Theorem bj-evalid 35174

Description: The evaluation at a set of the identity function is that set. (General form of ndxarg 16825.) The restriction to a set 𝑉 is necessary since the argument of the function Slot 𝐴 (like that of any function) has to be a set for the evaluation to be meaningful. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-evalid	⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem bj-evalid

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resiexg 7735	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ( I ↾ 𝑉) ∈ V)
2		bj-evalval 35173	. . 3 ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝑉) ∈ V → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = (( I ↾ 𝑉)‘𝐴))
3	1, 2	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = (( I ↾ 𝑉)‘𝐴))
4		fvresi 7027	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (( I ↾ 𝑉)‘𝐴) = 𝐴)
5	3, 4	sylan9eq 2799	1 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  Vcvv 3422   I cid 5479   ↾ cres 5582  ‘cfv 6418  Slot cslot 16810

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pow 5283  ax-pr 5347  ax-un 7566

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-res 5592  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fv 6426  df-slot 16811

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-ndxarg  35175  bj-evalidval  35176