Theorem tglnfn 28782

Description: Lines as functions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tglng.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tglng.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
tglng.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tglnfn	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐿 Fn ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I ))

Proof of Theorem tglnfn

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tglng.p	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2	1	fvexi 6896	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑃 ∈ V
3	2	rabex 5310	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} ∈ V
4	3	rgen2w 3090	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}){𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} ∈ V
5		eqid 2769	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})
6	5	fmpox 8064	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}){𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} ∈ V ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}):∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ({𝑥} × (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}))⟶V)
7	4, 6	mpbi 233	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}):∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ({𝑥} × (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}))⟶V
8		ffn 6706	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}):∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ({𝑥} × (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}))⟶V → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) Fn ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ({𝑥} × (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥})))
9	7, 8	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) Fn ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ({𝑥} × (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}))
10		xpdifid 6166	. . . 4 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ({𝑥} × (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥})) = ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I )
11	10	fneq2i 6634	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) Fn ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ({𝑥} × (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥})) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) Fn ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I ))
12	9, 11	mpbi 233	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) Fn ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I )
13		tglng.l	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
14		tglng.i	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
15	1, 13, 14	tglng 28781	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}))
16	15	fneq1d 6629	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → (𝐿 Fn ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I ) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) Fn ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I )))
17	12, 16	mpbiri 261	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐿 Fn ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I ))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ w3o 1100   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  ∀wral 3085  {crab 3423  Vcvv 3463   ∖ cdif 3910  {csn 4594  ∪ ciun 4960   I cid 5556   × cxp 5660   Fn wfn 6532  ⟶wf 6533  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7411   ∈ cmpo 7413  Basecbs 17269  TarskiGcstrkg 28662  Itvcitv 28668  LineGclng 28669

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-sep 5261  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5405  ax-un 7733

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1102  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3862  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4877  df-iun 4962  df-br 5114  df-opab 5178  df-mpt 5197  df-id 5557  df-xp 5668  df-rel 5669  df-cnv 5670  df-co 5671  df-dm 5672  df-rn 5673  df-res 5674  df-ima 5675  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7414  df-oprab 7415  df-mpo 7416  df-1st 7986  df-2nd 7987  df-trkg 28688

This theorem is referenced by:  tglngne  28785  tgelrnln  28865