Theorem bnj986 34931

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 34986. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj986.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj986.10	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj986.15	⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj986	⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑚∃𝑝𝜏)

Distinct variable group:   𝑚,𝑛,𝑝

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑓,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜓(𝑓,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜒(𝑓,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜏(𝑓,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐷(𝑓,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)

Proof of Theorem bnj986

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj986.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
2		bnj986.10	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
3	2	bnj158 34705	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ω 𝑛 = suc 𝑚)
4	1, 3	bnj769 34738	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ω 𝑛 = suc 𝑚)
5	4	bnj1196 34770	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑚(𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚))
6		vex 3492	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑛 ∈ V
7	6	sucex 7842	. . . . 5 ⊢ suc 𝑛 ∈ V
8	7	isseti 3506	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛
9	5, 8	jctir 520	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜒 → (∃𝑚(𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
10		exdistr 1954	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑚∃𝑝((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ ∃𝑚((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
11		19.41v 1949	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑚((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ (∃𝑚(𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
12	10, 11	bitr2i 276	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑚(𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ ∃𝑝 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ ∃𝑚∃𝑝((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
13	9, 12	sylib 218	. 2 ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑚∃𝑝((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
14		bnj986.15	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
15		df-3an 1089	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) ↔ ((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
16	14, 15	bitri 275	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ ((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
17	16	2exbii 1847	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑚∃𝑝𝜏 ↔ ∃𝑚∃𝑝((𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚) ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛))
18	13, 17	sylibr 234	1 ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑚∃𝑝𝜏)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1777   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3076   ∖ cdif 3973  ∅c0 4352  {csn 4648  suc csuc 6397   Fn wfn 6568  ωcom 7903   ∧ w-bnj17 34662

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447  ax-un 7770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-pss 3996  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-tr 5284  df-eprel 5599  df-po 5607  df-so 5608  df-fr 5652  df-we 5654  df-ord 6398  df-on 6399  df-lim 6400  df-suc 6401  df-om 7904  df-bnj17 34663

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj996  34932