Theorem inf3lema 9079

Description: Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 9090 for detailed description. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1996.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
inf3lem.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦})
inf3lem.2	⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω)
inf3lem.3	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
inf3lem.4	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inf3lema	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦,𝑤)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦,𝑤)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦,𝑤)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem inf3lema

Dummy variables 𝑣 𝑓 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ineq1 4179	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐴 → (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥))
2	1	sseq1d 3996	. 2 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐴 → ((𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))
3		inf3lem.4	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
4		sseq2 3991	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝐵 → ((𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣 ↔ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))
5	4	rabbidv 3479	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝐵 → {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣} = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵})
6		inf3lem.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦})
7		sseq2 3991	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣))
8	7	rabbidv 3479	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣})
9		ineq1 4179	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑓 → (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) = (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥))
10	9	sseq1d 3996	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑓 → ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣 ↔ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣))
11	10	cbvrabv 3490	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣} = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣}
12	8, 11	syl6eq 2870	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦} = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣})
13	12	cbvmptv 5160	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣})
14	6, 13	eqtri 2842	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣})
15		vex 3496	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
16	15	rabex 5226	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵} ∈ V
17	5, 14, 16	fvmpt 6761	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ V → (𝐺‘𝐵) = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵})
18	3, 17	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺‘𝐵) = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵}
19	2, 18	elrab2 3681	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1531   ∈ wcel 2108  {crab 3140  Vcvv 3493   ∩ cin 3933   ⊆ wss 3934  ∅c0 4289   ↦ cmpt 5137   ↾ cres 5550  ‘cfv 6348  ωcom 7572  reccrdg 8037

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2791  ax-sep 5194  ax-nul 5201  ax-pr 5320

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1084  df-tru 1534  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2064  df-mo 2616  df-eu 2648  df-clab 2798  df-cleq 2812  df-clel 2891  df-nfc 2961  df-ral 3141  df-rex 3142  df-rab 3145  df-v 3495  df-sbc 3771  df-dif 3937  df-un 3939  df-in 3941  df-ss 3950  df-nul 4290  df-if 4466  df-sn 4560  df-pr 4562  df-op 4566  df-uni 4831  df-br 5058  df-opab 5120  df-mpt 5138  df-id 5453  df-xp 5554  df-rel 5555  df-cnv 5556  df-co 5557  df-dm 5558  df-iota 6307  df-fun 6350  df-fv 6356

This theorem is referenced by:  inf3lemd  9082  inf3lem1  9083  inf3lem2  9084  inf3lem3  9085