P. 63 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 6201-6300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	rnco2 6201	The range of the composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ran (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (𝐴 “ ran 𝐵)
Theorem	dmco 6202	The domain of a composition. Exercise 27 of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2004.)
⊢ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (◡𝐵 “ dom 𝐴)
Theorem	coeq0 6203	A composition of two relations is empty iff there is no overlap between the range of the second and the domain of the first. Useful in combination with coundi 6194 and coundir 6195 to prune meaningless terms in the result. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (dom 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	coiun 6204*	Composition with an indexed union. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)
Theorem	cocnvcnv1 6205	A composition is not affected by a double converse of its first argument. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
⊢ (◡◡𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)
Theorem	cocnvcnv2 6206	A composition is not affected by a double converse of its second argument. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ◡◡𝐵) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)
Theorem	cores2 6207	Absorption of a reverse (preimage) restriction of the second member of a class composition. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2006.)
⊢ (dom 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∘ ◡(◡𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵))
Theorem	co02 6208	Composition with the empty set. Theorem 20 of [Suppes] p. 63. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ∅) = ∅
Theorem	co01 6209	Composition with the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∅ ∘ 𝐴) = ∅
Theorem	coi1 6210	Composition with the identity relation. Part of Theorem 3.7(i) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∘ I ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	coi2 6211	Composition with the identity relation. Part of Theorem 3.7(i) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → ( I ∘ 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	coires1 6212	Composition with a restricted identity relation. (Contributed by FL, 19-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ( I ↾ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)
Theorem	coass 6213	Associative law for class composition. Theorem 27 of [Suppes] p. 64. Also Exercise 21 of [Enderton] p. 53. Interestingly, this law holds for any classes whatsoever, not just functions or even relations. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-1997.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∘ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶))
Theorem	relcnvtrg 6214	General form of relcnvtr 6215. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑆 ∧ Rel 𝑇) → ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑆) ⊆ 𝑇 ↔ (◡𝑆 ∘ ◡𝑅) ⊆ ◡𝑇))
Theorem	relcnvtr 6215	A relation is transitive iff its converse is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 17-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ (◡𝑅 ∘ ◡𝑅) ⊆ ◡𝑅))
Theorem	relssdmrn 6216	A relation is included in the Cartesian product of its domain and range. Exercise 4.12(t) of [Mendelson] p. 235. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ (dom 𝐴 × ran 𝐴))
Theorem	resssxp 6217	If the 𝑅-image of a class 𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐵, then the restriction of 𝑅 to 𝐴 is a subset of the Cartesian product of 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))
Theorem	cnvssrndm 6218	The converse is a subset of the cartesian product of range and domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ◡𝐴 ⊆ (ran 𝐴 × dom 𝐴)
Theorem	cossxp 6219	Composition as a subset of the Cartesian product of factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ (dom 𝐵 × ran 𝐴)
Theorem	relrelss 6220	Two ways to describe the structure of a two-place operation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel dom 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
Theorem	unielrel 6221	The membership relation for a relation is inherited by class union. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ 𝑅)
Theorem	relfld 6222	The double union of a relation is its field. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ∪ ∪ 𝑅 = (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅))
Theorem	relresfld 6223	Restriction of a relation to its field. (Contributed by FL, 15-Apr-2012.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) = 𝑅)
Theorem	relcoi2 6224	Composition with the identity relation restricted to a relation's field. (Contributed by FL, 2-May-2011.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ∘ 𝑅) = 𝑅)
Theorem	relcoi1 6225	Composition with the identity relation restricted to a relation's field. (Contributed by FL, 8-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∘ ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	unidmrn 6226	The double union of the converse of a class is its field. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2008.)
⊢ ∪ ∪ ◡𝐴 = (dom 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐴)
Theorem	relcnvfld 6227	if 𝑅 is a relation, its double union equals the double union of its converse. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ∪ ∪ 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ ◡𝑅)
Theorem	dfdm2 6228	Alternate definition of domain df-dm 5626 that doesn't require dummy variables. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2010.)
⊢ dom 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ (◡𝐴 ∘ 𝐴)
Theorem	unixp 6229	The double class union of a nonempty Cartesian product is the union of it members. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → ∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	unixp0 6230	A Cartesian product is empty iff its union is empty. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	unixpid 6231	Field of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by FL, 10-Oct-2009.)
⊢ ∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	ressn 6232	Restriction of a class to a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ↾ {𝐵}) = ({𝐵} × (𝐴 “ {𝐵}))
Theorem	cnviin 6233*	The converse of an intersection is the intersection of the converse. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ◡∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ◡𝐵)
Theorem	cnvpo 6234	The converse of a partial order is a partial order. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2005.)
⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ ◡𝑅 Po 𝐴)
Theorem	cnvso 6235	The converse of a strict order relation is a strict order relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2005.)
⊢ (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ ◡𝑅 Or 𝐴)
Theorem	xpco 6236	Composition of two Cartesian products. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝐴 × 𝐶))
Theorem	xpcoid 6237	Composition of two Cartesian squares. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Jan-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴)
Theorem	elsnxp 6238*	Membership in a Cartesian product with a singleton. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Apr-2020.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑍 ∈ ({𝑋} × 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑍 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑦⟩))
Theorem	reu3op 6239*	There is a unique ordered pair fulfilling a wff iff there are uniquely two sets fulfilling a corresponding wff. (Contributed by AV, 1-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 × 𝑌)𝜓 ↔ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑌 𝜒 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑌 (𝜒 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩)))
Theorem	reuop 6240*	There is a unique ordered pair fulfilling a wff iff there are uniquely two sets fulfilling a corresponding wff. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑝 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 × 𝑌)𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑌 (𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 (𝜃 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩)))
Theorem	opreu2reurex 6241*	There is a unique ordered pair fulfilling a wff iff there are uniquely two sets fulfilling a corresponding wff. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ (∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	opreu2reu 6242*	If there is a unique ordered pair fulfilling a wff, then there is a double restricted unique existential qualification fulfilling a corresponding wff. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 → ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒)
Theorem	dfpo2 6243	Quantifier-free definition of a partial ordering. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Feb-2013.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ ((𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ∅ ∧ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ 𝑅))
Theorem	csbcog 6244	Distribute proper substitution through a composition of relations. (Contributed by RP, 28-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∘ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∘ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
Theorem	snres0 6245	Condition for restriction of a singleton to be empty. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (({⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩} ↾ 𝐶) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	imaindm 6246	The image is unaffected by intersection with the domain. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 “ 𝐴) = (𝑅 “ (𝐴 ∩ dom 𝑅))
2.3.11  The Predecessor Class
Syntax	cpred 6247	The predecessors symbol.
class Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)
Definition	df-pred 6248	Define the predecessor class of a binary relation. This is the class of all elements 𝑦 of 𝐴 such that 𝑦𝑅𝑋 (see elpred 6265). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jan-2011.)
⊢ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑋}))
Theorem	predeq123 6249	Equality theorem for the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑌))
Theorem	predeq1 6250	Equality theorem for the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = Pred(𝑆, 𝐴, 𝑋))
Theorem	predeq2 6251	Equality theorem for the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋))
Theorem	predeq3 6252	Equality theorem for the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.)
⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑌))
Theorem	nfpred 6253	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑋    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)
Theorem	csbpredg 6254	Move class substitution in and out of the predecessor class of a relation. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌Pred(𝑅, 𝐷, 𝑋) = Pred(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑅, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑋))
Theorem	predpredss 6255	If 𝐴 is a subset of 𝐵, then their predecessor classes are also subsets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ⊆ Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋))
Theorem	predss 6256	The predecessor class of 𝐴 is a subset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.)
⊢ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	sspred 6257	Another subset/predecessor class relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ⊆ 𝐵) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋))
Theorem	dfpred2 6258*	An alternate definition of predecessor class when 𝑋 is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Feb-2011.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑋})
Theorem	dfpred3 6259*	An alternate definition of predecessor class when 𝑋 is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑋}
Theorem	dfpred3g 6260*	An alternate definition of predecessor class when 𝑋 is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑋})
Theorem	elpredgg 6261	Membership in a predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2011.) Generalize to closed form. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ↔ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌𝑅𝑋)))
Theorem	elpredg 6262	Membership in a predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ↔ 𝑌𝑅𝑋))
Theorem	elpredimg 6263	Membership in a predecessor class - implicative version. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Apr-2011.) (Revised by NM, 5-Apr-2016.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)) → 𝑌𝑅𝑋)
Theorem	elpredim 6264	Membership in a predecessor class - implicative version. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-May-2012.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) → 𝑌𝑅𝑋)
Theorem	elpred 6265	Membership in a predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ↔ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌𝑅𝑋)))
Theorem	predexg 6266	The predecessor class exists when 𝐴 does. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Feb-2011.) Generalize to closed form. (Revised by BJ, 27-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∈ V)
Theorem	dffr4 6267*	Alternate definition of well-founded relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.)
⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝑥, 𝑦) = ∅))
Theorem	predel 6268	Membership in the predecessor class implies membership in the base class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Feb-2011.)
⊢ (𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	predtrss 6269	If 𝑅 is transitive over 𝐴 and 𝑌𝑅𝑋, then Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑌) is a subclass of Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑌) ⊆ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))
Theorem	predpo 6270	Property of the predecessor class for partial orders. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Apr-2012.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 28-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑌) ⊆ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)))
Theorem	predso 6271	Property of the predecessor class for strict total orders. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Feb-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑌) ⊆ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)))
Theorem	setlikespec 6272	If 𝑅 is set-like in 𝐴, then all predecessor classes of elements of 𝐴 exist. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∈ V)
Theorem	predidm 6273	Idempotent law for the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Mar-2011.)
⊢ Pred(𝑅, Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋), 𝑋) = Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)
Theorem	predin 6274	Intersection law for predecessor classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Mar-2011.)
⊢ Pred(𝑅, (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵), 𝑋) = (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∩ Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋))
Theorem	predun 6275	Union law for predecessor classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Mar-2011.)
⊢ Pred(𝑅, (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵), 𝑋) = (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∪ Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋))
Theorem	preddif 6276	Difference law for predecessor classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2011.)
⊢ Pred(𝑅, (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵), 𝑋) = (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∖ Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋))
Theorem	predep 6277	The predecessor under the membership relation is equivalent to an intersection. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → Pred( E , 𝐴, 𝑋) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑋))
Theorem	trpred 6278	The class of predecessors of an element of a transitive class for the membership relation is that element. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → Pred( E , 𝐴, 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	preddowncl 6279*	A property of classes that are downward closed under predecessor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Apr-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋) = Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)))
Theorem	predpoirr 6280	Given a partial ordering, a class is not a member of its predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 → ¬ 𝑋 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))
Theorem	predfrirr 6281	Given a well-founded relation, a class is not a member of its predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 → ¬ 𝑋 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))
Theorem	pred0 6282	The predecessor class over ∅ is always ∅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by AV, 11-Jun-2021.)
⊢ Pred(𝑅, ∅, 𝑋) = ∅
Theorem	dfse3 6283*	Alternate definition of set-like relationships. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥) ∈ V)
Theorem	predrelss 6284	Subset carries from relation to predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ⊆ Pred(𝑆, 𝐴, 𝑋))
Theorem	predprc 6285	The predecessor of a proper class is empty. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ V → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = ∅)
Theorem	predres 6286	Predecessor class is unaffected by restriction to the base class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = Pred((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴), 𝐴, 𝑋)
2.3.12  Well-founded induction (variant)
Theorem	frpomin 6287*	Every nonempty (possibly proper) subclass of a class 𝐴 with a well-founded set-like partial order 𝑅 has a minimal element. The additional condition of partial order over frmin 9639 enables avoiding the axiom of infinity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	frpomin2 6288*	Every nonempty (possibly proper) subclass of a class 𝐴 with a well-founded set-like partial order 𝑅 has a minimal element. The additional condition of partial order over frmin 9639 enables avoiding the axiom of infinity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑥) = ∅)
Theorem	frpoind 6289*	The principle of well-founded induction over a partial order. This theorem is a version of frind 9640 that does not require the axiom of infinity and can be used to prove wfi 6296 and tfi 7783. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	frpoinsg 6290*	Well-Founded Induction Schema (variant). If a property passes from all elements less than 𝑦 of a well-founded set-like partial order class 𝐴 to 𝑦 itself (induction hypothesis), then the property holds for all elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	frpoins2fg 6291*	Well-Founded Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	frpoins2g 6292*	Well-Founded Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	frpoins3g 6293*	Well-Founded Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑦 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥)𝜓 → 𝜑))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜒)
2.3.13  Well-ordered induction
Theorem	tz6.26 6294*	All nonempty subclasses of a class having a well-ordered set-like relation have minimal elements for that relation. Proposition 6.26 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 31. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jan-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 17-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑦) = ∅)
Theorem	tz6.26i 6295*	All nonempty subclasses of a class having a well-ordered set-like relation 𝑅 have 𝑅-minimal elements. Proposition 6.26 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 31. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑦) = ∅)
Theorem	wfi 6296*	The Principle of Well-Ordered Induction. Theorem 6.27 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 32. This principle states that if 𝐵 is a subclass of a well-ordered class 𝐴 with the property that every element of 𝐵 whose inital segment is included in 𝐴 is itself equal to 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jan-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 17-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	wfii 6297*	The Principle of Well-Ordered Induction. Theorem 6.27 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 32. This principle states that if 𝐵 is a subclass of a well-ordered class 𝐴 with the property that every element of 𝐵 whose inital segment is included in 𝐴 is itself equal to 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jan-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	wfisg 6298*	Well-Ordered Induction Schema. If a property passes from all elements less than 𝑦 of a well-ordered class 𝐴 to 𝑦 itself (induction hypothesis), then the property holds for all elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Feb-2011.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 17-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	wfis 6299*	Well-Ordered Induction Schema. If all elements less than a given set 𝑥 of the well-ordered class 𝐴 have a property (induction hypothesis), then all elements of 𝐴 have that property. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jan-2011.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)
Theorem	wfis2fg 6300*	Well-Ordered Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Feb-2011.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 17-Nov-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)