Theorem ovidig 7393

Description: The value of an operation class abstraction. Compare ovidi 7394. The condition (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) is been removed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ovidig.1	⊢ ∃*𝑧𝜑
ovidig.2	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ovidig	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem ovidig

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ov 7258	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
2		ovidig.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃*𝑧𝜑
3	2	funoprab 7374	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
4		ovidig.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
5	4	funeqi 6439	. . . 4 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ Fun {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
6	3, 5	mpbir 230	. . 3 ⊢ Fun 𝐹
7		oprabidw 7286	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
8	7	biimpri 227	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
9	8, 4	eleqtrrdi 2850	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹)
10		funopfv 6803	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 → (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧))
11	6, 9, 10	mpsyl 68	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧)
12	1, 11	eqtrid 2790	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃*wmo 2538  ⟨cop 4564  Fun wfun 6412  ‘cfv 6418  (class class class)co 7255  {coprab 7256

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fv 6426  df-ov 7258  df-oprab 7259

This theorem is referenced by:  ovidi  7394