Theorem clwlkwlk 30367

Description: Closed walks are walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
clwlkwlk	⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺))

Proof of Theorem clwlkwlk

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑝 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elopabran 5535	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))} → 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺))
2		clwlks 30364	. 2 ⊢ (ClWalks‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(♯‘𝑓)))}
3	1, 2	eleq2s 2878	1 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144   class class class wbr 5102  {copab 5166  ‘cfv 6538  0cc0 11203  ♯chash 14477  Walkscwlks 30182  ClWalkscclwlks 30362

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fv 6546  df-clwlks 30363

This theorem is used by:  clwlkswks  30368  upgrclwlkcompim  30373  clwlkcompbp  30374  clwlkclwwlkflem  30600  clwlknf1oclwwlknlem1  30677  clwlknf1oclwwlkn  30680  clwwlknonclwlknonf1o  30968  dlwwlknondlwlknonf1olem1  30970  wlkl0  30973