Theorem dfopab2 8031

Description: A way to define an ordered-pair class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfopab2	⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∣ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑}

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑧   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem dfopab2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfsbc1v 3773	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑
2	1	19.41 2236	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑))
3		sbcopeq1a 8028	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ([(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
4	3	pm5.32i 574	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
5	4	exbii 1848	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
6		nfcv 2891	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(1st ‘𝑧)
7		nfsbc1v 3773	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑
8	6, 7	nfsbcw 3775	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑
9	8	19.41 2236	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑))
10	5, 9	bitr3i 277	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑))
11	10	exbii 1848	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑))
12		elvv 5713	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
13	12	anbi1i 624	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑))
14	2, 11, 13	3bitr4i 303	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑))
15	14	abbii 2796	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
16		df-opab 5170	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
17		df-rab 3406	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∣ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
18	15, 16, 17	3eqtr4i 2762	1 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∣ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2109  {cab 2707  {crab 3405  Vcvv 3447  [wsbc 3753  ⟨cop 4595  {copab 5169   × cxp 5636  ‘cfv 6511  1^st c1st 7966  2^nd c2nd 7967

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387  ax-un 7711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fv 6519  df-1st 7968  df-2nd 7969

This theorem is referenced by: (None)