvRel 𝑅)
3		elinel1 4224	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅)
4	3	adantl 481	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅)
5		ecexr 8768	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
6	4, 5	syl 17	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
7		vex 3492	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
8		elecALTV 38222	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
9	6, 7, 8	sylancl 585	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
10	4, 9	mpbid 232	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐴𝑅𝑥)
11		elinel2 4225	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅)
12	11	adantl 481	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅)
13		ecexr 8768	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
14	12, 13	syl 17	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
15		elecALTV 38222	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
16	14, 7, 15	sylancl 585	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
17	12, 16	mpbid 232	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐵𝑅𝑥)
18	2, 10, 17	eqvreltr4d 38565	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)
19	2, 18	eqvrelthi 38569	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅)
20	19	ex 412	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → (𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
21	20	exlimdv 1932	. . . 4 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
22	1, 21	biimtrid 242	. . 3 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → (¬ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
23	22	orrd 862	. 2 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
24	23	orcomd 870	1 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 ∨ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 846   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1777   ∈ wcel 2108  Vcvv 3488   ∩ cin 3975  ∅c0 4352   class class class wbr 5166  [cec 8761   EqvRel weqvrel 38152

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-ec 8765  df-refrel 38468  df-symrel 38500  df-trrel 38530  df-eqvrel 38541

This theorem is referenced by:  qsdisjALTV  38571