P. 281 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 28001-28100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	isperp 28001*	Property for 2 lines A, B to be perpendicular. Item (ii) of definition 8.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ⟨“𝑢𝑥𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)))
Theorem	perpcom 28002	The "perpendicular" relation commutes. Theorem 8.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)
Theorem	perpneq 28003	Two perpendicular lines are different. Theorem 8.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	isperp2 28004*	Property for 2 lines A, B, intersecting at a point X to be perpendicular. Item (i) of definition 8.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ⟨“𝑢𝑋𝑣”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺)))
Theorem	isperp2d 28005	One direction of isperp2 28004. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑈𝑋𝑉”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	ragperp 28006	Deduce that two lines are perpendicular from a right angle statement. One direction of theorem 8.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ≠ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑈𝑋𝑉”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵)
Theorem	footexALT 28007*	Alternative version of footex 28010 which minimization requires a notably long time. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶𝐿𝑥)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)
Theorem	footexlem1 28008	Lemma for footex 28010. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐸𝐿𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐹𝐼𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝑌) = (𝐸 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑅)‘𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝑌 − 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑄) = (𝑌 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ((((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑍)‘𝑄)𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝐷) = (𝑌 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑋)‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	footexlem2 28009	Lemma for footex 28010. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐸𝐿𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐹𝐼𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝑌) = (𝐸 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑅)‘𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝑌 − 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑄) = (𝑌 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ((((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑍)‘𝑄)𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝐷) = (𝑌 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑋)‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶𝐿𝑋)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)
Theorem	footex 28010*	From a point 𝐶 outside of a line 𝐴, there exists a point 𝑥 on 𝐴 such that (𝐶𝐿𝑥) is perpendicular to 𝐴. This point is unique, see foot 28011. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶𝐿𝑥)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)
Theorem	foot 28011*	From a point 𝐶 outside of a line 𝐴, there exists a unique point 𝑥 on 𝐴 such that (𝐶𝐿𝑥) is perpendicular to 𝐴. That point is called the foot from 𝐶 on 𝐴. Theorem 8.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 60. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶𝐿𝑥)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)
Theorem	footne 28012	Uniqueness of the foot point. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	footeq 28013	Uniqueness of the foot point. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑍)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌𝐿𝑍)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
Theorem	hlperpnel 28014	A point on a half-line which is perpendicular to a line cannot be on that line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑈𝐿𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉(𝐾‘𝑈)𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	perprag 28015	Deduce a right angle from perpendicular lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	perpdragALT 28016	Deduce a right angle from perpendicular lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐵𝐿𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	perpdrag 28017	Deduce a right angle from perpendicular lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐵𝐿𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	colperp 28018	Deduce a perpendicularity from perpendicularity and colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐶)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐷)
Theorem	colperpexlem1 28019	Lemma for colperp 28018. First part of lemma 8.20 of [Schwabhauser] p. 62. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑆‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑆‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘(𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝑁‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐵𝐴𝑄”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	colperpexlem2 28020	Lemma for colperpex 28022. Second part of lemma 8.20 of [Schwabhauser] p. 62. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑆‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑆‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘(𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝑁‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑄)
Theorem	colperpexlem3 28021*	Lemma for colperpex 28022. Case 1 of theorem 8.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 63. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴𝐿𝑝)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝑝))))
Theorem	colperpex 28022*	In dimension 2 and above, on a line (𝐴𝐿𝐵) there is always a perpendicular 𝑃 from 𝐴 on a given plane (here given by 𝐶, in case 𝐶 does not lie on the line). Theorem 8.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 63. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴𝐿𝑝)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝑝))))
Theorem	mideulem2 28023	Lemma for opphllem 28024, which is itself used for mideu 28027. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑄𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑄𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑂) = (𝐵 − 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑇𝐼𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (((𝑆‘𝐴)‘𝑂)𝐼𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑍) = (𝑋 − 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = ((𝑆‘𝑀)‘𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝑀)
Theorem	opphllem 28024*	Lemma 8.24 of [Schwabhauser] p. 66. This is used later for mideulem 28025 and later for opphl 28043. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑄𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑄𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑂) = (𝐵 − 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑂 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝑅)))
Theorem	mideulem 28025*	Lemma for mideu 28027. We can assume mideulem.9 "without loss of generality". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑄𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑄𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑂)(≤G‘𝐺)(𝐵 − 𝑄))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴))
Theorem	midex 28026*	Existence of the midpoint, part Theorem 8.22 of [Schwabhauser] p. 64. Note that this proof requires a construction in 2 dimensions or more, i.e. it does not prove the existence of a midpoint in dimension 1, for a geometry restricted to a line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴))
Theorem	mideu 28027*	Existence and uniqueness of the midpoint, Theorem 8.22 of [Schwabhauser] p. 64. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴))
16.2.14  Half-planes
Theorem	islnopp 28028*	The property for two points 𝐴 and 𝐵 to lie on the opposite sides of a set 𝐷 Definition 9.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 67. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑂𝐵 ↔ ((¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))))
Theorem	islnoppd 28029*	Deduce that 𝐴 and 𝐵 lie on opposite sides of line 𝐿. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)
Theorem	oppne1 28030*	Points lying on opposite sides of a line cannot be on the line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	oppne2 28031*	Points lying on opposite sides of a line cannot be on the line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	oppne3 28032*	Points lying on opposite sides of a line cannot be equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	oppcom 28033*	Commutativity rule for "opposite" Theorem 9.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 67. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐴)
Theorem	opptgdim2 28034*	If two points opposite to a line exist, dimension must be 2 or more. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)
Theorem	oppnid 28035*	The "opposite to a line" relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴𝑂𝐴)
Theorem	opphllem1 28036*	Lemma for opphl 28043. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑆‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐶)
Theorem	opphllem2 28037*	Lemma for opphl 28043. Lemma 9.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 68. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑆‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝐵) ∨ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐶)
Theorem	opphllem3 28038*	Lemma for opphl 28043: We assume opphllem3.l "without loss of generality". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 − 𝐶)(≤G‘𝐺)(𝑅 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑅) = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴 ↔ (𝑁‘𝑈)(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶))
Theorem	opphllem4 28039*	Lemma for opphl 28043. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 − 𝐶)(≤G‘𝐺)(𝑅 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑅) = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝑂𝑉)
Theorem	opphllem5 28040*	Second part of Lemma 9.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 68. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝑂𝑉)
Theorem	opphllem6 28041*	First part of Lemma 9.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 68. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑅) = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴 ↔ (𝑁‘𝑈)(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶))
Theorem	oppperpex 28042*	Restating colperpex 28022 using the "opposite side of a line" relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴𝐿𝑝)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐷 ∧ 𝐶𝑂𝑝))
Theorem	opphl 28043*	If two points 𝐴 and 𝐶 lie on opposite sides of a line 𝐷, then any point of the half line (𝑅𝐴) also lies opposite to 𝐶. Theorem 9.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐶)
Theorem	outpasch 28044*	Axiom of Pasch, outer form. This was proven by Gupta from other axioms and is therefore presented as Theorem 9.6 in [Schwabhauser] p. 70. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑥)))
Theorem	hlpasch 28045*	An application of the axiom of Pasch for half-lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑒 ∧ 𝑒 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝐷)))
Syntax	chpg 28046	"Belong to the same open half-plane" relation for points in a geometry.
class hpG
Definition	df-hpg 28047*	Define the open half plane relation for a geometry 𝐺. Definition 9.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. See hpgbr 28049 to find the same formulation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ hpG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑑 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑔) / 𝑖]∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑝 (((𝑎 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑑 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑐)) ∧ ((𝑏 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑑 𝑡 ∈ (𝑏𝑖𝑐)))}))
Theorem	ishpg 28048*	Value of the half-plane relation for a given line 𝐷. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷) = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑎𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝑏𝑂𝑐)})
Theorem	hpgbr 28049*	Half-planes : property for points 𝐴 and 𝐵 to belong to the same open half plane delimited by line 𝐷. Definition 9.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐵𝑂𝑐)))
Theorem	hpgne1 28050*	Points on the open half plane cannot lie on its border. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	hpgne2 28051*	Points on the open half plane cannot lie on its border. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	lnopp2hpgb 28052*	Theorem 9.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵𝑂𝐶 ↔ 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵))
Theorem	lnoppnhpg 28053*	If two points lie on the opposite side of a line 𝐷, they are not on the same half-plane. Theorem 9.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)
Theorem	hpgerlem 28054*	Lemma for the proof that the half-plane relation is an equivalence relation. Lemma 9.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 𝐴𝑂𝑐)
Theorem	hpgid 28055*	The half-plane relation is reflexive. Theorem 9.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴)
Theorem	hpgcom 28056*	The half-plane relation commutes. Theorem 9.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴)
Theorem	hpgtr 28057*	The half-plane relation is transitive. Theorem 9.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶)
Theorem	colopp 28058*	Opposite sides of a line for colinear points. Theorem 9.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 73. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑂𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)))
Theorem	colhp 28059*	Half-plane relation for colinear points. Theorem 9.19 of [Schwabhauser] p. 73. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)))
Theorem	hphl 28060*	If two points are on the same half-line with endpoint on a line, they are on the same half-plane defined by this line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵(𝐾‘𝐴)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶)
16.2.15  Midpoints and Line Mirroring
Syntax	cmid 28061	Declare the constant for the midpoint operation.
class midG
Syntax	clmi 28062	Declare the constant for the line mirroring function.
class lInvG
Definition	df-mid 28063*	Define the midpoint operation. Definition 10.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 88. See ismidb 28067, midbtwn 28068, and midcgr 28069. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ midG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (℩𝑚 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)𝑏 = (((pInvG‘𝑔)‘𝑚)‘𝑎))))
Definition	df-lmi 28064*	Define the line mirroring function. Definition 10.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. See islmib 28076. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ lInvG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑚 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (℩𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)((𝑎(midG‘𝑔)𝑏) ∈ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑚(⟂G‘𝑔)(𝑎(LineG‘𝑔)𝑏) ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑏))))))
Theorem	midf 28065	Midpoint as a function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (midG‘𝐺):(𝑃 × 𝑃)⟶𝑃)
Theorem	midcl 28066	Closure of the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	ismidb 28067	Property of the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑀)‘𝐴) ↔ (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) = 𝑀))
Theorem	midbtwn 28068	Betweenness of midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))
Theorem	midcgr 28069	Congruence of midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐶 − 𝐵))
Theorem	midid 28070	Midpoint of a null segment. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	midcom 28071	Commutativity rule for the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) = (𝐵(midG‘𝐺)𝐴))
Theorem	mirmid 28072	Point inversion preserves midpoints. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐴)(midG‘𝐺)(𝑆‘𝐵)) = (𝑆‘(𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵)))
Theorem	lmieu 28073*	Uniqueness of the line mirror point. Theorem 10.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 88. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝑏) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑏) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝑏)))
Theorem	lmif 28074	Line mirror as a function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝑃⟶𝑃)
Theorem	lmicl 28075	Closure of the line mirror. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	islmib 28076	Property of the line mirror. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = (𝑀‘𝐴) ↔ ((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	lmicom 28077	The line mirroring function is an involution. Theorem 10.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmilmi 28078	Line mirroring is an involution. Theorem 10.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘(𝑀‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmireu 28079*	Any point has a unique antecedent through line mirroring. Theorem 10.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑀‘𝑏) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmieq 28080	Equality deduction for line mirroring. Theorem 10.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) = (𝑀‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	lmiinv 28081	The invariants of the line mirroring lie on the mirror line. Theorem 10.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷))
Theorem	lmicinv 28082	The mirroring line is an invariant. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmimid 28083	If we have a right angle, then the mirror point is the point inversion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐶) = (𝑆‘𝐶))
Theorem	lmif1o 28084	The line mirroring function 𝑀 is a bijection. Theorem 10.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
Theorem	lmiisolem 28085	Lemma for lmiiso 28086. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)(𝑀‘𝐴))(midG‘𝐺)(𝐵(midG‘𝐺)(𝑀‘𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀‘𝐴) − (𝑀‘𝐵)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))
Theorem	lmiiso 28086	The line mirroring function is an isometry, i.e. it is conserves congruence. Because it is also a bijection, it is also a motion. Theorem 10.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀‘𝐴) − (𝑀‘𝐵)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))
Theorem	lmimot 28087	Line mirroring is a motion of the geometric space. Theorem 10.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 90. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
Theorem	hypcgrlem1 28088	Lemma for hypcgr 28090, case where triangles share a cathetus. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐷)(LineG‘𝐺)𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹))
Theorem	hypcgrlem2 28089	Lemma for hypcgr 28090, case where triangles share one vertex 𝐵. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘((𝐶(midG‘𝐺)𝐹)(LineG‘𝐺)𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹))
Theorem	hypcgr 28090	If the catheti of two right-angled triangles are congruent, so is their hypothenuse. Theorem 10.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 91. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹))
Theorem	lmiopp 28091*	Line mirroring produces points on the opposite side of the mirroring line. Theorem 10.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂(𝑀‘𝐴))
Theorem	lnperpex 28092*	Existence of a perpendicular to a line 𝐿 at a given point 𝐴. Theorem 10.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑝𝐿𝐴) ∧ 𝑝((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝑄))
Theorem	trgcopy 28093*	Triangle construction: a copy of a given triangle can always be constructed in such a way that one side is lying on a half-line, and the third vertex is on a given half-plane: existence part. First part of Theorem 10.16 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑓”⟩ ∧ 𝑓((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹))
Theorem	trgcopyeulem 28094*	Lemma for trgcopyeu 28095. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ (𝐷𝐿𝐸)) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ (𝐷𝐿𝐸))) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸)𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑋”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑌”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
Theorem	trgcopyeu 28095*	Triangle construction: a copy of a given triangle can always be constructed in such a way that one side is lying on a half-line, and the third vertex is on a given half-plane: uniqueness part. Second part of Theorem 10.16 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑓”⟩ ∧ 𝑓((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹))
16.2.16  Congruence of angles
Syntax	ccgra 28096	Declare the constant for the congruence between angles relation.
class cgrA
Definition	df-cgra 28097*	Define the congruence relation between angles. As for triangles we use "words of points". See iscgra 28098 for a more human readable version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2020.)
⊢ cgrA = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(hlG‘𝑔) / 𝑘]((𝑎 ∈ (𝑝 ↑m (0..^3)) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑝 ↑m (0..^3))) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑎(cgrG‘𝑔)⟨“𝑥(𝑏‘1)𝑦”⟩ ∧ 𝑥(𝑘‘(𝑏‘1))(𝑏‘0) ∧ 𝑦(𝑘‘(𝑏‘1))(𝑏‘2)))})
Theorem	iscgra 28098*	Property for two angles ABC and DEF to be congruent. This is a modified version of the definition 11.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. where the number of constructed points has been reduced to two. We chose this version rather than the textbook version because it is shorter and therefore simpler to work with. Theorem dfcgra2 28119 shows that those definitions are indeed equivalent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑥𝐸𝑦”⟩ ∧ 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐷 ∧ 𝑦(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)))
Theorem	iscgra1 28099*	A special version of iscgra 28098 where one distance is known to be equal. In this case, angle congruence can be written with only one quantifier. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑥”⟩ ∧ 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)))
Theorem	iscgrad 28100	Sufficient conditions for angle congruence, deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝐸𝑌”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)