P. 300 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 29901-30000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	2pthdlem1 29901*	Lemma 1 for 2pthd 29911. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑘 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗)))
Theorem	2wlkdlem6 29902	Lemma 6 for 2wlkd 29907. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐼‘𝐾)))
Theorem	2wlkdlem7 29903	Lemma 7 for 2wlkd 29907. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ V ∧ 𝐾 ∈ V))
Theorem	2wlkdlem8 29904	Lemma 8 for 2wlkd 29907. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘0) = 𝐽 ∧ (𝐹‘1) = 𝐾))
Theorem	2wlkdlem9 29905	Lemma 9 for 2wlkd 29907. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1))))
Theorem	2wlkdlem10 29906*	Lemma 10 for 3wlkd 30140. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
Theorem	2wlkd 29907	Construction of a walk from two given edges in a graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 23-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	2wlkond 29908	A walk of length 2 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑃)
Theorem	2trld 29909	Construction of a trail from two given edges in a graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 24-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	2trlond 29910	A trail of length 2 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑃)
Theorem	2pthd 29911	A path of length 2 from one vertex to another vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 24-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	2spthd 29912	A simple path of length 2 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	2pthond 29913	A simple path of length 2 from one vertex to another, different vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 24-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽) ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐾)))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑃)
Theorem	2pthon3v 29914*	For a vertex adjacent to two other vertices there is a simple path of length 2 between these other vertices in a hypergraph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 24-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸)) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2))
Theorem	umgr2adedgwlklem 29915	Lemma for umgr2adedgwlk 29916, umgr2adedgspth 29919, etc. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸) → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))))
Theorem	umgr2adedgwlk 29916	In a multigraph, two adjacent edges form a walk of length 2. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴, 𝐵})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐾) = {𝐵, 𝐶})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 2 ∧ (𝐴 = (𝑃‘0) ∧ 𝐵 = (𝑃‘1) ∧ 𝐶 = (𝑃‘2))))
Theorem	umgr2adedgwlkon 29917	In a multigraph, two adjacent edges form a walk between two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴, 𝐵})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐾) = {𝐵, 𝐶})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑃)
Theorem	umgr2adedgwlkonALT 29918	Alternate proof for umgr2adedgwlkon 29917, using umgr2adedgwlk 29916, but with a much longer proof! In a multigraph, two adjacent edges form a walk between two (different) vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴, 𝐵})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐾) = {𝐵, 𝐶})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑃)
Theorem	umgr2adedgspth 29919	In a multigraph, two adjacent edges with different endvertices form a simple path of length 2. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽𝐾”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴, 𝐵})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘𝐾) = {𝐵, 𝐶})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	umgr2wlk 29920*	In a multigraph, there is a walk of length 2 for each pair of adjacent edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2 ∧ (𝐴 = (𝑝‘0) ∧ 𝐵 = (𝑝‘1) ∧ 𝐶 = (𝑝‘2))))
Theorem	umgr2wlkon 29921*	For each pair of adjacent edges in a multigraph, there is a walk of length 2 between the not common vertices of the edges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐶)𝑝)
Theorem	elwwlks2s3 29922*	A walk of length 2 as word is a length 3 string. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (2 WWalksN 𝐺) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 𝑊 = ⟨“𝑎𝑏𝑐”⟩)
Theorem	midwwlks2s3 29923*	There is a vertex between the endpoints of a walk of length 2 between two vertices as length 3 string. (Contributed by AV, 10-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (2 WWalksN 𝐺) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊‘1) = 𝑏)
Theorem	wwlks2onv 29924	If a length 3 string represents a walk of length 2, its components are vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Feb-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉))
Theorem	elwwlks2ons3im 29925	A walk as word of length 2 between two vertices is a length 3 string and its second symbol is a vertex. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) → (𝑊 = ⟨“𝐴(𝑊‘1)𝐶”⟩ ∧ (𝑊‘1) ∈ 𝑉))
Theorem	elwwlks2ons3 29926*	For each walk of length 2 between two vertices, there is a third vertex in the middle of the walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 14-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = ⟨“𝐴𝑏𝐶”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐴𝑏𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶)))
Theorem	s3wwlks2on 29927*	A length 3 string which represents a walk of length 2 between two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2)))
Theorem	umgrwwlks2on 29928	A walk of length 2 between two vertices as word in a multigraph. This theorem would also hold for pseudographs, but to prove this the cases 𝐴 = 𝐵 and/or 𝐵 = 𝐶 must be considered separately. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	wwlks2onsym 29929	There is a walk of length 2 from one vertex to another vertex iff there is a walk of length 2 from the other vertex to the first vertex. (Contributed by AV, 7-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ⟨“𝐶𝐵𝐴”⟩ ∈ (𝐶(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐴)))
Theorem	elwwlks2on 29930*	A walk of length 2 between two vertices as length 3 string. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = ⟨“𝐴𝑏𝐶”⟩ ∧ ∃𝑓(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑊 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2))))
Theorem	elwspths2on 29931*	A simple path of length 2 between two vertices (in a graph) as length 3 string. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = ⟨“𝐴𝑏𝐶”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐴𝑏𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐶))))
Theorem	wpthswwlks2on 29932	For two different vertices, a walk of length 2 between these vertices is a simple path of length 2 between these vertices in a simple graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 13-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 16-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐵) = (𝐴(2 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵))
Theorem	2wspdisj 29933*	All simple paths of length 2 from a fixed vertex to another vertex are disjunct. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Disj 𝑏 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝐴})(𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝑏)
Theorem	2wspiundisj 29934*	All simple paths of length 2 from a fixed vertex to another vertex are disjunct. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 14-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jan-2022.)
⊢ Disj 𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∪ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑎})(𝑎(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝑏)
Theorem	usgr2wspthons3 29935	A simple path of length 2 between two vertices represented as length 3 string corresponds to two adjacent edges in a simple graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	usgr2wspthon 29936*	A simple path of length 2 between two vertices corresponds to two adjacent edges in a simple graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑇 ∈ (𝐴(2 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ((𝑇 = ⟨“𝐴𝑏𝐶”⟩ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ ({𝐴, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑏, 𝐶} ∈ 𝐸))))
Theorem	elwwlks2 29937*	A walk of length 2 between two vertices as length 3 string in a pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝑊 ∈ (2 WWalksN 𝐺) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = ⟨“𝑎𝑏𝑐”⟩ ∧ ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2 ∧ (𝑎 = (𝑝‘0) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝑝‘1) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝑝‘2))))))
Theorem	elwspths2spth 29938*	A simple path of length 2 between two vertices as length 3 string in a pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 28-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝑊 ∈ (2 WSPathsN 𝐺) ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑊 = ⟨“𝑎𝑏𝑐”⟩ ∧ ∃𝑓∃𝑝(𝑓(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 2 ∧ (𝑎 = (𝑝‘0) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝑝‘1) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝑝‘2))))))
17.3.9  Walks in regular graphs
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlkl1 29939*	In a k-regular graph, there are k walks (as word) of length 1 starting at each vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 28-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉) → (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (1 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃}) = 𝐾)
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlkslem 29940*	Lemma for rusgrnumwwlks 29945. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Aug-2018.)
⊢ (𝑌 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑍 ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃} → {𝑤 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑤 ∈ 𝑋 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ (𝑌‘0) = 𝑃 ∧ 𝜓)})
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlklem 29941*	Lemma for rusgrnumwwlk 29946 etc. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑃𝐿𝑁) = (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃}))
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlkb0 29942*	Induction base 0 for rusgrnumwwlk 29946. Here, we do not need the regularity of the graph yet. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑃𝐿0) = 1)
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlkb1 29943*	Induction base 1 for rusgrnumwwlk 29946. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 28-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑃𝐿1) = 𝐾)
Theorem	rusgr0edg 29944*	Special case for graphs without edges: There are no walks of length greater than 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 0 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑃𝐿𝑁) = 0)
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlks 29945*	Induction step for rusgrnumwwlk 29946. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-May-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → ((𝑃𝐿𝑁) = (𝐾↑𝑁) → (𝑃𝐿(𝑁 + 1)) = (𝐾↑(𝑁 + 1))))
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlk 29946*	In a 𝐾-regular graph, the number of walks of a fixed length 𝑁 from a fixed vertex is 𝐾 to the power of 𝑁. By definition, (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) is the set of walks (as words) with length 𝑁, and (𝑃𝐿𝑁) is the number of walks with length 𝑁 starting at the vertex 𝑃. Because of the 𝐾-regularity, a walk can be continued in 𝐾 different ways at the end vertex of the walk, and this repeated 𝑁 times. This theorem even holds for 𝑁 = 0: in this case, the walk consists of only one vertex 𝑃, so the number of walks of length 𝑁 = 0 starting with 𝑃 is (𝐾↑0) = 1. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (𝑃𝐿𝑁) = (𝐾↑𝑁))
Theorem	rusgrnumwwlkg 29947*	In a 𝐾-regular graph, the number of walks (as words) of a fixed length 𝑁 from a fixed vertex is 𝐾 to the power of 𝑁. Closed form of rusgrnumwwlk 29946. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃}) = (𝐾↑𝑁))
Theorem	rusgrnumwlkg 29948*	In a k-regular graph, the number of walks of a fixed length n from a fixed vertex is k to the power of n. This theorem corresponds to statement 11 in [Huneke] p. 2: "The total number of walks v(0) v(1) ... v(n-2) from a fixed vertex v = v(0) is k^(n-2) as G is k-regular." This theorem even holds for n=0: then the walk consists of only one vertex v(0), so the number of walks of length n=0 starting with v=v(0) is 1=k^0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-Aug-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑤)‘0) = 𝑃)}) = (𝐾↑𝑁))
Theorem	clwwlknclwwlkdif 29949*	The set 𝐴 of walks of length 𝑁 starting with a fixed vertex 𝑉 and ending not at this vertex is the difference between the set 𝐶 of walks of length 𝑁 starting with this vertex 𝑋 and the set 𝐵 of closed walks of length 𝑁 anchored at this vertex 𝑋. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 16-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ (lastS‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑋)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑋(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑋}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∖ 𝐵)
Theorem	clwwlknclwwlkdifnum 29950*	In a 𝐾-regular graph, the size of the set 𝐴 of walks of length 𝑁 starting with a fixed vertex 𝑋 and ending not at this vertex is the difference between 𝐾 to the power of 𝑁 and the size of the set 𝐵 of closed walks of length 𝑁 anchored at this vertex 𝑋. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 8-Mar-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ (lastS‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑋)}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝑋(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ Fin) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)) → (♯‘𝐴) = ((𝐾↑𝑁) − (♯‘𝐵)))
17.3.10  Closed walks as words In general, a closed walk is an alternating sequence of vertices and edges, as defined in df-clwlks 29742: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n), with p(n) = p(0). Often, it is sufficient to refer to a walk by the (cyclic) sequence of its vertices, i.e omitting its edges in its representation: p(0) p(1) ... p(n-1) p(0), see the corresponding remark on cycles (which are special closed walks) in [Diestel] p. 7. As for "walks as words" in general, the concept of a Word, see df-word 14413, is also used in Definitions df-clwwlk 29952 and df-clwwlkn 29995, and the representation of a closed walk as the sequence of its vertices is called "closed walk as word". In contrast to "walks as words", the terminating vertex p(n) of a closed walk is omitted in the representation of a closed walk as word, see definitions df-clwwlk 29952, df-clwwlkn 29995 and df-clwwlknon 30058, because it is always equal to the first vertex of the closed walk. This represenation has the advantage that the vertices can be cyclically shifted without changing the represented closed walk. Furthermore, the length of a closed walk (i.e. the number of its edges) equals the number of symbols/vertices of the word representing the closed walk. To avoid to handle the degenerate case of representing a (closed) walk of length 0 by the empty word, this case is excluded within the definition (𝑤 ≠ ∅). This is because a walk of length 0 is anchored at an arbitrary vertex by the general definition for closed walks, see 0clwlkv 30101, which neither can be reflected by the empty word nor by a singleton word ⟨“𝑣”⟩ with vertex v : ⟨“𝑣”⟩ represents the walk "𝑣𝑣", which is a (closed) walk of length 1 (if there is an edge/loop from 𝑣 to 𝑣), see loopclwwlkn1b 30012. Therefore, a closed walk corresponds to a closed walk as word only for walks of length at least 1, see clwlkclwwlk2 29973 or clwlkclwwlken 29982. Although the set ClWWalksN of all closed walks of a fixed length as words over the set of vertices is defined as function over ℕ0, the fixed length is usually not 0, because (0 ClWWalksN 𝐺) = ∅ (see clwwlkn0 29998). Analogous to (𝐴(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵), the set of walks of a fixed length 𝑁 between two vertices 𝐴 and 𝐵, the set (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) of closed walks of a fixed length 𝑁 anchored at a fixed vertex 𝑋 is defined by df-clwwlknon 30058. This definition is also based on ℕ0 instead of ℕ, with (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)0) = ∅ (see clwwlk0on0 30062). clwwlknon1le1 30071 states that there is at most one (closed) walk of length 1 on a vertex, which would consist of a loop (see clwwlknon1loop 30068). And in a 𝐾-regular graph, there are 𝐾 closed walks of length 2 on each vertex, see clwwlknon2num 30075.
17.3.10.1  Closed walks as words
Syntax	cclwwlk 29951	Extend class notation with closed walks (in an undirected graph) as word over the set of vertices.
class ClWWalks
Definition	df-clwwlk 29952*	Define the set of all closed walks (in an undirected graph) as words over the set of vertices. Such a word corresponds to the sequence p(0) p(1) ... p(n-1) of the vertices in a closed walk p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n)=p(0) as defined in df-clwlks 29742. Notice that the word does not contain the terminating vertex p(n) of the walk, because it is always equal to the first vertex of the closed walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ClWWalks = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝑔) ∣ (𝑤 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑤) − 1)){(𝑤‘𝑖), (𝑤‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ (Edg‘𝑔) ∧ {(lastS‘𝑤), (𝑤‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝑔))})
Theorem	clwwlk 29953*	The set of closed walks (in an undirected graph) as words over the set of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ (𝑤 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑤) − 1)){(𝑤‘𝑖), (𝑤‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {(lastS‘𝑤), (𝑤‘0)} ∈ 𝐸)}
Theorem	isclwwlk 29954*	Properties of a word to represent a closed walk (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ↔ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ≠ ∅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑊) − 1)){(𝑊‘𝑖), (𝑊‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {(lastS‘𝑊), (𝑊‘0)} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	clwwlkbp 29955	Basic properties of a closed walk (in an undirected graph) as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	clwwlkgt0 29956	There is no empty closed walk (i.e. a closed walk without any edge) represented by a word of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) → 0 < (♯‘𝑊))
Theorem	clwwlksswrd 29957	Closed walks (represented by words) are words. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 25-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ⊆ Word (Vtx‘𝐺)
Theorem	clwwlk1loop 29958	A closed walk of length 1 is a loop. See also clwlkl1loop 29754. (Contributed by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ (♯‘𝑊) = 1) → {(𝑊‘0), (𝑊‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwwlkccatlem 29959*	Lemma for clwwlkccat 29960: index 𝑗 is shifted up by (♯‘𝐴), and the case 𝑖 = ((♯‘𝐴) − 1) is covered by the "bridge" {(lastS‘𝐴), (𝐵‘0)} = {(lastS‘𝐴), (𝐴‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺). (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2022.)
⊢ ((((𝐴 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝐴) − 1)){(𝐴‘𝑖), (𝐴‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺) ∧ {(lastS‘𝐴), (𝐴‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)) ∧ ((𝐵 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝐵) − 1)){(𝐵‘𝑗), (𝐵‘(𝑗 + 1))} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺) ∧ {(lastS‘𝐵), (𝐵‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)) ∧ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘(𝐴 ++ 𝐵)) − 1)){((𝐴 ++ 𝐵)‘𝑖), ((𝐴 ++ 𝐵)‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwwlkccat 29960	The concatenation of two words representing closed walks anchored at the same vertex represents a closed walk. The resulting walk is a "double loop", starting at the common vertex, coming back to the common vertex by the first walk, following the second walk and finally coming back to the common vertex again. (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) → (𝐴 ++ 𝐵) ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	umgrclwwlkge2 29961	A closed walk in a multigraph has a length of at least 2 (because it cannot have a loop). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 16-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UMGraph → (𝑃 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) → 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2a1 29962*	Lemma 1 for clwlkclwwlklem2a 29968. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((((♯‘𝑃) − 1) − 0) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 ∧ {(𝑃‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)), (𝑃‘0)} ∈ ran 𝐸)) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2a2 29963*	Lemma 2 for clwlkclwwlklem2a 29968. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)})))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (♯‘𝐹) = ((♯‘𝑃) − 1))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2a3 29964*	Lemma 3 for clwlkclwwlklem2a 29968. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)})))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)) = (lastS‘𝑃))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2fv1 29965*	Lemma 4a for clwlkclwwlklem2a 29968. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)})))    ⇒   ⊢ (((♯‘𝑃) ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 2))) → (𝐹‘𝐼) = (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝐼), (𝑃‘(𝐼 + 1))}))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2fv2 29966*	Lemma 4b for clwlkclwwlklem2a 29968. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)})))    ⇒   ⊢ (((♯‘𝑃) ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (𝐹‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)) = (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)), (𝑃‘0)}))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2a4 29967*	Lemma 4 for clwlkclwwlklem2a 29968. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)})))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1))) → ({(𝑃‘𝐼), (𝑃‘(𝐼 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 → (𝐸‘(𝐹‘𝐼)) = {(𝑃‘𝐼), (𝑃‘(𝐼 + 1))})))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2a 29968*	Lemma for clwlkclwwlklem2 29970. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ if(𝑥 < ((♯‘𝑃) − 2), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}), (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘0)})))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((((♯‘𝑃) − 1) − 0) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 ∧ {(𝑃‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)), (𝑃‘0)} ∈ ran 𝐸)) → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐸 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐸‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))}) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem1 29969*	Lemma 1 for clwlkclwwlk 29972. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((((♯‘𝑃) − 1) − 0) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 ∧ {(𝑃‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)), (𝑃‘0)} ∈ ran 𝐸)) → ∃𝑓((𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝐸 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))(𝐸‘(𝑓‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))}) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝑓)))))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem2 29970*	Lemma 2 for clwlkclwwlk 29972. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→𝑅 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐸) ∧ (𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐸‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹)))) → ((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝐹) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 ∧ {(𝑃‘((♯‘𝐹) − 1)), (𝑃‘0)} ∈ ran 𝐸))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlklem3 29971*	Lemma 3 for clwlkclwwlk 29972. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (∃𝑓((𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝐸 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))(𝐸‘(𝑓‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))}) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝑓))) ↔ ((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((((♯‘𝑃) − 1) − 0) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 ∧ {(𝑃‘((♯‘𝑃) − 2)), (𝑃‘0)} ∈ ran 𝐸))))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlk 29972*	A closed walk as word of length at least 2 corresponds to a closed walk in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (∃𝑓 𝑓(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ ((lastS‘𝑃) = (𝑃‘0) ∧ (𝑃 prefix ((♯‘𝑃) − 1)) ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺))))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlk2 29973*	A closed walk corresponds to a closed walk as word in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 1 ≤ (♯‘𝑃)) → (∃𝑓 𝑓(ClWalks‘𝐺)(𝑃 ++ ⟨“(𝑃‘0)”⟩) ↔ 𝑃 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺)))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkflem 29974*	Lemma for clwlkclwwlkf 29978. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (1st ‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (2nd ‘𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴(Walks‘𝐺)𝐵 ∧ (𝐵‘0) = (𝐵‘(♯‘𝐴)) ∧ (♯‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkf1lem2 29975*	Lemma 2 for clwlkclwwlkf1 29980. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2022.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (1st ‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (2nd ‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (1st ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (2nd ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐵 prefix (♯‘𝐴)) = (𝐸 prefix (♯‘𝐷))) → ((♯‘𝐴) = (♯‘𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐴))(𝐵‘𝑖) = (𝐸‘𝑖)))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkf1lem3 29976*	Lemma 3 for clwlkclwwlkf1 29980. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (1st ‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (2nd ‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (1st ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (2nd ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐵 prefix (♯‘𝐴)) = (𝐸 prefix (♯‘𝐷))) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐴))(𝐵‘𝑖) = (𝐸‘𝑖))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkfolem 29977*	Lemma for clwlkclwwlkfo 29979. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 1 ≤ (♯‘𝑊) ∧ ⟨𝑓, (𝑊 ++ ⟨“(𝑊‘0)”⟩)⟩ ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺)) → ⟨𝑓, (𝑊 ++ ⟨“(𝑊‘0)”⟩)⟩ ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkf 29978*	𝐹 is a function from the nonempty closed walks into the closed walks as word in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2022.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑐) prefix ((♯‘(2nd ‘𝑐)) − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐹:𝐶⟶(ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkfo 29979*	𝐹 is a function from the nonempty closed walks onto the closed walks as words in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 2-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑐) prefix ((♯‘(2nd ‘𝑐)) − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐹:𝐶–onto→(ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkf1 29980*	𝐹 is a one-to-one function from the nonempty closed walks into the closed walks as words in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 3-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑐) prefix ((♯‘(2nd ‘𝑐)) − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1→(ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlkf1o 29981*	𝐹 is a bijection between the nonempty closed walks and the closed walks as words in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 3-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ((2nd ‘𝑐) prefix ((♯‘(2nd ‘𝑐)) − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→(ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwlkclwwlken 29982*	The set of the nonempty closed walks and the set of closed walks as word are equinumerous in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 4-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))} ≈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwwisshclwwslemlem 29983*	Lemma for clwwisshclwwslem 29984. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (((𝐿 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(𝐿 − 1)){(𝑊‘𝑖), (𝑊‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝑅 ∧ {(𝑊‘(𝐿 − 1)), (𝑊‘0)} ∈ 𝑅) → {(𝑊‘((𝐴 + 𝐵) mod 𝐿)), (𝑊‘(((𝐴 + 1) + 𝐵) mod 𝐿))} ∈ 𝑅)
Theorem	clwwisshclwwslem 29984*	Lemma for clwwisshclwws 29985. (Contributed by AV, 24-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑊))) → ((∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑊) − 1)){(𝑊‘𝑖), (𝑊‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {(lastS‘𝑊), (𝑊‘0)} ∈ 𝐸) → ∀𝑗 ∈ (0..^((♯‘(𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁)) − 1)){((𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁)‘𝑗), ((𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁)‘(𝑗 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	clwwisshclwws 29985	Cyclically shifting a closed walk as word results in a closed walk as word (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))) → (𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁) ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwwisshclwwsn 29986	Cyclically shifting a closed walk as word results in a closed walk as word (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑊))) → (𝑊 cyclShift 𝑁) ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	erclwwlkrel 29987	∼ is a relation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑢, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ Rel ∼
Theorem	erclwwlkeq 29988*	Two classes are equivalent regarding ∼ if both are words and one is the other cyclically shifted. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑢, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑈 ∼ 𝑊 ↔ (𝑈 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑊))𝑈 = (𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛))))
Theorem	erclwwlkeqlen 29989*	If two classes are equivalent regarding ∼, then they are words of the same length. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑢, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑈 ∼ 𝑊 → (♯‘𝑈) = (♯‘𝑊)))
Theorem	erclwwlkref 29990*	∼ is a reflexive relation over the set of closed walks (defined as words). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑢, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ↔ 𝑥 ∼ 𝑥)
Theorem	erclwwlksym 29991*	∼ is a symmetric relation over the set of closed walks (defined as words). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑢, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∼ 𝑦 → 𝑦 ∼ 𝑥)
Theorem	erclwwlktr 29992*	∼ is a transitive relation over the set of closed walks (defined as words). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑢, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∼ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ∼ 𝑧)
Theorem	erclwwlk 29993*	∼ is an equivalence relation over the set of closed walks (defined as words). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑢, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝑤))𝑢 = (𝑤 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ∼ Er (ClWWalks‘𝐺)
17.3.10.2  Closed walks of a fixed length as words
Syntax	cclwwlkn 29994	Extend class notation with closed walks (in an undirected graph) of a fixed length as word over the set of vertices.
class ClWWalksN
Definition	df-clwwlkn 29995*	Define the set of all closed walks of a fixed length 𝑛 as words over the set of vertices in a graph 𝑔. If 0 < 𝑛, such a word corresponds to the sequence p(0) p(1) ... p(n-1) of the vertices in a closed walk p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n)=p(0) as defined in df-clwlks 29742. For 𝑛 = 0, the set is empty, see clwwlkn0 29998. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 22-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ClWWalksN = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝑔) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = 𝑛})
Theorem	clwwlkn 29996*	The set of closed walks of a fixed length 𝑁 as words over the set of vertices in a graph 𝐺. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 22-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘𝑤) = 𝑁}
Theorem	isclwwlkn 29997	A word over the set of vertices representing a closed walk of a fixed length. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 22-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ (♯‘𝑊) = 𝑁))
Theorem	clwwlkn0 29998	There is no closed walk of length 0 (i.e. a closed walk without any edge) represented by a word of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (0 ClWWalksN 𝐺) = ∅
Theorem	clwwlkneq0 29999	Sufficient conditions for ClWWalksN to be empty. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 24-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∉ V ∨ 𝑁 ∉ ℕ) → (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) = ∅)
Theorem	clwwlkclwwlkn 30000	A closed walk of a fixed length as word is a closed walk (in an undirected graph) as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 22-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) → 𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺))