| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > avril1 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Poisson d'Avril's
Theorem. This theorem is noted for its
Selbstdokumentieren property, which means, literally,
"self-documenting" and recalls the principle of quidquid
german dictum
sit, altum viditur, often used in set theory. Starting with the
seemingly simple yet profound fact that any object 𝑥 equals
itself
(proved by Tarski in 1965; see Lemma 6 of [Tarski] p. 68), we
demonstrate that the power set of the real numbers, as a relation on the
value of the imaginary unit, does not conjoin with an empty relation on
the product of the additive and multiplicative identity elements,
leading to this startling conclusion that has left even seasoned
professional mathematicians scratching their heads. (Contributed by
Prof. Loof Lirpa, 1-Apr-2005.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
A reply to skeptics can be found at mmnotes.txt, under the 1-Apr-2006 entry. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| avril1 | ⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝒫 ℝ(i‘1) ∧ 𝐹∅(0 · 1)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | equid 2045 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑥 = 𝑥 | |
| 2 | dfnul2 4289 | . . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ∅ = {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥} | |
| 3 | 2 | eqabri 2907 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥) |
| 4 | 3 | con2bii 360 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ ∅) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | mpbi 233 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ ∅ |
| 6 | eleq1 2853 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 〈𝐹, 0〉 → (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ↔ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅)) | |
| 7 | 5, 6 | mtbii 329 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 〈𝐹, 0〉 → ¬ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅) |
| 8 | 7 | vtocleg 3523 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ V → ¬ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅) |
| 9 | elex 3478 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅ → 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ V) | |
| 10 | 9 | con3i 155 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ V → ¬ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅) |
| 11 | 8, 10 | pm2.61i 184 | . . . 4 ⊢ ¬ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅ |
| 12 | df-br 5112 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹∅(0 · 1) ↔ 〈𝐹, (0 · 1)〉 ∈ ∅) | |
| 13 | 0cn 11209 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ | |
| 14 | 13 | mulridi 11224 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (0 · 1) = 0 |
| 15 | 14 | opeq2i 4844 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 〈𝐹, (0 · 1)〉 = 〈𝐹, 0〉 |
| 16 | 15 | eleq1i 2856 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (〈𝐹, (0 · 1)〉 ∈ ∅ ↔ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅) |
| 17 | 12, 16 | bitri 278 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹∅(0 · 1) ↔ 〈𝐹, 0〉 ∈ ∅) |
| 18 | 11, 17 | mtbir 326 | . . 3 ⊢ ¬ 𝐹∅(0 · 1) |
| 19 | 18 | intnan 492 | . 2 ⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝒫 (R × {0R})(℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦) ∧ 𝐹∅(0 · 1)) |
| 20 | df-i 11120 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ i = 〈0R, 1R〉 | |
| 21 | 20 | fveq1i 6886 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (i‘1) = (〈0R, 1R〉‘1) |
| 22 | df-fv 6548 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (〈0R, 1R〉‘1) = (℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦) | |
| 23 | 21, 22 | eqtri 2788 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (i‘1) = (℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦) |
| 24 | 23 | breq2i 5119 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴𝒫 ℝ(i‘1) ↔ 𝐴𝒫 ℝ(℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦)) |
| 25 | df-r 11121 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ℝ = (R × {0R}) | |
| 26 | sseq2 3964 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (ℝ = (R × {0R}) → (𝑧 ⊆ ℝ ↔ 𝑧 ⊆ (R × {0R}))) | |
| 27 | 26 | abbidv 2831 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (ℝ = (R × {0R}) → {𝑧 ∣ 𝑧 ⊆ ℝ} = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑧 ⊆ (R × {0R})}) |
| 28 | df-pw 4566 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝒫 ℝ = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑧 ⊆ ℝ} | |
| 29 | df-pw 4566 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝒫 (R × {0R}) = {𝑧 ∣ 𝑧 ⊆ (R × {0R})} | |
| 30 | 27, 28, 29 | 3eqtr4g 2825 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ℝ = (R × {0R}) → 𝒫 ℝ = 𝒫 (R × {0R})) |
| 31 | 25, 30 | ax-mp 5 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝒫 ℝ = 𝒫 (R × {0R}) |
| 32 | 31 | breqi 5117 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴𝒫 ℝ(℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦) ↔ 𝐴𝒫 (R × {0R})(℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦)) |
| 33 | 24, 32 | bitri 278 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴𝒫 ℝ(i‘1) ↔ 𝐴𝒫 (R × {0R})(℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦)) |
| 34 | 33 | anbi1i 636 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴𝒫 ℝ(i‘1) ∧ 𝐹∅(0 · 1)) ↔ (𝐴𝒫 (R × {0R})(℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦) ∧ 𝐹∅(0 · 1))) |
| 35 | 34 | notbii 323 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ (𝐴𝒫 ℝ(i‘1) ∧ 𝐹∅(0 · 1)) ↔ ¬ (𝐴𝒫 (R × {0R})(℩𝑦1〈0R, 1R〉𝑦) ∧ 𝐹∅(0 · 1))) |
| 36 | 19, 35 | mpbir 234 | 1 ⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝒫 ℝ(i‘1) ∧ 𝐹∅(0 · 1)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2146 {cab 2743 Vcvv 3457 ⊆ wss 3906 ∅c0 4286 𝒫 cpw 4564 {csn 4591 〈cop 4597 class class class wbr 5111 × cxp 5661 ℩cio 6494 ‘cfv 6540 (class class class)co 7416 Rcnr 10861 0Rc0r 10862 1Rc1r 10863 ℝcr 11110 0cc0 11111 1c1 11112 ici 11113 · cmul 11116 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2148 ax-9 2156 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2737 ax-resscn 11168 ax-1cn 11169 ax-icn 11170 ax-addcl 11171 ax-mulcl 11173 ax-mulcom 11175 ax-mulass 11177 ax-distr 11178 ax-i2m1 11179 ax-1rid 11181 ax-cnre 11184 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-sb 2100 df-clab 2744 df-cleq 2757 df-clel 2840 df-rex 3092 df-rab 3419 df-v 3459 df-dif 3909 df-un 3911 df-ss 3923 df-nul 4287 df-if 4490 df-pw 4566 df-sn 4592 df-pr 4594 df-op 4598 df-uni 4875 df-br 5112 df-iota 6496 df-fv 6548 df-ov 7419 df-i 11120 df-r 11121 |
| This theorem is used by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |