P. 92 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 9101-9200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	canth2g 9101	Cantor's theorem with the sethood requirement expressed as an antecedent. Theorem 23 of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≺ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	2pwuninel 9102	The power set of the power set of the union of a set does not belong to the set. This theorem provides a way of constructing a new set that doesn't belong to a given set. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2008.)
⊢ ¬ 𝒫 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	2pwne 9103	No set equals the power set of its power set. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝒫 𝒫 𝐴 ≠ 𝐴)
Theorem	disjen 9104	A stronger form of pwuninel 8257. We can use pwuninel 8257, 2pwuninel 9102 to create one or two sets disjoint from a given set 𝐴, but here we show that in fact such constructions exist for arbitrarily large disjoint extensions, which is to say that for any set 𝐵 we can construct a set 𝑥 that is equinumerous to it and disjoint from 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × {𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐴})) = ∅ ∧ (𝐵 × {𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐴}) ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	disjenex 9105*	Existence version of disjen 9104. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∃𝑥((𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	domss2 9106	A corollary of disjenex 9105. If 𝐹 is an injection from 𝐴 to 𝐵 then 𝐺 is a right inverse of 𝐹 from 𝐵 to a superset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐺 = ◡(𝐹 ∪ (1st ↾ ((𝐵 ∖ ran 𝐹) × {𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐴})))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	domssex2 9107*	A corollary of disjenex 9105. If 𝐹 is an injection from 𝐴 to 𝐵 then there is a right inverse 𝑔 of 𝐹 from 𝐵 to a superset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐵–1-1→V ∧ (𝑔 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	domssex 9108*	Weakening of domssex2 9107 to forget the functions in favor of dominance and equinumerosity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝑥))
2.4.31  Equinumerosity (cont.)
Theorem	xpf1o 9109*	Construct a bijection on a Cartesian product given bijections on the factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑋):𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝑌):𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩):(𝐴 × 𝐶)–1-1-onto→(𝐵 × 𝐷))
Theorem	xpen 9110	Equinumerosity law for Cartesian product. Proposition 4.22(b) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 × 𝐷))
Theorem	mapen 9111	Two set exponentiations are equinumerous when their bases and exponents are equinumerous. Theorem 6H(c) of [Enderton] p. 139. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐷))
Theorem	mapdom1 9112	Order-preserving property of set exponentiation. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) ≼ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶))
Theorem	mapxpen 9113	Equinumerosity law for double set exponentiation. Proposition 10.45 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 96. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ↑m 𝐶) ≈ (𝐴 ↑m (𝐵 × 𝐶)))
Theorem	xpmapenlem 9114*	Lemma for xpmapen 9115. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (1st ‘(𝑥‘𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (2nd ‘(𝑥‘𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ⟨((1st ‘𝑦)‘𝑧), ((2nd ‘𝑦)‘𝑧)⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ↑m 𝐶) ≈ ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) × (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶))
Theorem	xpmapen 9115	Equinumerosity law for set exponentiation of a Cartesian product. Exercise 4.47 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ↑m 𝐶) ≈ ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) × (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶))
Theorem	mapunen 9116	Equinumerosity law for set exponentiation of a disjoint union. Exercise 4.45 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (𝐶 ↑m (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ≈ ((𝐶 ↑m 𝐴) × (𝐶 ↑m 𝐵)))
Theorem	map2xp 9117	A cardinal power with exponent 2 is equivalent to a Cartesian product with itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ↑m 2o) ≈ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	mapdom2 9118	Order-preserving property of set exponentiation. Theorem 6L(d) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 = ∅)) → (𝐶 ↑m 𝐴) ≼ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐵))
Theorem	mapdom3 9119	Set exponentiation dominates the base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Jul-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ≼ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵))
Theorem	pwen 9120	If two sets are equinumerous, then their power sets are equinumerous. Proposition 10.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 87. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ≈ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	ssenen 9121*	Equinumerosity of equinumerous subsets of a set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐶)} ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐶)})
Theorem	limenpsi 9122	A limit ordinal is equinumerous to a proper subset of itself. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ Lim 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	limensuci 9123	A limit ordinal is equinumerous to its successor. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.)
⊢ Lim 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	limensuc 9124	A limit ordinal is equinumerous to its successor. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	infensuc 9125	Any infinite ordinal is equinumerous to its successor. Exercise 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 88. Proved without the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ω ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
2.4.32  Finite sets
Theorem	dif1enlem 9126	Lemma for rexdif1en 9128 and dif1en 9130. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals and add a sethood requirement to avoid ax-un 7714. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 5-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝐹‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	dif1enlemOLD 9127	Obsolete version of dif1enlem 9126 as of 5-Jan-2025. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Aug-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝐹‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	rexdif1en 9128*	If a set is equinumerous to a nonzero ordinal, then there exists an element in that set such that removing it leaves the set equinumerous to the predecessor of that ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals and avoid ax-un 7714. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 5-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	rexdif1enOLD 9129*	Obsolete version of rexdif1en 9128 as of 5-Jan-2025. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	dif1en 9130	If a set 𝐴 is equinumerous to the successor of an ordinal 𝑀, then 𝐴 with an element removed is equinumerous to 𝑀. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 6-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	dif1ennn 9131	If a set 𝐴 is equinumerous to the successor of a natural number 𝑀, then 𝐴 with an element removed is equinumerous to 𝑀. See also dif1ennnALT 9229. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 6-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	dif1enOLD 9132	Obsolete version of dif1en 9130 as of 6-Jan-2025. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	findcard 9133*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive hypothesis is that the result is true on the given set with any one element removed. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∖ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2 9134*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive step shows that the result is true if one more element is added to the set. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 8-Jul-2010.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2s 9135*	Variation of findcard2 9134 requiring that the element added in the induction step not be a member of the original set. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 30-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ Fin ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2d 9136*	Deduction version of findcard2 9134. (Contributed by SO, 16-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑦))) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)
Theorem	nnfi 9137	Natural numbers are finite sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	pssnn 9138*	A proper subset of a natural number is equinumerous to some smaller number. Lemma 6F of [Enderton] p. 137. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≈ 𝑥)
Theorem	ssnnfi 9139	A subset of a natural number is finite. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1998.) (Proof shortened by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	0finOLD 9140	Obsolete version of 0fi 9016 as of 13-Jan-2025. (Contributed by FL, 14-Jul-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ Fin
Theorem	unfi 9141	The union of two finite sets is finite. Part of Corollary 6K of [Enderton] p. 144. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2002.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 7-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	unfid 9142	The union of two finite sets is finite. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	ssfi 9143	A subset of a finite set is finite. Corollary 6G of [Enderton] p. 138. For a shorter proof using ax-pow 5323, see ssfiALT 9144. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 12-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	ssfiALT 9144	Shorter proof of ssfi 9143 using ax-pow 5323. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1998.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	diffi 9145	If 𝐴 is finite, (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) is finite. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	cnvfi 9146	If a set is finite, its converse is as well. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 9-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → ◡𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	pwssfi 9147	Every element of the power set of 𝐴 is finite if and only if 𝐴 is finite. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ Fin))
Theorem	fnfi 9148	A version of fnex 7194 for finite sets that does not require Replacement or Power Sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → 𝐹 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	f1oenfi 9149	If the domain of a one-to-one, onto function is finite, then the domain and range of the function are equinumerous. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Replacement or the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike f1oeng 8945). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 8-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1oenfirn 9150	If the range of a one-to-one, onto function is finite, then the domain and range of the function are equinumerous. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 9-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1domfi 9151	If the codomain of a one-to-one function is finite, then the function's domain is dominated by its codomain. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Replacement or the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike f1domg 8946). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1domfi2 9152	If the domain of a one-to-one function is finite, then the function's domain is dominated by its codomain when the latter is a set. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike f1dom2g 8944). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	enreffi 9153	Equinumerosity is reflexive for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike enrefg 8958). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 8-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ensymfib 9154	Symmetry of equinumerosity for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike ensymb 8976). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 9-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴))
Theorem	entrfil 9155	Transitivity of equinumerosity for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike entr 8980). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 10-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	enfii 9156	A set equinumerous to a finite set is finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	enfi 9157	Equinumerous sets have the same finiteness. For a shorter proof using ax-pow 5323, see enfiALT 9158. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Fin))
Theorem	enfiALT 9158	Shorter proof of enfi 9157 using ax-pow 5323. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Fin))
Theorem	domfi 9159	A set dominated by a finite set is finite. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	entrfi 9160	Transitivity of equinumerosity for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike entr 8980). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	entrfir 9161	Transitivity of equinumerosity for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike entr 8980). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	domtrfil 9162	Transitivity of dominance relation when 𝐴 is finite, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike domtr 8981). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	domtrfi 9163	Transitivity of dominance relation when 𝐵 is finite, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike domtr 8981). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	domtrfir 9164	Transitivity of dominance relation for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike domtr 8981). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	f1imaenfi 9165	If a function is one-to-one, then the image of a finite subset of its domain under it is equinumerous to the subset. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Replacement or the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike f1imaeng 8988). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 29-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Fin) → (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	ssdomfi 9166	A finite set dominates its subsets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike ssdomg 8974). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 12-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	ssdomfi2 9167	A set dominates its finite subsets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike ssdomg 8974). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	sbthfilem 9168*	Lemma for sbthfi 9169. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 4-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sbthfi 9169	Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike sbth 9067). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 4-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	domnsymfi 9170	If a set dominates a finite set, it cannot also be strictly dominated by the finite set. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike domnsym 9073). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 22-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	sdomdomtrfi 9171	Transitivity of strict dominance and dominance when 𝐴 is finite, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike sdomdomtr 9080). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	domsdomtrfi 9172	Transitivity of dominance and strict dominance when 𝐴 is finite, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike domsdomtr 9082). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	sucdom2 9173	Strict dominance of a set over another set implies dominance over its successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 4-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
2.4.33  Pigeonhole Principle
Theorem	phplem1 9174	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	phplem2 9175	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. Equinumerosity of successors implies equinumerosity of the original natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 4-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	nneneq 9176	Two equinumerous natural numbers are equal. Proposition 10.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90 and its converse. Also compare Corollary 6E of [Enderton] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 11-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	php 9177	Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is not equinumerous to a proper subset of itself. Theorem (Pigeonhole Principle) of [Enderton] p. 134. The theorem is so-called because you can't put n + 1 pigeons into n holes (if each hole holds only one pigeon). The proof consists of phplem1 9174, phplem2 9175, nneneq 9176, and this final piece of the proof. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	php2 9178	Corollary of Pigeonhole Principle. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 20-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	php3 9179	Corollary of Pigeonhole Principle. If 𝐴 is finite and 𝐵 is a proper subset of 𝐴, the 𝐵 is strictly less numerous than 𝐴. Stronger version of Corollary 6C of [Enderton] p. 135. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 26-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	php4 9180	Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle php 9177: a natural number is strictly dominated by its successor. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ≺ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	php5 9181	Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle php 9177: a natural number is not equinumerous to its successor. Corollary 10.21(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	phpeqd 9182	Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle using equality. Strengthening of php 9177 expressed without negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 28-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	nndomog 9183	Cardinal ordering agrees with ordinal number ordering when the smaller number is a natural number. Compare with nndomo 9187 when both are natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.) Generalize from nndomo 9187. (Revised by RP, 5-Nov-2023.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
2.4.34  Finite sets (cont.)
Theorem	onomeneq 9184	An ordinal number equinumerous to a natural number is equal to it. Proposition 10.22 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 2-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	onfin 9185	An ordinal number is finite iff it is a natural number. Proposition 10.32 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ω))
Theorem	onfin2 9186	A set is a natural number iff it is a finite ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ω = (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	nndomo 9187	Cardinal ordering agrees with natural number ordering. Example 3 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	nnsdomo 9188	Cardinal ordering agrees with natural number ordering. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))
Theorem	sucdom 9189	Strict dominance of a set over a natural number is the same as dominance over its successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2013.) Avoid ax-pow 5323. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 4-Dec-2024.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 11-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ suc 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	sucdomOLD 9190	Obsolete version of sucdom 9189 as of 4-Dec-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ suc 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	snnen2o 9191	A singleton {𝐴} is never equinumerous with the ordinal number 2. This holds for proper singletons (𝐴 ∈ V) as well as for singletons being the empty set (𝐴 ∉ V). (Contributed by AV, 6-Aug-2019.) Avoid ax-pow 5323, ax-un 7714. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 1-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ {𝐴} ≈ 2o
Theorem	0sdom1dom 9192	Strict dominance over 0 is the same as dominance over 1. For a shorter proof requiring ax-un 7714, see 0sdom1domALT . (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) Avoid ax-un 7714. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (∅ ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 1o ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	0sdom1domALT 9193	Alternate proof of 0sdom1dom 9192, shorter but requiring ax-un 7714. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∅ ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 1o ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	1sdom2 9194	Ordinal 1 is strictly dominated by ordinal 2. For a shorter proof requiring ax-un 7714, see 1sdom2ALT 9195. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2007.) Avoid ax-un 7714. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 8-Dec-2024.)
⊢ 1o ≺ 2o
Theorem	1sdom2ALT 9195	Alternate proof of 1sdom2 9194, shorter but requiring ax-un 7714. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1o ≺ 2o
Theorem	sdom1 9196	A set has less than one member iff it is empty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.) Avoid ax-pow 5323, ax-un 7714. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 12-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 1o ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	sdom1OLD 9197	Obsolete version of sdom1 9196 as of 12-Dec-2024. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 1o ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	modom 9198	Two ways to express "at most one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ≼ 1o)
Theorem	modom2 9199*	Two ways to express "at most one". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 1o)
Theorem	rex2dom 9200*	A set that has at least 2 different members dominates ordinal 2. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦) → 2o ≼ 𝐴)