Theorem bj-evalid 37746

Description: The evaluation at a set of the identity function is that set. General form of ndxarg 17262. The restriction to a set 𝑉 is necessary since the argument of the function Slot 𝐴 (like that of any function) has to be a set for the evaluation to be meaningful. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-evalid	⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem bj-evalid

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resiexg 7907	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ( I ↾ 𝑉) ∈ V)
2		bj-evalval 37745	. . 3 ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝑉) ∈ V → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = (( I ↾ 𝑉)‘𝐴))
3	1, 2	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = (( I ↾ 𝑉)‘𝐴))
4		fvresi 7171	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (( I ↾ 𝑉)‘𝐴) = 𝐴)
5	3, 4	sylan9eq 2817	1 ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142  Vcvv 3454   I cid 5554   ↾ cres 5662  ‘cfv 6536  Slot cslot 17247

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5335  ax-pr 5403  ax-un 7734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-id 5555  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-res 5672  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fv 6544  df-slot 17248

This theorem is used by:  bj-ndxarg  37747  bj-evalidval  37748