P. 92 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 9101-9200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	pwen 9101	If two sets are equinumerous, then their power sets are equinumerous. Proposition 10.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 87. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ≈ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	ssenen 9102*	Equinumerosity of equinumerous subsets of a set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐶)} ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐶)})
Theorem	limenpsi 9103	A limit ordinal is equinumerous to a proper subset of itself. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ Lim 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	limensuci 9104	A limit ordinal is equinumerous to its successor. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.)
⊢ Lim 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	limensuc 9105	A limit ordinal is equinumerous to its successor. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	infensuc 9106	Any infinite ordinal is equinumerous to its successor. Exercise 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 88. Proved without the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ω ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
2.4.32  Finite sets
Theorem	dif1enlem 9107	Lemma for rexdif1en 9109 and dif1en 9111. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals and add a sethood requirement to avoid ax-un 7677. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 5-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝐹‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	dif1enlemOLD 9108	Obsolete version of dif1enlem 9107 as of 5-Jan-2025. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Aug-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝐹‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	rexdif1en 9109*	If a set is equinumerous to a nonzero ordinal, then there exists an element in that set such that removing it leaves the set equinumerous to the predecessor of that ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals and avoid ax-un 7677. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 5-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	rexdif1enOLD 9110*	Obsolete version of rexdif1en 9109 as of 5-Jan-2025. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	dif1en 9111	If a set 𝐴 is equinumerous to the successor of an ordinal 𝑀, then 𝐴 with an element removed is equinumerous to 𝑀. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 6-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	dif1ennn 9112	If a set 𝐴 is equinumerous to the successor of a natural number 𝑀, then 𝐴 with an element removed is equinumerous to 𝑀. See also dif1ennnALT 9228. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 6-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	dif1enOLD 9113	Obsolete version of dif1en 9111 as of 6-Jan-2025. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	findcard 9114*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive hypothesis is that the result is true on the given set with any one element removed. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∖ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2 9115*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive step shows that the result is true if one more element is added to the set. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 8-Jul-2010.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2s 9116*	Variation of findcard2 9115 requiring that the element added in the induction step not be a member of the original set. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 30-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ Fin ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2d 9117*	Deduction version of findcard2 9115. (Contributed by SO, 16-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑦))) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)
Theorem	nnfi 9118	Natural numbers are finite sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	pssnn 9119*	A proper subset of a natural number is equinumerous to some smaller number. Lemma 6F of [Enderton] p. 137. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≈ 𝑥)
Theorem	ssnnfi 9120	A subset of a natural number is finite. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1998.) (Proof shortened by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	ssnnfiOLD 9121	Obsolete version of ssnnfi 9120 as of 23-Sep-2024. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1998.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	0fin 9122	The empty set is finite. (Contributed by FL, 14-Jul-2008.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ Fin
Theorem	unfi 9123	The union of two finite sets is finite. Part of Corollary 6K of [Enderton] p. 144. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2002.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 7-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	ssfi 9124	A subset of a finite set is finite. Corollary 6G of [Enderton] p. 138. For a shorter proof using ax-pow 5325, see ssfiALT 9125. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 12-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	ssfiALT 9125	Shorter proof of ssfi 9124 using ax-pow 5325. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1998.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	imafi 9126	Images of finite sets are finite. For a shorter proof using ax-pow 5325, see imafiALT 9296. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 7-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin) → (𝐹 “ 𝑋) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	pwfir 9127	If the power set of a set is finite, then the set itself is finite. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝒫 𝐵 ∈ Fin → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	pwfilem 9128*	Lemma for pwfi 9129. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2007.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 7-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝒫 𝑏 ↦ (𝑐 ∪ {𝑥}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝒫 𝑏 ∈ Fin → 𝒫 (𝑏 ∪ {𝑥}) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	pwfi 9129	The power set of a finite set is finite and vice-versa. Theorem 38 of [Suppes] p. 104 and its converse, Theorem 40 of [Suppes] p. 105. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2007.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 7-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	diffi 9130	If 𝐴 is finite, (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) is finite. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	cnvfi 9131	If a set is finite, its converse is as well. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 9-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → ◡𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	fnfi 9132	A version of fnex 7172 for finite sets that does not require Replacement or Power Sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → 𝐹 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	f1oenfi 9133	If the domain of a one-to-one, onto function is finite, then the domain and range of the function are equinumerous. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Replacement or the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike f1oeng 8918). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 8-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1oenfirn 9134	If the range of a one-to-one, onto function is finite, then the domain and range of the function are equinumerous. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 9-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1domfi 9135	If the codomain of a one-to-one function is finite, then the function's domain is dominated by its codomain. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Replacement or the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike f1domg 8919). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1domfi2 9136	If the domain of a one-to-one function is finite, then the function's domain is dominated by its codomain when the latter is a set. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike f1dom2g 8916). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	enreffi 9137	Equinumerosity is reflexive for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike enrefg 8931). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 8-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ensymfib 9138	Symmetry of equinumerosity for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike ensymb 8949). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 9-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴))
Theorem	entrfil 9139	Transitivity of equinumerosity for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike entr 8953). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 10-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	enfii 9140	A set equinumerous to a finite set is finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	enfi 9141	Equinumerous sets have the same finiteness. For a shorter proof using ax-pow 5325, see enfiALT 9142. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Fin))
Theorem	enfiALT 9142	Shorter proof of enfi 9141 using ax-pow 5325. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Fin))
Theorem	domfi 9143	A set dominated by a finite set is finite. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	entrfi 9144	Transitivity of equinumerosity for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike entr 8953). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	entrfir 9145	Transitivity of equinumerosity for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike entr 8953). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	domtrfil 9146	Transitivity of dominance relation when 𝐴 is finite, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike domtr 8954). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	domtrfi 9147	Transitivity of dominance relation when 𝐵 is finite, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike domtr 8954). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	domtrfir 9148	Transitivity of dominance relation for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike domtr 8954). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	f1imaenfi 9149	If a function is one-to-one, then the image of a finite subset of its domain under it is equinumerous to the subset. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Replacement or the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike f1imaeng 8961). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 29-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Fin) → (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	ssdomfi 9150	A finite set dominates its subsets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike ssdomg 8947). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 12-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	ssdomfi2 9151	A set dominates its finite subsets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike ssdomg 8947). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	sbthfilem 9152*	Lemma for sbthfi 9153. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 4-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sbthfi 9153	Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike sbth 9044). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 4-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	domnsymfi 9154	If a set dominates a finite set, it cannot also be strictly dominated by the finite set. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike domnsym 9050). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 22-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	sdomdomtrfi 9155	Transitivity of strict dominance and dominance when 𝐴 is finite, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike sdomdomtr 9061). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	domsdomtrfi 9156	Transitivity of dominance and strict dominance when 𝐴 is finite, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike domsdomtr 9063). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	sucdom2 9157	Strict dominance of a set over another set implies dominance over its successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 4-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
2.4.33  Pigeonhole Principle
Theorem	phplem1 9158	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	phplem2 9159	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. Equinumerosity of successors implies equinumerosity of the original natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 4-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	nneneq 9160	Two equinumerous natural numbers are equal. Proposition 10.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90 and its converse. Also compare Corollary 6E of [Enderton] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	php 9161	Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is not equinumerous to a proper subset of itself. Theorem (Pigeonhole Principle) of [Enderton] p. 134. The theorem is so-called because you can't put n + 1 pigeons into n holes (if each hole holds only one pigeon). The proof consists of phplem1 9158, phplem2 9159, nneneq 9160, and this final piece of the proof. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	php2 9162	Corollary of Pigeonhole Principle. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 20-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	php3 9163	Corollary of Pigeonhole Principle. If 𝐴 is finite and 𝐵 is a proper subset of 𝐴, the 𝐵 is strictly less numerous than 𝐴. Stronger version of Corollary 6C of [Enderton] p. 135. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 26-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	php4 9164	Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle php 9161: a natural number is strictly dominated by its successor. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ≺ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	php5 9165	Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle php 9161: a natural number is not equinumerous to its successor. Corollary 10.21(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	phpeqd 9166	Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle using equality. Strengthening of php 9161 expressed without negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) Avoid ax-pow. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 28-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	nndomog 9167	Cardinal ordering agrees with ordinal number ordering when the smaller number is a natural number. Compare with nndomo 9184 when both are natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.) Generalize from nndomo 9184. (Revised by RP, 5-Nov-2023.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	phplem1OLD 9168	Obsolete lemma for php 9161. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ({𝐴} ∪ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})) = (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	phplem2OLD 9169	Obsolete lemma for php 9161. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	phplem3OLD 9170	Obsolete version of phplem1 9158 as of 23-Sep-2024. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	phplem4OLD 9171	Obsolete version of phplem2 9159 as of 4-Nov-2024. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	nneneqOLD 9172	Obsolete version of nneneq 9160 as of 11-Nov-2024. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	phpOLD 9173	Obsolete version of php 9161 as of 18-Nov-2024. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-1998.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	php2OLD 9174	Obsolete version of php2 9162 as of 20-Nov-2024. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1998.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	php3OLD 9175	Obsolete version of php3 9163 as of 26-Nov-2024. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	phpeqdOLD 9176	Obsolete version of phpeqd 9166 as of 28-Nov-2024. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	nndomogOLD 9177	Obsolete version of nndomog 9167 as of 29-Nov-2024. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.) Generalize from nndomo 9184. (Revised by RP, 5-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	snnen2oOLD 9178	Obsolete version of snnen2o 9188 as of 18-Nov-2024. (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ {𝐴} ≈ 2o
2.4.34  Finite sets (cont.)
Theorem	onomeneq 9179	An ordinal number equinumerous to a natural number is equal to it. Proposition 10.22 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 2-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	onomeneqOLD 9180	Obsolete version of onomeneq 9179 as of 29-Nov-2024. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	onfin 9181	An ordinal number is finite iff it is a natural number. Proposition 10.32 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ω))
Theorem	onfin2 9182	A set is a natural number iff it is a finite ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ω = (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	nnfiOLD 9183	Obsolete version of nnfi 9118 as of 23-Sep-2024. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	nndomo 9184	Cardinal ordering agrees with natural number ordering. Example 3 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	nnsdomo 9185	Cardinal ordering agrees with natural number ordering. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))
Theorem	sucdom 9186	Strict dominance of a set over a natural number is the same as dominance over its successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2013.) Avoid ax-pow 5325. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 4-Dec-2024.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 11-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ suc 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	sucdomOLD 9187	Obsolete version of sucdom 9186 as of 4-Dec-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ suc 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	snnen2o 9188	A singleton {𝐴} is never equinumerous with the ordinal number 2. This holds for proper singletons (𝐴 ∈ V) as well as for singletons being the empty set (𝐴 ∉ V). (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2019.) Avoid ax-pow 5325, ax-un 7677. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 1-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ {𝐴} ≈ 2o
Theorem	0sdom1dom 9189	Strict dominance over 0 is the same as dominance over 1. For a shorter proof requiring ax-un 7677, see 0sdom1domALT . (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) Avoid ax-un 7677. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (∅ ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 1o ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	0sdom1domALT 9190	Alternate proof of 0sdom1dom 9189, shorter but requiring ax-un 7677. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∅ ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 1o ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	1sdom2 9191	Ordinal 1 is strictly dominated by ordinal 2. For a shorter proof requiring ax-un 7677, see 1sdom2ALT 9192. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2007.) Avoid ax-un 7677. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 8-Dec-2024.)
⊢ 1o ≺ 2o
Theorem	1sdom2ALT 9192	Alternate proof of 1sdom2 9191, shorter but requiring ax-un 7677. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1o ≺ 2o
Theorem	sdom1 9193	A set has less than one member iff it is empty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.) Avoid ax-pow 5325, ax-un 7677. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 12-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 1o ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	sdom1OLD 9194	Obsolete version of sdom1 9193 as of 12-Dec-2024. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 1o ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	modom 9195	Two ways to express "at most one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ≼ 1o)
Theorem	modom2 9196*	Two ways to express "at most one". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 1o)
Theorem	rex2dom 9197*	A set that has at least 2 different members dominates ordinal 2. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦) → 2o ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	1sdom2dom 9198	Strict dominance over 1 is the same as dominance over 2. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 23-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (1o ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 2o ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	1sdom 9199*	A set that strictly dominates ordinal 1 has at least 2 different members. (Closely related to 2dom 8981.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2013.) Avoid ax-un 7677. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (1o ≺ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	1sdomOLD 9200*	Obsolete version of 1sdom 9199 as of 30-Dec-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (1o ≺ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦))