Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > f1cofveqaeqALT | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Alternate proof of f1cofveqaeq 7112, 1 essential step shorter, but having more bytes (305 versus 282). (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
f1cofveqaeqALT | ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌)) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | f1f 6654 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵) | |
2 | fvco3 6849 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋))) | |
3 | 2 | adantrr 713 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋))) |
4 | fvco3 6849 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌))) | |
5 | 4 | adantrl 712 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌))) |
6 | 3, 5 | eqeq12d 2754 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌)))) |
7 | 6 | ex 412 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌))))) |
8 | 1, 7 | syl 17 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌))))) |
9 | 8 | adantl 481 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌))))) |
10 | 9 | imp 406 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌)))) |
11 | f1co 6666 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–1-1→𝐶) | |
12 | f1veqaeq 7111 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–1-1→𝐶 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | |
13 | 11, 12 | sylan 579 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑌) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)) |
14 | 10, 13 | sylbird 259 | 1 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑌)) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2108 ∘ ccom 5584 ⟶wf 6414 –1-1→wf1 6415 ‘cfv 6418 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1799 ax-4 1813 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2139 ax-11 2156 ax-12 2173 ax-ext 2709 ax-sep 5218 ax-nul 5225 ax-pr 5347 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 844 df-3an 1087 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1784 df-nf 1788 df-sb 2069 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2817 df-nfc 2888 df-ne 2943 df-ral 3068 df-rex 3069 df-rab 3072 df-v 3424 df-dif 3886 df-un 3888 df-in 3890 df-ss 3900 df-nul 4254 df-if 4457 df-sn 4559 df-pr 4561 df-op 4565 df-uni 4837 df-br 5071 df-opab 5133 df-id 5480 df-xp 5586 df-rel 5587 df-cnv 5588 df-co 5589 df-dm 5590 df-rn 5591 df-res 5592 df-ima 5593 df-iota 6376 df-fun 6420 df-fn 6421 df-f 6422 df-f1 6423 df-fv 6426 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |