Theorem 2ndinr 10048

Description: The second component of the value of a right injection is its argument. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jun-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2ndinr	⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ‘(inr‘𝑋)) = 𝑋)

Proof of Theorem 2ndinr

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-inr 10021	. . . 4 ⊢ inr = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ⟨1o, 𝑥⟩)
2		opeq2 4846	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → ⟨1o, 𝑥⟩ = ⟨1o, 𝑋⟩)
3		elex 3475	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑋 ∈ V)
4		opex 5439	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⟨1o, 𝑋⟩ ∈ V
5	4	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ⟨1o, 𝑋⟩ ∈ V)
6	1, 2, 3, 5	fvmptd3 7048	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (inr‘𝑋) = ⟨1o, 𝑋⟩)
7	6	fveq2d 6920	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ‘(inr‘𝑋)) = (2nd ‘⟨1o, 𝑋⟩))
8		1oex 8524	. . 3 ⊢ 1o ∈ V
9		op2ndg 8048	. . 3 ⊢ ((1o ∈ V ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (2nd ‘⟨1o, 𝑋⟩) = 𝑋)
10	8, 9	mpan 703	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ‘⟨1o, 𝑋⟩) = 𝑋)
11	7, 10	eqtrd 2798	1 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ‘(inr‘𝑋)) = 𝑋)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  Vcvv 3454  ⟨cop 4840  ‘cfv 6566  2^nd c2nd 8034  1_oc1o 8507  inrcinr 10018

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7783

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-suc 6394  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fv 6574  df-2nd 8036  df-1o 8514  df-inr 10021

This theorem is used by:  updjudhcoinrg  10051