Theorem 2clwwlk 30960

Description: Value of operation 𝐶, mapping a vertex v and an integer n greater than 1 to the "closed n-walks v(0) ... v(n-2) v(n-1) v(n) from v = v(0) = v(n) with v(n-2) = v" according to definition 6 in [Huneke] p. 2. Such closed walks are "double loops" consisting of a closed (n-2)-walk v = v(0) ... v(n-2) = v and a closed 2-walk v = v(n-2) v(n-1) v(n) = v, see 2clwwlk2clwwlk 30963. (𝑋𝐶𝑁) is called the "set of double loops of length 𝑁 on vertex 𝑋 " in the following. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 14-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 20-Apr-2022.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
2clwwlk.c	⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2clwwlk	⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝑋𝐶𝑁) = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑛,𝐺,𝑣,𝑤   𝑛,𝑁,𝑣,𝑤   𝑛,𝑉,𝑣   𝑛,𝑋,𝑣,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐶(𝑤, 𝑣, 𝑛)   𝑉(𝑤)

Proof of Theorem 2clwwlk

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		oveq12 7436	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑣 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑛 = 𝑁) → (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) = (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁))
2		fvoveq1 7450	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 = 𝑁 → (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = (𝑤‘(𝑁 − 2)))
3	2	adantl 487	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑣 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑛 = 𝑁) → (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = (𝑤‘(𝑁 − 2)))
4		simpl 488	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑣 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑛 = 𝑁) → 𝑣 = 𝑋)
5	3, 4	eqeq12d 2779	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑣 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑛 = 𝑁) → ((𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣 ↔ (𝑤‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋))
6	1, 5	rabeqbidv 3432	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑣 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑛 = 𝑁) → {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣} = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋})
7		2clwwlk.c	. 2 ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑛) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑛 − 2)) = 𝑣})
8		ovex 7460	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ∈ V
9	8	rabex 5303	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋} ∈ V
10	6, 7, 9	ovmpoa 7582	1 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝑋𝐶𝑁) = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ∣ (𝑤‘(𝑁 − 2)) = 𝑋})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2146  {crab 3415  ‘cfv 6546  (class class class)co 7427   ∈ cmpo 7429   − cmin 11551  2c2 12407  ℤ_≥cuz 12975  ClWWalksNOncclwwlknon 30690

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2196  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5262  ax-pr 5394

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3416  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3742  df-ss 3900  df-dif 4049  df-in 4093  df-un 4153  df-nul 4281  df-if 4485  df-pw 4561  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4838  df-uni 4870  df-br 5106  df-opab 5170  df-id 5549  df-xp 5660  df-rel 5661  df-cnv 5662  df-co 5663  df-dm 5664  df-iota 6500  df-fun 6548  df-fv 6554  df-ov 7430  df-oprab 7431  df-mpo 7432

This theorem is used by:  2clwwlk2  30961  2clwwlkel  30962  extwwlkfab  30965  numclwwlk3lem2lem  30996  numclwwlk3lem2  30997