| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 63 of 502) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31005) |
(31006-32528) |
(32529-50158) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | resdmss 6201 | Subset relationship for the domain of a restriction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | resdifdi 6202 | Distributive law for restriction over difference. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 15-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | resdifdir 6203 | Distributive law for restriction over difference. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 15-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ∖ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | mptpreima 6204* | The preimage of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐶) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶} | ||
| Theorem | mptiniseg 6205* | Converse singleton image of a function defined by maps-to. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡𝐹 “ {𝐶}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 = 𝐶}) | ||
| Theorem | dmmpt 6206 | The domain of the mapping operation in general. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ dom 𝐹 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 ∈ V} | ||
| Theorem | dmmptss 6207* | The domain of a mapping is a subset of its base class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dmmptg 6208* | The domain of the mapping operation is the stated domain, if the function value is always a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → dom (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | rnmpt0f 6209* | The range of a function in maps-to notation is empty if and only if its domain is empty. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 8-Apr-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran 𝐹 = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | rnmptn0 6210* | The range of a function in maps-to notation is nonempty if the domain is nonempty. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 8-Apr-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | dfco2 6211* | Alternate definition of a class composition, using only one bound variable. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ V ((◡𝐵 “ {𝑥}) × (𝐴 “ {𝑥})) | ||
| Theorem | dfco2a 6212* | Generalization of dfco2 6211, where 𝐶 can have any value between dom 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵 and V. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((dom 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ((◡𝐵 “ {𝑥}) × (𝐴 “ {𝑥}))) | ||
| Theorem | coundi 6213 | Class composition distributes over union. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | coundir 6214 | Class composition distributes over union. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∘ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | cores 6215 | Restricted first member of a class composition. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ∘ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | resco 6216 | Associative law for the restriction of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∘ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | imaco 6217 | Image of the composition of two classes. (Contributed by Jason Orendorff, 12-Dec-2006.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = (𝐴 “ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | rnco 6218 | The range of the composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2006.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) Avoid ax-11 2163. (Revised by TM, 24-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ran (𝐴 ↾ ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rncoOLD 6219 | Obsolete version of rnco 6218 as of 24-Jan-2026. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2006.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ran (𝐴 ↾ ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rnco2 6220 | The range of the composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (𝐴 “ ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmco 6221 | The domain of a composition. Exercise 27 of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2004.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (◡𝐵 “ dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | coeq0 6222 | A composition of two relations is empty iff there is no overlap between the range of the second and the domain of the first. Useful in combination with coundi 6213 and coundir 6214 to prune meaningless terms in the result. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (dom 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | coiun 6223* | Composition with an indexed union. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cocnvcnv1 6224 | A composition is not affected by a double converse of its first argument. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ (◡◡𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cocnvcnv2 6225 | A composition is not affected by a double converse of its second argument. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ◡◡𝐵) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cores2 6226 | Absorption of a reverse (preimage) restriction of the second member of a class composition. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ (dom 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∘ ◡(◡𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | co02 6227 | Composition with the empty set. Theorem 20 of [Suppes] p. 63. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ∅) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | co01 6228 | Composition with the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (∅ ∘ 𝐴) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | coi1 6229 | Composition with the identity relation. Part of Theorem 3.7(i) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∘ I ) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | coi2 6230 | Composition with the identity relation. Part of Theorem 3.7(i) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → ( I ∘ 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | coires1 6231 | Composition with a restricted identity relation. (Contributed by FL, 19-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ( I ↾ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | coass 6232 | Associative law for class composition. Theorem 27 of [Suppes] p. 64. Also Exercise 21 of [Enderton] p. 53. Interestingly, this law holds for any classes whatsoever, not just functions or even relations. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∘ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | relcnvtrg 6233 | General form of relcnvtr 6234. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑆 ∧ Rel 𝑇) → ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑆) ⊆ 𝑇 ↔ (◡𝑆 ∘ ◡𝑅) ⊆ ◡𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | relcnvtr 6234 | A relation is transitive iff its converse is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 17-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ (◡𝑅 ∘ ◡𝑅) ⊆ ◡𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | relssdmrn 6235 | A relation is included in the Cartesian product of its domain and range. Exercise 4.12(t) of [Mendelson] p. 235. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Dec-2024.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ (dom 𝐴 × ran 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | resssxp 6236 | If the 𝑅-image of a class 𝐴 is a subclass of 𝐵, then the restriction of 𝑅 to 𝐴 is a subset of the Cartesian product of 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvssrndm 6237 | The converse is a subset of the cartesian product of range and domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ ◡𝐴 ⊆ (ran 𝐴 × dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | cossxp 6238 | Composition as a subset of the Cartesian product of factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ (dom 𝐵 × ran 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | relrelss 6239 | Two ways to describe the structure of a two-place operation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel dom 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V)) | ||
| Theorem | unielrel 6240 | The membership relation for a relation is inherited by class union. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relfld 6241 | The double union of a relation is its field. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ∪ ∪ 𝑅 = (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | relresfld 6242 | Restriction of a relation to its field. (Contributed by FL, 15-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relcoi2 6243 | Composition with the identity relation restricted to a relation's field. (Contributed by FL, 2-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ∘ 𝑅) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relcoi1 6244 | Composition with the identity relation restricted to a relation's field. (Contributed by FL, 8-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∘ ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅)) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | unidmrn 6245 | The double union of the converse of a class is its field. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2008.) |
| ⊢ ∪ ∪ ◡𝐴 = (dom 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | relcnvfld 6246 | if 𝑅 is a relation, its double union equals the double union of its converse. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ∪ ∪ 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ ◡𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | dfdm2 6247 | Alternate definition of domain df-dm 5642 that doesn't require dummy variables. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2010.) |
| ⊢ dom 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ (◡𝐴 ∘ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | unixp 6248 | The double class union of a nonempty Cartesian product is the union of it members. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → ∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | unixp0 6249 | A Cartesian product is empty iff its union is empty. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | unixpid 6250 | Field of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by FL, 10-Oct-2009.) |
| ⊢ ∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ressn 6251 | Restriction of a class to a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ {𝐵}) = ({𝐵} × (𝐴 “ {𝐵})) | ||
| Theorem | cnviin 6252* | The converse of an intersection is the intersection of the converse. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ◡∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cnvpo 6253 | The converse of a partial order is a partial order. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ ◡𝑅 Po 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | cnvso 6254 | The converse of a strict order relation is a strict order relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ ◡𝑅 Or 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | xpco 6255 | Composition of two Cartesian products. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Nov-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝐴 × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | xpcoid 6256 | Composition of two Cartesian squares. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | elsnxp 6257* | Membership in a Cartesian product with a singleton. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Apr-2020.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑍 ∈ ({𝑋} × 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑍 = 〈𝑋, 𝑦〉)) | ||
| Theorem | reu3op 6258* | There is a unique ordered pair fulfilling a wff iff there are uniquely two sets fulfilling a corresponding wff. (Contributed by AV, 1-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝑝 = 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 × 𝑌)𝜓 ↔ (∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑌 𝜒 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑌 (𝜒 → 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 = 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉))) | ||
| Theorem | reuop 6259* | There is a unique ordered pair fulfilling a wff iff there are uniquely two sets fulfilling a corresponding wff. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jun-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝑝 = 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑝 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 × 𝑌)𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑌 (𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 (𝜃 → 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 = 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉))) | ||
| Theorem | opreu2reurex 6260* | There is a unique ordered pair fulfilling a wff iff there are uniquely two sets fulfilling a corresponding wff. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝑝 = 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ (∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | opreu2reu 6261* | If there is a unique ordered pair fulfilling a wff, then there is a double restricted unique existential qualification fulfilling a corresponding wff. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2023.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝑝 = 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 → ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | dfpo2 6262 | Quantifier-free definition of a partial ordering. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Feb-2013.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ ((𝑅 ∩ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ∅ ∧ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | csbcog 6263 | Distribute proper substitution through a composition of relations. (Contributed by RP, 28-Jun-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∘ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∘ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | snres0 6264 | Condition for restriction of a singleton to be empty. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (({〈𝐴, 𝐵〉} ↾ 𝐶) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | imaindm 6265 | The image is unaffected by intersection with the domain. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Dec-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 “ 𝐴) = (𝑅 “ (𝐴 ∩ dom 𝑅)) | ||
| Syntax | cpred 6266 | The predecessors symbol. |
| class Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) | ||
| Definition | df-pred 6267 | Define the predecessor class of a binary relation. This is the class of all elements 𝑦 of 𝐴 such that 𝑦𝑅𝑋 (see elpred 6284). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jan-2011.) |
| ⊢ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑋})) | ||
| Theorem | predeq123 6268 | Equality theorem for the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = Pred(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | predeq1 6269 | Equality theorem for the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = Pred(𝑆, 𝐴, 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | predeq2 6270 | Equality theorem for the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | predeq3 6271 | Equality theorem for the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | nfpred 6272 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑋 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | csbpredg 6273 | Move class substitution in and out of the predecessor class of a relation. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌Pred(𝑅, 𝐷, 𝑋) = Pred(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑅, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | predpredss 6274 | If 𝐴 is a subset of 𝐵, then their predecessor classes are also subsets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ⊆ Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | predss 6275 | The predecessor class of 𝐴 is a subset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.) |
| ⊢ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | sspred 6276 | Another subset/predecessor class relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ⊆ 𝐵) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | dfpred2 6277* | An alternate definition of predecessor class when 𝑋 is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Feb-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑋}) | ||
| Theorem | dfpred3 6278* | An alternate definition of predecessor class when 𝑋 is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑋} | ||
| Theorem | dfpred3g 6279* | An alternate definition of predecessor class when 𝑋 is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑋}) | ||
| Theorem | elpredgg 6280 | Membership in a predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2011.) Generalize to closed form. (Revised by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ↔ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌𝑅𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | elpredg 6281 | Membership in a predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ↔ 𝑌𝑅𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | elpredimg 6282 | Membership in a predecessor class - implicative version. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Apr-2011.) (Revised by NM, 5-Apr-2016.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)) → 𝑌𝑅𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | elpredim 6283 | Membership in a predecessor class - implicative version. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-May-2012.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) → 𝑌𝑅𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | elpred 6284 | Membership in a predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ↔ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌𝑅𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | predexg 6285 | The predecessor class exists when 𝐴 does. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Feb-2011.) Generalize to closed form. (Revised by BJ, 27-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | dffr4 6286* | Alternate definition of well-founded relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝑥, 𝑦) = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | predel 6287 | Membership in the predecessor class implies membership in the base class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Feb-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | predtrss 6288 | If 𝑅 is transitive over 𝐴 and 𝑌𝑅𝑋, then Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑌) is a subclass of Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∘ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑌) ⊆ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | predpo 6289 | Property of the predecessor class for partial orders. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Apr-2012.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 28-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑌) ⊆ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | predso 6290 | Property of the predecessor class for strict total orders. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Feb-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑌 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑌) ⊆ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | setlikespec 6291 | If 𝑅 is set-like in 𝐴, then all predecessor classes of elements of 𝐴 exist. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | predidm 6292 | Idempotent law for the predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ Pred(𝑅, Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋), 𝑋) = Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | predin 6293 | Intersection law for predecessor classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ Pred(𝑅, (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵), 𝑋) = (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∩ Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | predun 6294 | Union law for predecessor classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ Pred(𝑅, (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵), 𝑋) = (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∪ Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | preddif 6295 | Difference law for predecessor classes. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2011.) |
| ⊢ Pred(𝑅, (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵), 𝑋) = (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∖ Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | predep 6296 | The predecessor under the membership relation is equivalent to an intersection. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → Pred( E , 𝐴, 𝑋) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | trpred 6297 | The class of predecessors of an element of a transitive class for the membership relation is that element. (Contributed by BJ, 12-Oct-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → Pred( E , 𝐴, 𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | preddowncl 6298* | A property of classes that are downward closed under predecessor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Apr-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋) = Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | predpoirr 6299 | Given a partial ordering, a class is not a member of its predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 → ¬ 𝑋 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | predfrirr 6300 | Given a well-founded relation, a class is not a member of its predecessor class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Apr-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 → ¬ 𝑋 ∈ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |