Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > eqop2 | GIF version |
Description: Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
eqop2.1 | ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V |
eqop2.2 | ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
eqop2 | ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | eqop2.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V | |
2 | eqop2.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V | |
3 | 1, 2 | opelvv 4584 | . . 3 ⊢ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ (V × V) |
4 | eleq1 2200 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 → (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ (V × V))) | |
5 | 3, 4 | mpbiri 167 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 → 𝐴 ∈ (V × V)) |
6 | eqop 6068 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶))) | |
7 | 5, 6 | biadan2 451 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶))) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 = wceq 1331 ∈ wcel 1480 Vcvv 2681 〈cop 3525 × cxp 4532 ‘cfv 5118 1st c1st 6029 2nd c2nd 6030 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 698 ax-5 1423 ax-7 1424 ax-gen 1425 ax-ie1 1469 ax-ie2 1470 ax-8 1482 ax-10 1483 ax-11 1484 ax-i12 1485 ax-bndl 1486 ax-4 1487 ax-13 1491 ax-14 1492 ax-17 1506 ax-i9 1510 ax-ial 1514 ax-i5r 1515 ax-ext 2119 ax-sep 4041 ax-pow 4093 ax-pr 4126 ax-un 4350 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 964 df-tru 1334 df-nf 1437 df-sb 1736 df-eu 2000 df-mo 2001 df-clab 2124 df-cleq 2130 df-clel 2133 df-nfc 2268 df-ral 2419 df-rex 2420 df-v 2683 df-sbc 2905 df-un 3070 df-in 3072 df-ss 3079 df-pw 3507 df-sn 3528 df-pr 3529 df-op 3531 df-uni 3732 df-br 3925 df-opab 3985 df-mpt 3986 df-id 4210 df-xp 4540 df-rel 4541 df-cnv 4542 df-co 4543 df-dm 4544 df-rn 4545 df-iota 5083 df-fun 5120 df-fn 5121 df-f 5122 df-fo 5124 df-fv 5126 df-1st 6031 df-2nd 6032 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |