ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  en2prd GIF version

Theorem en2prd 7072
Description: Two proper unordered pairs are equinumerous. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 23-Dec-2024.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
en2prd.1 (𝜑𝐴𝑉)
en2prd.2 (𝜑𝐵𝑊)
en2prd.3 (𝜑𝐶𝑋)
en2prd.4 (𝜑𝐷𝑌)
en2prd.5 (𝜑𝐴𝐵)
en2prd.6 (𝜑𝐶𝐷)
Assertion
Ref Expression
en2prd (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ {𝐶, 𝐷})

Proof of Theorem en2prd
Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 en2prd.1 . . . . 5 (𝜑𝐴𝑉)
2 en2prd.3 . . . . 5 (𝜑𝐶𝑋)
3 opexg 4349 . . . . 5 ((𝐴𝑉𝐶𝑋) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∈ V)
41, 2, 3syl2anc 411 . . . 4 (𝜑 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∈ V)
5 en2prd.2 . . . . 5 (𝜑𝐵𝑊)
6 en2prd.4 . . . . 5 (𝜑𝐷𝑌)
7 opexg 4349 . . . . 5 ((𝐵𝑊𝐷𝑌) → ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩ ∈ V)
85, 6, 7syl2anc 411 . . . 4 (𝜑 → ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩ ∈ V)
9 prexg 4330 . . . 4 ((⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∈ V ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩ ∈ V) → {⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩} ∈ V)
104, 8, 9syl2anc 411 . . 3 (𝜑 → {⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩} ∈ V)
11 en2prd.5 . . . 4 (𝜑𝐴𝐵)
12 en2prd.6 . . . 4 (𝜑𝐶𝐷)
13 f1oprg 5665 . . . . 5 (((𝐴𝑉𝐶𝑋) ∧ (𝐵𝑊𝐷𝑌)) → ((𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷) → {⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩}:{𝐴, 𝐵}–1-1-onto→{𝐶, 𝐷}))
141, 2, 5, 6, 13syl22anc 1275 . . . 4 (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐵𝐶𝐷) → {⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩}:{𝐴, 𝐵}–1-1-onto→{𝐶, 𝐷}))
1511, 12, 14mp2and 433 . . 3 (𝜑 → {⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩}:{𝐴, 𝐵}–1-1-onto→{𝐶, 𝐷})
16 f1oeq1 5607 . . 3 (𝑓 = {⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩} → (𝑓:{𝐴, 𝐵}–1-1-onto→{𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ {⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩}:{𝐴, 𝐵}–1-1-onto→{𝐶, 𝐷}))
1710, 15, 16elabd 2965 . 2 (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝐴, 𝐵}–1-1-onto→{𝐶, 𝐷})
18 prexg 4330 . . . 4 ((𝐴𝑉𝐵𝑊) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ V)
191, 5, 18syl2anc 411 . . 3 (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ V)
20 prexg 4330 . . . 4 ((𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑌) → {𝐶, 𝐷} ∈ V)
212, 6, 20syl2anc 411 . . 3 (𝜑 → {𝐶, 𝐷} ∈ V)
22 breng 6995 . . 3 (({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ V ∧ {𝐶, 𝐷} ∈ V) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝐴, 𝐵}–1-1-onto→{𝐶, 𝐷}))
2319, 21, 22syl2anc 411 . 2 (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝐴, 𝐵}–1-1-onto→{𝐶, 𝐷}))
2417, 23mpbird 167 1 (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ {𝐶, 𝐷})
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 104  wb 105  wex 1541  wcel 2205  wne 2414  Vcvv 2815  {cpr 3695  cop 3697   class class class wbr 4114  1-1-ontowf1o 5356  cen 6986
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-14 2208  ax-ext 2216  ax-sep 4233  ax-pow 4292  ax-pr 4327
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-eu 2085  df-mo 2086  df-clab 2221  df-cleq 2227  df-clel 2230  df-nfc 2375  df-ne 2415  df-ral 2527  df-rex 2528  df-v 2817  df-dif 3216  df-un 3218  df-in 3220  df-ss 3227  df-nul 3513  df-pw 3676  df-sn 3700  df-pr 3701  df-op 3703  df-br 4115  df-opab 4177  df-id 4419  df-xp 4760  df-rel 4761  df-cnv 4762  df-co 4763  df-dm 4764  df-rn 4765  df-fun 5359  df-fn 5360  df-f 5361  df-f1 5362  df-fo 5363  df-f1o 5364  df-en 6989
This theorem is referenced by:  rex2dom  7076
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator