Theorem isushgr 29672

Description: The predicate "is an undirected simple hypergraph." (Contributed by AV, 19-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Oct-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isuhgr.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
isuhgr.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isushgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑈 → (𝐺 ∈ USHGraph ↔ 𝐸:dom 𝐸⟶1-1(𝒫 𝑉 ∖ {∅})))

Proof of Theorem isushgr

Dummy variables 𝑔 ℎ 𝑣 𝑒 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ushgr 29670	. . 3 ⊢ USHGraph = {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒⟶1-1(𝒫 𝑣 ∖ {∅})}
2	1	eleq2i 2856	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USHGraph ↔ 𝐺 ∈ {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒⟶1-1(𝒫 𝑣 ∖ {∅})})
3		fveq2 6911	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → (iEdg‘ℎ) = (iEdg‘𝐺))
4		isuhgr.e	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	eqtr4di 2816	. . . 4 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → (iEdg‘ℎ) = 𝐸)
6	3	dmeqd 5895	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → dom (iEdg‘ℎ) = dom (iEdg‘𝐺))
7	4	eqcomi 2772	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = 𝐸
8	7	dmeqi 5894	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = dom 𝐸
9	6, 8	eqtrdi 2814	. . . 4 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → dom (iEdg‘ℎ) = dom 𝐸)
10		fveq2 6911	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → (Vtx‘ℎ) = (Vtx‘𝐺))
11		isuhgr.v	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
12	10, 11	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → (Vtx‘ℎ) = 𝑉)
13	12	pweqd 4577	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → 𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) = 𝒫 𝑉)
14	13	difeq1d 4065	. . . 4 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → (𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∖ {∅}) = (𝒫 𝑉 ∖ {∅}))
15	5, 9, 14	f1eq123d 6841	. . 3 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → ((iEdg‘ℎ):dom (iEdg‘ℎ)⟶1-1(𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∖ {∅}) ↔ 𝐸:dom 𝐸⟶1-1(𝒫 𝑉 ∖ {∅})))
16		fvexd 6926	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = ℎ → (Vtx‘𝑔) ∈ V)
17		fveq2 6911	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = ℎ → (Vtx‘𝑔) = (Vtx‘ℎ))
18		fvexd 6926	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) → (iEdg‘𝑔) ∈ V)
19		fveq2 6911	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑔 = ℎ → (iEdg‘𝑔) = (iEdg‘ℎ))
20	19	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) → (iEdg‘𝑔) = (iEdg‘ℎ))
21		simpr 490	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) ∧ 𝑒 = (iEdg‘ℎ)) → 𝑒 = (iEdg‘ℎ))
22	21	dmeqd 5895	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) ∧ 𝑒 = (iEdg‘ℎ)) → dom 𝑒 = dom (iEdg‘ℎ))
23		simpr 490	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) → 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ))
24	23	pweqd 4577	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) → 𝒫 𝑣 = 𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ))
25	24	difeq1d 4065	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) → (𝒫 𝑣 ∖ {∅}) = (𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∖ {∅}))
26	25	adantr 486	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) ∧ 𝑒 = (iEdg‘ℎ)) → (𝒫 𝑣 ∖ {∅}) = (𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∖ {∅}))
27	21, 22, 26	f1eq123d 6841	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) ∧ 𝑒 = (iEdg‘ℎ)) → (𝑒:dom 𝑒⟶1-1(𝒫 𝑣 ∖ {∅}) ↔ (iEdg‘ℎ):dom (iEdg‘ℎ)⟶1-1(𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∖ {∅})))
28	18, 20, 27	sbcied2 3786	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) → ([(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒⟶1-1(𝒫 𝑣 ∖ {∅}) ↔ (iEdg‘ℎ):dom (iEdg‘ℎ)⟶1-1(𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∖ {∅})))
29	16, 17, 28	sbcied2 3786	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑔 = ℎ → ([(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒⟶1-1(𝒫 𝑣 ∖ {∅}) ↔ (iEdg‘ℎ):dom (iEdg‘ℎ)⟶1-1(𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∖ {∅})))
30	29	cbvabv 2834	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒⟶1-1(𝒫 𝑣 ∖ {∅})} = {ℎ ∣ (iEdg‘ℎ):dom (iEdg‘ℎ)⟶1-1(𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∖ {∅})}
31	15, 30	elab2g 3637	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑈 → (𝐺 ∈ {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒⟶1-1(𝒫 𝑣 ∖ {∅})} ↔ 𝐸:dom 𝐸⟶1-1(𝒫 𝑉 ∖ {∅})))
32	2, 31	bitrid 286	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑈 → (𝐺 ∈ USHGraph ↔ 𝐸:dom 𝐸⟶1-1(𝒫 𝑉 ∖ {∅})))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  {cab 2741  Vcvv 3454  [wsbc 3742   ∖ cdif 4048  ∅c0 4281  𝒫 cpw 4560  {csn 4588  dom cdm 5656  ⟶1-1wf1 6558  ‘cfv 6561  Vtxcvtx 29607  iEdgciedg 29608  USHGraphcushgr 29668

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-ext 2735  ax-nul 5264

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ne 2960  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5172  df-rel 5663  df-cnv 5664  df-co 5665  df-dm 5666  df-rn 5667  df-iota 6515  df-fun 6563  df-fn 6564  df-f 6565  df-f1 6566  df-fv 6569  df-ushgr 29670

This theorem is used by:  ushgrf  29674  uspgrushgr  29791