MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  sbth Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem sbth 9025
Description: Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem. Theorem 18 of [Suppes] p. 95. This theorem states that if set 𝐴 is smaller (has lower cardinality) than 𝐵 and vice-versa, then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are equinumerous (have the same cardinality). The interesting thing is that this can be proved without invoking the Axiom of Choice, as we do here. The theorem can also be proved from the axiom of choice and the linear order of the cardinal numbers, but our development does not provide the linear order of cardinal numbers until much later and in ways that depend on Schroeder-Bernstein.

The main proof consists of lemmas sbthlem1 9015 through sbthlem10 9024; this final piece mainly changes bound variables to eliminate the hypotheses of sbthlem10 9024. We follow closely the proof in Suppes, which you should consult to understand our proof at a higher level. Note that Suppes' proof, which is credited to J. M. Whitaker, does not require the Axiom of Infinity. In the Intuitionistic Logic Explorer (ILE) the Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem has been proven equivalent to the law of the excluded middle (LEM), and in ILE the LEM is not accepted as necessarily true; see https://us.metamath.org/ileuni/exmidsbth.html 9024. This is Metamath 100 proof #25. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1998.)

Assertion
Ref Expression
sbth ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵)

Proof of Theorem sbth
Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 𝑤 𝑓 𝑔 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 reldom 8889 . . . 4 Rel ≼
21brrelex1i 5680 . . 3 (𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ V)
31brrelex1i 5680 . . 3 (𝐵𝐴𝐵 ∈ V)
4 breq1 5101 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧𝑤𝐴𝑤))
5 breq2 5102 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑤𝑧𝑤𝐴))
64, 5anbi12d 632 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑧) ↔ (𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴)))
7 breq1 5101 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧𝑤𝐴𝑤))
86, 7imbi12d 344 . . . 4 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (((𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑧) → 𝑧𝑤) ↔ ((𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴) → 𝐴𝑤)))
9 breq2 5102 . . . . . 6 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝑤𝐴𝐵))
10 breq1 5101 . . . . . 6 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝑤𝐴𝐵𝐴))
119, 10anbi12d 632 . . . . 5 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴) ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴)))
12 breq2 5102 . . . . 5 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝑤𝐴𝐵))
1311, 12imbi12d 344 . . . 4 (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (((𝐴𝑤𝑤𝐴) → 𝐴𝑤) ↔ ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵)))
14 vex 3444 . . . . 5 𝑧 ∈ V
15 sseq1 3959 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦𝑧𝑥𝑧))
16 imaeq2 6015 . . . . . . . . . 10 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑓𝑦) = (𝑓𝑥))
1716difeq2d 4078 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦)) = (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥)))
1817imaeq2d 6019 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) = (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))))
19 difeq2 4072 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑧𝑦) = (𝑧𝑥))
2018, 19sseq12d 3967 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦) ↔ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑥)))
2115, 20anbi12d 632 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑥))))
2221cbvabv 2806 . . . . 5 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑥))}
23 eqid 2736 . . . . 5 ((𝑓 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))}) ∪ (𝑔 ↾ (𝑧 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))}))) = ((𝑓 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))}) ∪ (𝑔 ↾ (𝑧 {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧𝑦))})))
24 vex 3444 . . . . 5 𝑤 ∈ V
2514, 22, 23, 24sbthlem10 9024 . . . 4 ((𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑧) → 𝑧𝑤)
268, 13, 25vtocl2g 3529 . . 3 ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵))
272, 3, 26syl2an 596 . 2 ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵))
2827pm2.43i 52 1 ((𝐴𝐵𝐵𝐴) → 𝐴𝐵)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 395   = wceq 1541  wcel 2113  {cab 2714  Vcvv 3440  cdif 3898  cun 3899  wss 3901   cuni 4863   class class class wbr 5098  ccnv 5623  cres 5626  cima 5627  cen 8880  cdom 8881
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-12 2184  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5241  ax-nul 5251  ax-pow 5310  ax-pr 5377  ax-un 7680
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rab 3400  df-v 3442  df-dif 3904  df-un 3906  df-in 3908  df-ss 3918  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-pw 4556  df-sn 4581  df-pr 4583  df-op 4587  df-uni 4864  df-br 5099  df-opab 5161  df-id 5519  df-xp 5630  df-rel 5631  df-cnv 5632  df-co 5633  df-dm 5634  df-rn 5635  df-res 5636  df-ima 5637  df-fun 6494  df-fn 6495  df-f 6496  df-f1 6497  df-fo 6498  df-f1o 6499  df-en 8884  df-dom 8885
This theorem is referenced by:  sbthb  9026  sdomnsym  9030  domtriord  9051  xpen  9068  limenpsi  9080  unbnn  9196  infxpenlem  9923  fseqen  9937  infpwfien  9972  inffien  9973  alephdom  9991  mappwen  10022  infdjuabs  10115  infunabs  10116  infdju  10117  infdif  10118  infxpabs  10121  infmap2  10127  gchaleph  10582  gchhar  10590  inttsk  10685  inar1  10686  znnen  16137  qnnen  16138  rpnnen  16152  rexpen  16153  mreexfidimd  17573  acsinfdimd  18481  fislw  19554  opnreen  24776  ovolctb2  25449  vitali  25570  aannenlem3  26294  basellem4  27050  lgsqrlem4  27316  upgrex  29165  iccioo01  37532  ctbssinf  37611  phpreu  37805  poimirlem26  37847  pellexlem4  43074  pellexlem5  43075  idomsubgmo  43435
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator