Theorem ovidig 7561

Description: The value of an operation class abstraction. Compare ovidi 7562. The condition (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) is been removed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ovidig.1	⊢ ∃*𝑧𝜑
ovidig.2	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ovidig	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem ovidig

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ov 7422	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
2		ovidig.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃*𝑧𝜑
3	2	funoprab 7541	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
4		ovidig.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
5	4	funeqi 6561	. . . 4 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ Fun {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
6	3, 5	mpbir 234	. . 3 ⊢ Fun 𝐹
7		oprabidw 7450	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
8	7	biimpri 231	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
9	8, 4	eleqtrrdi 2876	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹)
10		funopfv 6934	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 → (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧))
11	6, 9, 10	mpsyl 69	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧)
12	1, 11	eqtrid 2812	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∃*wmo 2567  ⟨cop 4597  Fun wfun 6534  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7419  {coprab 7420

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-pr 5406

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7422  df-oprab 7423

This theorem is used by:  ovidi  7562