Theorem ovidig 7538

Description: The value of an operation class abstraction. Compare ovidi 7539. The condition (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) is been removed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ovidig.1	⊢ ∃*𝑧𝜑
ovidig.2	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ovidig	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem ovidig

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ov 7399	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
2		ovidig.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃*𝑧𝜑
3	2	funoprab 7518	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
4		ovidig.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
5	4	funeqi 6542	. . . 4 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ Fun {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
6	3, 5	mpbir 233	. . 3 ⊢ Fun 𝐹
7		oprabidw 7427	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
8	7	biimpri 230	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
9	8, 4	eleqtrrdi 2873	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹)
10		funopfv 6916	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 → (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧))
11	6, 9, 10	mpsyl 68	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧)
12	1, 11	eqtrid 2809	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1560   ∈ wcel 2142  ∃*wmo 2564  ⟨cop 4588  Fun wfun 6515  ‘cfv 6521  (class class class)co 7396  {coprab 7397

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5246  ax-pr 5390

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1100  df-tru 1563  df-fal 1573  df-ex 1800  df-nf 1804  df-sb 2091  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3415  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4481  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-id 5542  df-xp 5653  df-rel 5654  df-cnv 5655  df-co 5656  df-dm 5657  df-iota 6477  df-fun 6523  df-fv 6529  df-ov 7399  df-oprab 7400

This theorem is referenced by:  ovidi  7539