Theorem oppnid 27011

Description: The "opposite to a line" relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
hpg.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
hpg.d	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
hpg.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
hpg.o	⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}
opphl.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
opphl.d	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)
opphl.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
oppnid.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oppnid	⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴𝑂𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐷,𝑎,𝑏   𝐼,𝑎,𝑏   𝑃,𝑎,𝑏   𝑡,𝐴   𝑡,𝐷   𝑡,𝐺   𝑡,𝐿   𝑡,𝐼   𝑡,𝑂   𝑡,𝑃   𝜑,𝑡   𝑡, −   𝑡,𝑎,𝑏

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑎,𝑏)   𝐴(𝑎,𝑏)   𝐺(𝑎,𝑏)   𝐿(𝑎,𝑏)   − (𝑎,𝑏)   𝑂(𝑎,𝑏)

Proof of Theorem oppnid

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		hpg.p	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		hpg.d	. . . . 5 ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
3		hpg.i	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
4		opphl.g	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
5	4	ad3antrrr 726	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝐴) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴)) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
6		oppnid.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
7	6	ad3antrrr 726	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝐴) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
8		opphl.l	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
9		opphl.d	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)
10	9	ad3antrrr 726	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝐴) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴)) → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)
11		simplr 765	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝐴) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴)) → 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷)
12	1, 8, 3, 5, 10, 11	tglnpt 26814	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝐴) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴)) → 𝑡 ∈ 𝑃)
13		simpr 484	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝐴) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴)) → 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴))
14	1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 13	axtgbtwnid 26731	. . . 4 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝐴) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴)) → 𝐴 = 𝑡)
15	14, 11	eqeltrd 2839	. . 3 ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝐴) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)
16		hpg.o	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}
17	1, 2, 3, 16, 6, 6	islnopp 27004	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑂𝐴 ↔ ((¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴))))
18	17	simplbda 499	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝐴) → ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐴))
19	15, 18	r19.29a 3217	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)
20	17	simprbda 498	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝐴) → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷))
21	20	simpld 494	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴𝑂𝐴) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)
22	19, 21	pm2.65da 813	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴𝑂𝐴)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3064   ∖ cdif 3880   class class class wbr 5070  {copab 5132  ran crn 5581  ‘cfv 6418  (class class class)co 7255  Basecbs 16840  distcds 16897  TarskiGcstrkg 26693  Itvcitv 26699  LineGclng 26700

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3or 1086  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-cnv 5588  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-iota 6376  df-fv 6426  df-ov 7258  df-oprab 7259  df-mpo 7260  df-trkgb 26714  df-trkg 26718

This theorem is referenced by:  lnoppnhpg  27029