Theorem tglnunirn 29011

Description: Lines are sets of points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tglng.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tglng.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
tglng.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tglnunirn	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → ∪ ran 𝐿 ⊆ 𝑃)

Proof of Theorem tglnunirn

Dummy variables 𝑝 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tglng.p	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		tglng.l	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
3		tglng.i	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
4	1, 2, 3	tglng 29009	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}))
5	4	rneqd 5919	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → ran 𝐿 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}))
6	5	eleq2d 2846	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → (𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐿 ↔ 𝑝 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})))
7	6	biimpa 482	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ TarskiG ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐿) → 𝑝 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}))
8		eqid 2760	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})
9	1	fvexi 6899	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑃 ∈ V
10	9	rabex 5299	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} ∈ V
11	8, 10	elrnmpo 7556	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥})𝑝 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})
12		ssrab2 4005	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} ⊆ 𝑃
13		sseq1 3933	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑝 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} → (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃 ↔ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} ⊆ 𝑃))
14	12, 13	mpbiri 261	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑝 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
15	14	rexlimivw 3159	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥})𝑝 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
16	15	rexlimivw 3159	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥})𝑝 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
17	11, 16	sylbi 220	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
18	7, 17	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ TarskiG ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐿) → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
19	18	ralrimiva 3154	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → ∀𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐿 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
20		unissb 4900	. 2 ⊢ (∪ ran 𝐿 ⊆ 𝑃 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐿 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
21	19, 20	sylibr 237	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → ∪ ran 𝐿 ⊆ 𝑃)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∨ w3o 1102   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3076  ∃wrex 3086  {crab 3412   ⊆ wss 3895   ∖ cdif 4045  {csn 4583  ∪ cuni 4866  ran crn 5651  ‘cfv 6538  (class class class)co 7420   ∈ cmpo 7422  Basecbs 17387  TarskiGcstrkg 28889  Itvcitv 28895  LineGclng 28896

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-cnv 5658  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-iota 6494  df-fv 6546  df-ov 7423  df-oprab 7424  df-mpo 7425  df-trkg 28915

This theorem is used by:  tglnpt  29012  tglineintmo  29110