P. 60 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 5901-6000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Definition	df-smo 5901*	Definition of a strictly monotone ordinal function. Definition 7.46 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 50. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (Smo 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴:dom 𝐴⟶On ∧ Ord dom 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐴‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐴‘𝑦))))
Theorem	dfsmo2 5902*	Alternate definition of a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (Smo 𝐹 ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On ∧ Ord dom 𝐹 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
Theorem	issmo 5903*	Conditions for which 𝐴 is a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴:𝐵⟶On    &   ⊢ Ord 𝐵    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐴‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐴‘𝑦)))    &   ⊢ dom 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Smo 𝐴
Theorem	issmo2 5904*	Alternative definition of a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → ((𝐵 ⊆ On ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)) → Smo 𝐹))
Theorem	smoeq 5905	Equality theorem for strictly monotone functions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (Smo 𝐴 ↔ Smo 𝐵))
Theorem	smodm 5906	The domain of a strictly monotone function is an ordinal. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (Smo 𝐴 → Ord dom 𝐴)
Theorem	smores 5907	A strictly monotone function restricted to an ordinal remains strictly monotone. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((Smo 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐴) → Smo (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵))
Theorem	smores3 5908	A strictly monotone function restricted to an ordinal remains strictly monotone. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((Smo (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐵) → Smo (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶))
Theorem	smores2 5909	A strictly monotone ordinal function restricted to an ordinal is still monotone. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ((Smo 𝐹 ∧ Ord 𝐴) → Smo (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	smodm2 5910	The domain of a strictly monotone ordinal function is an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝐹) → Ord 𝐴)
Theorem	smofvon2dm 5911	The function values of a strictly monotone ordinal function are ordinals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ((Smo 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐵) ∈ On)
Theorem	iordsmo 5912	The identity relation restricted to the ordinals is a strictly monotone function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.)
⊢ Ord 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Smo ( I ↾ 𝐴)
Theorem	smo0 5913	The null set is a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 20-Nov-2011.)
⊢ Smo ∅
Theorem	smofvon 5914	If 𝐵 is a strictly monotone ordinal function, and 𝐴 is in the domain of 𝐵, then the value of the function at 𝐴 is an ordinal. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 20-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((Smo 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵) → (𝐵‘𝐴) ∈ On)
Theorem	smoel 5915	If 𝑥 is less than 𝑦 then a strictly monotone function's value will be strictly less at 𝑥 than at 𝑦. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 22-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((Smo 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐵‘𝐴))
Theorem	smoiun 5916*	The value of a strictly monotone ordinal function contains its indexed union. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 22-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((Smo 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐵‘𝐴))
Theorem	smoiso 5917	If 𝐹 is an isomorphism from an ordinal 𝐴 onto 𝐵, which is a subset of the ordinals, then 𝐹 is a strictly monotonic function. Exercise 3 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 50. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → Smo 𝐹)
Theorem	smoel2 5918	A strictly monotone ordinal function preserves the epsilon relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝐹) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵))
2.6.19  "Strong" transfinite recursion
Syntax	crecs 5919	Notation for a function defined by strong transfinite recursion.
class recs(𝐹)
Definition	df-recs 5920*	Define a function recs(𝐹) on On, the class of ordinal numbers, by transfinite recursion given a rule 𝐹 which sets the next value given all values so far. See df-irdg 5957 for more details on why this definition is desirable. Unlike df-irdg 5957 which restricts the update rule to use only the previous value, this version allows the update rule to use all previous values, which is why it is described as "strong", although it is actually more primitive. See tfri1d 5949 and tfri2d 5950 for the primary contract of this definition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ recs(𝐹) = ∪ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}
Theorem	recseq 5921	Equality theorem for recs. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → recs(𝐹) = recs(𝐺))
Theorem	nfrecs 5922	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for recs. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥recs(𝐹)
Theorem	tfrlem1 5923*	A technical lemma for transfinite recursion. Compare Lemma 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐵‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑥) = (𝐵‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑥)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥))
Theorem	tfrlem3ag 5924*	Lemma for transfinite recursion. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ V → (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤)))))
Theorem	tfrlem3a 5925*	Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤))))
Theorem	tfrlem3 5926*	Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))}
Theorem	tfrlem3-2 5927*	Lemma for transfinite recursion which changes a bound variable (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Apr-2019.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ V)
Theorem	tfrlem3-2d 5928*	Lemma for transfinite recursion which changes a bound variable (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ V))
Theorem	tfrlem4 5929*	Lemma for transfinite recursion. 𝐴 is the class of all "acceptable" functions, and 𝐹 is their union. First we show that an acceptable function is in fact a function. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 → Fun 𝑔)
Theorem	tfrlem5 5930*	Lemma for transfinite recursion. The values of two acceptable functions are the same within their domains. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑥𝑔𝑢 ∧ 𝑥ℎ𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
Theorem	recsfval 5931*	Lemma for transfinite recursion. The definition recs is the union of all acceptable functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    ⇒   ⊢ recs(𝐹) = ∪ 𝐴
Theorem	tfrlem6 5932*	Lemma for transfinite recursion. The union of all acceptable functions is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    ⇒   ⊢ Rel recs(𝐹)
Theorem	tfrlem7 5933*	Lemma for transfinite recursion. The union of all acceptable functions is a function. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    ⇒   ⊢ Fun recs(𝐹)
Theorem	tfrlem8 5934*	Lemma for transfinite recursion. The domain of recs is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Alan Sare, 11-Mar-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    ⇒   ⊢ Ord dom recs(𝐹)
Theorem	tfrlem9 5935*	Lemma for transfinite recursion. Here we compute the value of recs (the union of all acceptable functions). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom recs(𝐹) → (recs(𝐹)‘𝐵) = (𝐹‘(recs(𝐹) ↾ 𝐵)))
Theorem	tfr2a 5936	A weak version of transfinite recursion. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	tfr0 5937	Transfinite recursion at the empty set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-May-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺‘∅) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹‘∅) = (𝐺‘∅))
Theorem	tfrlemisucfn 5938*	We can extend an acceptable function by one element to produce a function. Lemma for tfrlemi1 5946. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑔 Fn 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑔 ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)⟩}) Fn suc 𝑧)
Theorem	tfrlemisucaccv 5939*	We can extend an acceptable function by one element to produce an acceptable function. Lemma for tfrlemi1 5946. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑔 Fn 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑔 ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)⟩}) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	tfrlemibacc 5940*	Each element of 𝐵 is an acceptable function. Lemma for tfrlemi1 5946. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ℎ = (𝑔 ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)⟩}))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	tfrlemibxssdm 5941*	The union of 𝐵 is defined on all ordinals. Lemma for tfrlemi1 5946. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ℎ = (𝑔 ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)⟩}))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ⊆ dom ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	tfrlemibfn 5942*	The union of 𝐵 is a function defined on 𝑥. Lemma for tfrlemi1 5946. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ℎ = (𝑔 ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)⟩}))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐵 Fn 𝑥)
Theorem	tfrlemibex 5943*	The set 𝐵 exists. Lemma for tfrlemi1 5946. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ℎ = (𝑔 ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)⟩}))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	tfrlemiubacc 5944*	The union of 𝐵 satisfies the recursion rule (lemma for tfrlemi1 5946). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ℎ = (𝑔 ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)⟩}))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑥 (∪ 𝐵‘𝑢) = (𝐹‘(∪ 𝐵 ↾ 𝑢)))
Theorem	tfrlemiex 5945*	Lemma for tfrlemi1 5946. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ℎ = (𝑔 ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)⟩}))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑢) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑢))))
Theorem	tfrlemi1 5946*	We can define an acceptable function on any ordinal. As with many of the transfinite recursion theorems, we have a hypothesis that states that 𝐹 is a function and that it is defined for all ordinals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔‘𝑢) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑢))))
Theorem	tfrlemi14d 5947*	The domain of recs is all ordinals (lemma for transfinite recursion). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom recs(𝐹) = On)
Theorem	tfrexlem 5948*	The transfinite recursion function is set-like if the input is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (recs(𝐹)‘𝐶) ∈ V)
Theorem	tfri1d 5949*	Principle of Transfinite Recursion, part 1 of 3. Theorem 7.41(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 47, with an additional condition. The condition is that 𝐺 is defined "everywhere" and here is stated as (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ V. Alternatively ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 → 𝑓 ∈ dom 𝐺) would suffice. Given a function 𝐺 satisfying that condition, we define a class 𝐴 of all "acceptable" functions. The final function we're interested in is the union 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) of them. 𝐹 is then said to be defined by transfinite recursion. The purpose of the 3 parts of this theorem is to demonstrate properties of 𝐹. In this first part we show that 𝐹 is a function whose domain is all ordinal numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-May-2019.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ V))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn On)
Theorem	tfri2d 5950*	Principle of Transfinite Recursion, part 2 of 3. Theorem 7.41(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 47, with an additional condition on the recursion rule 𝐺 ( as described at tfri1 5951). Here we show that the function 𝐹 has the property that for any function 𝐺 satisfying that condition, the "next" value of 𝐹 is 𝐺 recursively applied to all "previous" values of 𝐹. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ V))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ On) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	tfri1 5951*	Principle of Transfinite Recursion, part 1 of 3. Theorem 7.41(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 47, with an additional condition. The condition is that 𝐺 is defined "everywhere" and here is stated as (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ V. Alternatively ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 → 𝑓 ∈ dom 𝐺) would suffice. Given a function 𝐺 satisfying that condition, we define a class 𝐴 of all "acceptable" functions. The final function we're interested in is the union 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) of them. 𝐹 is then said to be defined by transfinite recursion. The purpose of the 3 parts of this theorem is to demonstrate properties of 𝐹. In this first part we show that 𝐹 is a function whose domain is all ordinal numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-May-2019.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺)    &   ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 Fn On
Theorem	tfri2 5952*	Principle of Transfinite Recursion, part 2 of 3. Theorem 7.41(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 47, with an additional condition on the recursion rule 𝐺 ( as described at tfri1 5951). Here we show that the function 𝐹 has the property that for any function 𝐺 satisfying that condition, the "next" value of 𝐹 is 𝐺 recursively applied to all "previous" values of 𝐹. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺)    &   ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	tfri3 5953*	Principle of Transfinite Recursion, part 3 of 3. Theorem 7.41(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 47, with an additional condition on the recursion rule 𝐺 ( as described at tfri1 5951). Finally, we show that 𝐹 is unique. We do this by showing that any class 𝐵 with the same properties of 𝐹 that we showed in parts 1 and 2 is identical to 𝐹. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺)    &   ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 Fn On ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝐵‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘(𝐵 ↾ 𝑥))) → 𝐵 = 𝐹)
Theorem	tfrex 5954*	The transfinite recursion function is set-like if the input is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ V))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	tfrfun 5955	Transfinite recursion produces a function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Aug-2021.)
⊢ Fun recs(𝐹)
2.6.20  Recursive definition generator
Syntax	crdg 5956	Extend class notation with the recursive definition generator, with characteristic function 𝐹 and initial value 𝐼.
class rec(𝐹, 𝐼)
Definition	df-irdg 5957*	Define a recursive definition generator on On (the class of ordinal numbers) with characteristic function 𝐹 and initial value 𝐼. This rather amazing operation allows us to define, with compact direct definitions, functions that are usually defined in textbooks only with indirect self-referencing recursive definitions. A recursive definition requires advanced metalogic to justify - in particular, eliminating a recursive definition is very difficult and often not even shown in textbooks. On the other hand, the elimination of a direct definition is a matter of simple mechanical substitution. The price paid is the daunting complexity of our rec operation (especially when df-recs 5920 that it is built on is also eliminated). But once we get past this hurdle, definitions that would otherwise be recursive become relatively simple. In classical logic it would be easier to divide this definition into cases based on whether the domain of 𝑔 is zero, a successor, or a limit ordinal. Cases do not (in general) work that way in intuitionistic logic, so instead we choose a definition which takes the union of all the results of the characteristic function for ordinals in the domain of 𝑔. This means that this definition has the expected properties for increasing and continuous ordinal functions, which include ordinal addition and multiplication. For finite recursion we also define df-frec 5978 and for suitable characteristic functions df-frec 5978 yields the same result as rec restricted to ω, as seen at frecrdg 5992. Note: We introduce rec with the philosophical goal of being able to eliminate all definitions with direct mechanical substitution and to verify easily the soundness of definitions. Metamath itself has no built-in technical limitation that prevents multiple-part recursive definitions in the traditional textbook style. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2019.)
⊢ rec(𝐹, 𝐼) = recs((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝐼 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑔(𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑥)))))
Theorem	rdgeq1 5958	Equality theorem for the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → rec(𝐹, 𝐴) = rec(𝐺, 𝐴))
Theorem	rdgeq2 5959	Equality theorem for the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → rec(𝐹, 𝐴) = rec(𝐹, 𝐵))
Theorem	rdgfun 5960	The recursive definition generator is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ Fun rec(𝐹, 𝐴)
Theorem	rdgtfr 5961*	The recursion rule for the recursive definition generator is defined everywhere. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-May-2020.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (Fun (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑔(𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑥)))) ∧ ((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑔(𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑥))))‘𝑓) ∈ V))
Theorem	rdgruledefgg 5962*	The recursion rule for the recursive definition generator is defined everywhere. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (Fun (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑔(𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑥)))) ∧ ((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑔(𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑥))))‘𝑓) ∈ V))
Theorem	rdgruledefg 5963*	The recursion rule for the recursive definition generator is defined everywhere. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 Fn V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Fun (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑔(𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑥)))) ∧ ((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑔(𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑥))))‘𝑓) ∈ V))
Theorem	rdgexggg 5964	The recursive definition generator produces a set on a set input. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	rdgexgg 5965	The recursive definition generator produces a set on a set input. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 Fn V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	rdgifnon 5966	The recursive definition generator is a function on ordinal numbers. The 𝐹 Fn V condition states that the characteristic function is defined for all sets (being defined for all ordinals might be enough if being used in a manner similar to rdgon 5973; in cases like df-oadd 6005 either presumably could work). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → rec(𝐹, 𝐴) Fn On)
Theorem	rdgifnon2 5967*	The recursive definition generator is a function on ordinal numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-May-2020.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → rec(𝐹, 𝐴) Fn On)
Theorem	rdgivallem 5968*	Value of the recursive definition generator. Lemma for rdgival 5969 which simplifies the value further. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘((rec(𝐹, 𝐴) ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥))))
Theorem	rdgival 5969*	Value of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑥))))
Theorem	rdgss 5970	Subset and recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rec(𝐹, 𝐼)‘𝐴) ⊆ (rec(𝐹, 𝐼)‘𝐵))
Theorem	rdgisuc1 5971*	One way of describing the value of the recursive definition generator at a successor. There is no condition on the characteristic function 𝐹 other than 𝐹 Fn V. Given that, the resulting expression encompasses both the expected successor term (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)) but also terms that correspond to the initial value 𝐴 and to limit ordinals ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵(𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑥)). If we add conditions on the characteristic function, we can show tighter results such as rdgisucinc 5972. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑥)) ∪ (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)))))
Theorem	rdgisucinc 5972*	Value of the recursive definition generator at a successor. This can be thought of as a generalization of oasuc 6044 and omsuc 6051. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)))
Theorem	rdgon 5973*	Evaluating the recursive definition generator produces an ordinal. There is a hypothesis that the characteristic function produces ordinals on ordinal arguments. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ On)
Theorem	rdg0 5974	The initial value of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘∅) = 𝐴
Theorem	rdg0g 5975	The initial value of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘∅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	rdgexg 5976	The recursive definition generator produces a set on a set input. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 Fn V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ V)
2.6.21  Finite recursion
Syntax	cfrec 5977	Extend class notation with the fnite recursive definition generator, with characteristic function 𝐹 and initial value 𝐼.
class frec(𝐹, 𝐼)
Definition	df-frec 5978*	Define a recursive definition generator on ω (the class of finite ordinals) with characteristic function 𝐹 and initial value 𝐼. This rather amazing operation allows us to define, with compact direct definitions, functions that are usually defined in textbooks only with indirect self-referencing recursive definitions. A recursive definition requires advanced metalogic to justify - in particular, eliminating a recursive definition is very difficult and often not even shown in textbooks. On the other hand, the elimination of a direct definition is a matter of simple mechanical substitution. The price paid is the daunting complexity of our frec operation (especially when df-recs 5920 that it is built on is also eliminated). But once we get past this hurdle, definitions that would otherwise be recursive become relatively simple; see frec0g 5983 and frecsuc 5991. Unlike with transfinite recursion, finite recurson can readily divide definitions and proofs into zero and successor cases, because even without excluded middle we have theorems such as nn0suc 4327. The analogous situation with transfinite recursion - being able to say that an ordinal is zero, successor, or limit - is enabled by excluded middle and thus is not available to us. For the characteristic functions which satisfy the conditions given at frecrdg 5992, this definition and df-irdg 5957 restricted to ω produce the same result. Note: We introduce frec with the philosophical goal of being able to eliminate all definitions with direct mechanical substitution and to verify easily the soundness of definitions. Metamath itself has no built-in technical limitation that prevents multiple-part recursive definitions in the traditional textbook style. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2019.)
⊢ frec(𝐹, 𝐼) = (recs((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼))})) ↾ ω)
Theorem	freceq1 5979	Equality theorem for the finite recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) = frec(𝐺, 𝐴))
Theorem	freceq2 5980	Equality theorem for the finite recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) = frec(𝐹, 𝐵))
Theorem	frecex 5981	Finite recursion produces a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Aug-2021.)
⊢ frec(𝐹, 𝐴) ∈ V
Theorem	nffrec 5982	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the finite recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥frec(𝐹, 𝐴)
Theorem	frec0g 5983	The initial value resulting from finite recursive definition generation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘∅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	frecabex 5984*	The class abstraction from df-frec 5978 exists. This is a lemma for other finite recursion proofs. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑆 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑆‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑆 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))} ∈ V)
Theorem	frectfr 5985*	Lemma to connect transfinite recursion theorems with finite recursion. That is, given the conditions 𝐹 Fn V and 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 on frec(𝐹, 𝐴), we want to be able to apply tfri1d 5949 or tfri2d 5950, and this lemma lets us satisfy hypotheses of those theorems. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))})    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∀𝑦(Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ V))
Theorem	frecfnom 5986*	The function generated by finite recursive definition generation is a function on omega. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-May-2020.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) Fn ω)
Theorem	frecsuclem1 5987*	Lemma for frecsuc 5991. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))})    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐺‘(recs(𝐺) ↾ suc 𝐵)))
Theorem	frecsuclemdm 5988*	Lemma for frecsuc 5991. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))})    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → dom (recs(𝐺) ↾ suc 𝐵) = suc 𝐵)
Theorem	frecsuclem2 5989*	Lemma for frecsuc 5991. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))})    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → ((recs(𝐺) ↾ suc 𝐵)‘𝐵) = (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵))
Theorem	frecsuclem3 5990*	Lemma for frecsuc 5991. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))})    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐹‘(frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)))
Theorem	frecsuc 5991*	The successor value resulting from finite recursive definition generation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2019.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐹‘(frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)))
Theorem	frecrdg 5992*	Transfinite recursion restricted to omega. Given a suitable characteristic function, df-frec 5978 produces the same results as df-irdg 5957 restricted to ω. Presumably the theorem would also hold if 𝐹 Fn V were changed to ∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) = (rec(𝐹, 𝐴) ↾ ω))
Theorem	freccl 5993*	Closure for finite recursion. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝑆)
2.6.22  Ordinal arithmetic
Syntax	c1o 5994	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 1.
class 1𝑜
Syntax	c2o 5995	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 2.
class 2𝑜
Syntax	c3o 5996	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 3.
class 3𝑜
Syntax	c4o 5997	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 4.
class 4𝑜
Syntax	coa 5998	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal addition operation.
class +𝑜
Syntax	comu 5999	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal multiplication operation.
class ·𝑜
Syntax	coei 6000	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal exponentiation operation.
class ↑𝑜