Theorem bnj986 34967

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 35022. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj986.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj986.10	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj986.15	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj986	⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑚∃𝑝𝜏)

Distinct variable group:   𝑚,𝑛,𝑝

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑓,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜓(𝑓,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜒(𝑓,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜏(𝑓,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐷(𝑓,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)

Proof of Theorem bnj986

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj986.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
2		bnj986.10	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
3	2	bnj158 34741	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ω 𝑛 = suc 𝑚)
4	1, 3	bnj769 34774	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ω 𝑛 = suc 𝑚)
5	4	bnj1196 34806	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑚(𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚))
6		vex 3440	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑛 ∈ V
7	6	sucex 7739	. . . . 5 ⊢ suc 𝑛 ∈ V
8	7	isseti 3454	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛
9	5, 8	jctir 520	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜒 → (∃𝑚(𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
10		exdistr 1955	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑚∃𝑝((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ ∃𝑚((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
11		19.41v 1950	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑚((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ (∃𝑚(𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
12	10, 11	bitr2i 276	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑚(𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ ∃𝑚∃𝑝((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
13	9, 12	sylib 218	. 2 ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑚∃𝑝((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
14		bnj986.15	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
15		df-3an 1088	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ ((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
16	14, 15	bitri 275	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ ((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
17	16	2exbii 1850	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑚∃𝑝𝜏 ↔ ∃𝑚∃𝑝((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
18	13, 17	sylibr 234	1 ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑚∃𝑝𝜏)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1541  ∃wex 1780   ∈ wcel 2111  ∃wrex 3056   ∖ cdif 3894  ∅c0 4280  {csn 4573  suc csuc 6308   Fn wfn 6476  ωcom 7796   ∧ w-bnj17 34698

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pr 5368  ax-un 7668

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-ne 2929  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-pss 3917  df-nul 4281  df-if 4473  df-pw 4549  df-sn 4574  df-pr 4576  df-op 4580  df-uni 4857  df-br 5090  df-opab 5152  df-tr 5197  df-eprel 5514  df-po 5522  df-so 5523  df-fr 5567  df-we 5569  df-ord 6309  df-on 6310  df-lim 6311  df-suc 6312  df-om 7797  df-bnj17 34699

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj996  34968