Theorem eqvreldisj 39388

Description: Equivalence classes do not overlap. In other words, two equivalence classes are either equal or disjoint. Theorem 74 of [Suppes] p. 83. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 2-Jun-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqvreldisj	⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 ∨ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅))

Proof of Theorem eqvreldisj

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		neq0 4309	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅))
2		simpl 488	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → EqvRel 𝑅)
3		elinel1 4157	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅)
4	3	adantl 487	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅)
5		ecexr 8708	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
6	4, 5	syl 18	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
7		vex 3462	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
8		elecALTV 38961	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
9	6, 7, 8	sylancl 598	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
10	4, 9	mpbid 235	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐴𝑅𝑥)
11		elinel2 4158	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅)
12	11	adantl 487	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅)
13		ecexr 8708	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
14	12, 13	syl 18	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
15		elecALTV 38961	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ V) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
16	14, 7, 15	sylancl 598	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
17	12, 16	mpbid 235	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐵𝑅𝑥)
18	2, 10, 17	eqvreltr4d 39383	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)
19	2, 18	eqvrelthi 39387	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (( EqvRel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅)
20	19	ex 418	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → (𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
21	20	exlimdv 1966	. . . 4 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
22	1, 21	biimtrid 245	. . 3 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → (¬ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
23	22	orrd 877	. 2 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
24	23	orcomd 885	1 ⊢ ( EqvRel 𝑅 → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 ∨ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2146  Vcvv 3458   ∩ cin 3907  ∅c0 4289   class class class wbr 5114  [cec 8701   EqvRel weqvrel 38890

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-pr 5409

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-ec 8705  df-refrel 39282  df-symrel 39314  df-trrel 39348  df-eqvrel 39359

This theorem is used by:  qsdisjALTV  39389