![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 100 of 489) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-30950) |
![]() (30951-32473) |
![]() (32474-48899) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | rankr1g 9901 | A relationship between the rank function and the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1. Proposition 9.15(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 = (rank‘𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | rankid 9902 | Identity law for the rank function. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc (rank‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | rankr1 9903 | A relationship between the rank function and the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1. Proposition 9.15(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 = (rank‘𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | ssrankr1 9904 | A relationship between an ordinal number less than or equal to a rank, and the cumulative hierarchy of sets 𝑅1. Proposition 9.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐵 ⊆ (rank‘𝐴) ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankr1a 9905 | A relationship between rank and 𝑅1, clearly equivalent to ssrankr1 9904 and friends through trichotomy, but in Raph's opinion considerably more intuitive. See rankr1b 9933 for the subset version. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | r1val2 9906* | The value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function expressed in terms of rank. Definition 15.19 of [Monk1] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = {𝑥 ∣ (rank‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴}) | ||
Theorem | r1val3 9907* | The value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function expressed in terms of rank. Theorem 15.18 of [Monk1] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝒫 {𝑦 ∣ (rank‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑥}) | ||
Theorem | rankel 9908 | The membership relation is inherited by the rank function. Proposition 9.16 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (rank‘𝐴) ∈ (rank‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rankval3 9909* | The value of the rank function expressed recursively: the rank of a set is the smallest ordinal number containing the ranks of all members of the set. Proposition 9.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑥} | ||
Theorem | bndrank 9910* | Any class whose elements have bounded rank is a set. Proposition 9.19 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥 → 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | unbndrank 9911* | The elements of a proper class have unbounded rank. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ (rank‘𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | rankpw 9912 | The rank of a power set. Part of Exercise 30 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ranklim 9913 | The rank of a set belongs to a limit ordinal iff the rank of its power set does. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | r1pw 9914 | A stronger property of 𝑅1 than rankpw 9912. The latter merely proves that 𝑅1 of the successor is a power set, but here we prove that if 𝐴 is in the cumulative hierarchy, then 𝒫 𝐴 is in the cumulative hierarchy of the successor. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | r1pwALT 9915 | Alternate shorter proof of r1pw 9914 based on the additional axioms ax-reg 9661 and ax-inf2 9710. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | r1pwcl 9916 | The cumulative hierarchy of a limit ordinal is closed under power set. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankssb 9917 | The subset relation is inherited by the rank function. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (rank‘𝐴) ⊆ (rank‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankss 9918 | The subset relation is inherited by the rank function. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (rank‘𝐴) ⊆ (rank‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rankunb 9919 | The rank of the union of two sets. Theorem 15.17(iii) of [Monk1] p. 112. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = ((rank‘𝐴) ∪ (rank‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankprb 9920 | The rank of an unordered pair. Part of Exercise 30 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → (rank‘{𝐴, 𝐵}) = suc ((rank‘𝐴) ∪ (rank‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankopb 9921 | The rank of an ordered pair. Part of Exercise 4 of [Kunen] p. 107. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → (rank‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) = suc suc ((rank‘𝐴) ∪ (rank‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankuni2b 9922* | The value of the rank function expressed recursively: the rank of a set is the smallest ordinal number containing the ranks of all members of the set. Proposition 9.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘∪ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | ranksn 9923 | The rank of a singleton. Theorem 15.17(v) of [Monk1] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘{𝐴}) = suc (rank‘𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rankuni2 9924* | The rank of a union. Part of Theorem 15.17(iv) of [Monk1] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘∪ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) | ||
Theorem | rankun 9925 | The rank of the union of two sets. Theorem 15.17(iii) of [Monk1] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = ((rank‘𝐴) ∪ (rank‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rankpr 9926 | The rank of an unordered pair. Part of Exercise 30 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘{𝐴, 𝐵}) = suc ((rank‘𝐴) ∪ (rank‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rankop 9927 | The rank of an ordered pair. Part of Exercise 4 of [Kunen] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) = suc suc ((rank‘𝐴) ∪ (rank‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | r1rankid 9928 | Any set is a subset of the hierarchy of its rank. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘(rank‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | rankeq0b 9929 | A set is empty iff its rank is empty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ (rank‘𝐴) = ∅)) | ||
Theorem | rankeq0 9930 | A set is empty iff its rank is empty. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ (rank‘𝐴) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | rankr1id 9931 | The rank of the hierarchy of an ordinal number is itself. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 ↔ (rank‘(𝑅1‘𝐴)) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rankuni 9932 | The rank of a union. Part of Exercise 4 of [Kunen] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (rank‘∪ 𝐴) = ∪ (rank‘𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rankr1b 9933 | A relationship between rank and 𝑅1. See rankr1a 9905 for the membership version. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | ranksuc 9934 | The rank of a successor. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘suc 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rankuniss 9935 | Upper bound of the rank of a union. Part of Exercise 30 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘∪ 𝐴) ⊆ (rank‘𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rankval4 9936* | The rank of a set is the supremum of the successors of the ranks of its members. Exercise 9.1 of [Jech] p. 72. Also a special case of Theorem 7V(b) of [Enderton] p. 204. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc (rank‘𝑥) | ||
Theorem | rankbnd 9937* | The rank of a set is bounded by a bound for the successor of its members. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | rankbnd2 9938* | The rank of a set is bounded by the successor of a bound for its members. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ⊆ suc 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rankc1 9939* | A relationship that can be used for computation of rank. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ∈ (rank‘∪ 𝐴) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) = (rank‘∪ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | rankc2 9940* | A relationship that can be used for computation of rank. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) = (rank‘∪ 𝐴) → (rank‘𝐴) = suc (rank‘∪ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | rankelun 9941 | Rank membership is inherited by union. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (((rank‘𝐴) ∈ (rank‘𝐶) ∧ (rank‘𝐵) ∈ (rank‘𝐷)) → (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ (rank‘(𝐶 ∪ 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | rankelpr 9942 | Rank membership is inherited by unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (((rank‘𝐴) ∈ (rank‘𝐶) ∧ (rank‘𝐵) ∈ (rank‘𝐷)) → (rank‘{𝐴, 𝐵}) ∈ (rank‘{𝐶, 𝐷})) | ||
Theorem | rankelop 9943 | Rank membership is inherited by ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (((rank‘𝐴) ∈ (rank‘𝐶) ∧ (rank‘𝐵) ∈ (rank‘𝐷)) → (rank‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) ∈ (rank‘〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) | ||
Theorem | rankxpl 9944 | A lower bound on the rank of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankxpu 9945 | An upper bound on the rank of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ suc suc (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rankfu 9946 | An upper bound on the rank of a function. (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 5-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (rank‘𝐹) ⊆ suc suc (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankmapu 9947 | An upper bound on the rank of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 5-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘(𝐴 ↑m 𝐵)) ⊆ suc suc suc (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rankxplim 9948 | The rank of a Cartesian product when the rank of the union of its arguments is a limit ordinal. Part of Exercise 4 of [Kunen] p. 107. See rankxpsuc 9951 for the successor case. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅) → (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankxplim2 9949 | If the rank of a Cartesian product is a limit ordinal, so is the rank of the union of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankxplim3 9950 | The rank of a Cartesian product is a limit ordinal iff its union is. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ Lim ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankxpsuc 9951 | The rank of a Cartesian product when the rank of the union of its arguments is a successor ordinal. Part of Exercise 4 of [Kunen] p. 107. See rankxplim 9948 for the limit ordinal case. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (((rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = suc 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅) → (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = suc suc (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | tcwf 9952 | The transitive closure function is well-founded if its argument is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (TC‘𝐴) ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) | ||
Theorem | tcrank 9953 | This theorem expresses two different facts from the two subset implications in this equality. In the forward direction, it says that the transitive closure has members of every rank below 𝐴. Stated another way, to construct a set at a given rank, you have to climb the entire hierarchy of ordinals below (rank‘𝐴), constructing at least one set at each level in order to move up the ranks. In the reverse direction, it says that every member of (TC‘𝐴) has a rank below the rank of 𝐴, since intuitively it contains only the members of 𝐴 and the members of those and so on, but nothing "bigger" than 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘𝐴) = (rank “ (TC‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | scottex 9954* | Scott's trick collects all sets that have a certain property and are of the smallest possible rank. This theorem shows that the resulting collection, expressed as in Equation 9.3 of [Jech] p. 72, is a set. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} ∈ V | ||
Theorem | scott0 9955* | Scott's trick collects all sets that have a certain property and are of the smallest possible rank. This theorem shows that the resulting collection, expressed as in Equation 9.3 of [Jech] p. 72, contains at least one representative with the property, if there is one. In other words, the collection is empty iff no set has the property (i.e. 𝐴 is empty). (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅) | ||
Theorem | scottexs 9956* | Theorem scheme version of scottex 9954. The collection of all 𝑥 of minimum rank such that 𝜑(𝑥) is true, is a set. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V | ||
Theorem | scott0s 9957* | Theorem scheme version of scott0 9955. The collection of all 𝑥 of minimum rank such that 𝜑(𝑥) is true, is not empty iff there is an 𝑥 such that 𝜑(𝑥) holds. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | cplem1 9958* | Lemma for the Collection Principle cp 9960. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (rank‘𝑦) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} & ⊢ 𝐷 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐷) ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | cplem2 9959* | Lemma for the Collection Principle cp 9960. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → (𝐵 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | cp 9960* | Collection Principle. This remarkable theorem scheme is in effect a very strong generalization of the Axiom of Replacement. The proof makes use of Scott's trick scottex 9954 that collapses a proper class into a set of minimum rank. The wff 𝜑 can be thought of as 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦). Scheme "Collection Principle" of [Jech] p. 72. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | bnd 9961* | A very strong generalization of the Axiom of Replacement (compare zfrep6 7995), derived from the Collection Principle cp 9960. Its strength lies in the rather profound fact that 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦) does not have to be a "function-like" wff, as it does in the standard Axiom of Replacement. This theorem is sometimes called the Boundedness Axiom. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2004.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | bnd2 9962* | A variant of the Boundedness Axiom bnd 9961 that picks a subset 𝑧 out of a possibly proper class 𝐵 in which a property is true. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2004.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | kardex 9963* | The collection of all sets equinumerous to a set 𝐴 and having the least possible rank is a set. This is the part of the justification of the definition of kard of [Enderton] p. 222. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2003.) |
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ≈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ≈ 𝐴 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V | ||
Theorem | karden 9964* | If we allow the Axiom of Regularity, we can avoid the Axiom of Choice by defining the cardinal number of a set as the set of all sets equinumerous to it and having the least possible rank. This theorem proves the equinumerosity relationship for this definition (compare carden 10620). The hypotheses correspond to the definition of kard of [Enderton] p. 222 (which we don't define separately since currently we do not use it elsewhere). This theorem along with kardex 9963 justify the definition of kard. The restriction to the least rank prevents the proper class that would result from {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐴}. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2003.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ≈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ≈ 𝐴 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ≈ 𝐵 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | htalem 9965* | Lemma for defining an emulation of Hilbert's epsilon. Hilbert's epsilon is described at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epsilon-calculus/. This theorem is equivalent to Hilbert's "transfinite axiom", described on that page, with the additional 𝑅 We 𝐴 antecedent. The element 𝐵 is the epsilon that the theorem emulates. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | hta 9966* |
A ZFC emulation of Hilbert's transfinite axiom. The set 𝐵 has the
properties of Hilbert's epsilon, except that it also depends on a
well-ordering 𝑅. This theorem arose from
discussions with Raph
Levien on 5-Mar-2004 about translating the HOL proof language, which
uses Hilbert's epsilon. See
https://us.metamath.org/downloads/choice.txt
(copy of obsolete link
http://ghilbert.org/choice.txt) and
https://us.metamath.org/downloads/megillaward2005he.pdf.
Hilbert's epsilon is described at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epsilon-calculus/. This theorem differs from Hilbert's transfinite axiom described on that page in that it requires 𝑅 We 𝐴 as an antecedent. Class 𝐴 collects the sets of the least rank for which 𝜑(𝑥) is true. Class 𝐵, which emulates Hilbert's epsilon, is the minimum element in a well-ordering 𝑅 on 𝐴. If a well-ordering 𝑅 on 𝐴 can be expressed in a closed form, as might be the case if we are working with say natural numbers, we can eliminate the antecedent with modus ponens, giving us the exact equivalent of Hilbert's transfinite axiom. Otherwise, we replace 𝑅 with a dummy setvar variable, say 𝑤, and attach 𝑤 We 𝐴 as an antecedent in each step of the ZFC version of the HOL proof until the epsilon is eliminated. At that point, 𝐵 (which will have 𝑤 as a free variable) will no longer be present, and we can eliminate 𝑤 We 𝐴 by applying exlimiv 1929 and weth 10564, using scottexs 9956 to establish the existence of 𝐴. For a version of this theorem scheme using class (meta)variables instead of wff (meta)variables, see htalem 9965. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑧) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → (𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
Syntax | cdju 9967 | Extend class notation to include disjoint union of two classes. |
class (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) | ||
Syntax | cinl 9968 | Extend class notation to include left injection of a disjoint union. |
class inl | ||
Syntax | cinr 9969 | Extend class notation to include right injection of a disjoint union. |
class inr | ||
Definition | df-dju 9970 | Disjoint union of two classes. This is a way of creating a set which contains elements corresponding to each element of 𝐴 or 𝐵, tagging each one with whether it came from 𝐴 or 𝐵. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) = (({∅} × 𝐴) ∪ ({1o} × 𝐵)) | ||
Definition | df-inl 9971 | Left injection of a disjoint union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ inl = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 〈∅, 𝑥〉) | ||
Definition | df-inr 9972 | Right injection of a disjoint union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ inr = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 〈1o, 𝑥〉) | ||
Theorem | djueq12 9973 | Equality theorem for disjoint union. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⊔ 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | djueq1 9974 | Equality theorem for disjoint union. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⊔ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | djueq2 9975 | Equality theorem for disjoint union. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ⊔ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ⊔ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | nfdju 9976 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for disjoint union. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | djuex 9977 | The disjoint union of sets is a set. For a shorter proof using djuss 9989 see djuexALT 9991. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | djuexb 9978 | The disjoint union of two classes is a set iff both classes are sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Sep-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ↔ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | djulcl 9979 | Left closure of disjoint union. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 → (inl‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | djurcl 9980 | Right closure of disjoint union. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → (inr‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | djulf1o 9981 | The left injection function on all sets is one to one and onto. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ inl:V–1-1-onto→({∅} × V) | ||
Theorem | djurf1o 9982 | The right injection function on all sets is one to one and onto. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ inr:V–1-1-onto→({1o} × V) | ||
Theorem | inlresf 9983 | The left injection restricted to the left class of a disjoint union is a function from the left class into the disjoint union. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (inl ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | inlresf1 9984 | The left injection restricted to the left class of a disjoint union is an injective function from the left class into the disjoint union. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (inl ↾ 𝐴):𝐴–1-1→(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | inrresf 9985 | The right injection restricted to the right class of a disjoint union is a function from the right class into the disjoint union. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (inr ↾ 𝐵):𝐵⟶(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | inrresf1 9986 | The right injection restricted to the right class of a disjoint union is an injective function from the right class into the disjoint union. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (inr ↾ 𝐵):𝐵–1-1→(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | djuin 9987 | The images of any classes under right and left injection produce disjoint sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ ((inl “ 𝐴) ∩ (inr “ 𝐵)) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | djur 9988* | A member of a disjoint union can be mapped from one of the classes which produced it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = (inl‘𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = (inr‘𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | djuss 9989 | A disjoint union is a subclass of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ⊆ ({∅, 1o} × (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | djuunxp 9990 | The union of a disjoint union and its inversion is the Cartesian product of an unordered pair and the union of the left and right classes of the disjoint unions. (Proposed by GL, 4-Jul-2022.) (Contributed by AV, 4-Jul-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐵 ⊔ 𝐴)) = ({∅, 1o} × (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | djuexALT 9991 | Alternate proof of djuex 9977, which is shorter, but based indirectly on the definitions of inl and inr. (Proposed by BJ, 28-Jun-2022.) (Contributed by AV, 28-Jun-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | eldju1st 9992 | The first component of an element of a disjoint union is either ∅ or 1o. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) → ((1st ‘𝑋) = ∅ ∨ (1st ‘𝑋) = 1o)) | ||
Theorem | eldju2ndl 9993 | The second component of an element of a disjoint union is an element of the left class of the disjoint union if its first component is the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ∧ (1st ‘𝑋) = ∅) → (2nd ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | eldju2ndr 9994 | The second component of an element of a disjoint union is an element of the right class of the disjoint union if its first component is not the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ∧ (1st ‘𝑋) ≠ ∅) → (2nd ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | djuun 9995 | The disjoint union of two classes is the union of the images of those two classes under right and left injection. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ ((inl “ 𝐴) ∪ (inr “ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | 1stinl 9996 | The first component of the value of a left injection is the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (1st ‘(inl‘𝑋)) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | 2ndinl 9997 | The second component of the value of a left injection is its argument. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ‘(inl‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | 1stinr 9998 | The first component of the value of a right injection is 1o. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (1st ‘(inr‘𝑋)) = 1o) | ||
Theorem | 2ndinr 9999 | The second component of the value of a right injection is its argument. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ‘(inr‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | updjudhf 10000* | The mapping of an element of the disjoint union to the value of the corresponding function is a function. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ↦ if((1st ‘𝑥) = ∅, (𝐹‘(2nd ‘𝑥)), (𝐺‘(2nd ‘𝑥)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵)⟶𝐶) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |