Theorem bj-idres 37832

Description: Alternate expression for the restricted identity relation. The advantage of that expression is to expose it as a "bounded" class, being included in the Cartesian square of the restricting class. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)

This is an alternate of idinxpresid 6050 (see idinxpres 6049). See also elrid 6048 and elidinxp 6046. (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-idres	⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem bj-idres

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-res 5673	. 2 ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = ( I ∩ (𝐴 × V))
2		inss1 4189	. . . 4 ⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × V)) ⊆ I
3		relinxp 5801	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel ( I ∩ (𝐴 × V))
4		elin 3921	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × V)) ↔ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐴 × V)))
5		bj-opelidb1 37825	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I ↔ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
6	5	simprbi 502	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
7		opelxp1 5703	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐴 × V) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
8		simpr 489	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
9		eleq1w 2846	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
10	9	biimpa 481	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
11	8, 10	jca 520	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
12	6, 7, 11	syl2an 607	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ I ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐴 × V)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
13	4, 12	sylbi 220	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × V)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
14		opelxpi 5698	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
15	13, 14	syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × V)) → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
16	3, 15	relssi 5773	. . . 4 ⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × V)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)
17	2, 16	ssini 4192	. . 3 ⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × V)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
18		ssv 3961	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ V
19		xpss2 5681	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ V → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐴 × V))
20		sslin 4195	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐴 × V) → ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × V)))
21	18, 19, 20	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × V))
22	17, 21	eqssi 3953	. 2 ⊢ ( I ∩ (𝐴 × V)) = ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
23	1, 22	eqtri 2786	1 ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  Vcvv 3455   ∩ cin 3904   ⊆ wss 3905  ⟨cop 4595   I cid 5555   × cxp 5659   ↾ cres 5663

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-pr 5404

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-opab 5174  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-res 5673

This theorem is used by:  bj-opelidres  37833