Theorem opreu2reurex 6241

Description: There is a unique ordered pair fulfilling a wff iff there are uniquely two sets fulfilling a corresponding wff. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2023.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
opreu2reurex.a	⊢ (𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opreu2reurex	⊢ (∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ (∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑏,𝑝   𝐵,𝑎,𝑏,𝑝   𝜑,𝑎,𝑏   𝜒,𝑝

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑝)   𝜒(𝑎,𝑏)

Proof of Theorem opreu2reurex

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqcom 2738	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ↔ ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
2		vex 3440	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
3		vex 3440	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑏 ∈ V
4	2, 3	opth 5414	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑎 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑦))
5	1, 4	bitri 275	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ↔ (𝑎 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑦))
6	5	imbi2i 336	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜒 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩) ↔ (𝜒 → (𝑎 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑦)))
7	6	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝜒 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩) ↔ (𝜒 → (𝑎 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑦))))
8	7	2ralbidva 3194	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜒 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜒 → (𝑎 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑦))))
9	8	2rexbiia 3193	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜒 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜒 → (𝑎 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑦)))
10	9	anbi2i 623	. 2 ⊢ ((∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜒 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩)) ↔ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜒 → (𝑎 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑦))))
11		opreu2reurex.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
12	11	reu3op 6239	. 2 ⊢ (∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜒 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩)))
13		2reu4 4470	. 2 ⊢ ((∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) ↔ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜒 → (𝑎 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑦))))
14	10, 12, 13	3bitr4i 303	1 ⊢ (∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ (∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111  ∀wral 3047  ∃wrex 3056  ∃!wreu 3344  ⟨cop 4579   × cxp 5612

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2180  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pr 5368

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2929  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-rmo 3346  df-reu 3347  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-sbc 3737  df-csb 3846  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4281  df-if 4473  df-sn 4574  df-pr 4576  df-op 4580  df-iun 4941  df-opab 5152  df-xp 5620  df-rel 5621

This theorem is referenced by:  opreu2reu  6242  2sqreuop  27400  2sqreuopnn  27401  2sqreuoplt  27402  2sqreuopltb  27403  2sqreuopnnlt  27404  2sqreuopnnltb  27405  opreu2reu1  32463