Theorem isprmidl 21500

Description: The predicate "is a prime ideal". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Jan-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
prmidlval.1	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
prmidlval.2	⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isprmidl	⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑃 ∈ (PrmIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑅,𝑎,𝑏,𝑥,𝑦   𝑃,𝑎,𝑏,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑎, 𝑏)   · (𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑎, 𝑏)

Proof of Theorem isprmidl

Dummy variable 𝑖 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		prmidlval.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
2		prmidlval.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)
3	1, 2	prmidlval 21499	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (PrmIdeal‘𝑅) = {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖)))})
4	3	eleq2d 2852	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑃 ∈ (PrmIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ 𝑃 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖)))}))
5		neeq1 3023	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑃 ≠ 𝐵))
6		eleq2 2855	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → ((𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 ↔ (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃))
7	6	2ralbidv 3232	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃))
8		sseq2 3966	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ↔ 𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃))
9		sseq2 3966	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → (𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖 ↔ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃))
10	8, 9	orbi12d 932	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → ((𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖) ↔ (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃)))
11	7, 10	imbi12d 347	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖)) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃))))
12	11	2ralbidv 3232	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → (∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖)) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃))))
13	5, 12	anbi12d 644	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑃 → ((𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖))) ↔ (𝑃 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃)))))
14	13	elrab 3653	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑖 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑖 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑖)))} ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃)))))
15	4, 14	bitrdi 290	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑃 ∈ (PrmIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃))))))
16		3anass 1111	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃))) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃)))))
17	15, 16	bitr4di 292	1 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑃 ∈ (PrmIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)∀𝑏 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑃 ∨ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑃)))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146   ≠ wne 2961  ∀wral 3082  {crab 3419   ⊆ wss 3908  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7423  Basecbs 17294  ._rcmulr 17336  Ringcrg 20346  LIdealclidl 21367  PrmIdealcprmidl 21497

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pr 5409

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7426  df-prmidl 21498

This theorem is used by:  prmidlnr  21501  prmidl  21502  prmidl2  21503  prmidlidl  21506  smprngprmrng  49145