Theorem tglnfn 28531

Description: Lines as functions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tglng.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tglng.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
tglng.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tglnfn	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐿 Fn ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I ))

Proof of Theorem tglnfn

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tglng.p	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2	1	fvexi 6895	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑃 ∈ V
3	2	rabex 5314	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} ∈ V
4	3	rgen2w 3057	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}){𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} ∈ V
5		eqid 2736	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})
6	5	fmpox 8071	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}){𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))} ∈ V ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}):∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ({𝑥} × (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}))⟶V)
7	4, 6	mpbi 230	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}):∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ({𝑥} × (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}))⟶V
8		ffn 6711	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}):∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ({𝑥} × (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}))⟶V → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) Fn ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ({𝑥} × (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥})))
9	7, 8	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) Fn ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ({𝑥} × (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}))
10		xpdifid 6162	. . . 4 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ({𝑥} × (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥})) = ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I )
11	10	fneq2i 6641	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) Fn ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ({𝑥} × (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥})) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) Fn ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I ))
12	9, 11	mpbi 230	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) Fn ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I )
13		tglng.l	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
14		tglng.i	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
15	1, 13, 14	tglng 28530	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}))
16	15	fneq1d 6636	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → (𝐿 Fn ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I ) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}) Fn ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I )))
17	12, 16	mpbiri 258	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐿 Fn ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I ))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ w3o 1085   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3052  {crab 3420  Vcvv 3464   ∖ cdif 3928  {csn 4606  ∪ ciun 4972   I cid 5552   × cxp 5657   Fn wfn 6531  ⟶wf 6532  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410   ∈ cmpo 7412  Basecbs 17233  TarskiGcstrkg 28411  Itvcitv 28417  LineGclng 28418

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5271  ax-nul 5281  ax-pr 5407  ax-un 7734

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3421  df-v 3466  df-sbc 3771  df-csb 3880  df-dif 3934  df-un 3936  df-in 3938  df-ss 3948  df-nul 4314  df-if 4506  df-pw 4582  df-sn 4607  df-pr 4609  df-op 4613  df-uni 4889  df-iun 4974  df-br 5125  df-opab 5187  df-mpt 5207  df-id 5553  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7413  df-oprab 7414  df-mpo 7415  df-1st 7993  df-2nd 7994  df-trkg 28437

This theorem is referenced by:  tglngne  28534  tgelrnln  28614