Theorem disjimeceqim 39308

Description: Disj implies coset-equality injectivity (domain-wise). Extracts the practical consequence of Disj: the map 𝑢 ↦ [𝑢]𝑅 is injective on dom 𝑅. This is exactly the "canonicity" property used repeatedly when turning ∃* into ∃! and when reasoning about uniqueness of representatives. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 3-Feb-2026.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
disjimeceqim	⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → 𝑢 = 𝑣))

Distinct variable group:   𝑢,𝑅,𝑣

Proof of Theorem disjimeceqim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ecdmn0 8733	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ [𝑢]𝑅 ≠ ∅)
2	1	biimpi 218	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅 → [𝑢]𝑅 ≠ ∅)
3		ineq2 4168	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑢]𝑅) = ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅))
4		inidm 4180	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑢]𝑅) = [𝑢]𝑅
5	3, 4	eqtr3di 2814	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = [𝑢]𝑅)
6	5	neeq1d 3018	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → (([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ ↔ [𝑢]𝑅 ≠ ∅))
7	2, 6	syl5ibrcom 249	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅))
8	7	rgen 3080	. . . 4 ⊢ ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅)
9	8	rgenw 3082	. . 3 ⊢ ∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅)
10		ralcom 3292	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅) ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅))
11	9, 10	mpbi 232	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅)
12		dfdisjALTV5a 39307	. . 3 ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
13	12	simplbi 500	. 2 ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
14		r19.26-2 3149	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅) ∧ (([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣)) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
15		pm3.33 774	. . . 4 ⊢ ((([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅) ∧ (([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣)) → ([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
16	15	2ralimi 3134	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅) ∧ (([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣)) → ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
17	14, 16	sylbir 237	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) ≠ ∅ → 𝑢 = 𝑣)) → ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
18	11, 13, 17	sylancr 596	1 ⊢ ( Disj 𝑅 → ∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅([𝑢]𝑅 = [𝑣]𝑅 → 𝑢 = 𝑣))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1562   ∈ wcel 2144   ≠ wne 2959  ∀wral 3078   ∩ cin 3905  ∅c0 4287  dom cdm 5649  Rel wrel 5654  [cec 8678   Disj wdisjALTV 38723

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2214  ax-ext 2736  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5392

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1565  df-fal 1575  df-ex 1802  df-nf 1806  df-sb 2093  df-mo 2568  df-eu 2598  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rmo 3369  df-rab 3417  df-v 3458  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-br 5103  df-opab 5165  df-id 5544  df-xp 5655  df-rel 5656  df-cnv 5657  df-co 5658  df-dm 5659  df-rn 5660  df-res 5661  df-ima 5662  df-ec 8682  df-coss 39005  df-cnvrefrel 39111  df-disjALTV 39294

This theorem is referenced by:  disjimeceqim2  39309  disjimeceqbi  39310  disjimrmoeqec  39312