| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > avril1 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Poisson d'Avril's
Theorem. This theorem is noted for its
Selbstdokumentieren property, which means, literally,
"self-documenting" and recalls the principle of quidquid
german dictum
sit, altum viditur, often used in set theory. Starting with the
seemingly simple yet profound fact that any object 𝑥 equals
itself
(proved by Tarski in 1965; see Lemma 6 of [Tarski] p. 68), we
demonstrate that the power set of the real numbers, as a relation on the
value of the imaginary unit, does not conjoin with an empty relation on
the product of the additive and multiplicative identity elements,
leading to this startling conclusion that has left even seasoned
professional mathematicians scratching their heads. (Contributed by
Prof. Loof Lirpa, 1-Apr-2005.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
A reply to skeptics can be found at mmnotes.txt, under the 1-Apr-2006 entry. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| avril1 | ⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝒫 ℝ(i‘1) ∧ 𝐹∅(0 · 1)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | equid 2045 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑥 = 𝑥 | |
| 2 | dfnul2 4282 | . . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ∅ = {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥} | |
| 3 | 2 | eqabri 2903 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥) |
| 4 | 3 | con2bii 360 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ ∅) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | mpbi 233 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ ∅ |
| 6 | eleq1 2849 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 〈𝐹, 0〉 → (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ↔ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅)) | |
| 7 | 5, 6 | mtbii 329 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 〈𝐹, 0〉 → ¬ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅) |
| 8 | 7 | vtocleg 3517 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ V → ¬ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅) |
| 9 | elex 3472 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅ → 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ V) | |
| 10 | 9 | con3i 155 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ V → ¬ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅) |
| 11 | 8, 10 | pm2.61i 184 | . . . 4 ⊢ ¬ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅ |
| 12 | df-br 5104 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹∅(0 · 1) ↔ 〈𝐹, (0 · 1)〉 ∈ ∅) | |
| 13 | 0cn 11291 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ | |
| 14 | 13 | mulridi 11306 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (0 · 1) = 0 |
| 15 | 14 | opeq2i 4837 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 〈𝐹, (0 · 1)〉 = 〈𝐹, 0〉 |
| 16 | 15 | eleq1i 2852 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (〈𝐹, (0 · 1)〉 ∈ ∅ ↔ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅) |
| 17 | 12, 16 | bitri 278 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹∅(0 · 1) ↔ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅) |
| 18 | 11, 17 | mtbir 326 | . . 3 ⊢ ¬ 𝐹∅(0 · 1) |
| 19 | 18 | intnan 492 | . 2 ⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝒫 (R × {0R})(℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦) ∧ 𝐹∅(0 · 1)) |
| 20 | df-i 11202 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ i = 〈0R, 1R〉 | |
| 21 | 20 | fveq1i 6884 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (i‘1) = (〈0R, 1R〉‘1) |
| 22 | df-fv 6545 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (〈0R, 1R〉‘1) = (℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦) | |
| 23 | 21, 22 | eqtri 2784 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (i‘1) = (℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦) |
| 24 | 23 | breq2i 5111 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴𝒫 ℝ(i‘1) ↔ 𝐴𝒫 ℝ(℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦)) |
| 25 | df-r 11203 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ℝ = (R × {0R}) | |
| 26 | sseq2 3957 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (ℝ = (R × {0R}) → (𝑧 ⊆ ℝ ↔ 𝑧 ⊆ (R × {0R}))) | |
| 27 | 26 | abbidv 2827 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (ℝ = (R × {0R}) → {𝑧 ∣ 𝑧 ⊆ ℝ} = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑧 ⊆ (R × {0R})}) |
| 28 | df-pw 4559 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝒫 ℝ = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑧 ⊆ ℝ} | |
| 29 | df-pw 4559 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝒫 (R × {0R}) = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑧 ⊆ (R × {0R})} | |
| 30 | 27, 28, 29 | 3eqtr4g 2821 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ℝ = (R × {0R}) → 𝒫 ℝ = 𝒫 (R × {0R})) |
| 31 | 25, 30 | ax-mp 5 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝒫 ℝ = 𝒫 (R × {0R}) |
| 32 | 31 | breqi 5109 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴𝒫 ℝ(℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦) ↔ 𝐴𝒫 (R × {0R})(℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦)) |
| 33 | 24, 32 | bitri 278 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴𝒫 ℝ(i‘1) ↔ 𝐴𝒫 (R × {0R})(℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦)) |
| 34 | 33 | anbi1i 636 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴𝒫 ℝ(i‘1) ∧ 𝐹∅(0 · 1)) ↔ (𝐴𝒫 (R × {0R})(℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦) ∧ 𝐹∅(0 · 1))) |
| 35 | 34 | notbii 323 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ (𝐴𝒫 ℝ(i‘1) ∧ 𝐹∅(0 · 1)) ↔ ¬ (𝐴𝒫 (R × {0R})(℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦) ∧ 𝐹∅(0 · 1))) |
| 36 | 19, 35 | mpbir 234 | 1 ⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝒫 ℝ(i‘1) ∧ 𝐹∅(0 · 1)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2145 {cab 2739 Vcvv 3451 ⊆ wss 3899 ∅c0 4279 𝒫 cpw 4557 {csn 4584 〈cop 4590 class class class wbr 5103 × cxp 5649 ℩cio 6491 ‘cfv 6537 (class class class)co 7418 Rcnr 10943 0Rc0r 10944 1Rc1r 10945 ℝcr 11192 0cc0 11193 1c1 11194 ici 11195 · cmul 11198 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2733 ax-resscn 11250 ax-1cn 11251 ax-icn 11252 ax-addcl 11253 ax-mulcl 11255 ax-mulcom 11257 ax-mulass 11259 ax-distr 11260 ax-i2m1 11261 ax-1rid 11263 ax-cnre 11266 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-sb 2100 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2836 df-rex 3088 df-rab 3414 df-v 3453 df-dif 3902 df-un 3904 df-ss 3916 df-nul 4280 df-if 4483 df-pw 4559 df-sn 4585 df-pr 4587 df-op 4591 df-uni 4868 df-br 5104 df-iota 6493 df-fv 6545 df-ov 7421 df-i 11202 df-r 11203 |
| This theorem is used by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |