Theorem tglnunirn 26909

Description: Lines are sets of points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tglng.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tglng.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
tglng.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tglnunirn	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → ∪ ran 𝐿 ⊆ 𝑃)

Proof of Theorem tglnunirn

Dummy variables 𝑝 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tglng.p	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		tglng.l	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
3		tglng.i	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
4	1, 2, 3	tglng 26907	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}))
5	4	rneqd 5847	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → ran 𝐿 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}))
6	5	eleq2d 2824	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → (𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐿 ↔ 𝑝 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})))
7	6	biimpa 477	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ TarskiG ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐿) → 𝑝 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}))
8		eqid 2738	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})
9	1	fvexi 6788	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑃 ∈ V
10	9	rabex 5256	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} ∈ V
11	8, 10	elrnmpo 7410	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥})𝑝 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})
12		ssrab2 4013	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} ⊆ 𝑃
13		sseq1 3946	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑝 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} → (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃 ↔ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} ⊆ 𝑃))
14	12, 13	mpbiri 257	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑝 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
15	14	rexlimivw 3211	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥})𝑝 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
16	15	rexlimivw 3211	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥})𝑝 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
17	11, 16	sylbi 216	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
18	7, 17	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ TarskiG ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐿) → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
19	18	ralrimiva 3103	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → ∀𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐿 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
20		unissb 4873	. 2 ⊢ (∪ ran 𝐿 ⊆ 𝑃 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐿 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
21	19, 20	sylibr 233	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → ∪ ran 𝐿 ⊆ 𝑃)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∨ w3o 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106  ∀wral 3064  ∃wrex 3065  {crab 3068   ∖ cdif 3884   ⊆ wss 3887  {csn 4561  ∪ cuni 4839  ran crn 5590  ‘cfv 6433  (class class class)co 7275   ∈ cmpo 7277  Basecbs 16912  TarskiGcstrkg 26788  Itvcitv 26794  LineGclng 26795

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pr 5352

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3717  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-cnv 5597  df-dm 5599  df-rn 5600  df-iota 6391  df-fv 6441  df-ov 7278  df-oprab 7279  df-mpo 7280  df-trkg 26814

This theorem is referenced by:  tglnpt  26910  tglineintmo  27003