Theorem ovid 7551

Description: The value of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ovid.1	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑)
ovid.2	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ovid	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑧,𝑅   𝑧,𝑆

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑅(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑆(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem ovid

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ov 7413	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
2	1	eqeq1i 2768	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧)
3		ovid.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑)
4	3	fnoprab 7535	. . . . 5 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)}
5		ovid.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}
6	5	fneq1i 6632	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)} ↔ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)})
7	4, 6	mpbir 234	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)}
8		opabidw 5508	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆))
9	8	biimpri 231	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)})
10		fnopfvb 6932	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)} ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)}) → ((𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
11	7, 9, 10	sylancr 598	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
12	5	eleq2i 2855	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)})
13		oprabidw 7441	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑))
14	12, 13	bitri 278	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑))
15	14	baib 544	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ↔ 𝜑))
16	11, 15	bitrd 282	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧 ↔ 𝜑))
17	2, 16	bitrid 286	1 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  ∃!weu 2596  ⟨cop 4595  {copab 5173   Fn wfn 6531  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410  {coprab 7411

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5404

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7413  df-oprab 7414

This theorem is referenced by: (None)