P. 100 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 9901-10000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	dfac12r 9901	The axiom of choice holds iff every ordinal has a well-orderable powerset. This version of dfac12 9904 does not assume the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ On 𝒫 𝑥 ∈ dom card ↔ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ⊆ dom card)
Theorem	dfac12k 9902*	Equivalence of dfac12 9904 and dfac12a 9903, without using Regularity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2015.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ On 𝒫 𝑥 ∈ dom card ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ On 𝒫 (ℵ‘𝑦) ∈ dom card)
Theorem	dfac12a 9903	The axiom of choice holds iff every ordinal has a well-orderable powerset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On 𝒫 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	dfac12 9904	The axiom of choice holds iff every aleph has a well-orderable powerset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On 𝒫 (ℵ‘𝑥) ∈ dom card)
Theorem	kmlem1 9905*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, 1 => 2. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑥((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 𝜑) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → 𝜓)))
Theorem	kmlem2 9906*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 3 => 4. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜑 → ∃!𝑤 𝑤 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦)) ↔ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜑 → ∃!𝑤 𝑤 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦))))
Theorem	kmlem3 9907*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 3 => 4. The right-hand side is part of the hypothesis of 4. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤)))
Theorem	kmlem4 9908*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 3 => 4. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑤) → ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ 𝑤) = ∅)
Theorem	kmlem5 9909*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 3 => 4. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑤) → ((𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ∩ (𝑤 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑤}))) = ∅)
Theorem	kmlem6 9910*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 4 => 1. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜑 → 𝐴 = ∅)) → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	kmlem7 9911*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 4 => 1. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤) = ∅)) → ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤)))
Theorem	kmlem8 9912*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4 1 <=> 4. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2004.)
⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 𝜓 → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → ∃!𝑤 𝑤 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦))) ↔ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 𝜓 ∨ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑢 ∃!𝑤 𝑤 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦))))
Theorem	kmlem9 9913*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 3 => 4. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑥 𝑢 = (𝑡 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑡}))}    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤) = ∅)
Theorem	kmlem10 9914*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 3 => 4. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑥 𝑢 = (𝑡 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑡}))}    ⇒   ⊢ (∀ℎ(∀𝑧 ∈ ℎ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℎ (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤) = ∅) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ ℎ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	kmlem11 9915*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 3 => 4. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑥 𝑢 = (𝑡 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑡}))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∩ ∪ 𝐴) = (𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})))
Theorem	kmlem12 9916*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 3 => 4. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑥 𝑢 = (𝑡 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑡}))}    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑧})) ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → ∃!𝑣 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦)) → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → ∃!𝑣 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ (𝑦 ∩ ∪ 𝐴)))))
Theorem	kmlem13 9917*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4 1 <=> 4. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑥 𝑢 = (𝑡 ∖ ∪ (𝑥 ∖ {𝑡}))}    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 → (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤) = ∅)) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃!𝑣 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥(¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤)) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → ∃!𝑣 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦))))
Theorem	kmlem14 9918*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 5 <=> 4. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃!𝑣 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤)) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑧∃𝑣∀𝑢(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	kmlem15 9919*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4, part of 5 <=> 4. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃!𝑣 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ∀𝑧∃𝑣∀𝑢(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	kmlem16 9920*	Lemma for 5-quantifier AC of Kurt Maes, Th. 4 5 <=> 4. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑣) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃!𝑣 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑧 ∩ 𝑤)) ∨ ∃𝑦(¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑧∃𝑣∀𝑢((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	dfackm 9921*	Equivalence of the Axiom of Choice and Maes' AC ackm 10220. The proof consists of lemmas kmlem1 9905 through kmlem16 9920 and this final theorem. AC is not used for the proof. Note: bypassing the first step (i.e., replacing dfac5 9883 with biid 260) establishes the AC equivalence shown by Maes' writeup. The left-hand-side AC shown here was chosen because it is shorter to display. (Contributed by NM, 13-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑦∀𝑧∃𝑣∀𝑢((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑣))) ∨ (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))))))
2.6.14  Cardinal number arithmetic For cardinal arithmetic, we follow [Mendelson] p. 258. Rather than defining operations restricted to cardinal numbers, we use disjoint union df-dju 9658 (⊔) for cardinal addition, Cartesian product df-xp 5595 (×) for cardinal multiplication, and set exponentiation df-map 8598 (↑m) for cardinal exponentiation. Equinumerosity and dominance serve the roles of equality and ordering. If we wanted to, we could easily convert our theorems to actual cardinal number operations via carden 10306, carddom 10309, and cardsdom 10310. The advantage of Mendelson's approach is that we can directly use many equinumerosity theorems that we already have available.
Theorem	undjudom 9922	Cardinal addition dominates union. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))
Theorem	endjudisj 9923	Equinumerosity of a disjoint union and a union of two disjoint sets. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ≈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	djuen 9924	Disjoint unions of equinumerous sets are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 ⊔ 𝐷))
Theorem	djuenun 9925	Disjoint union is equinumerous to union for disjoint sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐷))
Theorem	dju1en 9926	Cardinal addition with cardinal one (which is the same as ordinal one). Used in proof of Theorem 6J of [Enderton] p. 143. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ⊔ 1o) ≈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	dju1dif 9927	Adding and subtracting one gives back the original cardinality. Similar to pncan 11225 for cardinalities. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 ⊔ 1o)) → ((𝐴 ⊔ 1o) ∖ {𝐵}) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	dju1p1e2 9928	1+1=2 for cardinal number addition, derived from pm54.43 9758 as promised. Theorem *110.643 of Principia Mathematica, vol. II, p. 86, which adds the remark, "The above proposition is occasionally useful." Whitehead and Russell define cardinal addition on collections of all sets equinumerous to 1 and 2 (which for us are proper classes unless we restrict them as in karden 9652), but after applying definitions, our theorem is equivalent. Because we use a disjoint union for cardinal addition (as explained in the comment at the top of this section), we use ≈ instead of =. See dju1p1e2ALT 9929 for a shorter proof that doesn't use pm54.43 9758. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (1o ⊔ 1o) ≈ 2o
Theorem	dju1p1e2ALT 9929	Alternate proof of dju1p1e2 9928. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (1o ⊔ 1o) ≈ 2o
Theorem	dju0en 9930	Cardinal addition with cardinal zero (the empty set). Part (a1) of proof of Theorem 6J of [Enderton] p. 143. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ⊔ ∅) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	xp2dju 9931	Two times a cardinal number. Exercise 4.56(g) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (2o × 𝐴) = (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐴)
Theorem	djucomen 9932	Commutative law for cardinal addition. Exercise 4.56(c) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ≈ (𝐵 ⊔ 𝐴))
Theorem	djuassen 9933	Associative law for cardinal addition. Exercise 4.56(c) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ⊔ 𝐶) ≈ (𝐴 ⊔ (𝐵 ⊔ 𝐶)))
Theorem	xpdjuen 9934	Cardinal multiplication distributes over cardinal addition. Theorem 6I(3) of [Enderton] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴 × (𝐵 ⊔ 𝐶)) ≈ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊔ (𝐴 × 𝐶)))
Theorem	mapdjuen 9935	Sum of exponents law for cardinal arithmetic. Theorem 6I(4) of [Enderton] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴 ↑m (𝐵 ⊔ 𝐶)) ≈ ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) × (𝐴 ↑m 𝐶)))
Theorem	pwdjuen 9936	Sum of exponents law for cardinal arithmetic. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝒫 (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ≈ (𝒫 𝐴 × 𝒫 𝐵))
Theorem	djudom1 9937	Ordering law for cardinal addition. Exercise 4.56(f) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐶) ≼ (𝐵 ⊔ 𝐶))
Theorem	djudom2 9938	Ordering law for cardinal addition. Theorem 6L(a) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐶 ⊔ 𝐴) ≼ (𝐶 ⊔ 𝐵))
Theorem	djudoml 9939	A set is dominated by its disjoint union with another. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐴 ≼ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))
Theorem	djuxpdom 9940	Cartesian product dominates disjoint union for sets with cardinality greater than 1. Similar to Proposition 10.36 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 93. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ ((1o ≺ 𝐴 ∧ 1o ≺ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵))
Theorem	djufi 9941	The disjoint union of two finite sets is finite. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≺ ω ∧ 𝐵 ≺ ω) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ≺ ω)
Theorem	cdainflem 9942	Any partition of omega into two pieces (which may be disjoint) contains an infinite subset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≈ ω → (𝐴 ≈ ω ∨ 𝐵 ≈ ω))
Theorem	djuinf 9943	A set is infinite iff the cardinal sum with itself is infinite. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 ↔ ω ≼ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐴))
Theorem	infdju1 9944	An infinite set is equinumerous to itself added with one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ⊔ 1o) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	pwdju1 9945	The sum of a powerset with itself is equipotent to the successor powerset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝒫 𝐴 ⊔ 𝒫 𝐴) ≈ 𝒫 (𝐴 ⊔ 1o))
Theorem	pwdjuidm 9946	If the natural numbers inject into 𝐴, then 𝒫 𝐴 is idempotent under cardinal sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 → (𝒫 𝐴 ⊔ 𝒫 𝐴) ≈ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	djulepw 9947	If 𝐴 is idempotent under cardinal sum and 𝐵 is dominated by the power set of 𝐴, then so is the cardinal sum of 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊔ 𝐴) ≈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝒫 𝐴) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ≼ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	onadju 9948	The cardinal and ordinal sums are always equinumerous. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 7-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ≈ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵))
Theorem	cardadju 9949	The cardinal sum is equinumerous to an ordinal sum of the cardinals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ≈ ((card‘𝐴) +o (card‘𝐵)))
Theorem	djunum 9950	The disjoint union of two numerable sets is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ∈ dom card)
Theorem	unnum 9951	The union of two numerable sets is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ dom card)
Theorem	nnadju 9952	The cardinal and ordinal sums of finite ordinals are equal. For a shorter proof using ax-rep 5214, see nnadjuALT 9953. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 11-Apr-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Feb-2013.) Avoid ax-rep 5214. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 2-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (card‘(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 +o 𝐵))
Theorem	nnadjuALT 9953	Shorter proof of nnadju 9952 using ax-rep 5214. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 11-Apr-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Feb-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (card‘(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 +o 𝐵))
Theorem	ficardadju 9954	The disjoint union of finite sets is equinumerous to the ordinal sum of the cardinalities of those sets. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 3-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ≈ ((card‘𝐴) +o (card‘𝐵)))
Theorem	ficardun 9955	The cardinality of the union of disjoint, finite sets is the ordinal sum of their cardinalities. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 5-Jun-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-rep 5214. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 3-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (card‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = ((card‘𝐴) +o (card‘𝐵)))
Theorem	ficardunOLD 9956	Obsolete version of ficardun 9955 as of 3-Jul-2024. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 5-Jun-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (card‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = ((card‘𝐴) +o (card‘𝐵)))
Theorem	ficardun2 9957	The cardinality of the union of finite sets is at most the ordinal sum of their cardinalities. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Feb-2013.) Avoid ax-rep 5214. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 3-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (card‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((card‘𝐴) +o (card‘𝐵)))
Theorem	ficardun2OLD 9958	Obsolete version of ficardun2 9957 as of 3-Jul-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Feb-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (card‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((card‘𝐴) +o (card‘𝐵)))
Theorem	pwsdompw 9959*	Lemma for domtriom 10198. This is the equinumerosity version of the algebraic identity Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑛(2↑𝑘) = (2↑𝑛) − 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ ω ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝐵‘𝑘) ≈ 𝒫 𝑘) → ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝐵‘𝑘) ≺ (𝐵‘𝑛))
Theorem	unctb 9960	The union of two countable sets is countable. (Contributed by FL, 25-Aug-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ ω ∧ 𝐵 ≼ ω) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≼ ω)
Theorem	infdjuabs 9961	Absorption law for addition to an infinite cardinal. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	infunabs 9962	An infinite set is equinumerous to its union with a smaller one. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	infdju 9963	The sum of two cardinal numbers is their maximum, if one of them is infinite. Proposition 10.41 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 95. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ≈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	infdif 9964	The cardinality of an infinite set does not change after subtracting a strictly smaller one. Example in [Enderton] p. 164. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	infdif2 9965	Cardinality ordering for an infinite class difference. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ≼ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	infxpdom 9966	Dominance law for multiplication with an infinite cardinal. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	infxpabs 9967	Absorption law for multiplication with an infinite cardinal. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	infunsdom1 9968	The union of two sets that are strictly dominated by the infinite set 𝑋 is also dominated by 𝑋. This version of infunsdom 9969 assumes additionally that 𝐴 is the smaller of the two. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝑋)) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≺ 𝑋)
Theorem	infunsdom 9969	The union of two sets that are strictly dominated by the infinite set 𝑋 is also strictly dominated by 𝑋. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴 ≺ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝑋)) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ≺ 𝑋)
Theorem	infxp 9970	Absorption law for multiplication with an infinite cardinal. Equivalent to Proposition 10.41 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 95. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ω ≼ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	pwdjudom 9971	A property of dominance over a powerset, and a main lemma for gchac 10436. Similar to Lemma 2.3 of [KanamoriPincus] p. 420. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝒫 (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐴) ≼ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	infpss 9972*	Every infinite set has an equinumerous proper subset, proved without AC or Infinity. Exercise 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91. See also infpssALT 10068. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐴))
Theorem	infmap2 9973*	An exponentiation law for infinite cardinals. Similar to Lemma 6.2 of [Jech] p. 43. Although this version of infmap 10331 avoids the axiom of choice, it requires the powerset of an infinite set to be well-orderable and so is usually not applicable. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((ω ≼ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ∈ dom card) → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐵)})
2.6.15  The Ackermann bijection
Theorem	ackbij2lem1 9974	Lemma for ackbij2 9998. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin))
Theorem	ackbij1lem1 9975	Lemma for ackbij2 9998. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))
Theorem	ackbij1lem2 9976	Lemma for ackbij2 9998. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∩ suc 𝐴) = ({𝐴} ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)))
Theorem	ackbij1lem3 9977	Lemma for ackbij2 9998. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin))
Theorem	ackbij1lem4 9978	Lemma for ackbij2 9998. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → {𝐴} ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin))
Theorem	ackbij1lem5 9979	Lemma for ackbij2 9998. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 18-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (card‘𝒫 suc 𝐴) = ((card‘𝒫 𝐴) +o (card‘𝒫 𝐴)))
Theorem	ackbij1lem6 9980	Lemma for ackbij2 9998. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin)) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin))
Theorem	ackbij1lem7 9981*	Lemma for ackbij1 9993. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))
Theorem	ackbij1lem8 9982*	Lemma for ackbij1 9993. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘{𝐴}) = (card‘𝒫 𝐴))
Theorem	ackbij1lem9 9983*	Lemma for ackbij1 9993. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (𝐹‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = ((𝐹‘𝐴) +o (𝐹‘𝐵)))
Theorem	ackbij1lem10 9984*	Lemma for ackbij1 9993. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:(𝒫 ω ∩ Fin)⟶ω
Theorem	ackbij1lem11 9985*	Lemma for ackbij1 9993. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin))
Theorem	ackbij1lem12 9986*	Lemma for ackbij1 9993. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))
Theorem	ackbij1lem13 9987*	Lemma for ackbij1 9993. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	ackbij1lem14 9988*	Lemma for ackbij1 9993. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘{𝐴}) = suc (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	ackbij1lem15 9989*	Lemma for ackbij1 9993. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin)) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵)) → ¬ (𝐹‘(𝐴 ∩ suc 𝑐)) = (𝐹‘(𝐵 ∩ suc 𝑐)))
Theorem	ackbij1lem16 9990*	Lemma for ackbij1 9993. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin)) → ((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	ackbij1lem17 9991*	Lemma for ackbij1 9993. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:(𝒫 ω ∩ Fin)–1-1→ω
Theorem	ackbij1lem18 9992*	Lemma for ackbij1 9993. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) → ∃𝑏 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑏) = suc (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	ackbij1 9993*	The Ackermann bijection, part 1: each natural number can be uniquely coded in binary as a finite set of natural numbers and conversely. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:(𝒫 ω ∩ Fin)–1-1-onto→ω
Theorem	ackbij1b 9994*	The Ackermann bijection, part 1b: the bijection from ackbij1 9993 restricts naturally to the powers of particular naturals. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐹 “ 𝒫 𝐴) = (card‘𝒫 𝐴))
Theorem	ackbij2lem2 9995*	Lemma for ackbij2 9998. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 dom 𝑥 ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 “ 𝑦))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (rec(𝐺, ∅)‘𝐴):(𝑅1‘𝐴)–1-1-onto→(card‘(𝑅1‘𝐴)))
Theorem	ackbij2lem3 9996*	Lemma for ackbij2 9998. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 dom 𝑥 ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 “ 𝑦))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (rec(𝐺, ∅)‘𝐴) ⊆ (rec(𝐺, ∅)‘suc 𝐴))
Theorem	ackbij2lem4 9997*	Lemma for ackbij2 9998. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 dom 𝑥 ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 “ 𝑦))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (rec(𝐺, ∅)‘𝐵) ⊆ (rec(𝐺, ∅)‘𝐴))
Theorem	ackbij2 9998*	The Ackermann bijection, part 2: hereditarily finite sets can be represented by recursive binary notation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 dom 𝑥 ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 “ 𝑦))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ∪ (rec(𝐺, ∅) “ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐻:∪ (𝑅1 “ ω)–1-1-onto→ω
Theorem	r1om 9999	The set of hereditarily finite sets is countable. See ackbij2 9998 for an explicit bijection that works without Infinity. See also r1omALT 10531. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝑅1‘ω) ≈ ω
Theorem	fictb 10000	A set is countable iff its collection of finite intersections is countable. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 24-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≼ ω ↔ (fi‘𝐴) ≼ ω))