![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > dfoprab3s | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dfoprab3s | ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | dfoprab2 7191 | . 2 ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | nfsbc1v 3740 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑 | |
3 | 2 | 19.41 2235 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)) |
4 | sbcopeq1a 7730 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → ([(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)) | |
5 | 4 | pm5.32i 578 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)) |
6 | 5 | exbii 1849 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)) |
7 | nfcv 2955 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(1st ‘𝑤) | |
8 | nfsbc1v 3740 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑 | |
9 | 7, 8 | nfsbcw 3742 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑 |
10 | 9 | 19.41 2235 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)) |
11 | 6, 10 | bitr3i 280 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)) |
12 | 11 | exbii 1849 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)) |
13 | elvv 5590 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉) | |
14 | 13 | anbi1i 626 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)) |
15 | 3, 12, 14 | 3bitr4i 306 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)) |
16 | 15 | opabbii 5097 | . 2 ⊢ {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} = {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)} |
17 | 1, 16 | eqtri 2821 | 1 ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 399 = wceq 1538 ∃wex 1781 ∈ wcel 2111 Vcvv 3441 [wsbc 3720 〈cop 4531 {copab 5092 × cxp 5517 ‘cfv 6324 {coprab 7136 1st c1st 7669 2nd c2nd 7670 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2113 ax-9 2121 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2770 ax-sep 5167 ax-nul 5174 ax-pow 5231 ax-pr 5295 ax-un 7441 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 845 df-3an 1086 df-tru 1541 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2070 df-mo 2598 df-eu 2629 df-clab 2777 df-cleq 2791 df-clel 2870 df-nfc 2938 df-ral 3111 df-rex 3112 df-rab 3115 df-v 3443 df-sbc 3721 df-dif 3884 df-un 3886 df-in 3888 df-ss 3898 df-nul 4244 df-if 4426 df-sn 4526 df-pr 4528 df-op 4532 df-uni 4801 df-br 5031 df-opab 5093 df-mpt 5111 df-id 5425 df-xp 5525 df-rel 5526 df-cnv 5527 df-co 5528 df-dm 5529 df-rn 5530 df-iota 6283 df-fun 6326 df-fv 6332 df-oprab 7139 df-1st 7671 df-2nd 7672 |
This theorem is referenced by: dfoprab3 7734 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |