P. 281 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 28001-28100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	subsid1 28001	Identity law for subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 -s 0s ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	subsid 28002	Subtraction of a surreal from itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 -s 𝐴) = 0s )
Theorem	subadds 28003	Relationship between addition and subtraction for surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 +s 𝐶) = 𝐴))
Theorem	subaddsd 28004	Relationship between addition and subtraction for surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 +s 𝐶) = 𝐴))
Theorem	pncans 28005	Cancellation law for surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) -s 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	pncan3s 28006	Subtraction and addition of equals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 +s (𝐵 -s 𝐴)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	pncan2s 28007	Cancellation law for surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) -s 𝐴) = 𝐵)
Theorem	npcans 28008	Cancellation law for surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) +s 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	sltsub1 28009	Subtraction from both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 -s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 -s 𝐶)))
Theorem	sltsub2 28010	Subtraction from both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 -s 𝐵) <s (𝐶 -s 𝐴)))
Theorem	sltsub1d 28011	Subtraction from both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 -s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 -s 𝐶)))
Theorem	sltsub2d 28012	Subtraction from both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 -s 𝐵) <s (𝐶 -s 𝐴)))
Theorem	negsubsdi2d 28013	Distribution of negative over subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘(𝐴 -s 𝐵)) = (𝐵 -s 𝐴))
Theorem	addsubsassd 28014	Associative-type law for surreal addition and subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) -s 𝐶) = (𝐴 +s (𝐵 -s 𝐶)))
Theorem	addsubsd 28015	Law for surreal addition and subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) -s 𝐶) = ((𝐴 -s 𝐶) +s 𝐵))
Theorem	sltsubsubbd 28016	Equivalence for the surreal less-than relationship between differences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 -s 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 -s 𝐵) <s (𝐶 -s 𝐷)))
Theorem	sltsubsub2bd 28017	Equivalence for the surreal less-than relationship between differences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) <s (𝐶 -s 𝐷) ↔ (𝐷 -s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 -s 𝐴)))
Theorem	sltsubsub3bd 28018	Equivalence for the surreal less-than relationship between differences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 -s 𝐷) ↔ (𝐷 -s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 -s 𝐴)))
Theorem	slesubsubbd 28019	Equivalence for the surreal less-than or equal relationship between differences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 -s 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 -s 𝐵) ≤s (𝐶 -s 𝐷)))
Theorem	slesubsub2bd 28020	Equivalence for the surreal less-than or equal relationship between differences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) ≤s (𝐶 -s 𝐷) ↔ (𝐷 -s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 -s 𝐴)))
Theorem	slesubsub3bd 28021	Equivalence for the surreal less-than or equal relationship between differences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 -s 𝐷) ↔ (𝐷 -s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 -s 𝐴)))
Theorem	sltsubaddd 28022	Surreal less-than relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) <s 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 <s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	sltsubadd2d 28023	Surreal less-than relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) <s 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 <s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	sltaddsubd 28024	Surreal less-than relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) <s 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 <s (𝐶 -s 𝐵)))
Theorem	sltaddsub2d 28025	Surreal less-than relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) <s 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 <s (𝐶 -s 𝐴)))
Theorem	slesubaddd 28026	Surreal less-than or equal relationship between subtraction and addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) ≤s 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 ≤s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	subsubs4d 28027	Law for double surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) -s 𝐶) = (𝐴 -s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	subsubs2d 28028	Law for double surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 -s (𝐵 -s 𝐶)) = (𝐴 +s (𝐶 -s 𝐵)))
Theorem	nncansd 28029	Cancellation law for surreal subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 -s (𝐴 -s 𝐵)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	posdifsd 28030	Comparison of two surreals whose difference is positive. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ 0s <s (𝐵 -s 𝐴)))
Theorem	sltsubposd 28031	Subtraction of a positive number decreases the sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0s <s 𝐴 ↔ (𝐵 -s 𝐴) <s 𝐵))
Theorem	subsge0d 28032	Non-negative subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0s ≤s (𝐴 -s 𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ≤s 𝐴))
Theorem	addsubs4d 28033	Rearrangement of four terms in mixed addition and subtraction. Surreal version. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) -s (𝐶 +s 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 -s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 -s 𝐷)))
Theorem	sltm1d 28034	A surreal is greater than itself minus one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 -s 1s ) <s 𝐴)
15.5.3  Multiplication
Syntax	cmuls 28035	Set up the syntax for surreal multiplication.
class ·s
Definition	df-muls 28036*	Define surreal multiplication. Definition from [Conway] p. 5. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ·s = norec2 ((𝑧 ∈ V, 𝑚 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦⦌(({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝑥)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝑦)𝑎 = (((𝑝𝑚𝑦) +s (𝑥𝑚𝑞)) -s (𝑝𝑚𝑞))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝑥)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝑦)𝑏 = (((𝑟𝑚𝑦) +s (𝑥𝑚𝑠)) -s (𝑟𝑚𝑠))}) |s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝑥)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝑦)𝑐 = (((𝑡𝑚𝑦) +s (𝑥𝑚𝑢)) -s (𝑡𝑚𝑢))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝑥)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝑦)𝑑 = (((𝑣𝑚𝑦) +s (𝑥𝑚𝑤)) -s (𝑣𝑚𝑤))}))))
Theorem	mulsfn 28037	Surreal multiplication is a function over surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ·s Fn ( No × No )
Theorem	mulsval 28038*	The value of surreal multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) = (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑎 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑏 = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) |s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑐 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑑 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
Theorem	mulsval2lem 28039*	Lemma for mulsval2 28040. Change bound variables in one of the cases. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑌 𝑎 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} = {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑌 𝑏 = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}
Theorem	mulsval2 28040*	The value of surreal multiplication, expressed with fewer distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) = (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑎 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑏 = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) |s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑐 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑑 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
Theorem	muls01 28041	Surreal multiplication by zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ·s 0s ) = 0s )
Theorem	mulsrid 28042	Surreal one is a right identity element for multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ·s 1s ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	mulsridd 28043	Surreal one is a right identity element for multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 1s ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	mulsproplemcbv 28044*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Change some bound variables for later use. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑔 ∈ No ∀ℎ ∈ No ∀𝑖 ∈ No ∀𝑗 ∈ No ∀𝑘 ∈ No ∀𝑙 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑔) +no ( bday ‘ℎ)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑖) +no ( bday ‘𝑘)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑗) +no ( bday ‘𝑙))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑖) +no ( bday ‘𝑙)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑗) +no ( bday ‘𝑘))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑔 ·s ℎ) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑖 <s 𝑗 ∧ 𝑘 <s 𝑙) → ((𝑖 ·s 𝑙) -s (𝑖 ·s 𝑘)) <s ((𝑗 ·s 𝑙) -s (𝑗 ·s 𝑘))))))
Theorem	mulsproplem1 28045*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Instantiate some variables. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((( bday ‘𝑋) +no ( bday ‘𝑌)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑍) +no ( bday ‘𝑇)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑊) +no ( bday ‘𝑈))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑍) +no ( bday ‘𝑈)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑊) +no ( bday ‘𝑇))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 ·s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑍 <s 𝑊 ∧ 𝑇 <s 𝑈) → ((𝑍 ·s 𝑈) -s (𝑍 ·s 𝑇)) <s ((𝑊 ·s 𝑈) -s (𝑊 ·s 𝑇)))))
Theorem	mulsproplem2 28046*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Under the inductive hypothesis, the product of a member of the old set of 𝐴 and 𝐵 itself is a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	mulsproplem3 28047*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Under the inductive hypothesis, the product of 𝐴 itself and a member of the old set of 𝐵 is a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝑌) ∈ No )
Theorem	mulsproplem4 28048*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Under the inductive hypothesis, the product of a member of the old set of 𝐴 and a member of the old set of 𝐵 is a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ·s 𝑌) ∈ No )
Theorem	mulsproplem5 28049*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Show one of the inequalities involved in surreal multiplication's cuts. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑃 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑄)) -s (𝑃 ·s 𝑄)) <s (((𝑇 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑈)) -s (𝑇 ·s 𝑈)))
Theorem	mulsproplem6 28050*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Show one of the inequalities involved in surreal multiplication's cuts. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑃 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑄)) -s (𝑃 ·s 𝑄)) <s (((𝑉 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑊)) -s (𝑉 ·s 𝑊)))
Theorem	mulsproplem7 28051*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Show one of the inequalities involved in surreal multiplication's cuts. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑅 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑆)) -s (𝑅 ·s 𝑆)) <s (((𝑇 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑈)) -s (𝑇 ·s 𝑈)))
Theorem	mulsproplem8 28052*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Show one of the inequalities involved in surreal multiplication's cuts. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑅 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑆)) -s (𝑅 ·s 𝑆)) <s (((𝑉 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑊)) -s (𝑉 ·s 𝑊)))
Theorem	mulsproplem9 28053*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Show that the cut involved in surreal multiplication makes sense. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑔 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)ℎ = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s ({𝑖 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑖 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑗 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))}))
Theorem	mulsproplem10 28054*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. State the cut properties of surreal multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑔 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)ℎ = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} <<s ({𝑖 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑖 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑗 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
Theorem	mulsproplem11 28055*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Under the inductive hypothesis, demonstrate closure of surreal multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	mulsproplem12 28056*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Demonstrate the second half of the inductive statement assuming 𝐶 and 𝐷 are not the same age and 𝐸 and 𝐹 are not the same age. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 <s 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 <s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( bday ‘𝐶) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐷) ∨ ( bday ‘𝐷) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( bday ‘𝐸) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐹) ∨ ( bday ‘𝐹) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐸)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐶 ·s 𝐸)) <s ((𝐷 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐷 ·s 𝐸)))
Theorem	mulsproplem13 28057*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Remove the restriction on 𝐶 and 𝐷 from mulsproplem12 28056. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 <s 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 <s 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( bday ‘𝐸) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐹) ∨ ( bday ‘𝐹) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐸)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐶 ·s 𝐸)) <s ((𝐷 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐷 ·s 𝐸)))
Theorem	mulsproplem14 28058*	Lemma for surreal multiplication. Finally, we remove the restriction on 𝐸 and 𝐹 from mulsproplem12 28056 and mulsproplem13 28057. This completes the induction on surreal multiplication. mulsprop 28059 brings all this together technically. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ No ∀𝑏 ∈ No ∀𝑐 ∈ No ∀𝑑 ∈ No ∀𝑒 ∈ No ∀𝑓 ∈ No (((( bday ‘𝑎) +no ( bday ‘𝑏)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑒)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑓))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝑐) +no ( bday ‘𝑓)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝑑) +no ( bday ‘𝑒))))) ∈ ((( bday ‘𝐴) +no ( bday ‘𝐵)) ∪ (((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐸)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐹))) ∪ ((( bday ‘𝐶) +no ( bday ‘𝐹)) ∪ (( bday ‘𝐷) +no ( bday ‘𝐸))))) → ((𝑎 ·s 𝑏) ∈ No ∧ ((𝑐 <s 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 <s 𝑓) → ((𝑐 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑐 ·s 𝑒)) <s ((𝑑 ·s 𝑓) -s (𝑑 ·s 𝑒))))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 <s 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 <s 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐶 ·s 𝐸)) <s ((𝐷 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐷 ·s 𝐸)))
Theorem	mulsprop 28059	Surreals are closed under multiplication and obey a particular ordering law. Theorem 3.4 of [Gonshor] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ No ∧ 𝐷 ∈ No ) ∧ (𝐸 ∈ No ∧ 𝐹 ∈ No )) → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ((𝐶 <s 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 <s 𝐹) → ((𝐶 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐶 ·s 𝐸)) <s ((𝐷 ·s 𝐹) -s (𝐷 ·s 𝐸)))))
Theorem	mulscutlem 28060*	Lemma for mulscut 28061. State the theorem with extra DV conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑎 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑏 = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} <<s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑐 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑑 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
Theorem	mulscut 28061*	Show the cut properties of surreal multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑎 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑏 = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} <<s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑐 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑑 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
Theorem	mulscut2 28062*	Show that the cut involved in surreal multiplication is actually a cut. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑞 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑎 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑠 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑏 = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑢 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑐 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑤 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑑 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))}))
Theorem	mulscl 28063	The surreals are closed under multiplication. Theorem 8(i) of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	mulscld 28064	The surreals are closed under multiplication. Theorem 8(i) of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ No )
Theorem	sltmul 28065	An ordering relationship for surreal multiplication. Compare theorem 8(iii) of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ No ∧ 𝐷 ∈ No )) → ((𝐴 <s 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 <s 𝐷) → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐷) -s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶)) <s ((𝐵 ·s 𝐷) -s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶))))
Theorem	sltmuld 28066	An ordering relationship for surreal multiplication. Compare theorem 8(iii) of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 <s 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐷) -s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶)) <s ((𝐵 ·s 𝐷) -s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)))
Theorem	slemuld 28067	An ordering relationship for surreal multiplication. Compare theorem 8(iii) of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≤s 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐷) -s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶)) ≤s ((𝐵 ·s 𝐷) -s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)))
Theorem	mulscom 28068	Surreal multiplication commutes. Part of theorem 7 of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) = (𝐵 ·s 𝐴))
Theorem	mulscomd 28069	Surreal multiplication commutes. Part of theorem 7 of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) = (𝐵 ·s 𝐴))
Theorem	muls02 28070	Surreal multiplication by zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( 0s ·s 𝐴) = 0s )
Theorem	mulslid 28071	Surreal one is a left identity element for multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( 1s ·s 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	mulslidd 28072	Surreal one is a left identity element for multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1s ·s 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	mulsgt0 28073	The product of two positive surreals is positive. Theorem 9 of [Conway] p. 20. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 0s <s 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 0s <s 𝐵)) → 0s <s (𝐴 ·s 𝐵))
Theorem	mulsgt0d 28074	The product of two positive surreals is positive. Theorem 9 of [Conway] p. 20. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0s <s 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0s <s 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0s <s (𝐴 ·s 𝐵))
Theorem	mulsge0d 28075	The product of two non-negative surreals is non-negative. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0s ≤s 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0s ≤s 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0s ≤s (𝐴 ·s 𝐵))
Theorem	ssltmul1 28076*	One surreal set less-than relationship for cuts of 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 <<s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀 |s 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐿 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑀 𝑎 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 𝑏 = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) <<s {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)})
Theorem	ssltmul2 28077*	One surreal set less-than relationship for cuts of 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 <<s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀 |s 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)} <<s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐿 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 𝑐 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 𝑑 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))}))
Theorem	mulsuniflem 28078*	Lemma for mulsunif 28079. State the theorem with some extra distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 <<s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀 |s 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) = (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐿 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑀 𝑎 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 𝑏 = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) |s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐿 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 𝑐 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 𝑑 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
Theorem	mulsunif 28079*	Surreal multiplication has the uniformity property. That is, any cuts that define 𝐴 and 𝐵 can be used in the definition of (𝐴 ·s 𝐵). Theorem 3.5 of [Gonshor] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 <<s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀 |s 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) = (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐿 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑀 𝑎 = (((𝑝 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑞)) -s (𝑝 ·s 𝑞))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 𝑏 = (((𝑟 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑠)) -s (𝑟 ·s 𝑠))}) |s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐿 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 𝑐 = (((𝑡 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑢)) -s (𝑡 ·s 𝑢))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 𝑑 = (((𝑣 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑤)) -s (𝑣 ·s 𝑤))})))
Theorem	addsdilem1 28080*	Lemma for surreal distribution. Expand the left hand side of the main expression. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) = ((({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝐿 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (𝑦𝐿 +s 𝐶))) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s (𝑦𝐿 +s 𝐶)))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑧𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝐿 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝑧𝐿))) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝑧𝐿)))}) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝑅 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (𝑦𝑅 +s 𝐶))) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s (𝑦𝑅 +s 𝐶)))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑧𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝑅 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝑧𝑅))) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝑧𝑅)))})) |s (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝐿 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (𝑦𝑅 +s 𝐶))) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s (𝑦𝑅 +s 𝐶)))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑧𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝐿 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝑧𝑅))) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝑧𝑅)))}) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝑅 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (𝑦𝐿 +s 𝐶))) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s (𝑦𝐿 +s 𝐶)))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑧𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝑅 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝑧𝐿))) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝑧𝐿)))}))))
Theorem	addsdilem2 28081*	Lemma for surreal distribution. Expand the right hand side of the main expression. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶)) = ((({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑎 = ((((𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑎 = ((((𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶))}) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑧𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑎 = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) +s (((𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑧𝐿)) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝑧𝐿)))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑧𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑎 = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) +s (((𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑧𝑅)) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝑧𝑅)))})) |s (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)𝑎 = ((((𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)𝑎 = ((((𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶))}) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑧𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑎 = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) +s (((𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑧𝑅)) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝑧𝑅)))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑧𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑎 = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) +s (((𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑧𝐿)) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝑧𝐿)))}))))
Theorem	addsdilem3 28082*	Lemma for addsdi 28084. Show one of the equalities involved in the final expression. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴))(𝑥𝑂 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) = ((𝑥𝑂 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝑥𝑂 ·s 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵))(𝐴 ·s (𝑦𝑂 +s 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝑂) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴))∀𝑦𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵))(𝑥𝑂 ·s (𝑦𝑂 +s 𝐶)) = ((𝑥𝑂 ·s 𝑦𝑂) +s (𝑥𝑂 ·s 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑋 ∈ (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑌 ∈ (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (((𝑋 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (𝑌 +s 𝐶))) -s (𝑋 ·s (𝑌 +s 𝐶))) = ((((𝑋 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑌)) -s (𝑋 ·s 𝑌)) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶)))
Theorem	addsdilem4 28083*	Lemma for addsdi 28084. Show one of the equalities involved in the final expression. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴))(𝑥𝑂 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) = ((𝑥𝑂 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝑥𝑂 ·s 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐶) ∪ ( R ‘𝐶))(𝐴 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝑧𝑂)) = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑧𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴))∀𝑧𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐶) ∪ ( R ‘𝐶))(𝑥𝑂 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝑧𝑂)) = ((𝑥𝑂 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝑥𝑂 ·s 𝑧𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑋 ∈ (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑍 ∈ (( L ‘𝐶) ∪ ( R ‘𝐶)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (((𝑋 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝑍))) -s (𝑋 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝑍))) = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) +s (((𝑋 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑍)) -s (𝑋 ·s 𝑍))))
Theorem	addsdi 28084	Distributive law for surreal numbers. Commuted form of part of theorem 7 of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶)))
Theorem	addsdid 28085	Distributive law for surreal numbers. Commuted form of part of theorem 7 of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶)))
Theorem	addsdird 28086	Distributive law for surreal numbers. Part of theorem 7 of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) ·s 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)))
Theorem	subsdid 28087	Distribution of surreal multiplication over subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s (𝐵 -s 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) -s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶)))
Theorem	subsdird 28088	Distribution of surreal multiplication over subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 -s 𝐵) ·s 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐶) -s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)))
Theorem	mulnegs1d 28089	Product with negative is negative of product. Part of theorem 7 of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ·s 𝐵) = ( -us ‘(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)))
Theorem	mulnegs2d 28090	Product with negative is negative of product. Part of theorem 7 of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s ( -us ‘𝐵)) = ( -us ‘(𝐴 ·s 𝐵)))
Theorem	mul2negsd 28091	Surreal product of two negatives. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ·s ( -us ‘𝐵)) = (𝐴 ·s 𝐵))
Theorem	mulsasslem1 28092*	Lemma for mulsass 28095. Expand the left hand side of the formula. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ·s 𝐶) = ((({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑎 = ((((((𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) ·s 𝐶) +s ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ·s 𝑧𝐿)) -s ((((𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) ·s 𝑧𝐿))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑎 = ((((((𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) ·s 𝐶) +s ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ·s 𝑧𝐿)) -s ((((𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) ·s 𝑧𝐿))}) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑎 = ((((((𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) ·s 𝐶) +s ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ·s 𝑧𝑅)) -s ((((𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) ·s 𝑧𝑅))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑎 = ((((((𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) ·s 𝐶) +s ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ·s 𝑧𝑅)) -s ((((𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) ·s 𝑧𝑅))})) |s (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑎 = ((((((𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) ·s 𝐶) +s ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ·s 𝑧𝑅)) -s ((((𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) ·s 𝑧𝑅))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑎 = ((((((𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) ·s 𝐶) +s ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ·s 𝑧𝑅)) -s ((((𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) ·s 𝑧𝑅))}) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑎 = ((((((𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) ·s 𝐶) +s ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ·s 𝑧𝐿)) -s ((((𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s 𝑦𝑅)) ·s 𝑧𝐿))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑎 = ((((((𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) ·s 𝐶) +s ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ·s 𝑧𝐿)) -s ((((𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s 𝑦𝐿)) ·s 𝑧𝐿))}))))
Theorem	mulsasslem2 28093*	Lemma for mulsass 28095. Expand the right hand side of the formula. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)) = ((({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝐿 ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (((𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝐿)) -s (𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝑧𝐿)))) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s (((𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝐿)) -s (𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝑧𝐿))))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝐿 ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (((𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝑅)) -s (𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝑧𝑅)))) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s (((𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝑅)) -s (𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝑧𝑅))))}) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝑅 ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (((𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝑅)) -s (𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝑧𝑅)))) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s (((𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝑅)) -s (𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝑧𝑅))))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝑅 ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (((𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝐿)) -s (𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝑧𝐿)))) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s (((𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝐿)) -s (𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝑧𝐿))))})) |s (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝐿 ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (((𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝑅)) -s (𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝑧𝑅)))) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s (((𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝑅)) -s (𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝑧𝑅))))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝐿 ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (((𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝐿)) -s (𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝑧𝐿)))) -s (𝑥𝐿 ·s (((𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝐿)) -s (𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝑧𝐿))))}) ∪ ({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝐿 ∈ ( L ‘𝐶)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝑅 ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (((𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝐿)) -s (𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝑧𝐿)))) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s (((𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝐿)) -s (𝑦𝐿 ·s 𝑧𝐿))))} ∪ {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)∃𝑦𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐵)∃𝑧𝑅 ∈ ( R ‘𝐶)𝑎 = (((𝑥𝑅 ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (((𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝑅)) -s (𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝑧𝑅)))) -s (𝑥𝑅 ·s (((𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝑅)) -s (𝑦𝑅 ·s 𝑧𝑅))))}))))
Theorem	mulsasslem3 28094*	Lemma for mulsass 28095. Demonstrate the central equality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ 𝑃 ⊆ (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 ⊆ (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (( L ‘𝐶) ∪ ( R ‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴))∀𝑦𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵))∀𝑧𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐶) ∪ ( R ‘𝐶))((𝑥𝑂 ·s 𝑦𝑂) ·s 𝑧𝑂) = (𝑥𝑂 ·s (𝑦𝑂 ·s 𝑧𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴))∀𝑦𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵))((𝑥𝑂 ·s 𝑦𝑂) ·s 𝐶) = (𝑥𝑂 ·s (𝑦𝑂 ·s 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴))∀𝑧𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐶) ∪ ( R ‘𝐶))((𝑥𝑂 ·s 𝐵) ·s 𝑧𝑂) = (𝑥𝑂 ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵))∀𝑧𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐶) ∪ ( R ‘𝐶))((𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝑂) ·s 𝑧𝑂) = (𝐴 ·s (𝑦𝑂 ·s 𝑧𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴))((𝑥𝑂 ·s 𝐵) ·s 𝐶) = (𝑥𝑂 ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐵) ∪ ( R ‘𝐵))((𝐴 ·s 𝑦𝑂) ·s 𝐶) = (𝐴 ·s (𝑦𝑂 ·s 𝐶)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐶) ∪ ( R ‘𝐶))((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ·s 𝑧𝑂) = (𝐴 ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧𝑂)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑄 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑅 𝑎 = ((((((𝑥 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦)) -s (𝑥 ·s 𝑦)) ·s 𝐶) +s ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ·s 𝑧)) -s ((((𝑥 ·s 𝐵) +s (𝐴 ·s 𝑦)) -s (𝑥 ·s 𝑦)) ·s 𝑧)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑄 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑅 𝑎 = (((𝑥 ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)) +s (𝐴 ·s (((𝑦 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧)) -s (𝑦 ·s 𝑧)))) -s (𝑥 ·s (((𝑦 ·s 𝐶) +s (𝐵 ·s 𝑧)) -s (𝑦 ·s 𝑧))))))
Theorem	mulsass 28095	Associative law for surreal multiplication. Part of theorem 7 of [Conway] p. 19. Much like the case for additive groups, this theorem together with mulscom 28068, addsdi 28084, mulsgt0 28073, and the addition theorems would make the surreals into an ordered ring except that they are a proper class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ·s 𝐶) = (𝐴 ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)))
Theorem	mulsassd 28096	Associative law for surreal multiplication. Part of theorem 7 of [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ·s 𝐶) = (𝐴 ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝐶)))
Theorem	muls4d 28097	Rearrangement of four surreal factors. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ·s (𝐶 ·s 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐶) ·s (𝐵 ·s 𝐷)))
Theorem	mulsunif2lem 28098*	Lemma for mulsunif2 28099. State the theorem with extra disjoint variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 <<s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀 |s 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) = (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐿 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑀 𝑎 = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) -s ((𝐴 -s 𝑝) ·s (𝐵 -s 𝑞)))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 𝑏 = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) -s ((𝑟 -s 𝐴) ·s (𝑠 -s 𝐵)))}) |s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐿 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 𝑐 = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) +s ((𝐴 -s 𝑡) ·s (𝑢 -s 𝐵)))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 𝑑 = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) +s ((𝑣 -s 𝐴) ·s (𝐵 -s 𝑤)))})))
Theorem	mulsunif2 28099*	Alternate expression for surreal multiplication. Note from [Conway] p. 19. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 <<s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀 |s 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) = (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐿 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑀 𝑎 = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) -s ((𝐴 -s 𝑝) ·s (𝐵 -s 𝑞)))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 𝑏 = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) -s ((𝑟 -s 𝐴) ·s (𝑠 -s 𝐵)))}) |s ({𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐿 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 𝑐 = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) +s ((𝐴 -s 𝑡) ·s (𝑢 -s 𝐵)))} ∪ {𝑑 ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 𝑑 = ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) +s ((𝑣 -s 𝐴) ·s (𝐵 -s 𝑤)))})))
Theorem	sltmul2 28100	Multiplication of both sides of surreal less-than by a positive number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 0s <s 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No ) → (𝐵 <s 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) <s (𝐴 ·s 𝐶)))