Theorem disjimeceqim 39403

Description: Disj implies coset-equality injectivity (domain-wise). Extracts the practical consequence of Disj: the map 𝑢 ↦ [𝑢]𝑅 is injective on dom 𝑅. This is exactly the "canonicity" property used repeatedly when turning ∃* into ∃! and when reasoning about uniqueness of representatives. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Feb-2026.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
disjimeceqim	⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → 𝑢 = 𝑣))

Distinct variable group:   𝑢,𝑅,𝑣

Proof of Theorem disjimeceqim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ecdmn0 8750	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ [𝑢]𝑅 ≠ ∅)
2	1	biimpi 219	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅 → [𝑢]𝑅 ≠ ∅)
3		ineq2 4175	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑢]𝑅) = ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅))
4		inidm 4187	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑢]𝑅) = [𝑢]𝑅
5	3, 4	eqtr3di 2820	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = [𝑢]𝑅)
6	5	neeq1d 3024	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → (([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ [𝑢]𝑅 ≠ ∅))
7	2, 6	syl5ibrcom 250	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅))
8	7	rgen 3088	. . . 4 ⊢ ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅)
9	8	rgenw 3090	. . 3 ⊢ ∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅)
10		ralcom 3300	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅) ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅))
11	9, 10	mpbi 233	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅)
12		dfdisjALTV5a 39402	. . 3 ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
13	12	simplbi 501	. 2 ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
14		r19.26-2 3157	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅) ∧ (([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣)) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
15		pm3.33 776	. . . 4 ⊢ ((([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅) ∧ (([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣)) → ([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
16	15	2ralimi 3142	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅) ∧ (([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣)) → ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
17	14, 16	sylbir 238	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣)) → ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
18	11, 13, 17	sylancr 598	1 ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → 𝑢 = 𝑣))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1568   ∈ wcel 2150   ≠ wne 2965  ∀wral 3086   ∩ cin 3912  ∅c0 4294  dom cdm 5665  Rel wrel 5670  [cec 8695   Disj wdisjALTV 38818

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1823  ax-4 1837  ax-5 1938  ax-6 1995  ax-7 2036  ax-8 2152  ax-9 2160  ax-10 2183  ax-11 2199  ax-12 2220  ax-ext 2742  ax-sep 5262  ax-pr 5408

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1571  df-fal 1581  df-ex 1808  df-nf 1812  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2574  df-eu 2604  df-clab 2749  df-cleq 2762  df-clel 2845  df-nfc 2919  df-ne 2966  df-ral 3087  df-rex 3097  df-rmo 3376  df-rab 3424  df-v 3464  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-id 5560  df-xp 5671  df-rel 5672  df-cnv 5673  df-co 5674  df-dm 5675  df-rn 5676  df-res 5677  df-ima 5678  df-ec 8699  df-coss 39100  df-cnvrefrel 39206  df-disjALTV 39389

This theorem is referenced by:  disjimeceqim2  39404  disjimeceqbi  39405  disjimrmoeqec  39407