Theorem clwlkwlk 30102

Description: Closed walks are walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
clwlkwlk	⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺))

Proof of Theorem clwlkwlk

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑝 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elopabran 5548	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))} → 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺))
2		clwlks 30099	. 2 ⊢ (ClWalks‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))}
3	1, 2	eleq2s 2881	1 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143   class class class wbr 5110  {copab 5174  ‘cfv 6538  0cc0 11101  ♯chash 14368  Walkscwlks 29924  ClWalkscclwlks 30097

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5270  ax-pr 5406

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-uni 4874  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-mpt 5194  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fv 6546  df-clwlks 30098

This theorem is referenced by:  clwlkswks  30103  upgrclwlkcompim  30108  clwlkcompbp  30109  clwlkclwwlkflem  30333  clwlknf1oclwwlknlem1  30410  clwlknf1oclwwlkn  30413  clwwlknonclwlknonf1o  30691  dlwwlknondlwlknonf1olem1  30693  wlkl0  30696