P. 281 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 28001-28100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	fltoprmgt3 28001*	Fermat's last theorem holds for any exponent greater than 2 if it holds for all odd prime exponents greater than 3. (TODO-AV: after a proof is available for 𝑁 = 3, see flt3, the hypothesis fltoprmgt3.3 can be removed.) (Contributed by AV, 15-Sep-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑏 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑐 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑝 ∈ ℙ (3 < 𝑝 → ((𝑎↑𝑝) + (𝑏↑𝑝)) ≠ (𝑐↑𝑝)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑎↑3) + (𝑏↑3)) ≠ (𝑐↑3))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) ≠ (𝐶↑𝑁))
PART 15  SURREAL NUMBERS
15.1  Sign sequence representation and Alling's axioms The surreal numbers can be represented in several equivalent ways. In [Alling], Norman Alling made this notion explicit by giving a set of axioms that all representations admit, then proving that there is an order and birthday preserving bijection between any systems that satisfy these axioms. In this section, we start with the definition of surreal numbers given in [Gonshor] and derive Alling's axioms. After deriving them we no longer refer to the explicit definition of surreals. In particular, we never take advantage of the fact that the empty set is a surreal number under our definition.
15.1.1  Definitions and initial properties
Syntax	csur 28002	Declare the class of all surreal numbers (see df-no 28005).
class No
Syntax	clts 28003	Declare the less-than relation over surreal numbers (see df-lts 28006).
class <s
Syntax	cbday 28004	Declare the birthday function for surreal numbers (see df-bday 28007).
class bday
Definition	df-no 28005*	Define the class of surreal numbers. The surreal numbers are a proper class of numbers developed by John H. Conway and introduced by Donald Knuth in 1975. They form a proper class into which all ordered fields can be embedded. The approach we take to defining them was first introduced by Hary Gonshor, and is based on the conception of a "sign expansion" of a surreal number. We define the surreals as ordinal-indexed sequences of 1o and 2o, analogous to Gonshor's ( − ) and ( + ). After introducing this definition, we will abstract away from it using axioms that Norman Alling developed in "Foundations of Analysis over Surreal Number Fields." This is done in an effort to be agnostic towards the exact implementation of surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ No = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑎 ∈ On 𝑓:𝑎⟶{1o, 2o}}
Definition	df-lts 28006*	Next, we introduce surreal less-than, a comparison relation over the surreals by lexicographically ordering them. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ <s = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ No ∧ 𝑔 ∈ No) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑔‘𝑦) ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥){⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} (𝑔‘𝑥)))}
Definition	df-bday 28007	Finally, we introduce the birthday function. This function maps each surreal to an ordinal. In our implementation, this is the domain of the sign function. The important properties of this function are established later. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.)
⊢ bday = (𝑥 ∈ No ↦ dom 𝑥)
Theorem	elno 28008*	Membership in the surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by SF, 14-Apr-2012.) Avoid ax-rep 5231. (Revised by SN, 5-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴:𝑥⟶{1o, 2o})
Theorem	ltsval 28009*	The value of the surreal less-than relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐴‘𝑦) = (𝐵‘𝑦) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑥){⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} (𝐵‘𝑥))))
Theorem	bdayval 28010	The value of the birthday function within the surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (bday‘𝐴) = dom 𝐴)
Theorem	nofun 28011	A surreal is a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Fun 𝐴)
Theorem	nodmon 28012	The domain of a surreal is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → dom 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	norn 28013	The range of a surreal is a subset of the surreal signs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ran 𝐴 ⊆ {1o, 2o})
Theorem	nofnbday 28014	A surreal is a function over its birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → 𝐴 Fn (bday‘𝐴))
Theorem	nodmord 28015	The domain of a surreal has the ordinal property. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Ord dom 𝐴)
Theorem	elno2 28016	An alternative condition for membership in No. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Mar-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ (Fun 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ran 𝐴 ⊆ {1o, 2o}))
Theorem	elno3 28017	Another condition for membership in No. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No ↔ (𝐴:dom 𝐴⟶{1o, 2o} ∧ dom 𝐴 ∈ On))
Theorem	ltsval2 28018*	Alternate expression for surreal less-than. Two surreals obey surreal less-than iff they obey the sign ordering at the first place they differ. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}){⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} (𝐵‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)})))
Theorem	nofv 28019	The function value of a surreal is either a sign or the empty set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ((𝐴‘𝑋) = ∅ ∨ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o ∨ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 2o))
Theorem	nosgnn0 28020	∅ is not a surreal sign. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ {1o, 2o}
Theorem	nosgnn0i 28021	If 𝑋 is a surreal sign, then it is not null. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Aug-2011.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ ∅ ≠ 𝑋
Theorem	noreson 28022	The restriction of a surreal to an ordinal is still a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ No)
Theorem	ltsintdifex 28023*	If 𝐴 <s 𝐵, then the intersection of all the ordinals that have differing signs in 𝐴 and 𝐵 exists. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} ∈ V))
Theorem	ltsres 28024	If the restrictions of two surreals to a given ordinal obey surreal less-than, then so do the two surreals themselves. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) <s (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) → 𝐴 <s 𝐵))
Theorem	noxp1o 28025	The Cartesian product of an ordinal and {1o} is a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 × {1o}) ∈ No)
Theorem	noseponlem 28026*	Lemma for nosepon 28027. Consider a case of proper subset domain. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ dom 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵) → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝐴‘𝑥) = (𝐵‘𝑥))
Theorem	nosepon 28027*	Given two unequal surreals, the minimal ordinal at which they differ is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ∈ On)
Theorem	noextend 28028	Extending a surreal by one sign value results in a new surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 𝑋⟩}) ∈ No)
Theorem	noextendseq 28029	Extend a surreal by a sequence of ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 30-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∪ ((𝐵 ∖ dom 𝐴) × {𝑋})) ∈ No)
Theorem	noextenddif 28030*	Calculate the place where a surreal and its extension differ. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ {1o, 2o}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ ((𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 𝑋⟩})‘𝑥)} = dom 𝐴)
Theorem	noextendlt 28031	Extending a surreal with a negative sign results in a smaller surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 1o⟩}) <s 𝐴)
Theorem	noextendgt 28032	Extending a surreal with a positive sign results in a bigger surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → 𝐴 <s (𝐴 ∪ {⟨dom 𝐴, 2o⟩}))
Theorem	nolesgn2o 28033	Given 𝐴 less-than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 2o, then 𝐵(𝑋) = 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 2o) ∧ ¬ 𝐵 <s 𝐴) → (𝐵‘𝑋) = 2o)
Theorem	nolesgn2ores 28034	Given 𝐴 less-than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 2o, then (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 2o) ∧ ¬ 𝐵 <s 𝐴) → (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋))
Theorem	nogesgn1o 28035	Given 𝐴 greater than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 1o, then 𝐵(𝑋) = 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → (𝐵‘𝑋) = 1o)
Theorem	nogesgn1ores 28036	Given 𝐴 greater than or equal to 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐴(𝑋) = 1o, then (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↾ suc 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ suc 𝑋))
15.1.2  Ordering
Theorem	ltssolem1 28037	Lemma for ltsso 28038. The "sign expansion" binary relation totally orders the surreal signs. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.)
⊢ {⟨1o, ∅⟩, ⟨1o, 2o⟩, ⟨∅, 2o⟩} Or ({1o, 2o} ∪ {∅})
Theorem	ltsso 28038	Less-than totally orders the surreals. Axiom O of [Alling] p. 184. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2011.)
⊢ <s Or No
15.1.3  Birthday Function
Theorem	bdayfo 28039	The birthday function maps the surreals onto the ordinals. Axiom B of [Alling] p. 184. (Proof shortened on 14-Apr-2012 by SF). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2011.)
⊢ bday:No–onto→On
15.1.4  Density
Theorem	fvnobday 28040	The value of a surreal at its birthday is ∅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by SF, 14-Apr-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴‘(bday‘𝐴)) = ∅)
Theorem	nosepnelem 28041*	Lemma for nosepne 28042. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) ≠ (𝐵‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}))
Theorem	nosepne 28042*	The value of two non-equal surreals at the first place they differ is different. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) ≠ (𝐵‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}))
Theorem	nosep1o 28043*	If the value of a surreal at a separator is 1o then the surreal is lesser. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) = 1o) → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
Theorem	nosep2o 28044*	If the value of a surreal at a separator is 2o then the surreal is greater. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐵‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐴‘𝑥)}) = 2o) → 𝐵 <s 𝐴)
Theorem	nosepdmlem 28045*	Lemma for nosepdm 28046. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∪ dom 𝐵))
Theorem	nosepdm 28046*	The first place two surreals differ is an element of the larger of their domains. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∪ dom 𝐵))
Theorem	nosepeq 28047*	The values of two surreals at a point less than their separators are equal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)}) → (𝐴‘𝑋) = (𝐵‘𝑋))
Theorem	nosepssdm 28048*	Given two non-equal surreals, their separator is less-than or equal to the domain of one of them. Part of Lemma 2.1.1 of [Lipparini] p. 3. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑥)} ⊆ dom 𝐴)
Theorem	nodenselem4 28049*	Lemma for nodense 28054. Show that a particular abstraction is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) → ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} ∈ On)
Theorem	nodenselem5 28050*	Lemma for nodense 28054. If the birthdays of two distinct surreals are equal, then the ordinal from nodenselem4 28049 is an element of that birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) ∧ ((bday‘𝐴) = (bday‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} ∈ (bday‘𝐴))
Theorem	nodenselem6 28051*	The restriction of a surreal to the abstraction from nodenselem4 28049 is still a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) ∧ ((bday‘𝐴) = (bday‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → (𝐴 ↾ ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}) ∈ No)
Theorem	nodenselem7 28052*	Lemma for nodense 28054. 𝐴 and 𝐵 are equal at all elements of the abstraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) ∧ ((bday‘𝐴) = (bday‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → (𝐶 ∈ ∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)} → (𝐴‘𝐶) = (𝐵‘𝐶)))
Theorem	nodenselem8 28053*	Lemma for nodense 28054. Give a condition for surreal less-than when two surreals have the same birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ (bday‘𝐴) = (bday‘𝐵)) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}) = 1o ∧ (𝐵‘∩ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ (𝐴‘𝑎) ≠ (𝐵‘𝑎)}) = 2o)))
Theorem	nodense 28054*	Given two distinct surreals with the same birthday, there is an older surreal lying between the two of them. Axiom SD of [Alling] p. 184. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) ∧ ((bday‘𝐴) = (bday‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ No ((bday‘𝑥) ∈ (bday‘𝐴) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 <s 𝐵))
15.1.5  Full-Eta Property The theorems in this section are derived from "A clean way to separate sets of surreals" by Paolo Lipparini, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.03500.
Theorem	bdayimaon 28055	Lemma for full-eta properties. The successor of the union of the image of the birthday function under a set is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → suc ∪ (bday “ 𝐴) ∈ On)
Theorem	nolt02olem 28056	Lemma for nolt02o 28057. If 𝐴(𝑋) is undefined with 𝐴 surreal and 𝑋 ordinal, then dom 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = ∅) → dom 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋)
Theorem	nolt02o 28057	Given 𝐴 less-than 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and undefined at 𝑋, then 𝐵(𝑋) = 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴‘𝑋) = ∅) → (𝐵‘𝑋) = 2o)
Theorem	nogt01o 28058	Given 𝐴 greater than 𝐵, equal to 𝐵 up to 𝑋, and 𝐵(𝑋) undefined, then 𝐴(𝑋) = 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝑋 ∈ On) ∧ ((𝐴 ↾ 𝑋) = (𝐵 ↾ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵) ∧ (𝐵‘𝑋) = ∅) → (𝐴‘𝑋) = 1o)
Theorem	noresle 28059*	Restriction law for surreals. Lemma 2.1.4 of [Lipparini] p. 3. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑈 ∈ No ∧ 𝑆 ∈ No) ∧ (dom 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝑆 ↾ suc 𝑔) <s (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝑔))) → ¬ 𝑆 <s 𝑈)
Theorem	nomaxmo 28060*	A class of surreals has at most one maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦)
Theorem	nominmo 28061*	A class of surreals has at most one minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥)
Theorem	nosupprefixmo 28062*	In any class of surreals, there is at most one value of the prefix property. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝐺) = 𝑥))
Theorem	noinfprefixmo 28063*	In any class of surreals, there is at most one value of the prefix property. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ No → ∃*𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝐺) = 𝑥))
Theorem	nosupcbv 28064*	Lemma to change bound variables in a surreal supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏, ((℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑎 <s 𝑏), 2o⟩}), (𝑐 ∈ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑑 ∈ dom 𝑒 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑒 → (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑑) = (𝑓 ↾ suc 𝑑)))} ↦ (℩𝑎∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑐 ∈ dom 𝑒 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑓 <s 𝑒 → (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑐) = (𝑓 ↾ suc 𝑐)) ∧ (𝑒‘𝑐) = 𝑎))))
Theorem	nosupno 28065*	The next several theorems deal with a surreal "supremum". This surreal will ultimately be shown to bound 𝐴 below and bound the restriction of any surreal above. We begin by showing that the given expression actually defines a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ No)
Theorem	nosupdm 28066*	The domain of the surreal supremum when there is no maximum. The primary point of this theorem is to change bound variable. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 → dom 𝑆 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑞 <s 𝑝 → (𝑝 ↾ suc 𝑧) = (𝑞 ↾ suc 𝑧)))})
Theorem	nosupbday 28067*	Birthday bounding law for surreal supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ On ∧ (bday “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝑂)) → (bday‘𝑆) ⊆ 𝑂)
Theorem	nosupfv 28068*	The value of surreal supremum when there is no maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑈 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑆‘𝐺) = (𝑈‘𝐺))
Theorem	nosupres 28069*	A restriction law for surreal supremum when there is no maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑈 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑆 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺))
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem1 28070*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 28076. Establish a soft upper bound. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑆 <s (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆))
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem2 28071*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 28076. When there is no maximum, if any member of 𝐴 is a prolongment of 𝑆, then so are all elements of 𝐴 above it. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆) ∧ (𝑊 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑊 <s 𝑈))) → (𝑊 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem3 28072*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 28076. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑆 and in 𝐴, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) is not 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) ≠ 2o)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem4 28073*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 28076. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑆 and in 𝐴, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) is not undefined. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem5 28074*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 28076. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑆 and in 𝐴, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) is not 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑆) ≠ 1o)
Theorem	nosupbnd1lem6 28075*	Lemma for nosupbnd1 28076. Establish a hard upper bound when there is no maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) <s 𝑆)
Theorem	nosupbnd1 28076*	Bounding law from below for the surreal supremum. Proposition 4.2 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑆) <s 𝑆)
Theorem	nosupbnd2lem1 28077*	Bounding law from above when a set of surreals has a maximum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (((𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑦) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s 𝑍) → ¬ (𝑍 ↾ suc dom 𝑈) <s (𝑈 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑈, 2o⟩}))
Theorem	nosupbnd2 28078*	Bounding law from above for the surreal supremum. Proposition 4.3 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No) → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s 𝑍 ↔ ¬ (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑆) <s 𝑆))
Theorem	noinfcbv 28079*	Change bound variables for surreal infimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎, ((℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑏 <s 𝑎), 1o⟩}), (𝑐 ∈ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑏 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑑 <s 𝑒 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑏) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑏)))} ↦ (℩𝑎∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑐 ∈ dom 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑑 <s 𝑒 → (𝑑 ↾ suc 𝑐) = (𝑒 ↾ suc 𝑐)) ∧ (𝑑‘𝑐) = 𝑎))))
Theorem	noinfno 28080*	The next several theorems deal with a surreal "infimum". This surreal will ultimately be shown to bound 𝐵 above and bound the restriction of any surreal below. We begin by showing that the given expression actually defines a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑇 ∈ No)
Theorem	noinfdm 28081*	Next, we calculate the domain of 𝑇. This is mostly to change bound variables. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 → dom 𝑇 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑝 <s 𝑞 → (𝑝 ↾ suc 𝑧) = (𝑞 ↾ suc 𝑧)))})
Theorem	noinfbday 28082*	Birthday bounding law for surreal infimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑂 ∈ On ∧ (bday “ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑂)) → (bday‘𝑇) ⊆ 𝑂)
Theorem	noinffv 28083*	The value of surreal infimum when there is no minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑣 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑇‘𝐺) = (𝑈‘𝐺))
Theorem	noinfres 28084*	The restriction of surreal infimum when there is no minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑣 → (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝐺)))) → (𝑇 ↾ suc 𝐺) = (𝑈 ↾ suc 𝐺))
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem1 28085*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 28091. Establish a soft lower bound. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) <s 𝑇)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem2 28086*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 28091. When there is no minimum, if any member of 𝐵 is a prolongment of 𝑇, then so are all elements below it. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇) ∧ (𝑊 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑈 <s 𝑊))) → (𝑊 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem3 28087*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 28091. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑇 and in 𝐵, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) is not 1o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) ≠ 1o)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem4 28088*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 28091. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑇 and in 𝐵, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) is not undefined. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem5 28089*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 28091. If 𝑈 is a prolongment of 𝑇 and in 𝐵, then (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) is not 2o. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)) → (𝑈‘dom 𝑇) ≠ 2o)
Theorem	noinfbnd1lem6 28090*	Lemma for noinfbnd1 28091. Establish a hard lower bound when there is no minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑇 <s (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇))
Theorem	noinfbnd1 28091*	Bounding law from above for the surreal infimum. Analagous to proposition 4.2 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑇 <s (𝑈 ↾ dom 𝑇))
Theorem	noinfbnd2lem1 28092*	Bounding law from below when a set of surreals has a minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑈 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑈) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No) ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑍 <s 𝑏) → ¬ (𝑈 ∪ {⟨dom 𝑈, 1o⟩}) <s (𝑍 ↾ suc dom 𝑈))
Theorem	noinfbnd2 28093*	Bounding law from below for the surreal infimum. Analagous to proposition 4.3 of [Lipparini] p. 6. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No) → (∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑍 <s 𝑏 ↔ ¬ 𝑇 <s (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑇)))
Theorem	nosupinfsep 28094*	Given two sets of surreals, a surreal 𝑊 separates them iff its restriction to the maximum of dom 𝑆 and dom 𝑇 separates them. Corollary 4.4 of [Lipparini] p. 7. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ No) → ((∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s 𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑊 <s 𝑏) ↔ (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎 <s (𝑊 ↾ (dom 𝑆 ∪ dom 𝑇)) ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑊 ↾ (dom 𝑆 ∪ dom 𝑇)) <s 𝑏)))
Theorem	noetasuplem1 28095*	Lemma for noeta 28105. Establish that our final surreal really is a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ (bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → 𝑍 ∈ No)
Theorem	noetasuplem2 28096*	Lemma for noeta 28105. The restriction of 𝑍 to dom 𝑆 is 𝑆. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ (bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)
Theorem	noetasuplem3 28097*	Lemma for noeta 28105. 𝑍 is an upper bound for 𝐴. Part of Theorem 5.1 of [Lipparini] p. 7-8. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ (bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑋 <s 𝑍)
Theorem	noetasuplem4 28098*	Lemma for noeta 28105. When 𝐴 and 𝐵 are separated, then 𝑍 is a lower bound for 𝐵. Part of Theorem 5.1 of [Lipparini] p. 7-8. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ (bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑎 <s 𝑏) → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑍 <s 𝑏)
Theorem	noetainflem1 28099*	Lemma for noeta 28105. Establish that this particular construction gives a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑇 ∪ ((suc ∪ (bday “ 𝐴) ∖ dom 𝑇) × {2o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → 𝑊 ∈ No)
Theorem	noetainflem2 28100*	Lemma for noeta 28105. The restriction of 𝑊 to the domain of 𝑇 is 𝑇. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑇 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦 <s 𝑥), 1o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 (¬ 𝑢 <s 𝑣 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑇 ∪ ((suc ∪ (bday “ 𝐴) ∖ dom 𝑇) × {2o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝑊 ↾ dom 𝑇) = 𝑇)