MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  isprmidl Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem isprmidl 21444
Description: The predicate "is a prime ideal". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Jan-2024.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
prmidlval.1 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
prmidlval.2 · = (.r𝑅)
Assertion
Ref Expression
isprmidl (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑃 ∈ (PrmIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑃𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎𝑃𝑏𝑃)))))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑅,𝑎,𝑏,𝑥,𝑦   𝑃,𝑎,𝑏,𝑥,𝑦
Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦,𝑎,𝑏)   · (𝑥,𝑦,𝑎,𝑏)

Proof of Theorem isprmidl
Dummy variable 𝑖 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 prmidlval.1 . . . . 5 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
2 prmidlval.2 . . . . 5 · = (.r𝑅)
31, 2prmidlval 21443 . . . 4 (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (PrmIdeal‘𝑅) = {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎𝑖𝑏𝑖)))})
43eleq2d 2849 . . 3 (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑃 ∈ (PrmIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ 𝑃 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎𝑖𝑏𝑖)))}))
5 neeq1 3020 . . . . 5 (𝑖 = 𝑃 → (𝑖𝐵𝑃𝐵))
6 eleq2 2852 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑖 = 𝑃 → ((𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 ↔ (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃))
762ralbidv 3229 . . . . . . 7 (𝑖 = 𝑃 → (∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃))
8 sseq2 3964 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑖 = 𝑃 → (𝑎𝑖𝑎𝑃))
9 sseq2 3964 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑖 = 𝑃 → (𝑏𝑖𝑏𝑃))
108, 9orbi12d 931 . . . . . . 7 (𝑖 = 𝑃 → ((𝑎𝑖𝑏𝑖) ↔ (𝑎𝑃𝑏𝑃)))
117, 10imbi12d 347 . . . . . 6 (𝑖 = 𝑃 → ((∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎𝑖𝑏𝑖)) ↔ (∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎𝑃𝑏𝑃))))
12112ralbidv 3229 . . . . 5 (𝑖 = 𝑃 → (∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎𝑖𝑏𝑖)) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎𝑃𝑏𝑃))))
135, 12anbi12d 643 . . . 4 (𝑖 = 𝑃 → ((𝑖𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎𝑖𝑏𝑖))) ↔ (𝑃𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎𝑃𝑏𝑃)))))
1413elrab 3651 . . 3 (𝑃 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎𝑖𝑏𝑖)))} ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑃𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎𝑃𝑏𝑃)))))
154, 14bitrdi 290 . 2 (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑃 ∈ (PrmIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑃𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎𝑃𝑏𝑃))))))
16 3anass 1111 . 2 ((𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑃𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎𝑃𝑏𝑃))) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑃𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎𝑃𝑏𝑃)))))
1715, 16bitr4di 292 1 (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑃 ∈ (PrmIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑃𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎𝑃𝑏𝑃)))))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 209  wa 400  wo 860  w3a 1103   = wceq 1570  wcel 2143  wne 2958  wral 3079  {crab 3416  wss 3906  cfv 6538  (class class class)co 7412  Basecbs 17270  .rcmulr 17312  Ringcrg 20316  LIdealclidl 21311  PrmIdealcprmidl 21441
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5270  ax-pr 5406
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-uni 4874  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-mpt 5194  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fv 6546  df-ov 7415  df-prmidl 21442
This theorem is referenced by:  prmidlnr  21445  prmidl  21446  prmidl2  21447  prmidlidl  21450  smprngprmrng  49087
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator