Theorem bj-evalid 37064

Description: The evaluation at a set of the identity function is that set. (General form of ndxarg 17166.) The restriction to a set 𝑉 is necessary since the argument of the function Slot 𝐴 (like that of any function) has to be a set for the evaluation to be meaningful. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-evalid	⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem bj-evalid

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resiexg 7888	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ( I ↾ 𝑉) ∈ V)
2		bj-evalval 37063	. . 3 ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝑉) ∈ V → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = (( I ↾ 𝑉)‘𝐴))
3	1, 2	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = (( I ↾ 𝑉)‘𝐴))
4		fvresi 7147	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (( I ↾ 𝑉)‘𝐴) = 𝐴)
5	3, 4	sylan9eq 2784	1 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  Vcvv 3447   I cid 5532   ↾ cres 5640  ‘cfv 6511  Slot cslot 17151

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pow 5320  ax-pr 5387  ax-un 7711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-res 5650  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fv 6519  df-slot 17152

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-ndxarg  37065  bj-evalidval  37066