Theorem fvmptrab 48455

Description: Value of a function mapping a set to a class abstraction restricting a class depending on the argument of the function. More general version of fvmptrabfv 7026, but relying on the fact that out-of-domain arguments evaluate to the empty set, which relies on set.mm's particular encoding. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2022.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
fvmptrab.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ 𝜑})
fvmptrab.r	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
fvmptrab.s	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → 𝑀 = 𝑁)
fvmptrab.v	⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑁 ∈ V)
fvmptrab.n	⊢ (𝑋 ∉ 𝑉 → 𝑁 = ∅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fvmptrab	⊢ (𝐹‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜓}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝑀   𝑥,𝑁,𝑦   𝑥,𝑋,𝑦   𝑥,𝑉   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜓(𝑦)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝑀(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem fvmptrab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvmptrab.f	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ 𝜑})
2	1	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ 𝜑}))
3		fvmptrab.s	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → 𝑀 = 𝑁)
4		fvmptrab.r	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
5	3, 4	rabeqbidv 3429	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → {𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜓})
6	5	adantl 487	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑋) → {𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜓})
7		id 23	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)
8		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜓}
9		fvmptrab.v	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑁 ∈ V)
10	8, 9	rabexd 5300	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)
11	2, 6, 7, 10	fvmptd 7001	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜓})
12	1	fvmptndm 7025	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = ∅)
13		df-nel 3062	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∉ 𝑉 ↔ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)
14		fvmptrab.n	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∉ 𝑉 → 𝑁 = ∅)
15		rabeq 3426	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑁 = ∅ → {𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑦 ∈ ∅ ∣ 𝜓})
16		rab0 4334	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ ∅ ∣ 𝜓} = ∅
17	15, 16	eqtr2di 2812	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑁 = ∅ → ∅ = {𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜓})
18	14, 17	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∉ 𝑉 → ∅ = {𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜓})
19	13, 18	sylbir 238	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ = {𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜓})
20	12, 19	eqtrd 2795	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜓})
21	11, 20	pm2.61i 184	1 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜓}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144   ∉ wnel 3061  {crab 3412  Vcvv 3450  ∅c0 4278   ↦ cmpt 5185  ‘cfv 6538

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-nel 3062  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3847  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fv 6546

This theorem is used by: (None)