P. 100 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 9901-10000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	carddom2 9901	Two numerable sets have the dominance relationship iff their cardinalities have the subset relationship. See also carddom 10476, which uses AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐴) ⊆ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	harcard 9902	The class of ordinal numbers dominated by a set is a cardinal number. Theorem 59 of [Suppes] p. 228. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (card‘(har‘𝐴)) = (har‘𝐴)
Theorem	cardprclem 9903*	Lemma for cardprc 9904. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 𝑥}    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	cardprc 9904	The class of all cardinal numbers is not a set (i.e. is a proper class). Theorem 19.8 of [Eisenberg] p. 310. In this proof (which does not use AC), we cannot use Cantor's construction canth3 10483 to ensure that there is always a cardinal larger than a given cardinal, but we can use Hartogs' construction hartogs 9461 to construct (effectively) (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) from (ℵ‘𝐴), which achieves the same thing. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jan-2013.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 𝑥} ∉ V
Theorem	carduni 9905*	The union of a set of cardinals is a cardinal. Theorem 18.14 of [Monk1] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (card‘𝑥) = 𝑥 → (card‘∪ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝐴))
Theorem	cardiun 9906*	The indexed union of a set of cardinals is a cardinal. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (card‘𝐵) = 𝐵 → (card‘∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵))
Theorem	cardennn 9907	If 𝐴 is equinumerous to a natural number, then that number is its cardinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (card‘𝐴) = 𝐵)
Theorem	cardsucinf 9908	The cardinality of the successor of an infinite ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ω ⊆ 𝐴) → (card‘suc 𝐴) = (card‘𝐴))
Theorem	cardsucnn 9909	The cardinality of the successor of a finite ordinal (natural number). This theorem does not hold for infinite ordinals; see cardsucinf 9908. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (card‘suc 𝐴) = suc (card‘𝐴))
Theorem	cardom 9910	The set of natural numbers is a cardinal number. Theorem 18.11 of [Monk1] p. 133. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (card‘ω) = ω
Theorem	carden2 9911	Two numerable sets are equinumerous iff their cardinal numbers are equal. Unlike carden 10473, the Axiom of Choice is not required. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐴) = (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	cardsdom2 9912	A numerable set is strictly dominated by another iff their cardinalities are strictly ordered. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → ((card‘𝐴) ∈ (card‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵))
Theorem	domtri2 9913	Trichotomy of dominance for numerable sets (does not use AC). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴))
Theorem	nnsdomel 9914	Strict dominance and elementhood are the same for finite ordinals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐵))
Theorem	cardval2 9915*	An alternate version of the value of the cardinal number of a set. Compare cardval 10468. This theorem could be used to give a simpler definition of card in place of df-card 9863. It apparently does not occur in the literature. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (card‘𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ≺ 𝐴})
Theorem	isinffi 9916*	An infinite set contains subsets equinumerous to every finite set. Extension of isinf 9177 from finite ordinals to all finite sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐵–1-1→𝐴)
Theorem	fidomtri 9917	Trichotomy of dominance without AC when one set is finite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴))
Theorem	fidomtri2 9918	Trichotomy of dominance without AC when one set is finite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴))
Theorem	harsdom 9919	The Hartogs number of a well-orderable set strictly dominates the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → 𝐴 ≺ (har‘𝐴))
Theorem	onsdom 9920*	Any well-orderable set is strictly dominated by an ordinal number. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 22-Oct-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥)
Theorem	harval2 9921*	An alternate expression for the Hartogs number of a well-orderable set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (har‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥})
Theorem	harsucnn 9922	The next cardinal after a finite ordinal is the successor ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 5-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (har‘𝐴) = suc 𝐴)
Theorem	cardmin2 9923*	The smallest ordinal that strictly dominates a set is a cardinal, if it exists. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥 ↔ (card‘∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥}) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ≺ 𝑥})
Theorem	pm54.43lem 9924*	In Theorem *54.43 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 360, the number 1 is defined as the collection of all sets with cardinality 1 (i.e. all singletons; see card1 9892), so that their 𝐴 ∈ 1 means, in our notation, 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 1o}. Here we show that this is equivalent to 𝐴 ≈ 1o so that we can use the latter more convenient notation in pm54.43 9925. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 1o ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 1o})
Theorem	pm54.43 9925	Theorem *54.43 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 360. "From this proposition it will follow, when arithmetical addition has been defined, that 1+1=2." See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principia_Mathematica#Quotations. This theorem states that two sets of cardinality 1 are disjoint iff their union has cardinality 2. Whitehead and Russell define 1 as the collection of all sets with cardinality 1 (i.e. all singletons; see card1 9892), so that their 𝐴 ∈ 1 means, in our notation, 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (card‘𝑥) = 1o} which is the same as 𝐴 ≈ 1o by pm54.43lem 9924. We do not have several of their earlier lemmas available (which would otherwise be unused by our different approach to arithmetic), so our proof is longer. (It is also longer because we must show every detail.) Theorem dju1p1e2 10096 shows the derivation of 1+1=2 for cardinal numbers from this theorem. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 1o ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 1o) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≈ 2o))
Theorem	enpr2 9926	An unordered pair with distinct elements is equinumerous to ordinal two. This is a closed-form version of enpr2d 8997. (Contributed by FL, 17-Aug-2008.) Avoid ax-pow 5312, ax-un 7690. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o)
Theorem	pr2ne 9927	If an unordered pair has two elements, then they are different. (Contributed by FL, 14-Feb-2010.) Avoid ax-pow 5312, ax-un 7690. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))
Theorem	prdom2 9928	An unordered pair has at most two elements. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≼ 2o)
Theorem	en2eqpr 9929	Building a set with two elements. (Contributed by FL, 11-Aug-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ≈ 2o ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵}))
Theorem	en2eleq 9930	Express a set of pair cardinality as the unordered pair of a given element and the other element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑃 ≈ 2o) → 𝑃 = {𝑋, ∪ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑋})})
Theorem	en2other2 9931	Taking the other element twice in a pair gets back to the original element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑃 ≈ 2o) → ∪ (𝑃 ∖ {∪ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑋})}) = 𝑋)
Theorem	dif1card 9932	The cardinality of a nonempty finite set is one greater than the cardinality of the set with one element removed. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (card‘𝐴) = suc (card‘(𝐴 ∖ {𝑋})))
Theorem	leweon 9933*	Lexicographical order is a well-ordering of On × On. Proposition 7.56(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 54. Note that unlike r0weon 9934, this order is not set-like, as the preimage of ⟨1o, ∅⟩ is the proper class ({∅} × On). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐿 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (On × On)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ (1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐿 We (On × On)
Theorem	r0weon 9934*	A set-like well-ordering of the class of ordinal pairs. Proposition 7.58(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 54. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐿 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (On × On)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ (1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ((𝑧 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (On × On)) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑧) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑧)) ∈ ((1st ‘𝑤) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑤)) ∨ (((1st ‘𝑧) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑧)) = ((1st ‘𝑤) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑧𝐿𝑤)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 We (On × On) ∧ 𝑅 Se (On × On))
Theorem	infxpenlem 9935*	Lemma for infxpen 9936. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐿 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (On × On)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ (1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ (2nd ‘𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ((𝑧 ∈ (On × On) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (On × On)) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑧) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑧)) ∈ ((1st ‘𝑤) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑤)) ∨ (((1st ‘𝑧) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑧)) = ((1st ‘𝑤) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑧𝐿𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑅 ∩ ((𝑎 × 𝑎) × (𝑎 × 𝑎)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ On ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑎 (ω ⊆ 𝑚 → (𝑚 × 𝑚) ≈ 𝑚)) ∧ (ω ⊆ 𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑎 𝑚 ≺ 𝑎)))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((1st ‘𝑤) ∪ (2nd ‘𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = OrdIso(𝑄, (𝑎 × 𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ω ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	infxpen 9936	Every infinite ordinal is equinumerous to its Cartesian square. Proposition 10.39 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 94, whose proof we follow closely. The key idea is to show that the relation 𝑅 is a well-ordering of (On × On) with the additional property that 𝑅-initial segments of (𝑥 × 𝑥) (where 𝑥 is a limit ordinal) are of cardinality at most 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ω ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	xpomen 9937	The Cartesian product of omega (the set of ordinal natural numbers) with itself is equinumerous to omega. Exercise 1 of [Enderton] p. 133. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (ω × ω) ≈ ω
Theorem	xpct 9938	The cartesian product of two countable sets is countable. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ ω ∧ 𝐵 ≼ ω) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≼ ω)
Theorem	infxpidm2 9939	Every infinite well-orderable set is equinumerous to its Cartesian square. This theorem provides the basis for infinite cardinal arithmetic. Proposition 10.40 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 95. See also infxpidm 10484. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	infxpenc 9940*	A canonical version of infxpen 9936, by a completely different approach (although it uses infxpen 9936 via xpomen 9937). Using Cantor's normal form, we can show that 𝐴 ↑o 𝐵 respects equinumerosity (oef1o 9619), so that all the steps of (ω↑𝑊) · (ω↑𝑊) ≈ ω↑(2𝑊) ≈ (ω↑2)↑𝑊 ≈ ω↑𝑊 can be verified using bijections to do the ordinal commutations. (The assumption on 𝑁 can be satisfied using cnfcom3c 9627.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (On ∖ 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(ω ↑o 2o)–1-1-onto→ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:𝐴–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑊))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ((ω ↑o 2o) ↑m 𝑊) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (𝐹 ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡( I ↾ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((ω CNF 𝑊) ∘ 𝐾) ∘ ◡((ω ↑o 2o) CNF 𝑊))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑m (𝑊 ·o 2o)) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (( I ↾ ω) ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡(𝑌 ∘ ◡𝑋))))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((𝑊 ·o 𝑧) +o 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((2o ·o 𝑤) +o 𝑧))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (((ω CNF (2o ·o 𝑊)) ∘ 𝐿) ∘ ◡(ω CNF (𝑊 ·o 2o)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊), 𝑦 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑥) +o 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ⟨(𝑁‘𝑥), (𝑁‘𝑦)⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (◡𝑁 ∘ (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐽) ∘ 𝑍) ∘ 𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:(𝐴 × 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝐴)
Theorem	infxpenc2lem1 9941*	Lemma for infxpenc2 9944. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (◡(𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ↦ (ω ↑o 𝑥))‘ran (𝑛‘𝑏))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ω ⊆ 𝑏)) → (𝑊 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ∧ (𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑊)))
Theorem	infxpenc2lem2 9942*	Lemma for infxpenc2 9944. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (◡(𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ↦ (ω ↑o 𝑥))‘ran (𝑛‘𝑏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(ω ↑o 2o)–1-1-onto→ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ((ω ↑o 2o) ↑m 𝑊) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (𝐹 ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡( I ↾ 𝑊))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((ω CNF 𝑊) ∘ 𝐾) ∘ ◡((ω ↑o 2o) CNF 𝑊))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑m (𝑊 ·o 2o)) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (( I ↾ ω) ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡(𝑌 ∘ ◡𝑋))))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((𝑊 ·o 𝑧) +o 𝑤))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑧 ∈ 2o, 𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ↦ ((2o ·o 𝑤) +o 𝑧))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (((ω CNF (2o ·o 𝑊)) ∘ 𝐿) ∘ ◡(ω CNF (𝑊 ·o 2o)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑥 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊), 𝑦 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑥) +o 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ ⟨((𝑛‘𝑏)‘𝑥), ((𝑛‘𝑏)‘𝑦)⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (◡(𝑛‘𝑏) ∘ (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐽) ∘ 𝑍) ∘ 𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → (𝑔‘𝑏):(𝑏 × 𝑏)–1-1-onto→𝑏))
Theorem	infxpenc2lem3 9943*	Lemma for infxpenc2 9944. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑛‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (◡(𝑥 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ↦ (ω ↑o 𝑥))‘ran (𝑛‘𝑏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(ω ↑o 2o)–1-1-onto→ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → (𝑔‘𝑏):(𝑏 × 𝑏)–1-1-onto→𝑏))
Theorem	infxpenc2 9944*	Existence form of infxpenc 9940. A "uniform" or "canonical" version of infxpen 9936, asserting the existence of a single function 𝑔 that simultaneously demonstrates product idempotence of all ordinals below a given bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → (𝑔‘𝑏):(𝑏 × 𝑏)–1-1-onto→𝑏))
Theorem	iunmapdisj 9945*	The union ∪ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐶(𝐴 ↑m 𝑛) is a disjoint union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ ∃*𝑛 ∈ 𝐶 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝑛)
Theorem	fseqenlem1 9946*	Lemma for fseqen 9949. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seqω((𝑛 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m suc 𝑛) ↦ ((𝑓‘(𝑥 ↾ 𝑛))𝐹(𝑥‘𝑛)))), {⟨∅, 𝐵⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ω) → (𝐺‘𝐶):(𝐴 ↑m 𝐶)–1-1→𝐴)
Theorem	fseqenlem2 9947*	Lemma for fseqen 9949. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = seqω((𝑛 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m suc 𝑛) ↦ ((𝑓‘(𝑥 ↾ 𝑛))𝐹(𝑥‘𝑛)))), {⟨∅, 𝐵⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑘) ↦ ⟨dom 𝑦, ((𝐺‘dom 𝑦)‘𝑦)⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:∪ 𝑘 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑘)–1-1→(ω × 𝐴))
Theorem	fseqdom 9948*	One half of fseqen 9949. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (ω × 𝐴) ≼ ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑛))
Theorem	fseqen 9949*	A set that is equinumerous to its Cartesian product is equinumerous to the set of finite sequences on it. (This can be proven more easily using some choice but this proof avoids it.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 × 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ω (𝐴 ↑m 𝑛) ≈ (ω × 𝐴))
Theorem	infpwfidom 9950	The collection of finite subsets of a set dominates the set. (We use the weaker sethood assumption (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∈ V because this theorem also implies that 𝐴 is a set if 𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∈ V → 𝐴 ≼ (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin))
Theorem	dfac8alem 9951*	Lemma for dfac8a 9952. If the power set of a set has a choice function, then the set is numerable. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑔‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑓)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → (∃𝑔∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝑔‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦) → 𝐴 ∈ dom card))
Theorem	dfac8a 9952*	Numeration theorem: every set with a choice function on its power set is numerable. With AC, this reduces to the statement that every set is numerable. Similar to Theorem 10.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 84. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃ℎ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (ℎ‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦) → 𝐴 ∈ dom card))
Theorem	dfac8b 9953*	The well-ordering theorem: every numerable set is well-orderable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)
Theorem	dfac8clem 9954*	Lemma for dfac8c 9955. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑠 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) ↦ (℩𝑎 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑠 ¬ 𝑏𝑟𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑟 𝑟 We ∪ 𝐴 → ∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧)))
Theorem	dfac8c 9955*	If the union of a set is well-orderable, then the set has a choice function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑟 𝑟 We ∪ 𝐴 → ∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧)))
Theorem	ac10ct 9956*	A proof of the well-ordering theorem weth 10417, an Axiom of Choice equivalent, restricted to sets dominated by some ordinal (in particular finite sets and countable sets), proven in ZF without AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝐴 ≼ 𝑦 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴)
Theorem	ween 9957*	A set is numerable iff it can be well-ordered. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card ↔ ∃𝑟 𝑟 We 𝐴)
Theorem	ac5num 9958*	A version of ac5b 10400 with the choice as a hypothesis. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((∪ 𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝐴⟶∪ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	ondomen 9959	If a set is dominated by an ordinal, then it is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	numdom 9960	A set dominated by a numerable set is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	ssnum 9961	A subset of a numerable set is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	onssnum 9962	All subsets of the ordinals are numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ On) → 𝐴 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	indcardi 9963*	Indirect strong induction on the cardinality of a finite or numerable set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ dom card)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑅 ≼ 𝑇 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑆 ≺ 𝑅 → 𝜒)) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑅 = 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
Theorem	acnrcl 9964	Reverse closure for the choice set predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	acneq 9965	Equality theorem for the choice set function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → AC 𝐴 = AC 𝐶)
Theorem	isacn 9966*	The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ ((𝒫 𝑋 ∖ {∅}) ↑m 𝐴)∃𝑔∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑓‘𝑥)))
Theorem	acni 9967*	The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝑋 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))
Theorem	acni2 9968*	The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐴⟶𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	acni3 9969*	The property of being a choice set of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑔‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 𝜑) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐴⟶𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	acnlem 9970*	Construct a mapping satisfying the consequent of isacn 9966. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑥)) → ∃𝑔∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑥) ∈ (𝑓‘𝑥))
Theorem	numacn 9971	A well-orderable set has choice sequences of every length. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ dom card → 𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴))
Theorem	finacn 9972	Every set has finite choice sequences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → AC 𝐴 = V)
Theorem	acndom 9973	A set with long choice sequences also has shorter choice sequences, where "shorter" here means the new index set is dominated by the old index set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐵 → 𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴))
Theorem	acnnum 9974	A set 𝑋 which has choice sequences on it of length 𝒫 𝑋 is well-orderable (and hence has choice sequences of every length). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝒫 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	acnen 9975	The class of choice sets of length 𝐴 is a cardinal invariant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → AC 𝐴 = AC 𝐵)
Theorem	acndom2 9976	A set smaller than one with choice sequences of length 𝐴 also has choice sequences of length 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ≼ 𝑌 → (𝑌 ∈ AC 𝐴 → 𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴))
Theorem	acnen2 9977	The class of sets with choice sequences of length 𝐴 is a cardinal invariant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ≈ 𝑌 → (𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 ↔ 𝑌 ∈ AC 𝐴))
Theorem	fodomacn 9978	A version of fodom 10445 that doesn't require the Axiom of Choice ax-ac 10381. If 𝐴 has choice sequences of length 𝐵, then any surjection from 𝐴 to 𝐵 can be inverted to an injection the other way. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ AC 𝐵 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
Theorem	fodomnum 9979	A version of fodom 10445 that doesn't require the Axiom of Choice ax-ac 10381. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom card → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
Theorem	fonum 9980	A surjection maps numerable sets to numerable sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	numwdom 9981	A surjection maps numerable sets to numerable sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ≼* 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	fodomfi2 9982	Onto functions define dominance when a finite number of choices need to be made. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	wdomfil 9983	Weak dominance agrees with normal for finite left sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ Fin → (𝑋 ≼* 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ≼ 𝑌))
Theorem	infpwfien 9984	Any infinite well-orderable set is equinumerous to its set of finite subsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	inffien 9985	The set of finite intersections of an infinite well-orderable set is equinumerous to the set itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → (fi‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	wdomnumr 9986	Weak dominance agrees with normal for numerable right sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom card → (𝐴 ≼* 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	alephfnon 9987	The aleph function is a function on the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ℵ Fn On
Theorem	aleph0 9988	The first infinite cardinal number, discovered by Georg Cantor in 1873, has the same size as the set of natural numbers ω (and under our particular definition is also equal to it). In the literature, the argument of the aleph function is often written as a subscript, and the first aleph is written ℵ0. Exercise 3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91. Also Definition 12(i) of [Suppes] p. 228. From Moshé Machover, Set Theory, Logic, and Their Limitations, p. 95: "Aleph ... the first letter in the Hebrew alphabet ... is also the first letter of the Hebrew word ... (einsoph, meaning infinity), which is a cabbalistic appellation of the deity. The notation is due to Cantor, who was deeply interested in mysticism." (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (ℵ‘∅) = ω
Theorem	alephlim 9989*	Value of the aleph function at a limit ordinal. Definition 12(iii) of [Suppes] p. 91. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (ℵ‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (ℵ‘𝑥))
Theorem	alephsuc 9990	Value of the aleph function at a successor ordinal. Definition 12(ii) of [Suppes] p. 91. Here we express the successor aleph in terms of the Hartogs function df-har 9474, which gives the smallest ordinal that strictly dominates its argument (or the supremum of all ordinals that are dominated by the argument). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) = (har‘(ℵ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	alephon 9991	An aleph is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ On
Theorem	alephcard 9992	Every aleph is a cardinal number. Theorem 65 of [Suppes] p. 229. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (card‘(ℵ‘𝐴)) = (ℵ‘𝐴)
Theorem	alephnbtwn 9993	No cardinal can be sandwiched between an aleph and its successor aleph. Theorem 67 of [Suppes] p. 229. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ ((card‘𝐵) = 𝐵 → ¬ ((ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴)))
Theorem	alephnbtwn2 9994	No set has equinumerosity between an aleph and its successor aleph. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ¬ ((ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴))
Theorem	alephordilem1 9995	Lemma for alephordi 9996. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴))
Theorem	alephordi 9996	Strict ordering property of the aleph function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord 9997	Ordering property of the aleph function. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord2 9998	Ordering property of the aleph function. Theorem 8A(a) of [Enderton] p. 213 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord2i 9999	Ordering property of the aleph function. Theorem 66 of [Suppes] p. 229. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (ℵ‘𝐴) ∈ (ℵ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	alephord3 10000	Ordering property of the aleph function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (ℵ‘𝐴) ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐵)))