MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  sbth Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem sbth 9023
Description: Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem. Theorem 18 of [Suppes] p. 95. This theorem states that if set 𝐴 is smaller (has lower cardinality) than 𝐵 and vice-versa, then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are equinumerous (have the same cardinality). The interesting thing is that this can be proved without invoking the Axiom of Choice, as we do here. The theorem can also be proved from the axiom of choice and the linear order of the cardinal numbers, but our development does not provide the linear order of cardinal numbers until much later and in ways that depend on Schroeder-Bernstein.

The main proof consists of lemmas sbthlem1 9013 through sbthlem10 9022; this final piece mainly changes bound variables to eliminate the hypotheses of sbthlem10 9022. We follow closely the proof in Suppes, which you should consult to understand our proof at a higher level. Note that Suppes' proof, which is credited to J. M. Whitaker, does not require the Axiom of Infinity. In the Intuitionistic Logic Explorer (ILE) the Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem has been proven equivalent to the law of the excluded middle (LEM), and in ILE the LEM is not accepted as necessarily true; see https://us.metamath.org/ileuni/exmidsbth.html 9022. This is Metamath 100 proof #25. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1998.)

Assertion
Ref Expression
sbth ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵)

Proof of Theorem sbth
Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 𝑤 𝑓 𝑔 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 reldom 8887 . . . 4 Rel ≼
21brrelex1i 5678 . . 3 (𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ V)
31brrelex1i 5678 . . 3 (𝐵𝐴𝐵 ∈ V)
4 breq1 5099 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧𝑤𝐴𝑤))
5 breq2 5100 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑤𝑧𝑤𝐴))
64, 5anbi12d 632 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑧) ↔ (𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴)))
7 breq1 5099 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧𝑤𝐴𝑤))
86, 7imbi12d 344 . . . 4 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (((𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑧) → 𝑧𝑤) ↔ ((𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴) → 𝐴𝑤)))
9 breq2 5100 . . . . . 6 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝑤𝐴𝐵))
10 breq1 5099 . . . . . 6 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝑤𝐴𝐵𝐴))
119, 10anbi12d 632 . . . . 5 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴) ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴)))
12 breq2 5100 . . . . 5 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝑤𝐴𝐵))
1311, 12imbi12d 344 . . . 4 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (((𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴) → 𝐴𝑤) ↔ ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵)))
14 vex 3442 . . . . 5 𝑧 ∈ V
15 sseq1 3957 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦𝑧𝑥𝑧))
16 imaeq2 6013 . . . . . . . . . 10 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑓𝑦) = (𝑓𝑥))
1716difeq2d 4076 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦)) = (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥)))
1817imaeq2d 6017 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) = (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))))
19 difeq2 4070 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑧𝑦) = (𝑧𝑥))
2018, 19sseq12d 3965 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦) ↔ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑥)))
2115, 20anbi12d 632 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑥))))
2221cbvabv 2804 . . . . 5 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑥))}
23 eqid 2734 . . . . 5 ((𝑓 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))}) ∪ (𝑔 ↾ (𝑧 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))}))) = ((𝑓 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))}) ∪ (𝑔 ↾ (𝑧 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))})))
24 vex 3442 . . . . 5 𝑤 ∈ V
2514, 22, 23, 24sbthlem10 9022 . . . 4 ((𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑧) → 𝑧𝑤)
268, 13, 25vtocl2g 3527 . . 3 ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵))
272, 3, 26syl2an 596 . 2 ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵))
2827pm2.43i 52 1 ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 395   = wceq 1541  wcel 2113  {cab 2712  Vcvv 3438  cdif 3896  cun 3897  wss 3899   cuni 4861   class class class wbr 5096  ccnv 5621  cres 5624  cima 5625  cen 8878  cdom 8879
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-12 2182  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5239  ax-nul 5249  ax-pow 5308  ax-pr 5375  ax-un 7678
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2537  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2809  df-ral 3050  df-rex 3059  df-rab 3398  df-v 3440  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4284  df-if 4478  df-pw 4554  df-sn 4579  df-pr 4581  df-op 4585  df-uni 4862  df-br 5097  df-opab 5159  df-id 5517  df-xp 5628  df-rel 5629  df-cnv 5630  df-co 5631  df-dm 5632  df-rn 5633  df-res 5634  df-ima 5635  df-fun 6492  df-fn 6493  df-f 6494  df-f1 6495  df-fo 6496  df-f1o 6497  df-en 8882  df-dom 8883
This theorem is referenced by:  sbthb  9024  sdomnsym  9028  domtriord  9049  xpen  9066  limenpsi  9078  unbnn  9194  infxpenlem  9921  fseqen  9935  infpwfien  9970  inffien  9971  alephdom  9989  mappwen  10020  infdjuabs  10113  infunabs  10114  infdju  10115  infdif  10116  infxpabs  10119  infmap2  10125  gchaleph  10580  gchhar  10588  inttsk  10683  inar1  10684  znnen  16135  qnnen  16136  rpnnen  16150  rexpen  16151  mreexfidimd  17571  acsinfdimd  18479  fislw  19552  opnreen  24774  ovolctb2  25447  vitali  25568  aannenlem3  26292  basellem4  27048  lgsqrlem4  27314  upgrex  29114  iccioo01  37471  ctbssinf  37550  phpreu  37744  poimirlem26  37786  pellexlem4  43016  pellexlem5  43017  idomsubgmo  43377
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator