Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > f1cofveqaeqALT | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Alternate proof of f1cofveqaeq 7016, 1 essential step shorter, but having more bytes (305 versus 282). (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
f1cofveqaeqALT | ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌)) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | f1f 6575 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵) | |
2 | fvco3 6760 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋))) | |
3 | 2 | adantrr 715 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋))) |
4 | fvco3 6760 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌))) | |
5 | 4 | adantrl 714 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌))) |
6 | 3, 5 | eqeq12d 2837 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌)))) |
7 | 6 | ex 415 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌))))) |
8 | 1, 7 | syl 17 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌))))) |
9 | 8 | adantl 484 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌))))) |
10 | 9 | imp 409 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌)))) |
11 | f1co 6585 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–1-1→𝐶) | |
12 | f1veqaeq 7015 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–1-1→𝐶 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | |
13 | 11, 12 | sylan 582 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)) |
14 | 10, 13 | sylbird 262 | 1 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌)) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 398 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2114 ∘ ccom 5559 ⟶wf 6351 –1-1→wf1 6352 ‘cfv 6355 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2145 ax-11 2161 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2793 ax-sep 5203 ax-nul 5210 ax-pow 5266 ax-pr 5330 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-or 844 df-3an 1085 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2070 df-mo 2622 df-eu 2654 df-clab 2800 df-cleq 2814 df-clel 2893 df-nfc 2963 df-ne 3017 df-ral 3143 df-rex 3144 df-rab 3147 df-v 3496 df-sbc 3773 df-dif 3939 df-un 3941 df-in 3943 df-ss 3952 df-nul 4292 df-if 4468 df-sn 4568 df-pr 4570 df-op 4574 df-uni 4839 df-br 5067 df-opab 5129 df-id 5460 df-xp 5561 df-rel 5562 df-cnv 5563 df-co 5564 df-dm 5565 df-rn 5566 df-res 5567 df-ima 5568 df-iota 6314 df-fun 6357 df-fn 6358 df-f 6359 df-f1 6360 df-fv 6363 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |