Theorem ovid 7454

Description: The value of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ovid.1	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑)
ovid.2	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ovid	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑧,𝑅   𝑧,𝑆

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑅(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑆(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem ovid

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ov 7318	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
2	1	eqeq1i 2742	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ (𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧)
3		ovid.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃!𝑧𝜑)
4	3	fnoprab 7440	. . . . 5 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)}
5		ovid.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)}
6	5	fneq1i 6568	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)} ↔ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)})
7	4, 6	mpbir 230	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)}
8		opabidw 5457	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆))
9	8	biimpri 227	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)})
10		fnopfvb 6862	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)} ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)}) → ((𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
11	7, 9, 10	sylancr 587	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
12	5	eleq2i 2829	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)})
13		oprabidw 7346	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑))
14	12, 13	bitri 274	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝜑))
15	14	baib 536	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ↔ 𝜑))
16	11, 15	bitrd 278	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐹‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑧 ↔ 𝜑))
17	2, 16	bitrid 282	1 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = 𝑧 ↔ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2105  ∃!weu 2567  ⟨cop 4577  {copab 5149   Fn wfn 6460  ‘cfv 6465  (class class class)co 7315  {coprab 7316

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5238  ax-nul 5245  ax-pr 5367

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2815  df-nfc 2887  df-ne 2942  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rab 3405  df-v 3443  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4268  df-if 4472  df-sn 4572  df-pr 4574  df-op 4578  df-uni 4851  df-br 5088  df-opab 5150  df-id 5507  df-xp 5613  df-rel 5614  df-cnv 5615  df-co 5616  df-dm 5617  df-iota 6417  df-fun 6467  df-fn 6468  df-fv 6473  df-ov 7318  df-oprab 7319

This theorem is referenced by: (None)