Theorem inf3lema 9521

Description: Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 9532 for detailed description. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1996.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
inf3lem.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦})
inf3lem.2	⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω)
inf3lem.3	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
inf3lem.4	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inf3lema	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦,𝑤)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦,𝑤)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦,𝑤)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem inf3lema

Dummy variables 𝑣 𝑓 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ineq1 4162	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐴 → (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥))
2	1	sseq1d 3962	. 2 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐴 → ((𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))
3		inf3lem.4	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
4		sseq2 3957	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝐵 → ((𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣 ↔ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))
5	4	rabbidv 3403	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝐵 → {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣} = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵})
6		inf3lem.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦})
7		sseq2 3957	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣))
8	7	rabbidv 3403	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣})
9		ineq1 4162	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑓 → (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) = (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥))
10	9	sseq1d 3962	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑓 → ((𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣 ↔ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣))
11	10	cbvrabv 3406	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣} = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣}
12	8, 11	eqtrdi 2784	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦} = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣})
13	12	cbvmptv 5197	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣})
14	6, 13	eqtri 2756	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑣})
15		vex 3441	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
16	15	rabex 5279	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵} ∈ V
17	5, 14, 16	fvmpt 6935	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ V → (𝐺‘𝐵) = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵})
18	3, 17	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺‘𝐵) = {𝑓 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑓 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵}
19	2, 18	elrab2 3646	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113  {crab 3396  Vcvv 3437   ∩ cin 3897   ⊆ wss 3898  ∅c0 4282   ↦ cmpt 5174   ↾ cres 5621  ‘cfv 6486  ωcom 7802  reccrdg 8334

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2146  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2182  ax-ext 2705  ax-sep 5236  ax-nul 5246  ax-pr 5372

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2537  df-eu 2566  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2808  df-nfc 2882  df-ral 3049  df-rex 3058  df-rab 3397  df-v 3439  df-dif 3901  df-un 3903  df-in 3905  df-ss 3915  df-nul 4283  df-if 4475  df-pw 4551  df-sn 4576  df-pr 4578  df-op 4582  df-uni 4859  df-br 5094  df-opab 5156  df-mpt 5175  df-id 5514  df-xp 5625  df-rel 5626  df-cnv 5627  df-co 5628  df-dm 5629  df-iota 6442  df-fun 6488  df-fv 6494

This theorem is referenced by:  inf3lemd  9524  inf3lem1  9525  inf3lem2  9526  inf3lem3  9527