Theorem ovid 7591

Description: The value of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ovid.1	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑)
ovid.2	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ovid	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑧,𝑅   𝑧,𝑆

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑅(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑆(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem ovid

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ov 7451	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
2	1	eqeq1i 2745	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧)
3		ovid.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑)
4	3	fnoprab 7575	. . . . 5 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)}
5		ovid.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}
6	5	fneq1i 6676	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)} ↔ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)})
7	4, 6	mpbir 231	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)}
8		opabidw 5543	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆))
9	8	biimpri 228	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)})
10		fnopfvb 6974	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)} ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)}) → ((𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
11	7, 9, 10	sylancr 586	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
12	5	eleq2i 2836	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)})
13		oprabidw 7479	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑))
14	12, 13	bitri 275	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑))
15	14	baib 535	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ↔ 𝜑))
16	11, 15	bitrd 279	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧 ↔ 𝜑))
17	2, 16	bitrid 283	1 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃!weu 2571  ⟨cop 4654  {copab 5228   Fn wfn 6568  ‘cfv 6573  (class class class)co 7448  {coprab 7449

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-fv 6581  df-ov 7451  df-oprab 7452

This theorem is referenced by: (None)