P. 81 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 8001-8100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	1st0 8001	The value of the first-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
⊢ (1st ‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	2nd0 8002	The value of the second-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
⊢ (2nd ‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	op1st 8003	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐴
Theorem	op2nd 8004	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐵
Theorem	op1std 8005	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → (1st ‘𝐶) = 𝐴)
Theorem	op2ndd 8006	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → (2nd ‘𝐶) = 𝐵)
Theorem	op1stg 8007	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐴)
Theorem	op2ndg 8008	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐵)
Theorem	ot1stg 8009	Extract the first member of an ordered triple. (Due to infrequent usage, it isn't worthwhile at this point to define special extractors for triples, so we reuse the ordered pair extractors for ot1stg 8009, ot2ndg 8010, ot3rdg 8011.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (1st ‘(1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	ot2ndg 8010	Extract the second member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 8009 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (2nd ‘(1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	ot3rdg 8011	Extract the third member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 8009 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩) = 𝐶)
Theorem	1stval2 8012	Alternate value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (1st ‘𝐴) = ∩ ∩ 𝐴)
Theorem	2ndval2 8013	Alternate value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (2nd ‘𝐴) = ∩ ∩ ∩ ◡{𝐴})
Theorem	oteqimp 8014	The components of an ordered triple. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (𝑇 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍) → ((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐴 ∧ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑇) = 𝐶)))
Theorem	fo1st 8015	The 1st function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 1st :V–onto→V
Theorem	fo2nd 8016	The 2nd function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 2nd :V–onto→V
Theorem	br1steqg 8017	Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 1st. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.) Revised to remove sethood hypothesis on 𝐶. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴))
Theorem	br2ndeqg 8018	Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 2nd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.) Revised to remove sethood hypothesis on 𝐶. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2nd 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐵))
Theorem	f1stres 8019	Mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (1st ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐴
Theorem	f2ndres 8020	Mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (2nd ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐵
Theorem	fo1stres 8021	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → (1st ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐴)
Theorem	fo2ndres 8022	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (2nd ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐵)
Theorem	1st2val 8023*	Value of an alternate definition of the 1st function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑥}‘𝐴) = (1st ‘𝐴)
Theorem	2nd2val 8024*	Value of an alternate definition of the 2nd function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑦}‘𝐴) = (2nd ‘𝐴)
Theorem	1stcof 8025	Composition of the first member function with another function. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2007.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝐵 × 𝐶) → (1st ∘ 𝐹):𝐴⟶𝐵)
Theorem	2ndcof 8026	Composition of the second member function with another function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝐵 × 𝐶) → (2nd ∘ 𝐹):𝐴⟶𝐶)
Theorem	xp1st 8027	Location of the first element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → (1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	xp2nd 8028	Location of the second element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	elxp6 8029	Membership in a Cartesian product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 7928. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)⟩ ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	elxp7 8030	Membership in a Cartesian product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 7928. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	eqopi 8031	Equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶)) → 𝐴 = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	xp2 8032*	Representation of Cartesian product based on ordered pair component functions. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ (V × V) ∣ ((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)}
Theorem	unielxp 8033	The membership relation for a Cartesian product is inherited by union. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	1st2nd2 8034	Reconstruction of a member of a Cartesian product in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → 𝐴 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)⟩)
Theorem	1st2ndb 8035	Reconstruction of an ordered pair in terms of its components. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ↔ 𝐴 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)⟩)
Theorem	xpopth 8036	An ordered pair theorem for members of Cartesian products. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐷) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 × 𝑆)) → (((1st ‘𝐴) = (1st ‘𝐵) ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = (2nd ‘𝐵)) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	eqop 8037	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → (𝐴 = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶)))
Theorem	eqop2 8038	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶)))
Theorem	op1steq 8039*	Two ways of expressing that an element is the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴 = ⟨𝐵, 𝑥⟩))
Theorem	opreuopreu 8040*	There is a unique ordered pair fulfilling a wff iff its components fulfil a corresponding wff. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑎 = (1st ‘𝑝) ∧ 𝑏 = (2nd ‘𝑝)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)∃𝑎∃𝑏(𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	el2xptp 8041*	A member of a nested Cartesian product is an ordered triple. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ((𝐵 × 𝐶) × 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧⟩)
Theorem	el2xptp0 8042	A member of a nested Cartesian product is an ordered triple. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ∈ ((𝑈 × 𝑉) × 𝑊) ∧ ((1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) = 𝑋 ∧ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) = 𝑌 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝑍)) ↔ 𝐴 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍⟩))
Theorem	el2xpss 8043*	Version of elrel 5789 for triple Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ ((𝐵 × 𝐶) × 𝐷)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧⟩)
Theorem	2nd1st 8044	Swap the members of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∪ ◡{𝐴} = ⟨(2nd ‘𝐴), (1st ‘𝐴)⟩)
Theorem	1st2nd 8045	Reconstruction of a member of a relation in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)⟩)
Theorem	1stdm 8046	The first ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the domain of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → (1st ‘𝐴) ∈ dom 𝑅)
Theorem	2ndrn 8047	The second ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the range of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝑅)
Theorem	1st2ndbr 8048	Express an element of a relation as a relationship between first and second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (1st ‘𝐴)𝐵(2nd ‘𝐴))
Theorem	releldm2 8049*	Two ways of expressing membership in the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (1st ‘𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	reldm 8050*	An expression for the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → dom 𝐴 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (1st ‘𝑥)))
Theorem	releldmdifi 8051*	One way of expressing membership in the difference of domains of two nested relations. (Contributed by AV, 26-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐵) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)(1st ‘𝑥) = 𝐶))
Theorem	funfv1st2nd 8052	The function value for the first component of an ordered pair is the second component of the ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 17-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑋)) = (2nd ‘𝑋))
Theorem	funelss 8053	If the first component of an element of a function is in the domain of a subset of the function, the element is a member of this subset. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((1st ‘𝑋) ∈ dom 𝐵 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	funeldmdif 8054*	Two ways of expressing membership in the difference of domains of two nested functions. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)(1st ‘𝑥) = 𝐶))
Theorem	sbcopeq1a 8055	Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered pair (analogue of sbceq1a 3758 that avoids the existential quantifiers of copsexg 5479). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ([(1st ‘𝐴) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	csbopeq1a 8056	Equality theorem for substitution of a class 𝐴 for an ordered pair ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ in 𝐵 (analogue of csbeq1a 3870). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ⦋(1st ‘𝐴) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑦⦌𝐵 = 𝐵)
Theorem	sbcoteq1a 8057	Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered triple. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → ([(1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) / 𝑦][(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	dfopab2 8058*	A way to define an ordered-pair class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∣ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑}
Theorem	dfoprab3s 8059*	A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
Theorem	dfoprab3 8060*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	dfoprab4 8061*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	dfoprab4f 8062*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2008.) Remove unnecessary distinct variable conditions. (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	opabex2 8063*	Condition for an operation to be a set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabn1stprc 8064*	An ordered-pair class abstraction which does not depend on the first abstraction variable is a proper class. There must be, however, at least one set which satisfies the restricting wff. (Contributed by AV, 27-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∉ V)
Theorem	opiota 8065*	The property of a uniquely specified ordered pair. The proof uses properties of the ℩ description binder. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑧∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (1st ‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (2nd ‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐷 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑧∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝐶 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 = 𝑌)))
Theorem	cnvoprab 8066*	The converse of a class abstraction of nested ordered pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Aug-2017.) (Proof shortened by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝑎 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑎 ∈ (V × V))    ⇒   ⊢ ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑎⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	dfxp3 8067*	Define the Cartesian product of three classes. Compare df-xp 5672. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶)}
Theorem	elopabi 8068*	A consequence of membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜒)
Theorem	eloprabi 8069*	A consequence of membership in an operation class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2006.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = (2nd ‘𝐴) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜃)
Theorem	mpomptsx 8070*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦⦌𝐶)
Theorem	mpompts 8071*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦⦌𝐶)
Theorem	dmmpossx 8072*	The domain of a mapping is a subset of its base class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ dom 𝐹 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵)
Theorem	fmpox 8073*	Functionality, domain and codomain of a class given by the maps-to notation, where 𝐵(𝑥) is not constant but depends on 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝐹:∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵)⟶𝐷)
Theorem	fmpo 8074*	Functionality, domain and range of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐷)
Theorem	fnmpo 8075*	Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵))
Theorem	fnmpoi 8076*	Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵)
Theorem	dmmpo 8077*	Domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵)
Theorem	ovmpoelrn 8078*	An operation's value belongs to its range. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝑂𝑌) ∈ 𝑀)
Theorem	dmmpoga 8079*	Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 8077. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Feb-2019.) (Proof shortened by Lammen, 29-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵))
Theorem	dmmpog 8080*	Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 8077. Caution: This theorem is only valid in the very special case where the value of the mapping is a constant! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jun-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Feb-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵))
Theorem	mpoexxg 8081*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (version for dependent domains). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	mpoexg 8082*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	mpoexga 8083*	If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V)
Theorem	mpoexw 8084*	Weak version of mpoex 8085 that holds without ax-rep 5243. If the domain and codomain of an operation given by maps-to notation are sets, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V
Theorem	mpoex 8085*	If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V
Theorem	mpoexd 8086*	Existence of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Jun-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V)
Theorem	mptmpoopabbrd 8087*	The operation value of a function value of a collection of ordered pairs of elements related in two ways. (Contributed by Alexander van Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jan-2021.) Add disjoint variable condition on 𝐷, 𝑓, ℎ to remove hypotheses; avoid ax-rep 5243. (Revised by SN, 7-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐵‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑌) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (𝐴‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (𝐵‘𝑔) ↦ {⟨𝑓, ℎ⟩ ∣ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝑔)ℎ)}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(𝑀‘𝐺)𝑌) = {⟨𝑓, ℎ⟩ ∣ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝐺)ℎ)})
Theorem	mptmpoopabovd 8088*	The operation value of a function value of a collection of ordered pairs of related elements. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jan-2021.) Add disjoint variable condition on 𝐷, 𝑓, ℎ to remove hypotheses. (Revised by SN, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐵‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (𝐴‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (𝐵‘𝑔) ↦ {⟨𝑓, ℎ⟩ ∣ (𝑓(𝑎(𝐶‘𝑔)𝑏)ℎ ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝑔)ℎ)}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(𝑀‘𝐺)𝑌) = {⟨𝑓, ℎ⟩ ∣ (𝑓(𝑋(𝐶‘𝐺)𝑌)ℎ ∧ 𝑓(𝐷‘𝐺)ℎ)})
Theorem	el2mpocsbcl 8089*	If the operation value of the operation value of two nested maps-to notation is not empty, all involved arguments belong to the corresponding base classes of the maps-to notations. (Contributed by AV, 21-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑠 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐶 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑆(𝑋𝑂𝑌)𝑇) → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝑌 / 𝑦⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑥⦌⦋𝑌 / 𝑦⦌𝐷))))
Theorem	el2mpocl 8090*	If the operation value of the operation value of two nested maps-to notation is not empty, all involved arguments belong to the corresponding base classes of the maps-to notations. Using implicit substitution. (Contributed by AV, 21-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑠 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → (𝐶 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝐷 = 𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐶 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑆(𝑋𝑂𝑌)𝑇) → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐺))))
Theorem	fnmpoovd 8091*	A function with a Cartesian product as domain is a mapping with two arguments defined by its operation values. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝑖 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑗 = 𝑏) → 𝐷 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑖𝑀𝑗) = 𝐷))
Theorem	offval22 8092*	The function operation expressed as a mapping, variation of offval2 7707. (Contributed by SO, 15-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐶𝑅𝐷)))
Theorem	brovpreldm 8093	If a binary relation holds for the result of an operation, the operands are in the domain of the operation. (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐷(𝐵𝐴𝐶)𝐸 → ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ dom 𝐴)
Theorem	bropopvvv 8094*	If a binary relation holds for the result of an operation which is a result of an operation, the involved classes are sets. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Dec-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑣 ∈ V, 𝑒 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑣, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ 𝜑}))    &   ⊢ ((𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ 𝑒 = 𝐸) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐴(𝑉𝑂𝐸)𝐵) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ 𝜃})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(𝑉𝑂𝐸)𝐵)𝑃 → ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)))
Theorem	bropfvvvvlem 8095*	Lemma for bropfvvvv 8096. (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑏 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑐 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ {⟨𝑑, 𝑒⟩ ∣ 𝜑}))    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐵(𝑂‘𝐴)𝐶) = {⟨𝑑, 𝑒⟩ ∣ 𝜃})    ⇒   ⊢ ((⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑇) ∧ 𝐷(𝐵(𝑂‘𝐴)𝐶)𝐸) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V)))
Theorem	bropfvvvv 8096*	If a binary relation holds for the result of an operation which is a function value, the involved classes are sets. (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2020.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑏 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑐 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ {⟨𝑑, 𝑒⟩ ∣ 𝜑}))    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐵(𝑂‘𝐴)𝐶) = {⟨𝑑, 𝑒⟩ ∣ 𝜃})    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → 𝑉 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → 𝑊 = 𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐷(𝐵(𝑂‘𝐴)𝐶)𝐸 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ V ∧ 𝐸 ∈ V))))
Theorem	ovmptss 8097*	If all the values of the mapping are subsets of a class 𝑋, then so is any evaluation of the mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝐸𝐹𝐺) ⊆ 𝑋)
Theorem	relmpoopab 8098*	Any function to sets of ordered pairs produces a relation on function value unconditionally. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ 𝜑})    ⇒   ⊢ Rel (𝐶𝐹𝐷)
Theorem	fmpoco 8099*	Composition of two functions. Variation of fmptco 7132 when the second function has two arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑅 → 𝑆 = 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑇))
Theorem	oprabco 8100*	Composition of a function with an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐻‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻 Fn 𝐷 → 𝐺 = (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹))