Theorem sbthlem6 9104

Description: Lemma for sbth 9109. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sbthlem.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
sbthlem.2	⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}
sbthlem.3	⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbthlem6	⊢ ((ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ((dom 𝑔 = 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔)) → ran 𝐻 = 𝐵)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐷   𝑥,𝑓   𝑥,𝑔   𝑥,𝐻

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑓, 𝑔)   𝐵(𝑓, 𝑔)   𝐷(𝑓, 𝑔)   𝐻(𝑓, 𝑔)

Proof of Theorem sbthlem6

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rnun 6136	. . . 4 ⊢ ran ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))) = (ran (𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ ran (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))
2		sbthlem.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))
3	2	rneqi 5919	. . . 4 ⊢ ran 𝐻 = ran ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))
4		df-ima 5664	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷) = ran (𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷)
5	4	uneq1i 4111	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ ran (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))) = (ran (𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ ran (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))
6	1, 3, 5	3eqtr4i 2794	. . 3 ⊢ ran 𝐻 = ((𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ ran (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))
7		sbthlem.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
8		sbthlem.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}
9	7, 8	sbthlem4 9102	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((dom 𝑔 = 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔) → (◡𝑔 “ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)) = (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))
10		df-ima 5664	. . . . 5 ⊢ (◡𝑔 “ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)) = ran (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))
11	9, 10	eqtr3di 2811	. . . 4 ⊢ (((dom 𝑔 = 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔) → (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)) = ran (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))
12	11	uneq2d 4115	. . 3 ⊢ (((dom 𝑔 = 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔) → ((𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) = ((𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ ran (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))))
13	6, 12	eqtr4id 2815	. 2 ⊢ (((dom 𝑔 = 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔) → ran 𝐻 = ((𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
14		imassrn 6196	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷) ⊆ ran 𝑓
15		sstr2 3938	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷) ⊆ ran 𝑓 → (ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝐵))
16	14, 15	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝐵)
17		undif 4438	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ((𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) = 𝐵)
18	16, 17	sylib 221	. 2 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) = 𝐵)
19	13, 18	sylan9eqr 2818	1 ⊢ ((ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ((dom 𝑔 = 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔)) → ran 𝐻 = 𝐵)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2739  Vcvv 3451   ∖ cdif 3896   ∪ cun 3897   ⊆ wss 3899  ∪ cuni 4867  ^◡ccnv 5650  dom cdm 5651  ran crn 5652   ↾ cres 5653   “ cima 5654  Fun wfun 6531

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-pr 5391

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-fun 6539

This theorem is used by:  sbthlem9  9107