Theorem dfoprab3s 8034

Description: A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfoprab3s	⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑤   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem dfoprab3s

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfoprab2 7454	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
2		nfsbc1v 3764	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑
3	2	19.41 2270	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
4		sbcopeq1a 8030	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ([(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
5	4	pm5.32i 582	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
6	5	exbii 1868	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
7		nfcv 2924	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(1st ‘𝑤)
8		nfsbc1v 3764	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑
9	7, 8	nfsbcw 3766	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑
10	9	19.41 2270	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
11	6, 10	bitr3i 279	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
12	11	exbii 1868	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
13		elvv 5722	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
14	13	anbi1i 633	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
15	3, 12, 14	3bitr4i 305	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
16	15	opabbii 5167	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
17	1, 16	eqtri 2785	1 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1560  ∃wex 1799   ∈ wcel 2142  Vcvv 3454  [wsbc 3744  ⟨cop 4588  {copab 5162   × cxp 5645  ‘cfv 6521  {coprab 7397  1^st c1st 7968  2^nd c2nd 7969

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5246  ax-nul 5256  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7718

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1100  df-tru 1563  df-fal 1573  df-ex 1800  df-nf 1804  df-sb 2091  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3415  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3745  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4481  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-mpt 5182  df-id 5542  df-xp 5653  df-rel 5654  df-cnv 5655  df-co 5656  df-dm 5657  df-rn 5658  df-iota 6477  df-fun 6523  df-fv 6529  df-oprab 7400  df-1st 7970  df-2nd 7971

This theorem is referenced by:  dfoprab3  8035