Theorem clwlkwlk 30161

Description: Closed walks are walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
clwlkwlk	⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺))

Proof of Theorem clwlkwlk

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑝 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elopabran 5551	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))} → 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺))
2		clwlks 30158	. 2 ⊢ (ClWalks‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))}
3	1, 2	eleq2s 2884	1 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146   class class class wbr 5114  {copab 5178  ‘cfv 6543  0cc0 11118  ♯chash 14386  Walkscwlks 29983  ClWalkscclwlks 30156

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pr 5409

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fv 6551  df-clwlks 30157

This theorem is used by:  clwlkswks  30162  upgrclwlkcompim  30167  clwlkcompbp  30168  clwlkclwwlkflem  30392  clwlknf1oclwwlknlem1  30469  clwlknf1oclwwlkn  30472  clwwlknonclwlknonf1o  30750  dlwwlknondlwlknonf1olem1  30752  wlkl0  30755