Theorem inf3lema 9577

Description: Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 9588 for detailed description. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1996.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
inf3lem.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦})
inf3lem.2	⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω)
inf3lem.3	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
inf3lem.4	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inf3lema	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦,𝑤)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦,𝑤)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦,𝑤)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem inf3lema

Dummy variables 𝑣 𝑓 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ineq1 4176	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐴 → (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥))
2	1	sseq1d 3978	. 2 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐴 → ((𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))
3		inf3lem.4	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
4		sseq2 3973	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝐵 → ((𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣 ↔ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))
5	4	rabbidv 3413	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝐵 → {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣} = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵})
6		inf3lem.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦})
7		sseq2 3973	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣))
8	7	rabbidv 3413	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣})
9		ineq1 4176	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑓 → (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) = (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥))
10	9	sseq1d 3978	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑓 → ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣 ↔ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣))
11	10	cbvrabv 3416	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣} = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣}
12	8, 11	eqtrdi 2780	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦} = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣})
13	12	cbvmptv 5211	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣})
14	6, 13	eqtri 2752	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣})
15		vex 3451	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
16	15	rabex 5294	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵} ∈ V
17	5, 14, 16	fvmpt 6968	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ V → (𝐺‘𝐵) = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵})
18	3, 17	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺‘𝐵) = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵}
19	2, 18	elrab2 3662	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  {crab 3405  Vcvv 3447   ∩ cin 3913   ⊆ wss 3914  ∅c0 4296   ↦ cmpt 5188   ↾ cres 5640  ‘cfv 6511  ωcom 7842  reccrdg 8377

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fv 6519

This theorem is referenced by:  inf3lemd  9580  inf3lem1  9581  inf3lem2  9582  inf3lem3  9583