Theorem bj-findes 12764

Description: Principle of induction, using explicit substitutions. Constructive proof (from CZF). See the comment of bj-findis 12762 for explanations. From this version, it is easy to prove findes 4455. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-findes	⊢ (([∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem bj-findes

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1476	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
2		nfv 1476	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑
3	1, 2	nfim 1519	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)
4		nfs1v 1875	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
5		nfsbc1v 2880	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
6	4, 5	nfim 1519	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
7		sbequ12 1712	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
8		suceq 4262	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → suc 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)
9	8	sbceq1d 2867	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
10	7, 9	imbi12d 233	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
11	3, 6, 10	cbvral 2608	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
12		nfsbc1v 2880	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[∅ / 𝑥]𝜑
13		sbceq1a 2871	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑))
14	13	biimprd 157	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ([∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑))
15		sbequ1 1709	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
16		sbceq1a 2871	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
17	16	biimprd 157	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ([suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑))
18	12, 4, 5, 14, 15, 17	bj-findis 12762	. 2 ⊢ (([∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝜑)
19	11, 18	sylan2b 283	1 ⊢ (([∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   = wceq 1299  [wsb 1703  ∀wral 2375  [wsbc 2862  ∅c0 3310  suc csuc 4225  ωcom 4442

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 584  ax-in2 585  ax-io 671  ax-5 1391  ax-7 1392  ax-gen 1393  ax-ie1 1437  ax-ie2 1438  ax-8 1450  ax-10 1451  ax-11 1452  ax-i12 1453  ax-bndl 1454  ax-4 1455  ax-13 1459  ax-14 1460  ax-17 1474  ax-i9 1478  ax-ial 1482  ax-i5r 1483  ax-ext 2082  ax-nul 3994  ax-pr 4069  ax-un 4293  ax-setind 4390  ax-bd0 12592  ax-bdim 12593  ax-bdan 12594  ax-bdor 12595  ax-bdn 12596  ax-bdal 12597  ax-bdex 12598  ax-bdeq 12599  ax-bdel 12600  ax-bdsb 12601  ax-bdsep 12663  ax-infvn 12724

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1302  df-fal 1305  df-nf 1405  df-sb 1704  df-clab 2087  df-cleq 2093  df-clel 2096  df-nfc 2229  df-ral 2380  df-rex 2381  df-rab 2384  df-v 2643  df-sbc 2863  df-dif 3023  df-un 3025  df-in 3027  df-ss 3034  df-nul 3311  df-sn 3480  df-pr 3481  df-uni 3684  df-int 3719  df-suc 4231  df-iom 4443  df-bdc 12620  df-bj-ind 12710

This theorem is referenced by: (None)