Theorem acexmidlemv 5917

Description: Lemma for acexmid 5918.

This is acexmid 5918 with additional disjoint variable conditions, most notably between 𝜑 and 𝑥.

(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
acexmidlemv.choice	⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
acexmidlemv	⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢

Proof of Theorem acexmidlemv

Dummy variables 𝑠 𝑡 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		onsucelsucexmidlem 4562	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)} ∈ On
2		pp0ex 4219	. . . . 5 ⊢ {∅, {∅}} ∈ V
3	2	rabex 4174	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)} ∈ V
4		prexg 4241	. . . 4 ⊢ (({𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)} ∈ On ∧ {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)} ∈ V) → {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}} ∈ V)
5	1, 3, 4	mp2an 426	. . 3 ⊢ {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}} ∈ V
6		raleq 2690	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}} → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}}∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)))
7	6	exbidv 1836	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}} → (∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}}∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)))
8		acexmidlemv.choice	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)
9	5, 7, 8	vtocl 2815	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}}∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)
10		eqeq1 2200	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑡 → (𝑠 = ∅ ↔ 𝑡 = ∅))
11	10	orbi1d 792	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑡 → ((𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑡 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)))
12	11	cbvrabv 2759	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)} = {𝑡 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑡 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}
13		eqeq1 2200	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑡 → (𝑠 = {∅} ↔ 𝑡 = {∅}))
14	13	orbi1d 792	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑠 = 𝑡 → ((𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑡 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)))
15	14	cbvrabv 2759	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)} = {𝑡 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑡 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}
16		eqid 2193	. . . 4 ⊢ {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}} = {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}}
17	12, 15, 16	acexmidlem2 5916	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}}∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
18	17	exlimiv 1609	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ {{𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = ∅ ∨ 𝜑)}, {𝑠 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑠 = {∅} ∨ 𝜑)}}∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢) → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
19	9, 18	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 104   ∨ wo 709   = wceq 1364  ∃wex 1503   ∈ wcel 2164  ∀wral 2472  ∃wrex 2473  ∃!wreu 2474  {crab 2476  Vcvv 2760  ∅c0 3447  {csn 3619  {cpr 3620  Oncon0 4395

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-sep 4148  ax-nul 4156  ax-pow 4204  ax-pr 4239

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 981  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-reu 2479  df-rab 2481  df-v 2762  df-sbc 2987  df-dif 3156  df-un 3158  df-in 3160  df-ss 3167  df-nul 3448  df-pw 3604  df-sn 3625  df-pr 3626  df-uni 3837  df-tr 4129  df-iord 4398  df-on 4400  df-suc 4403  df-iota 5216  df-riota 5874

This theorem is referenced by:  acexmid  5918