Home Intuitionistic Logic ExplorerTheorem List (p. 26 of 111) < Previous  Next > Bad symbols? Try the GIF version. Mirrors  >  Metamath Home Page  >  ILE Home Page  >  Theorem List Contents  >  Recent Proofs       This page: Page List

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2501-2600   *Has distinct variable group(s)
TypeLabelDescription
Statement

Theoremr19.29af2 2501 A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 2499 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2017.)
𝑥𝜑    &   𝑥𝜒    &   (((𝜑𝑥𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝐴 𝜓)       (𝜑𝜒)

Theoremr19.29af 2502* A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 2499 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Nov-2017.)
𝑥𝜑    &   (((𝜑𝑥𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝐴 𝜓)       (𝜑𝜒)

Theoremr19.29a 2503* A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 2499 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Nov-2017.)
(((𝜑𝑥𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝐴 𝜓)       (𝜑𝜒)

Theoremr19.29d2r 2504 Theorem 19.29 of [Margaris] p. 90 with two restricted quantifiers, deduction version (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jan-2017.)
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 𝜓)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 𝜒)       (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 (𝜓𝜒))

Theoremr19.29vva 2505* A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 2499, version with two restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Nov-2017.)
((((𝜑𝑥𝐴) ∧ 𝑦𝐵) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 𝜓)       (𝜑𝜒)

Theoremr19.32r 2506 One direction of Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. For decidable propositions this is an equivalence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2018.)
𝑥𝜑       ((𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝐴 𝜓) → ∀𝑥𝐴 (𝜑𝜓))

Theoremr19.32vr 2507* One direction of Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. For decidable propositions this is an equivalence, as seen at r19.32vdc 2508. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2018.)
((𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝐴 𝜓) → ∀𝑥𝐴 (𝜑𝜓))

Theoremr19.32vdc 2508* Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers, where 𝜑 is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jun-2018.)
(DECID 𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝐴 (𝜑𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝐴 𝜓)))

Theoremr19.35-1 2509 Restricted quantifier version of 19.35-1 1556. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jun-2018.)
(∃𝑥𝐴 (𝜑𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝐴 𝜓))

Theoremr19.36av 2510* One direction of a restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90. In classical logic, the converse would hold if 𝐴 has at least one element, but in intuitionistic logic, that is not a sufficient condition. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.)
(∃𝑥𝐴 (𝜑𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑𝜓))

Theoremr19.37 2511 Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. In classical logic the converse would hold if 𝐴 has at least one element, but that is not sufficient in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by FL, 13-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
𝑥𝜑       (∃𝑥𝐴 (𝜑𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝐴 𝜓))

Theoremr19.37av 2512* Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
(∃𝑥𝐴 (𝜑𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝐴 𝜓))

Theoremr19.40 2513 Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.40 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
(∃𝑥𝐴 (𝜑𝜓) → (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝐴 𝜓))

Theoremr19.41 2514 Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2010.)
𝑥𝜓       (∃𝑥𝐴 (𝜑𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑𝜓))

Theoremr19.41v 2515* Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2003.)
(∃𝑥𝐴 (𝜑𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑𝜓))

Theoremr19.42v 2516* Restricted version of Theorem 19.42 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
(∃𝑥𝐴 (𝜑𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝐴 𝜓))

Theoremr19.43 2517 Restricted version of Theorem 19.43 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jun-2018.)
(∃𝑥𝐴 (𝜑𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥𝐴 𝜓))

Theoremr19.44av 2518* One direction of a restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.44 of [Margaris] p. 90. The other direction doesn't hold when 𝐴 is empty. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
(∃𝑥𝐴 (𝜑𝜓) → (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑𝜓))

Theoremr19.45av 2519* Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.45 of [Margaris] p. 90. (The other direction doesn't hold when 𝐴 is empty.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
(∃𝑥𝐴 (𝜑𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥𝐴 𝜓))

Theoremralcomf 2520* Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
𝑦𝐴    &   𝑥𝐵       (∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝐵𝑥𝐴 𝜑)

Theoremrexcomf 2521* Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
𝑦𝐴    &   𝑥𝐵       (∃𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝐵𝑥𝐴 𝜑)

Theoremralcom 2522* Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
(∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝐵𝑥𝐴 𝜑)

Theoremrexcom 2523* Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
(∃𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝐵𝑥𝐴 𝜑)

Theoremrexcom13 2524* Swap 1st and 3rd restricted existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2015.)
(∃𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵𝑧𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧𝐶𝑦𝐵𝑥𝐴 𝜑)

Theoremrexrot4 2525* Rotate existential restricted quantifiers twice. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2015.)
(∃𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵𝑧𝐶𝑤𝐷 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧𝐶𝑤𝐷𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 𝜑)

Theoremralcom3 2526 A commutative law for restricted quantifiers that swaps the domain of the restriction. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
(∀𝑥𝐴 (𝑥𝐵𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 (𝑥𝐴𝜑))

Theoremreean 2527* Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
𝑦𝜑    &   𝑥𝜓       (∃𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 (𝜑𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦𝐵 𝜓))

Theoremreeanv 2528* Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
(∃𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 (𝜑𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦𝐵 𝜓))

Theorem3reeanv 2529* Rearrange three existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
(∃𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵𝑧𝐶 (𝜑𝜓𝜒) ↔ (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦𝐵 𝜓 ∧ ∃𝑧𝐶 𝜒))

Theoremnfreu1 2530 𝑥 is not free in ∃!𝑥𝐴𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.)
𝑥∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜑

Theoremnfrmo1 2531 𝑥 is not free in ∃*𝑥𝐴𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
𝑥∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜑

Theoremnfreudxy 2532* Not-free deduction for restricted uniqueness. This is a version where 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jun-2018.)
𝑦𝜑    &   (𝜑𝑥𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)       (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃!𝑦𝐴 𝜓)

Theoremnfreuxy 2533* Not-free for restricted uniqueness. This is a version where 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jun-2018.)
𝑥𝐴    &   𝑥𝜑       𝑥∃!𝑦𝐴 𝜑

Theoremrabid 2534 An "identity" law of concretion for restricted abstraction. Special case of Definition 2.1 of [Quine] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.)
(𝑥 ∈ {𝑥𝐴𝜑} ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑))

Theoremrabid2 2535* An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
(𝐴 = {𝑥𝐴𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑)

Theoremrabbi 2536 Equivalent wff's correspond to equal restricted class abstractions. Closed theorem form of rabbidva 2598. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.)
(∀𝑥𝐴 (𝜓𝜒) ↔ {𝑥𝐴𝜓} = {𝑥𝐴𝜒})

Theoremrabswap 2537 Swap with a membership relation in a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2005.)
{𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵} = {𝑥𝐵𝑥𝐴}

Theoremnfrab1 2538 The abstraction variable in a restricted class abstraction isn't free. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.)
𝑥{𝑥𝐴𝜑}

Theoremnfrabxy 2539* A variable not free in a wff remains so in a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2018.)
𝑥𝜑    &   𝑥𝐴       𝑥{𝑦𝐴𝜑}

Theoremreubida 2540 Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
𝑥𝜑    &   ((𝜑𝑥𝐴) → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜒))

Theoremreubidva 2541* Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2004.)
((𝜑𝑥𝐴) → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜒))

Theoremreubidv 2542* Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1996.)
(𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜒))

Theoremreubiia 2543 Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference rule). (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2004.)
(𝑥𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))       (∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜓)

Theoremreubii 2544 Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference rule). (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-1999.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜓)

Theoremrmobida 2545 Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
𝑥𝜑    &   ((𝜑𝑥𝐴) → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜒))

Theoremrmobidva 2546* Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
((𝜑𝑥𝐴) → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜒))

Theoremrmobidv 2547* Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
(𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜒))

Theoremrmobiia 2548 Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference rule). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
(𝑥𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))       (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜓)

Theoremrmobii 2549 Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference rule). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
(𝜑𝜓)       (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜓)

Theoremraleqf 2550 Equality theorem for restricted universal quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
𝑥𝐴    &   𝑥𝐵       (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 𝜑))

Theoremrexeqf 2551 Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
𝑥𝐴    &   𝑥𝐵       (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝐵 𝜑))

Theoremreueq1f 2552 Equality theorem for restricted uniqueness quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
𝑥𝐴    &   𝑥𝐵       (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝐵 𝜑))

Theoremrmoeq1f 2553 Equality theorem for restricted uniqueness quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
𝑥𝐴    &   𝑥𝐵       (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝐵 𝜑))

Theoremraleq 2554* Equality theorem for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
(𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 𝜑))

Theoremrexeq 2555* Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.)
(𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝐵 𝜑))

Theoremreueq1 2556* Equality theorem for restricted uniqueness quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
(𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝐵 𝜑))

Theoremrmoeq1 2557* Equality theorem for restricted uniqueness quantifier. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
(𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝐵 𝜑))

Theoremraleqi 2558* Equality inference for restricted universal qualifier. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
𝐴 = 𝐵       (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 𝜑)

Theoremrexeqi 2559* Equality inference for restricted existential qualifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
𝐴 = 𝐵       (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝐵 𝜑)

Theoremraleqdv 2560* Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2005.)
(𝜑𝐴 = 𝐵)       (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 𝜓))

Theoremrexeqdv 2561* Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2007.)
(𝜑𝐴 = 𝐵)       (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥𝐵 𝜓))

Theoremraleqbi1dv 2562* Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
(𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑𝜓))       (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 𝜓))

Theoremrexeqbi1dv 2563* Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-1997.)
(𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑𝜓))       (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝐵 𝜓))

Theoremreueqd 2564* Equality deduction for restricted uniqueness quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
(𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑𝜓))       (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥𝐵 𝜓))

Theoremrmoeqd 2565* Equality deduction for restricted uniqueness quantifier. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
(𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜑𝜓))       (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥𝐵 𝜓))

Theoremraleqbidv 2566* Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2007.)
(𝜑𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 𝜒))

Theoremrexeqbidv 2567* Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2007.)
(𝜑𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥𝐵 𝜒))

Theoremraleqbidva 2568* Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)
(𝜑𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ((𝜑𝑥𝐴) → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 𝜒))

Theoremrexeqbidva 2569* Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)
(𝜑𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ((𝜑𝑥𝐴) → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥𝐵 𝜒))

Theoremmormo 2570 Unrestricted "at most one" implies restricted "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
(∃*𝑥𝜑 → ∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜑)

Theoremreu5 2571 Restricted uniqueness in terms of "at most one." (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
(∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜑))

Theoremreurex 2572 Restricted unique existence implies restricted existence. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1999.)
(∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑)

Theoremreurmo 2573 Restricted existential uniqueness implies restricted "at most one." (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
(∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜑 → ∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜑)

Theoremrmo5 2574 Restricted "at most one" in term of uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
(∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜑))

Theoremnrexrmo 2575 Nonexistence implies restricted "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)
(¬ ∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 → ∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜑)

Theoremcbvralf 2576 Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.)
𝑥𝐴    &   𝑦𝐴    &   𝑦𝜑    &   𝑥𝜓    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))       (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝐴 𝜓)

Theoremcbvrexf 2577 Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jun-2018.)
𝑥𝐴    &   𝑦𝐴    &   𝑦𝜑    &   𝑥𝜓    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))       (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝐴 𝜓)

Theoremcbvral 2578* Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.)
𝑦𝜑    &   𝑥𝜓    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))       (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝐴 𝜓)

Theoremcbvrex 2579* Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
𝑦𝜑    &   𝑥𝜓    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))       (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝐴 𝜓)

Theoremcbvreu 2580* Change the bound variable of a restricted uniqueness quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
𝑦𝜑    &   𝑥𝜓    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))       (∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦𝐴 𝜓)

Theoremcbvrmo 2581* Change the bound variable of restricted "at most one" using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
𝑦𝜑    &   𝑥𝜓    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))       (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦𝐴 𝜓)

Theoremcbvralv 2582* Change the bound variable of a restricted universal quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1997.)
(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))       (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝐴 𝜓)

Theoremcbvrexv 2583* Change the bound variable of a restricted existential quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1998.)
(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))       (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝐴 𝜓)

Theoremcbvreuv 2584* Change the bound variable of a restricted uniqueness quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))       (∃!𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦𝐴 𝜓)

Theoremcbvrmov 2585* Change the bound variable of a restricted uniqueness quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))       (∃*𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦𝐴 𝜓)

Theoremcbvraldva2 2586* Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted universal quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
((𝜑𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓𝜒))    &   ((𝜑𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)       (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝐵 𝜒))

Theoremcbvrexdva2 2587* Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
((𝜑𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓𝜒))    &   ((𝜑𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)       (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝐵 𝜒))

Theoremcbvraldva 2588* Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted universal quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
((𝜑𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝐴 𝜒))

Theoremcbvrexdva 2589* Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
((𝜑𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝐴 𝜒))

Theoremcbvral2v 2590* Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.)
(𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑𝜒))    &   (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒𝜓))       (∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧𝐴𝑤𝐵 𝜓)

Theoremcbvrex2v 2591* Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 2-Jul-2012.)
(𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑𝜒))    &   (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒𝜓))       (∃𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧𝐴𝑤𝐵 𝜓)

Theoremcbvral3v 2592* Change bound variables of triple restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2005.)
(𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝜑𝜒))    &   (𝑦 = 𝑣 → (𝜒𝜃))    &   (𝑧 = 𝑢 → (𝜃𝜓))       (∀𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵𝑧𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑤𝐴𝑣𝐵𝑢𝐶 𝜓)

Theoremcbvralsv 2593* Change bound variable by using a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
(∀𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝐴 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)

Theoremcbvrexsv 2594* Change bound variable by using a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2008.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
(∃𝑥𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝐴 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)

Theoremsbralie 2595* Implicit to explicit substitution that swaps variables in a quantified expression. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2004.)
(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑𝜓))       ([𝑥 / 𝑦]∀𝑥𝑦 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝑥 𝜓)

Theoremrabbiia 2596 Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (inference rule). (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
(𝑥𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))       {𝑥𝐴𝜑} = {𝑥𝐴𝜓}

Theoremrabbii 2597 Equivalent wff's correspond to equal restricted class abstractions. Inference form of rabbidv 2599. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Nov-2019.)
(𝜑𝜓)       {𝑥𝐴𝜑} = {𝑥𝐴𝜓}

Theoremrabbidva 2598* Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.)
((𝜑𝑥𝐴) → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → {𝑥𝐴𝜓} = {𝑥𝐴𝜒})

Theoremrabbidv 2599* Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1995.)
(𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒))       (𝜑 → {𝑥𝐴𝜓} = {𝑥𝐴𝜒})

Theoremrabeqf 2600 Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.)
𝑥𝐴    &   𝑥𝐵       (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥𝐴𝜑} = {𝑥𝐵𝜑})

Page List
Jump to page: Contents  1 1-100 2 101-200 3 201-300 4 301-400 5 401-500 6 501-600 7 601-700 8 701-800 9 801-900 10 901-1000 11 1001-1100 12 1101-1200 13 1201-1300 14 1301-1400 15 1401-1500 16 1501-1600 17 1601-1700 18 1701-1800 19 1801-1900 20 1901-2000 21 2001-2100 22 2101-2200 23 2201-2300 24 2301-2400 25 2401-2500 26 2501-2600 27 2601-2700 28 2701-2800 29 2801-2900 30 2901-3000 31 3001-3100 32 3101-3200 33 3201-3300 34 3301-3400 35 3401-3500 36 3501-3600 37 3601-3700 38 3701-3800 39 3801-3900 40 3901-4000 41 4001-4100 42 4101-4200 43 4201-4300 44 4301-4400 45 4401-4500 46 4501-4600 47 4601-4700 48 4701-4800 49 4801-4900 50 4901-5000 51 5001-5100 52 5101-5200 53 5201-5300 54 5301-5400 55 5401-5500 56 5501-5600 57 5601-5700 58 5701-5800 59 5801-5900 60 5901-6000 61 6001-6100 62 6101-6200 63 6201-6300 64 6301-6400 65 6401-6500 66 6501-6600 67 6601-6700 68 6701-6800 69 6801-6900 70 6901-7000 71 7001-7100 72 7101-7200 73 7201-7300 74 7301-7400 75 7401-7500 76 7501-7600 77 7601-7700 78 7701-7800 79 7801-7900 80 7901-8000 81 8001-8100 82 8101-8200 83 8201-8300 84 8301-8400 85 8401-8500 86 8501-8600 87 8601-8700 88 8701-8800 89 8801-8900 90 8901-9000 91 9001-9100 92 9101-9200 93 9201-9300 94 9301-9400 95 9401-9500 96 9501-9600 97 9601-9700 98 9701-9800 99 9801-9900 100 9901-10000 101 10001-10100 102 10101-10200 103 10201-10300 104 10301-10400 105 10401-10500 106 10501-10600 107 10601-10700 108 10701-10800 109 10801-10900 110 10901-11000 111 11001-11080
 Copyright terms: Public domain < Previous  Next >