Theorem dfopab2 8055

Description: A way to define an ordered-pair class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfopab2	⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∣ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑}

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑧   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem dfopab2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfsbc1v 3766	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑
2	1	19.41 2274	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑))
3		sbcopeq1a 8052	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ([(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
4	3	pm5.32i 585	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
5	4	exbii 1881	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
6		nfcv 2927	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(1st ‘𝑧)
7		nfsbc1v 3766	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑
8	6, 7	nfsbcw 3768	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑
9	8	19.41 2274	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑))
10	5, 9	bitr3i 280	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑))
11	10	exbii 1881	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑))
12		elvv 5738	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
13	12	anbi1i 636	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑))
14	2, 11, 13	3bitr4i 306	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑))
15	14	abbii 2832	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
16		df-opab 5176	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
17		df-rab 3419	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∣ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
18	15, 16, 17	3eqtr4i 2798	1 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∣ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2146  {cab 2743  {crab 3418  Vcvv 3457  [wsbc 3746  ⟨cop 4597  {copab 5175   × cxp 5661  ‘cfv 6540  1^st c1st 7990  2^nd c2nd 7991

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fv 6548  df-1st 7992  df-2nd 7993

This theorem is used by: (None)