Theorem eqvreldisj 37076

Description: Equivalence classes do not overlap. In other words, two equivalence classes are either equal or disjoint. Theorem 74 of [Suppes] p. 83. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 2-Jun-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqvreldisj	⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 ∨ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅))

Proof of Theorem eqvreldisj

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		neq0 4305	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅))
2		simpl 483	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → EqvRel 𝑅)
3		elinel1 4155	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅)
4	3	adantl 482	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅)
5		ecexr 8653	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
6	4, 5	syl 17	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
7		vex 3449	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
8		elecALTV 36726	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
9	6, 7, 8	sylancl 586	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
10	4, 9	mpbid 231	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐴𝑅𝑥)
11		elinel2 4156	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅)
12	11	adantl 482	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅)
13		ecexr 8653	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
14	12, 13	syl 17	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
15		elecALTV 36726	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
16	14, 7, 15	sylancl 586	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
17	12, 16	mpbid 231	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐵𝑅𝑥)
18	2, 10, 17	eqvreltr4d 37071	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)
19	2, 18	eqvrelthi 37075	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅)
20	19	ex 413	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → (𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
21	20	exlimdv 1936	. . . 4 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
22	1, 21	biimtrid 241	. . 3 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → (¬ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
23	22	orrd 861	. 2 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
24	23	orcomd 869	1 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 ∨ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   ∨ wo 845   = wceq 1541  ∃wex 1781   ∈ wcel 2106  Vcvv 3445   ∩ cin 3909  ∅c0 4282   class class class wbr 5105  [cec 8646   EqvRel weqvrel 36651

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5384

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3065  df-rex 3074  df-rab 3408  df-v 3447  df-dif 3913  df-un 3915  df-in 3917  df-ss 3927  df-nul 4283  df-if 4487  df-sn 4587  df-pr 4589  df-op 4593  df-br 5106  df-opab 5168  df-id 5531  df-xp 5639  df-rel 5640  df-cnv 5641  df-co 5642  df-dm 5643  df-rn 5644  df-res 5645  df-ima 5646  df-ec 8650  df-refrel 36974  df-symrel 37006  df-trrel 37036  df-eqvrel 37047

This theorem is referenced by:  qsdisjALTV  37077