Theorem brfvopabrbr 7013

Description: The binary relation of a function value which is an ordered-pair class abstraction of a restricted binary relation is the restricted binary relation. The first hypothesis can often be obtained by using fvmptopab 7498. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
brfvopabrbr.1	⊢ (𝐴‘𝑍) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥(𝐵‘𝑍)𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)}
brfvopabrbr.2	⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
brfvopabrbr.3	⊢ Rel (𝐵‘𝑍)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brfvopabrbr	⊢ (𝑋(𝐴‘𝑍)𝑌 ↔ (𝑋(𝐵‘𝑍)𝑌 ∧ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑋,𝑦   𝑥,𝑌,𝑦   𝑥,𝑍,𝑦   𝜓,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem brfvopabrbr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brne0 5158	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋(𝐴‘𝑍)𝑌 → (𝐴‘𝑍) ≠ ∅)
2		fvprc 6900	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑍 ∈ V → (𝐴‘𝑍) = ∅)
3	2	necon1ai 2986	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴‘𝑍) ≠ ∅ → 𝑍 ∈ V)
4	1, 3	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋(𝐴‘𝑍)𝑌 → 𝑍 ∈ V)
5		brfvopabrbr.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴‘𝑍) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥(𝐵‘𝑍)𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)}
6	5	relopabi 5805	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel (𝐴‘𝑍)
7	6	brrelex1i 5711	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋(𝐴‘𝑍)𝑌 → 𝑋 ∈ V)
8	6	brrelex2i 5712	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋(𝐴‘𝑍)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ V)
9	4, 7, 8	3jca 1146	. 2 ⊢ (𝑋(𝐴‘𝑍)𝑌 → (𝑍 ∈ V ∧ 𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V))
10		brne0 5158	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋(𝐵‘𝑍)𝑌 → (𝐵‘𝑍) ≠ ∅)
11		fvprc 6900	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝑍 ∈ V → (𝐵‘𝑍) = ∅)
12	11	necon1ai 2986	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵‘𝑍) ≠ ∅ → 𝑍 ∈ V)
13	10, 12	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋(𝐵‘𝑍)𝑌 → 𝑍 ∈ V)
14		brfvopabrbr.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel (𝐵‘𝑍)
15	14	brrelex1i 5711	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋(𝐵‘𝑍)𝑌 → 𝑋 ∈ V)
16	14	brrelex2i 5712	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋(𝐵‘𝑍)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ V)
17	13, 15, 16	3jca 1146	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋(𝐵‘𝑍)𝑌 → (𝑍 ∈ V ∧ 𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V))
18	17	adantr 486	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑋(𝐵‘𝑍)𝑌 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑍 ∈ V ∧ 𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V))
19	5	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ V → (𝐴‘𝑍) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥(𝐵‘𝑍)𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)})
20		brfvopabrbr.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
21	19, 20	rbropap 5542	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑍 ∈ V ∧ 𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V) → (𝑋(𝐴‘𝑍)𝑌 ↔ (𝑋(𝐵‘𝑍)𝑌 ∧ 𝜓)))
22	9, 18, 21	pm5.21nii 381	1 ⊢ (𝑋(𝐴‘𝑍)𝑌 ↔ (𝑋(𝐵‘𝑍)𝑌 ∧ 𝜓))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959  Vcvv 3454  ∅c0 4281   class class class wbr 5106  {copab 5170  Rel wrel 5660  ‘cfv 6558

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5395

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-iota 6512  df-fv 6566

This theorem is used by:  istrl  30309  ispth  30336  isspth  30337  isclwlk  30390  iscrct  30407  iscycl  30408  iseupth  30832