Theorem bj-findes 17007

Description: Principle of induction, using explicit substitutions. Constructive proof (from CZF). See the comment of bj-findis 17005 for explanations. From this version, it is easy to prove findes 4750. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-findes	⊢ (([∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem bj-findes

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1581	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
2		nfv 1581	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑
3	1, 2	nfim 1625	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4		nfs1v 1999	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
5		nfsbc1v 3070	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
6	4, 5	nfim 1625	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
7		sbequ12 1824	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
8		suceq 4547	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → suc 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)
9	8	sbceq1d 3056	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
10	7, 9	imbi12d 234	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
11	3, 6, 10	cbvral 2782	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
12		nfsbc1v 3070	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[∅ / 𝑥]𝜑
13		sbceq1a 3061	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑))
14	13	biimprd 158	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ([∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑))
15		sbequ1 1821	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
16		sbceq1a 3061	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
17	16	biimprd 158	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ([suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑))
18	12, 4, 5, 14, 15, 17	bj-findis 17005	. 2 ⊢ (([∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝜑)
19	11, 18	sylan2b 287	1 ⊢ (([∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝜑)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1402  [wsb 1815  ∀wral 2528  [wsbc 3051  ∅c0 3520  suc csuc 4510  ωcom 4737

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-nul 4259  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-bd0 16839  ax-bdim 16840  ax-bdan 16841  ax-bdor 16842  ax-bdn 16843  ax-bdal 16844  ax-bdex 16845  ax-bdeq 16846  ax-bdel 16847  ax-bdsb 16848  ax-bdsep 16910  ax-infvn 16967

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-suc 4516  df-iom 4738  df-bdc 16867  df-bj-ind 16953

This theorem is used by: (None)