Theorem ovidig 7498

Description: The value of an operation class abstraction. Compare ovidi 7499. The condition (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) is been removed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ovidig.1	⊢ ∃*𝑧𝜑
ovidig.2	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ovidig	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem ovidig

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ov 7359	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
2		ovidig.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃*𝑧𝜑
3	2	funoprab 7478	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
4		ovidig.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
5	4	funeqi 6506	. . . 4 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ Fun {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
6	3, 5	mpbir 232	. . 3 ⊢ Fun 𝐹
7		oprabidw 7387	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
8	7	biimpri 229	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
9	8, 4	eleqtrrdi 2850	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹)
10		funopfv 6876	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 → (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧))
11	6, 9, 10	mpsyl 68	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧)
12	1, 11	eqtrid 2786	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1547   ∈ wcel 2119  ∃*wmo 2541  ⟨cop 4561  Fun wfun 6479  ‘cfv 6485  (class class class)co 7356  {coprab 7357

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-10 2152  ax-11 2168  ax-12 2189  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5218  ax-pr 5362

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-fal 1560  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2573  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2888  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3064  df-rab 3392  df-v 3433  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4262  df-if 4455  df-sn 4556  df-pr 4558  df-op 4562  df-uni 4839  df-br 5073  df-opab 5135  df-id 5513  df-xp 5624  df-rel 5625  df-cnv 5626  df-co 5627  df-dm 5628  df-iota 6441  df-fun 6487  df-fv 6493  df-ov 7359  df-oprab 7360

This theorem is referenced by:  ovidi  7499