Theorem clwlkwlk 29811

Description: Closed walks are walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
clwlkwlk	⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺))

Proof of Theorem clwlkwlk

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑝 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elopabran 5581	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))} → 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺))
2		clwlks 29808	. 2 ⊢ (ClWalks‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))}
3	1, 2	eleq2s 2862	1 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108   class class class wbr 5166  {copab 5228  ‘cfv 6573  0cc0 11184  ♯chash 14379  Walkscwlks 29632  ClWalkscclwlks 29806

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fv 6581  df-clwlks 29807

This theorem is referenced by:  clwlkswks  29812  upgrclwlkcompim  29817  clwlkcompbp  29818  clwlkclwwlkflem  30036  clwlknf1oclwwlknlem1  30113  clwlknf1oclwwlkn  30116  clwwlknonclwlknonf1o  30394  dlwwlknondlwlknonf1olem1  30396  wlkl0  30399