Theorem xpider 8648

Description: A Cartesian square is an equivalence relation (in general, it is not a poset). (Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xpider	⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐴) Er 𝐴

Proof of Theorem xpider

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relxp 5638	. 2 ⊢ Rel (𝐴 × 𝐴)
2		dmxpid 5871	. 2 ⊢ dom (𝐴 × 𝐴) = 𝐴
3		cnvxp 6095	. . 3 ⊢ ◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) = (𝐴 × 𝐴)
4		xpidtr 6062	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)
5		uneq1 4103	. . . 4 ⊢ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) = (𝐴 × 𝐴) → (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
6		unss2 4128	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) → (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
7		unidm 4099	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴)
8		eqtr 2759	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴))
9		sseq2 3958	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴) → ((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ↔ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
10	9	biimpd 228	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴) → ((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
11	8, 10	syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → ((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
12	7, 11	mpan2 688	. . . 4 ⊢ ((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → ((◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) → (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
13	5, 6, 12	syl2im 40	. . 3 ⊢ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) = (𝐴 × 𝐴) → (((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) → (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
14	3, 4, 13	mp2 9	. 2 ⊢ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)
15		df-er 8569	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) Er 𝐴 ↔ (Rel (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ dom (𝐴 × 𝐴) = 𝐴 ∧ (◡(𝐴 × 𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐴))) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
16	1, 2, 14, 15	mpbir3an 1340	1 ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐴) Er 𝐴

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1540   ∪ cun 3896   ⊆ wss 3898   × cxp 5618  ^◡ccnv 5619  dom cdm 5620   ∘ ccom 5624  Rel wrel 5625   Er wer 8566

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5243  ax-nul 5250  ax-pr 5372

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3404  df-v 3443  df-dif 3901  df-un 3903  df-in 3905  df-ss 3915  df-nul 4270  df-if 4474  df-sn 4574  df-pr 4576  df-op 4580  df-br 5093  df-opab 5155  df-xp 5626  df-rel 5627  df-cnv 5628  df-co 5629  df-dm 5630  df-er 8569

This theorem is referenced by:  riiner  8650  efglem  19417