Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > eqop2 | GIF version |
Description: Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
eqop2.1 | ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V |
eqop2.2 | ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
eqop2 | ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | eqop2.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V | |
2 | eqop2.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V | |
3 | 1, 2 | opelvv 4654 | . . 3 ⊢ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ (V × V) |
4 | eleq1 2229 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 → (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ (V × V))) | |
5 | 3, 4 | mpbiri 167 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 → 𝐴 ∈ (V × V)) |
6 | eqop 6145 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶))) | |
7 | 5, 6 | biadan2 452 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶))) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 = wceq 1343 ∈ wcel 2136 Vcvv 2726 〈cop 3579 × cxp 4602 ‘cfv 5188 1st c1st 6106 2nd c2nd 6107 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 699 ax-5 1435 ax-7 1436 ax-gen 1437 ax-ie1 1481 ax-ie2 1482 ax-8 1492 ax-10 1493 ax-11 1494 ax-i12 1495 ax-bndl 1497 ax-4 1498 ax-17 1514 ax-i9 1518 ax-ial 1522 ax-i5r 1523 ax-13 2138 ax-14 2139 ax-ext 2147 ax-sep 4100 ax-pow 4153 ax-pr 4187 ax-un 4411 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 970 df-tru 1346 df-nf 1449 df-sb 1751 df-eu 2017 df-mo 2018 df-clab 2152 df-cleq 2158 df-clel 2161 df-nfc 2297 df-ral 2449 df-rex 2450 df-v 2728 df-sbc 2952 df-un 3120 df-in 3122 df-ss 3129 df-pw 3561 df-sn 3582 df-pr 3583 df-op 3585 df-uni 3790 df-br 3983 df-opab 4044 df-mpt 4045 df-id 4271 df-xp 4610 df-rel 4611 df-cnv 4612 df-co 4613 df-dm 4614 df-rn 4615 df-iota 5153 df-fun 5190 df-fn 5191 df-f 5192 df-fo 5194 df-fv 5196 df-1st 6108 df-2nd 6109 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |