Theorem ovid 7509

Description: The value of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ovid.1	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑)
ovid.2	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ovid	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑧,𝑅   𝑧,𝑆

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑅(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑆(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem ovid

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ov 7371	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
2	1	eqeq1i 2742	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧)
3		ovid.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑)
4	3	fnoprab 7493	. . . . 5 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)}
5		ovid.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}
6	5	fneq1i 6597	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)} ↔ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)})
7	4, 6	mpbir 231	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)}
8		opabidw 5480	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆))
9	8	biimpri 228	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)})
10		fnopfvb 6893	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)} ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)}) → ((𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
11	7, 9, 10	sylancr 588	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
12	5	eleq2i 2829	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)})
13		oprabidw 7399	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑))
14	12, 13	bitri 275	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑))
15	14	baib 535	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ↔ 𝜑))
16	11, 15	bitrd 279	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧 ↔ 𝜑))
17	2, 16	bitrid 283	1 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  ∃!weu 2569  ⟨cop 4588  {copab 5162   Fn wfn 6495  ‘cfv 6500  (class class class)co 7368  {coprab 7369

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5243  ax-nul 5253  ax-pr 5379

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-nul 4288  df-if 4482  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-id 5527  df-xp 5638  df-rel 5639  df-cnv 5640  df-co 5641  df-dm 5642  df-iota 6456  df-fun 6502  df-fn 6503  df-fv 6508  df-ov 7371  df-oprab 7372

This theorem is referenced by: (None)