Theorem bj-evalid 37252

Description: The evaluation at a set of the identity function is that set. (General form of ndxarg 17127.) The restriction to a set 𝑉 is necessary since the argument of the function Slot 𝐴 (like that of any function) has to be a set for the evaluation to be meaningful. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-evalid	⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem bj-evalid

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resiexg 7856	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ( I ↾ 𝑉) ∈ V)
2		bj-evalval 37251	. . 3 ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝑉) ∈ V → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = (( I ↾ 𝑉)‘𝐴))
3	1, 2	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = (( I ↾ 𝑉)‘𝐴))
4		fvresi 7121	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (( I ↾ 𝑉)‘𝐴) = 𝐴)
5	3, 4	sylan9eq 2792	1 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3441   I cid 5519   ↾ cres 5627  ‘cfv 6493  Slot cslot 17112

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5242  ax-nul 5252  ax-pow 5311  ax-pr 5378  ax-un 7682

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3401  df-v 3443  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4287  df-if 4481  df-pw 4557  df-sn 4582  df-pr 4584  df-op 4588  df-uni 4865  df-br 5100  df-opab 5162  df-mpt 5181  df-id 5520  df-xp 5631  df-rel 5632  df-cnv 5633  df-co 5634  df-dm 5635  df-res 5637  df-iota 6449  df-fun 6495  df-fv 6501  df-slot 17113

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-ndxarg  37253  bj-evalidval  37254