Theorem isprmidl 21652

Description: The predicate "is a prime ideal". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Jan-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
prmidlval.1	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
prmidlval.2	⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isprmidl	⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑃 ∈ (PrmIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑅,𝑎,𝑏,𝑥,𝑦   𝑃,𝑎,𝑏,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑎, 𝑏)   · (𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑎, 𝑏)

Proof of Theorem isprmidl

Dummy variable 𝑖 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		prmidlval.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
2		prmidlval.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)
3	1, 2	prmidlval 21651	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (PrmIdeal‘𝑅) = {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖)))})
4	3	eleq2d 2850	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑃 ∈ (PrmIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ 𝑃 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖)))}))
5		neeq1 3021	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑃 ≠ 𝐵))
6		eleq2 2853	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → ((𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 ↔ (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃))
7	6	2ralbidv 3230	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃))
8		sseq2 3939	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ↔ 𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃))
9		sseq2 3939	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → (𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖 ↔ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃))
10	8, 9	orbi12d 932	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → ((𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖) ↔ (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃)))
11	7, 10	imbi12d 347	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖)) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃))))
12	11	2ralbidv 3230	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → (∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖)) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃))))
13	5, 12	anbi12d 644	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → ((𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖))) ↔ (𝑃 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃)))))
14	13	elrab 3648	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖)))} ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃)))))
15	4, 14	bitrdi 290	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑃 ∈ (PrmIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃))))))
16		3anass 1111	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃))) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃)))))
17	15, 16	bitr4di 292	1 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑃 ∈ (PrmIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃)))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959  ∀wral 3080  {crab 3416   ⊆ wss 3900  ‘cfv 6561  (class class class)co 7446  Basecbs 17419  ._rcmulr 17461  Ringcrg 20492  LIdealclidl 21517  PrmIdealcprmidl 21649

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5253  ax-nul 5264  ax-pr 5396

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5551  df-xp 5662  df-rel 5663  df-cnv 5664  df-co 5665  df-dm 5666  df-iota 6515  df-fun 6563  df-fv 6569  df-ov 7449  df-prmidl 21650

This theorem is used by:  prmidlnr  21653  prmidl  21654  prmidl2  21655  prmidlidl  21658  smprngprmrng  49651