Theorem tglnunirn 29038

Description: Lines are sets of points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tglng.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tglng.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
tglng.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tglnunirn	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → ∪ ran 𝐿 ⊆ 𝑃)

Proof of Theorem tglnunirn

Dummy variables 𝑝 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tglng.p	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		tglng.l	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
3		tglng.i	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
4	1, 2, 3	tglng 29036	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}))
5	4	rneqd 5926	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → ran 𝐿 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}))
6	5	eleq2d 2850	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → (𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐿 ↔ 𝑝 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})))
7	6	biimpa 482	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ TarskiG ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐿) → 𝑝 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}))
8		eqid 2763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})
9	1	fvexi 6919	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑃 ∈ V
10	9	rabex 5304	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} ∈ V
11	8, 10	elrnmpo 7577	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥})𝑝 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})
12		ssrab2 4008	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} ⊆ 𝑃
13		sseq1 3938	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑝 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} → (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃 ↔ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} ⊆ 𝑃))
14	12, 13	mpbiri 261	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑝 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
15	14	rexlimivw 3163	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥})𝑝 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
16	15	rexlimivw 3163	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥})𝑝 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
17	11, 16	sylbi 220	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
18	7, 17	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ TarskiG ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐿) → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
19	18	ralrimiva 3158	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → ∀𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐿 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
20		unissb 4904	. 2 ⊢ (∪ ran 𝐿 ⊆ 𝑃 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ ran 𝐿 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑃)
21	19, 20	sylibr 237	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → ∪ ran 𝐿 ⊆ 𝑃)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∨ w3o 1102   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  ∃wrex 3090  {crab 3416   ⊆ wss 3900   ∖ cdif 4048  {csn 4588  ∪ cuni 4870  ran crn 5656  ‘cfv 6555  (class class class)co 7440   ∈ cmpo 7442  Basecbs 17413  TarskiGcstrkg 28916  Itvcitv 28922  LineGclng 28923

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5395

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-cnv 5663  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-iota 6509  df-fv 6563  df-ov 7443  df-oprab 7444  df-mpo 7445  df-trkg 28942

This theorem is used by:  tglnpt  29039  tglineintmo  29137